Prodromal Symptoms in Patients with Bisphosphonate-Associated Atypical Fractures of the Femur

Reporting of Full-Length Femur Imaging to Detect Incomplete Atypical Femur Fractures: 2023 Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry

Incomplete atypical femur fractures (iAFFs) are associated with the long-term use of anti-resorptive therapies. Although X-rays are typically used to screen for iAFFs, images from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) offer an alternate method for detecting iAFFs. Although a previous 2019 ISCD Official Position on this subject exists, our task force aimed to update the literature review and to propose recommendations on reporting findings related to iAFFs that may be observed on DXA images. The task force recommended that full-length femur imaging (FFI) from DXA can be used as a screening tool for iAFFs. The presence of focal lateral cortical thickening and transverse lucencies should be reported, if identified on the FFI. This task force proposed a classification system to determine the likelihood of an iAFF, based on radiographic features seen on the FFI. Lastly, the task force recommended that the clinical assessment of prodromal symptoms (pain) is not required for the assessment of FFI.

Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fracture Treated by Prophylactic Intramedullary Nail Fixation: A Case Series

Long-term bisphosphonate use may be associated with atypical femoral fractures. In this report, we describe three cases of bisphosphonate-associated incomplete atypical femoral fracture, treated by prophylactic intramedullary nail fixation. Patients with long-term intake of bisphosphonates must be carefully monitored; atypical femoral fracture should be suspected in the presence of symptoms such as thigh pain. Its early identification is important to avoid a complete fracture and invasive surgery, and prophylactic fixation is recommended for incomplete atypical femoral fractures.

Importance and Difficulty of Differentiating BMA-induced AFF Prodromal Symptoms from Hormonal Therapy-related Femoral Pain

We herein report a case of breast cancer in a 74-year-old woman treated with exemestane as fourth-line hormonal therapy and bone-modifying agents for long time. She suddenly developed a right femoral shaft fracture during treatment. Her femoral fracture had a beaking sign on radiogram. Given this finding, her fracture was ultimately diagnosed as atypical femoral fracture (AFF). In this case, it was difficult to recognize the difference between groin pain as a prodromal symptom of AFF and that due to an adverse reaction to hormonal therapy. Therefore, clinicians should recognize the difficulty of this differentiation and consider the situation with caution.

Atypical femoral fractures in Italy: a retrospective analysis in a large urban emergency department during a 7-year period (2007-2013)

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) seen in a large emergency department in Italy. It was a retrospective study of all men and women aged 40 years or older admitted to the Emergency Department of Parma University Hospital for a femoral fracture. Cases were identified in the hospital database with use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 820 or 821 or text strings. All the radiographic images of fractures not clearly identified as proximal or condylar were retrieved and evaluated by three independent reviewers. Fractures were considered as atypical if all three reviewers agreed on at least four of five major features defined by the 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research criteria. In the 7-year period (2007-2013), with a total follow-up of 1,383,154 patient-years, we found 22 AFFs in 21 patients, accounting for 7.1% of low-trauma subtrochanteric/femoral shaft fractures and 0.6% of all femoral fractures. The incidence was very low (1.6 in 100,000 patient-years in both sexes combined). In contrast, the incidence of classic fractures of the proximal end of the femur was at least two orders of magnitude higher (typical/atypical rate ratio 152). Bisphosphonate use was reported in 13 patients (62%; mean treatment duration 9 years; range 5-14 years). Among 286 patients with typical subtrochanteric/femoral shaft fractures, 20 were being treated with bisphosphonate (7%; odds ratio 22; 95% confidence interval 8-58; p < 0.001). This study confirms the very low incidence of AFFs in the largest Italian cohort of patients to date. Even though the risk is higher in patients treated with bisphosphonates, AFFs are very rare, and typical femoral fractures are at least 100-fold more frequent.

Retrospective review of patients with atypical bisphosphonate related proximal femoral fractures

INTRODUCTION

Patients may be at an increased risk of atypical proximal femoral fractures with prolonged bisphosphonate use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who sustained a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur in our department between April 2009 and March 2014. The radiographs were reviewed for features of atypical femoral fractures as described by the American Society of Bone Mineral Research.

RESULTS

185 patients were coded according to the National Hip Fracture Database as having sustained a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Of these, 26 patients had radiographic findings consistent with an atypical subtrochanteric fracture. 5 patients were excluded as their histology confirmed malignancy. 12 patients were taking bisphosphonates on admission. All 12 patients were females taking alendronic acid on admission, who sustained the fracture as the result of minimal or no trauma and underwent long gamma nail fixation. The mean age was 71.6 years (range 62-79 years). The mean length of time on bisphosphonates prior to admission was 8.33 years (range 3-25 years). 9/12 patients had pre-existing symptoms for between 5days and 2 years prior to admission. 1 patient sustained a broken gamma nail 14 weeks post-operatively requiring revision. The mean time to discharge from theatre was 16days (range 5-57days). The mean time to radiological union in the patients in whom there was evidence was 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small group of patients, management of this fracture pattern can be complex with the potential for delayed or non-union and prodromal symptoms are common.

Bone Structure and Turnover Status in Postmenopausal Women with Atypical Femur Fracture After Prolonged Bisphosphonate Therapy

Atypical femur fracture (AFF), a serious complication of long-term bisphosphonate therapy, is usually preceded by an incomplete fracture appearing on the lateral femur. AFF is most likely the result of severely suppressed bone turnover (SSBT). However, the differences in bone structure and turnover between patients with incomplete and complete AFF remain unknown. We examined trans-iliac bone biopsies from 12 white postmenopausal women with AFF (incomplete = 5; complete = 7) on BP therapy of >5 years and 43 healthy white premenopausal women. Histomorphometric measurements were performed separately in cancellous, intracortical and endosteal envelopes. Of the 43 histomorphometric measurements on 3 difference bone surfaces (cancellous, intracortical and endosteal), only 2 bone resorption variables (Oc.S/BS and Oc.S/NOS) on the endosteal surface were significantly lower in patients with complete AFF than those with incomplete AFF. Compared to healthy premenopausal women, the trabecular bone volume, thickness and number were all significantly lower in patients with AFF. The dynamic bone formation variables in patients with AFF were significantly reduced on all bone surfaces. The likelihood of a biopsy with no tetracycline labeling was significantly higher in AFF patients than in healthy premenopausal women. Based on these results, we conclude that there are no significant differences in bone turnover between patients with incomplete and complete AFF, suggesting that the suppression of bone turnover had already existed in the femur with incomplete AFF. Compared to healthy premenopausal women, bone turnover is similarly suppressed in patients with either type of AFF.

Scoring System for Identifying Impending Complete Fractures in Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fractures

CONTEXT

Although impending incomplete atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) require prophylactic fixation, there is still a lack of study on predicting complete fracture among the incomplete AFFs.

OBJECTIVE

Our purposes are to develop a scoring system to predict progression into complete fracture and to evaluate its reliability and validity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

We reviewed 46 incomplete AFFs in 44 patients who did not undergo prophylactic fixation. A weighted scoring system, including four identified risk factors (the site, severity of pain, status of the contralateral femur, and the extent of radiolucent line), was developed. We evaluated its interobserver reliability by using intraclass correlation coefficiency (ICC) and its accuracy using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. The validity of the scoring system was tested in a different cohort.

INTERVENTION

Observational study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Progression to complete fracture within 6 months.

RESULTS

Among 46 incomplete fractures, 13 developed a complete fracture within 6 months. The probability of complete fracture increased abruptly when the score was 8 points or more. The proposed scoring system showed an almost perfect reliability (ICC, 0.997; 95% confidence interval, 0.995 to 0.998) and higher accuracy than any single risk factor in ROC curve. In the different series, the positive predictive value was 100% and the sensitivity was 75%, when cutoff value was 8 points.

CONCLUSION

The progression to complete fracture could be predicted by using our scoring system. Incomplete AFF with scores <8 points can be treated conservatively, whereas lesions with scores ≥8 require prophylactic fixation.

Bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis: a review of skeletal safety concerns

The use of bisphosphonates in treatment of osteoporosis declined significantly over the past decade. There is currently great concern, among patients and physicians, about two potential skeletal adverse effects associated with bisphosphonates- jaw osteonecrosis and atypical femur fractures. This has become a major public health issue since untreated osteoporosis carries a significant burden in terms of fracture-related morbidity and mortality, and bisphosphonates, considered first-line therapy for osteoporosis, have established efficacy in fracture and mortality reduction. Areas covered: In this review we discuss current literature on osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures in patients with osteoporosis treated with bisphosphonates, including case definition, pathogenesis, epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, management and prevention. We conducted a literature search using PubMed and PubMed Central, using the search terms 'bisphosphonates', 'osteonecrosis of the jaw', and 'atypical fractures'. We selected relevant articles including meta-analyses, clinical trials, observational studies, and major society guidelines published between 2010 and 2016, to be included in this review. A few articles published prior to 2010 were also included as references. Expert commentary: The rare skeletal side effects of bisphosphonates should not preclude their use in patients with osteoporosis and high fracture risk, as benefits significantly outweigh the risks.

Incidence and Characteristics of Atypical Femoral Fractures: Clinical and Geometrical Data

Despite the multitude of studies published on atypical femoral fractures (AFFs), a profile for patients at risk does not exist. This study aimed first at estimating AFF incidence over a 19-month-period in Quebec City using the ASBMR Task force criteria to define AFF. The medical records of patients hospitalized for hip or femoral fracture between June 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010, were reviewed. Thirty-six cases of atypical fractures were identified during the 19-month period, representing an AFF incidence of 7.0 (range, 4.7 to 9.3) cases per 100,000 person-years. In the second part of the study, data regarding the characteristics suspected of increasing the risks of AFF were collected from medical and pharmacological records, proximal femur radiographs, and patient interviews. The data regarding each patient with an AFF during years 2008-2011 were compared to two controls with a hip or femoral fragility fracture or a traumatic fracture, paired for age and sex. Twenty patients with AFF were added to the 36 patients with AFF selected in the first part, thereby 56 patients with AFF were investigated. The association between the occurrence of AFF and bisphosphonates (BPs) use was proven statistically significant in multivariate analysis, odds ratio (OR) = 10.39 (95% CI, 2.22 to 48.58; p = 0.0029). Compared to controls, patients with AFF had excessive femoral offset (43.1 mm versus 38.3 mm, p = 0.0007), proximal femoral neck angle in varus (128.9 degrees versus 134.0 degrees, p < 0.0001), and had greater proximal cortical thickness. This retrospective study confirms the low incidence of AFF, confirms its significant association with exposure to BPs, and reveals the possible contribution of proximal femoral geometry in AFF occurrence.

Mortality After Atypical Femoral Fractures: A Cohort Study

Although osteoporotic fracture rates can be reduced by bisphosphonates, prolonged therapy is associated with higher risk of atypical femoral fractures. Ordinary fragility fractures are linked to high mortality rates. We aimed to determine whether atypical femoral fractures also confer excess mortality. Radiographs were reviewed for all patients aged ≥55 years who had experienced a subtrochanteric or femoral shaft fracture in Sweden in 2008 to 2010. The fractures were classified as either atypical or ordinary. Data on medication use, coexisting conditions, and date of death were obtained from national registers. We estimated multivariable-adjusted relative risks of death after atypical femoral fractures compared with ordinary subtrochanteric or femoral shaft fractures and calculated age- and sex-standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for atypical and ordinary fractures compared with the population average. During a mean of 4 years of follow-up, 39 of 172 (23%) patients with an atypical fracture had died compared with 588 of 952 (62%) with an ordinary fracture, corresponding to a relative risk of 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.68). The lower risk was evident in both users and nonusers of bisphosphonates. No patient with atypical fracture died in the first year after fracture. Individuals with an ordinary fracture had a higher mortality risk than the general population (SMR = 1.82; 95% CI 1.69-1.99), but no excess risk was found in patients with atypical fracture (SMR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.65-1.26). We conclude that in contrast to ordinary subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures, atypical femoral fractures are not associated with excess mortality.

Risk of atypical femoral fracture during and after bisphosphonate use

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Use of bisphosphonates in women is associated with higher risk of atypical femoral fractures. The risk in terms of timing of use and type of bisphosphonate, and in men, remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed radiographs of 5,342 Swedish women and men aged 55 years or more who had had a fracture of the femoral shaft in the 3-year period 2008-2010 (97% of those eligible), and found 172 patients with atypical fractures (93% of them women). We obtained data on medication and comorbidity. The risk of atypical fracture associated with bisphosphonate use was estimated in a nationwide cohort analysis. In addition, we performed a case-control analysis with comparison to 952 patients with ordinary shaft fractures. A short report of the findings has recently been presented (Schilcher et al. 2014a). Here we provide full details.

RESULTS

The age-adjusted relative risk (RR) of atypical fracture associated with bisphosphonate use was 55 (95% CI: 39-79) in women and 54 (CI: 15-192) in men. In bisphosphonate users, women had a 3-fold higher risk than men (RR = 3.1, CI: 1.1-8.4). Alendronate users had higher risk than risedronate users (RR = 1.9, CI: 1.1-3.3). The RR after 4 years or more of use reached 126 (CI: 55-288), with a corresponding absolute risk of 11 (CI: 7-14) fractures per 10,000 person-years of use. The risk decreased by 70% per year since last use.

INTERPRETATION

Women have a higher risk of atypical femoral fracture than men. The type of bisphosphonate used may affect risk estimates and the risk decreases rapidly after cessation.