Coexistent lumbar spine disorders have a crucial impact on the clinical outcome after total hip replacement

Surgical Management of Hip-Spine Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Hip-spine syndrome (HSS) was first described in 1983 to describe the symptomatology resulting from concomitant lumbar degenerative stenosis and hip osteoarthritis. Numerous studies have sought to understand the underlying pathology and appropriate management of this syndrome. The purpose of this article is to review the literature for the specific imaging characteristics and the optimal surgical treatment of HSS.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted via an electronic database search through PubMed to identify all publications related to HSS. All publications that contained data on patients who underwent surgical treatment for HSS and reported patient-reported outcome measures or radiographic data were included. Exclusion criteria consisted of publications in a language other than English, review articles, and technique articles.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles that focused on the surgical management of HSS were identified. Of these 15 articles, 8 reported radiographic outcomes, with most reporting no significant change in spinopelvic parameters before and after surgery. Thirteen articles reported clinical outcomes, with 8 of those 13 articles identifying patient-reported outcome measures to be significantly improved following surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The data on the surgical management of HSS remains sparse. While there is some evidence that total hip arthroplasty in patients who previously underwent spinal fusion may have higher complication rates, there remains debate regarding which surgical problem to address first, the hip or the spine.

Association between physical measures of spinopelvic alignment and physical functioning with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) after total hip arthroplasty: Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Prevalence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) has trended upwards over past decades and is projected to increase further. Optimizing outcomes after surgery is essential to avoid surgical revision and maximize outcomes. Low back pain is reported as a problem post THA. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used to evaluate THA outcomes but have limitations (e.g., ceiling effects). It is therefore important to assess a comprehensive range of outcomes. Physical outcome measures of spinopelvic alignment and physical functioning demonstrate potential value, but no evidence synthesis has investigated their association with PROMs. The objectives of this systematic review are to evaluate the association between spinopelvic alignment and physical outcome measures of physical functioning with PROMs and characteristics of low back pain after THA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol is aligned with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. Cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort studies evaluating the association between the physical outcome measures and PROMs (any outcome measures reported) following THA by any approach/implant will be included except surface replacement and revision THA. Studies investigating THA for developmental pathology and inflammatory conditions will be excluded. A systematic search in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the grey literature will be carried out from inception to July 31, 2023. Two independent reviewers will evaluate eligibility of retrieved articles, extract data and assess risk of bias (NIH quality assessment tool) of included studies. A third reviewer will mediate disagreements. Random-effects meta-analyses will be conducted if studies are sufficiently homogeneous in design, population, physical measures and PROMs; reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Where meta-analyses are not possible, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Confidence in cumulative evidence will be assessed using a modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO Registration number CRD42023412744.

Net Promoter Score: a prospective, single-centre observational study assessing if a single question determined treatment success after primary or revision hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Our study aimed to identify the relationship between treatment outcome assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and satisfaction measured by calculation of the Net Promoter Score (NPS), which identifies promoters, following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim was to evaluate this association separately in primary and revision THA and to determine thresholds based on PROMs that identify detractors of the surgical procedure or the centre.

METHODS

A total of 1,243 patients who underwent primary or revision THA at our hospital were asked to complete questionnaires of the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Euroquol-5D (EQ-5D) and information on pain intensity preoperatively, three and 12 months after surgery. Postoperatively, the patients were additionally asked about their satisfaction with the procedure and the hospital by using three different NPS questions. The association between PROMs and NPS was evaluated based on group comparisons of primary or revision THA and receiver operating characteristics analysis (ROC) to determine threshold values.

RESULTS

At 12 months the NPS of all three questions were invariably linked to treatment outcome in patients after primary THA and patients with a single revision. In these two treatment groups, promoters always showed significantly better PROM scores than detractors. The NPS score was always higher in the primary group in comparison to the single revision group, e.g. 66.4% would undergo the procedure again in the first group, while only 33.0% would opt for this in the latter group. The high thresholds for the PROMs at 12 months, that were calculated by ROC analysis to identify promoter/detractors, indicate that patients` satisfaction required very good joint function and pain relief. However, the NPS was not a suitable tool to identify patients who need further care in an early phase after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

With NPS already a single question or a single parameter provides the desired information regarding patient satisfaction and also treatment success.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Medical Faculty of the University Rostock: "Ethikkommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Rostock", Address: St.-Georg Str. 108 18055 Rostock, Germany, reference number: A2015-0055.

Total hip arthroplasty in patients with vertebral compression fracture is associated with poor clinical outcomes - retrospective analysis on 453 cases

PURPOSE

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly performed in older adults, and the prevalence of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) increases with age. We aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of THA in patients with VCF.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 453 patients who underwent THA at our institution between 2015 and 2021. We classified patients into those with and without VCF. VCF was identified using preoperative upright whole-spine radiographs. Spinal parameters, preoperative and 1-year postoperative clinical outcomes of the Harris hip score (HHS), Oxford hip score (OHS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain (LBP) were assessed. Furthermore, propensity score-matched cohorts for age, sex, body mass index, and spinal parameters were created, and the clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Among the 453 patients, 51 (11.3%) with VCF and 402 without VCF were identified. Before matching, patients with VCF were older (p < 0.01), had sagittal spinal imbalance (p < 0.01), and had worse clinical outcomes pre- and postoperatively. After matching 47 patients in both groups, patients with VCF had worse HHS (p < 0.05), especially regarding support and distance walked, and worse VAS scores for LBP (p < 0.05) pre- and postoperatively. However, the improvements in scores were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HHS, especially regarding support and distance walked, and VAS scores for LBP were poorer in patients with VCF preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Our findings suggest that hip surgeons should evaluate not only spinal alignment but also the presence of VCF before performing THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Characteristics associated with comorbid lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms in people with knee or hip osteoarthritis: an analysis of 9,136 good life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D®) participants

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have found that lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) often co-occurs with knee or hip OA and can impact treatment response. However, it is unclear what participant characteristics may be helpful in identifying individuals with these co-occurring conditions. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore characteristics associated with comorbid symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in people with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) enrolled in a primary care education and exercise program.

METHODS

Sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, health status measures, and a self-report questionnaire on the presence of LSS symptoms was collected at baseline from the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark primary care program for knee and hip OA. Cross-sectional associations between characteristics and the presence of comorbid LSS symptoms were assessed separately in participants with primary complaint of knee and hip OA, using domain-specific logistic models and a logistic model including all characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 6,541 participants with a primary complaint of knee OA and 2,595 participants with a primary complaint of hip OA were included, of which 40% and 50% reported comorbid LSS symptoms, respectively. LSS symptoms were associated with similar characteristics in knee and hip OA. Sick leave was the only sociodemographic variable consistently associated with LSS symptoms. For clinical characteristics, back pain, longer symptom duration and bilateral or comorbid knee or hip symptoms were also consistently associated. Health status measures were not consistently related to LSS symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Comorbid LSS symptoms in people with knee or hip OA undergoing a primary care treatment program of group-based education and exercise were common and associated with a similar set of characteristics. These characteristics may help to identify people with co-occurring LSS and knee or hip OA, which can be used to help guide clinical decision-making.

Investigating sagittal spinal alignment, low back pain, and clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty for lumbar hyperlordosis: a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Hip-spine syndrome, wherein flexion deformity of the hip might exaggerate normal lumbar lordosis (LL), was first described in 1983. It could result in subluxation of the posterior facets and cause low back pain (LBP). However, the clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and spinal alignment changes in patients with lumbar hyperlordosis (hyper LL) remain unknown. We aimed to clarify the proportion of patients with hyper LL before THA and compare pre- and post-operative sagittal spinal alignment, LBP, and clinical outcomes between patients with hyper LL and those with normal LL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated 278 patients who underwent primary THA between December 2015 and December 2019. Spine radiographs in the standing position were examined preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Patients with hyper LL were defined as having a pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL of < - 9° preoperatively. The control group included age- and sex-matched patients with normal LL, defined by a PI minus LL of - 9° to 9°. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for LBP, Harris hip score (HHS), Oxford hip score (OHS), and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (13.7%) had hyper LL, and they exhibited a lower pelvic tilt, lower sagittal vertical axis, and greater sigmoid curvature than did the controls. Evaluation of changes in the spinal alignment after surgery showed that the pelvis tilted more posteriorly, and LL decreased more in the hyper LL group than in the control group. Pre- and post-operative VAS for LBP, HHS, OHS, and UCLA activity scores were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Hyper LL in patients with hip osteoarthritis had no adverse effects on LBP and the clinical outcomes of THA. Hyper LL may partially result from a flexible and adaptable lumbo-pelvic structure.

Associations between comorbid lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms and treatment outcomes in 6,813 patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis following a patient education and exercise therapy program

Objective

People with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) can experience comorbid lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), but the impact on treatment outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between comorbid LSS symptoms and changes in pain, function, and quality of life following a patient education and exercise therapy program.

Design

This was a longitudinal analysis of 6813 participants in the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D®) program; a structured patient education and exercise therapy program for knee and hip OA. Participants were classified as having comorbid LSS symptoms based on self-report symptom items. Linear mixed models were used to assess differences in change in pain, function, and quality of life outcomes (0 worst to 100 best) at 3- and 12-month follow-up.

Results

15% and 23% of knee and hip OA participants had comorbid LSS symptoms, respectively. Knee participants with comorbid LSS symptoms had smaller improvement in pain at 3-months (-1.7, 95% CI -3.3 to -0.1) and hip participants with comorbid LSS symptoms had greater improvement in function at 3- (2.5, 95% CI 0.5 to 5.0) and 12-months (3.8, 95% CI 0.9 to 6.6), when compared to those without LSS symptoms. These differences were not clinically significant and no differences in other outcomes were observed.

Conclusion

Knee or hip OA patients with comorbid LSS symptoms should expect similar improvements in knee- or hip-related pain, function, and quality of life outcomes when undergoing a patient education and exercise therapy program compared to those without LSS symptoms.

Preoperative Factors Associated With Low Back Pain Improvement After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Japanese Population

BACKGROUND

Spinal disorders and low back pain (LBP) have been associated with worse clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is essential to identify spinal factors associated with post-THA LBP improvement. Therefore, we aimed to determine the proportion of patients with improved LBP after THA and to identify the preoperative spinal factors associated with LBP improvement.

METHODS

We included 151 patients who underwent primary THA between December 2015 and December 2019 and had a preoperative visual analog scale score for LBP of ≥2. The patients were classified into the LBP improved or LBP continued group based on a visual analog scale score for LBP at 1 year after THA. Preoperative spinal parameters were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients (62.9%) were classified into the LBP improved group. Among the coronal spinal parameters, the Cobb angle was significantly lower in the LBP improved group. Among the sagittal spinal parameters, the LBP continued group showed a significantly more posteriorly titled pelvis, lower lumbar lordosis, greater sagittal vertical axis, and greater pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch, indicating a sagittal spinal imbalance. Logistic regression analysis found that preoperative factors associated with LBP improvement after THA had a low Cobb angle and high anterior pelvic plane angle (anteriorly tilted pelvis).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with LBP before THA, 62.9% had improved LBP. Sagittal spinal imbalance and high Cobb angle were the key spinal factors associated with persistent LBP. Our findings suggest that hip surgeons should evaluate spinal alignment before THA in patients with LBP.

Surgical Intervention for Femoroacetabular Impingement Can Lead to Improvements in Both Hip and Back Function in Patients With Coexisting Chronic Back Pain at 1-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To determine whether patients with coexisting lumbar back pain experience back pain improvement after undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review compared patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI with lumbar spine back pain to patients solely reporting hip pain. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) were recorded preoperatively and at 1-year follow up. The Oswestry Disability Index score, which quantifies disability from lower back pain, and visual analog scale were recorded from the hip-spine cohort alone. Statistical analysis was performed using paired sample t tests with P ≤ .05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between November 2016 and October 2018 were enrolled. Thirty-four patients with a mean age of 48.2 ± 14.0 years and body mass index of 26.6 ± 6.6 had a history of back pain and 34 patients were age- and sex-matched for the matched-control (MC) cohort. The MC cohort had lower mHHS and NAHS scores preoperatively. The MC cohort reported a larger increase in the mHHS (P = .01) and NAHS scores (P = .01) postoperatively. More patients in the MC cohort reached minimally clinically important difference with mHHS (P = .003) and NAHS (P = .06). Following surgery, the hip-spine cohort reported a lower Oswestry Disability Index score, indicating minimal disability (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intervention for FAI can lead to improvements in hip and back pain in patients with coexisting lumbar pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study.

Influence of sagittal degenerative spondylolisthesis on anteversion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DSPL), as opposed to other degenerative spinal conditions, is disregarded in the assessment of hip stability after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to determine whether patients with DSPL have different acetabular anteversion compared to patients with normal spine before and following THA.

METHODS

Preoperative and postoperative 6‑month lateral pelvic radiographs in standing and sitting positions from 91 patients who underwent primary THA were retrospectively compared for spinopelvic parameters between patients with DSPL (n = 31) and with normal spine (n = 34).

RESULTS

Compared to control patients in the standing position, patients with DSPL had significantly increased preoperative pelvic tilt (24° in DSPL vs. 8° in controls; p < 0.01), pelvic-femoral angle (194° in DSPL vs. 174° in controls; p < 0.05), decreased lumbar lordosis (35° in DSPL vs. 43° in controls; p < 0.05), increased postoperative pelvic tilt (22° in DSPL vs. 7° in controls; p < 0.01), pelvic-femoral angle (187° in DSPL vs. 179° in controls; p < 0.05), and acetabular anteversion (31° in DSPL vs. 23° in controls; p < 0.05). Preoperative (p = 0.181) and postoperative (p = 0.201) sitting pelvic tilt did not differ. There were positive correlations between preoperative standing pelvic tilt and postoperative standing acetabular anteversion, pelvic-femoral angle, and combined sagittal index (CSI) in DSPL (R² = 0.8416; R² = 0.9180; R² = 0.9459, respectively, p < 0.01) and in controls (R² = 0.6872; R² = 0.6176; R² = 0.7129, respectively, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

While the imbalance of seated sagittal plane is usually insignificant and compensable, the mechanism by which DSPL patients achieve a standing posture is different from control patients, with more hip extension and posterior tilt of the pelvis. Special attention should be paid to the risk of impingement caused by the increase of acetabular anteversion in the postoperative standing position.

Total hip arthroplasty and lumbar spine disorders: Plain co-existence or mutual influence?

Lumbar spine disorders (LSD) might influence the outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite a known common prevalence of LSD and degenerative hip disorders, this study investigates their mutual influence in case of co-existence with the purpose to advance surgeons planning and patient’s prognosis. Patients with and without LSD were compared before and at the one-year postoperative examination. For clinical evaluation the WOMAC was assessed. The radiological analysis focused on cup anteversion and inclination. The total group included 203 consecutive patients. The overall incidence of LSD was 51.0%. Patients with LSD were on average 4.3 years older and had a 1.8 higher BMI than non-LSD patients (P<0.05). The cup positioning and the clinical results were comparable between both groups before and at the last time of follow up (P>0.05). No hip dislocations nor clinical signs of impingement were seen.We can conclude that there is a high degree of co-existence of LSD and hip disorders. However, a strong negative impact of LSD to clinical or radiologic results could not be confirmed in our study.

Influence of leg length inequalities on pelvis and spine in patients with total hip arthroplasty

Background

Leg length inequalities (LLIs) are a common finding in patients with a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, we compared the effects of simulated LLIs in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a matched control group.

Research question

Do LLIs lead to different effects on the musculoskeletal apparatus of patients with a THA then in a control group?

Methods

In 99 patients with a THA the effects of simulated LLIs were compared to a matched control group of 101 subjects without a hip arthroplasty. First, we compared methods for LLI quantification (tape measurements, pelvic x- ray and rasterstereography). Second, the effects of simulated LLIs on the spine and pelvis were evaluated in both groups using surface topography. LLIs of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 mm were simulated on both sides with a simulation platform. The changes of pelvic position (pelvic obliquity & pelvic torsion) and the effects on spinal posture (surface rotation & lateral deviation) were measured and analysed using a surface topography system.

Results

Mean LLI measured with a tape was 0.9 mm (SD +/- 14.8). Mean pelvic obliquity measured on x-rays was 1.2 mm (SD +/- 11.6) and with surface topography 0.9 mm (SD +/- 7.9). Simulated LLIs resulted in significant changes of pelvic position and spinal posture in the patient and control group. Interestingly, our study showed that simulated LLIs lead to greater changes in pelvic position (p<0.05) in patients with a THA.

Significance

This is the first study to demonstrate that LLIs might have a greater impact on the pelvic position of THA patients than in native hips, which could indicate that LLIs do need to be compensated differently in patients with THA than in patients without a THA.

Links between the Hip and the Lumbar Spine (Hip Spine Syndrome) as they Relate to Clinical Decision Making for Patients with Lumbopelvic Pain

This narrative review focuses on the links between the hip and lumbar spine in the context of lumbopelvic pain. The literature regarding this topic is variable, found in many disciplines of care using different terminology. Collectively these inconsistencies add to the complexity of understanding the current evidence as it pertains to clinical practice. We have chosen to review studies that describe and assess overlapping pain distributions between the lumbar spine and hip, hip osteoarthritis and lumbopelvic pain, improvements in low back pain following hip arthroplasty, association of hip range of motion and lumbopelvic pain, and lumbopelvic motion and hip motion as they relate to low back pain and gender. The links between the hip and lumbar spine may provide the clinician important information to make decisions and recommendations for people presenting with the clinical symptom complex including lumbopelvic pain.

Comorbidities in Patients With End-Stage Knee OA: Prevalence and Effect on Physical Function

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of comorbidities and their effect on physical function, quality of life (QOL), and pain, in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A rehabilitation facility at university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N=577; 503 women and 74 men) diagnosed with end-stage knee OA between October 2013 and June 2018.

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comorbidities were as follows: osteoporosis, presarcopenia, degenerative spine disease, diabetes, and hypertension. All patients completed the following performance-based physical function tests: stair-climbing test (SCT), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and gait analysis. Self-reported physical function and pain were measured using Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and a visual analog scale (VAS), respectively, and self-reported QOL was measured using EuroQoL 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses revealed that patients with osteoporosis had significantly higher scores in SCT ascent, SCT descent, TUG, WOMAC pain tests, and lower scores in 6MWT, gait speed, and cadence tests than those without osteoporosis. Patients with presarcopenia recorded higher scores in SCT ascent, TUG, EQ-5D, and lower scores in 6MWT and gait speed tests than those without presarcopenia. Patients with degenerative spine disease showed higher scores in WOMAC pain and lower scores in gait speeds than those without degenerative spine disease. Patients with diabetes showed higher scores in SCT ascent than those without diabetes, and patients with hypertension showed lower scores in 6MWT than those without hypertension. After adjusting age, sex, and body mass index, SCT descent retained significant association with osteoporosis, SCT ascent showed independent association with presarcopenia and diabetes, and WOMAC pain revealed significant association with degenerative spine disease.

CONCLUSION

The results confirm associations between comorbidities, performance-based and self-reported physical functions, and QOL in patients with end-stage knee OA.

Effect of Spinal Fusion Surgery on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Matched Comparison Study

BACKGROUND

Studies regarding postoperative outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients who have comorbid factors tend to focus on medical diseases. However, there is a paucity of literature examining the effect of a patient's orthopedic surgical history on outcomes after THA. Significantly, there are currently no studies on the effect of spinal fusion surgery on THA outcomes.

METHODS

A review of 82 consecutive patients who had prior spinal fusion surgery who underwent elective THA from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2015, was conducted. A matching cohort of 82 patients was selected from the remaining THA patients to maintain a 1:1 ratio control group. This cohort of 82 patients was matched for age, gender, body mass index ±5, preoperative Oxford score ±10, total Short Form-36 score ±10, and total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score ±50. Data on the same functional outcomes were prospectively collected at 6-month and 2-year follow-up for comparison.

RESULTS

Patients without spinal fusion had better outcome scores than patients with prior spinal fusion, specifically in their 6-month WOMAC scores (253.33-225.07; P = .046), their 2-year Short Form-36 total scores (79.71-69.21; P = .041), and their 2-year WOMAC scores (213.5-267.41; P = .054).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patients with prior spinal fusion had worse outcomes after THA than patients without prior spinal fusion. This has clinical significance in counseling patients with previous spinal fusion undergoing THA.

Sagittal spinopelvic alignment predicts hip function after total hip arthroplasty

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between preoperative sagittal spinopelvic alignment and postoperative clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This retrospective study included 92 patients with hip osteoarthritis who underwent primary THA between May 2013 and October 2015. Patients' characteristics, radiographic sagittal spinopelvic parameters and modified Harris Hip Scores, including function scores (gait scores and functional activities scores), were investigated. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to determine the associations between each preoperative sagittal spinopelvic parameter and postoperative hip function The preoperative sagittal spinopelvic parameters that were associated with postoperative gait scores were sagittal vertical axis (adjusted β-coefficient=-0.28, P=0.02), lumbar lordosis angle (adjusted β-coefficient=0.29, P=0.0089), pelvic tilt (adjusted β-coefficient=-0.25, P=0.045), sacral slope (adjusted β-coefficient=0.27, P=0.017) and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis angle (adjusted β-coefficient=-0.31, P=0.01). The preoperative sagittal spinopelvic parameters that were related to the postoperative functional activities scores were sagittal vertical axis (adjusted β-coefficient=-0.38, P=0.0051) and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis angle (adjusted β-coefficient=-0.39, P=0.0033). Patients with preoperative imbalanced sagittal alignment such as larger sagittal vertical axis, larger pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis and retroversion of pelvis had poorer clinical outcomes than others after THA. While, those preoperative imbalanced patients with anteversion of pelvis may have a compensatory ability which could correct the abnormal sagittal alignment after THA. Preoperative sagittal spinopelvic alignment affected postoperative clinical outcomes after THA.