Change in reimbursement and costs in German oncological head and neck surgery over the last decade: ablative tongue cancer surgery and reconstruction with split-thickness skin graft vs. microvascular radial forearm flap

Tissue Transfer After Tongue Resection: Micro-Vascular Reconstruction Using Radial Artery Free Flap versus Reconstruction by Split Thickness Skin Graft in T2 Lesions of Tongue Carcinoma

To compare postoperative complications, functional rehabilitation, surgical outcomes of the radial artery forearm free flap (RAFFF) and split thickness skin graft (STSG) reconstruction of postsurgical defect in T2 lesions of cancer oral cavity. Observational Prospective comparative study. Academic tertiary referral centre. In our study of forty four patients, after tumour resection, half underwent reconstruction using RAFFF (Group I) and another half by STSG (Group II). All of the patients were followed postoperatively to determine and compare their functional outcomes related to donor site and recipient site complications, speech, deglutition and mouth opening. The speech intelligibility and deglutition were each assessed using Articulation Handicap Index and Vedio-fluoroscopy using the Functional oral intake scale. Operative time for STSG reconstruction was shorter at 2.2 ± 0.97 SD hours compared to 5.9 ± 1.24 SD hours for RAFFF reconstruction. Hospital stay was 8.3 ± 1.19 SD days for STSG patients and 12.6 ± 1.7 SD days for RAFFF patients. The functional outcomes of speech quality and swallowing were near comparable in both groups but the donor site complications were significant in the RAFFF group. Operative time, hospital stay and donor site complications are both significantly reduced with the STSG as opposed to RAFF. Functional and oncologic results of both methods are near comparable. To conclude, STSG can be used for reconstruction of the post-surgical defects in T2 lesions of the tongue.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Split-Thickness Skin Grafts for Floor of Mouth Cancer Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) on quality of life (QOL) for early-stage floor of mouth carcinoma (FOM-CA) undergoing surgical resection and split-thickness skin graft (STSG) reconstruction have not been established. We have performed a cross-sectional QOL analysis of such patients to define functional postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with pathologic stage T1/T2 FOM-CA who underwent resection and STSG reconstruction at a tertiary academic cancer center reported outcomes with the University of Washington QOL (v4) questionnaire after at least 6 months since surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-four out of 49 eligible patients completed questionnaires with a mean follow-up of 41 months (range: 6-88). Subsites of tumor involvement/resection included the following: (1) lateral FOM (L-FOM) (n = 17), (2) anterior FOM (A-FOM) (n = 4), and (3) alveolar ridge with FOM, all of whom underwent lateral marginal mandibulectomy (MM-FOM) (n = 3). All patients reported swallowing scores of 70 ("I cannot swallow certain solid foods") or better. Ninety-six percent (23/24) reported speech of 70 ("difficulty saying some words, but I can be understood over the phone") or better. A-FOM patients reported worse chewing than L-FOM patients (mean: 50.0 vs. 85.3; p = 0.01). All 4 A-FOM patients reported a low chewing score of 50 ("I can eat soft solids but cannot chew some foods"). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between subsite groups in swallowing, speech, or taste.

CONCLUSION

STSG reconstructions for pathologic T1-T2 FOM-CA appear to result in acceptable PROM QOL outcomes with the exception of A-FOM tumors having worse chewing outcomes.

Clinical management of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue: patients not eligible for free flaps, a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The management of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the tongue represents the most demanding treatment planning in head and neck surgery. Ablation followed by free flap reconstruction is considered the gold standard, but not all patients are suitable for this strategy. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive view of surgical reconstruction possibilities in patients not eligible for free flaps.

METHODS

Following PRISMA recommendations, a systematic literature review was conducted searching for original papers that investigated outcomes of patients treated by surgical ablation for tongue SCC followed by reconstruction with local or pedicled flaps. Selected papers were read and data extracted for qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The study design was case series in sixteen papers, cohort study in the remaining four. Four different local flaps (BMM, FAMM, NLIF, SMIF) and four regional flaps have been discussed in included studies (IHF, SFIF, SCM, PMMC).

CONCLUSION

The improved anatomical knowledge makes local flaps a reliable alternative to free tissue transfer in cases requiring small-/medium-sized defects. Regional flaps still represent cornerstones in reconstruction of the tongue. Ease of execution, costs-to-benefit ratio, low-rate complications, minimal donor site morbidity represent the best advantages choosing local/regional flaps.

Oral recipient site infections in reconstructive surgery - impact of the graft itself and the perioperative antibiosis

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to assess the influence of peri/post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis (POABP) and the reconstructive graft itself on recipient sites infections in head and neck surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 322 consecutive patients with reconstructive surgery were investigated. The primary objective was to analyze the differences of commonly applied reconstructive grafts on the occurrence of oral recipient site infections. Moreover, differences of POABP regimes (namely: ampicillin/sulbactam, 2^nd generation cephalosporins, clindamycin) and antibiotic alternatives were investigated. In addition, patients' length of in-hospital stay was analyzed in regard to reconstructive graft and POABP regime.

RESULTS

The free radial forearm flap and split-thickness skin graft presented significantly less recipient site infections and shorter length of in-hospital stays (LOS) in comparison to further six reconstructive technique with pedicled tissue transfer or bone transfers. LOS was significantly shorter for patients with ampicillin/sulbactam than with 2^nd generation cephalosporins as POABP. 91% of the harvested pathogens (n=193) were susceptible to the combination of 2^nd and 3^rd generation cephalosporins. Secondly, 92 out 113 (81%) harvested pathogens presented susceptibility to moxifloxacin.

CONCLUSION

Smaller tissue transfers are less prone to infections of the recipient site and present low LOS. For an POABP regime, the combination of 2^nd and 3^rd generation cephalosporins presents substantial results in recipient site infections. In cases of allergy, potential pathogens show adequate susceptibility to moxifloxacin.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A combination of 2^nd and 3^rd generation cephalosporins may be used to prevent recipient sites in head and neck surgery.

Oral recipient site infections in reconstructive surgery - impact of the graft itself and the perioperative antibiosis

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to assess the influence of peri/post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis (POABP) and the reconstructive graft itself on recipient sites infections in head and neck surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 322 consecutive patients with reconstructive surgery were investigated. The primary objective was to analyze the differences of commonly applied reconstructive grafts on the occurrence of oral recipient site infections. Moreover, differences of POABP regimes (namely: ampicillin/sulbactam, 2^nd generation cephalosporins, clindamycin) and antibiotic alternatives were investigated. In addition, patients' length of in-hospital stay was analyzed in regard to reconstructive graft and POABP regime.

RESULTS

The free radial forearm flap and split-thickness skin graft presented significantly less recipient site infections and shorter length of in-hospital stays (LOS) in comparison to further six reconstructive technique with pedicled tissue transfer or bone transfers. LOS was significantly shorter for patients with ampicillin/sulbactam than with 2^nd generation cephalosporins as POABP. 91% of the harvested pathogens (n=193) were susceptible to the combination of 2^nd and 3^rd generation cephalosporins. Secondly, 92 out 113 (81%) harvested pathogens presented susceptibility to moxifloxacin.

CONCLUSION

Smaller tissue transfers are less prone to infections of the recipient site and present low LOS. For an POABP regime, the combination of 2^nd and 3^rd generation cephalosporins presents substantial results in recipient site infections. In cases of allergy, potential pathogens show adequate susceptibility to moxifloxacin.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A combination of 2^nd and 3^rd generation cephalosporins may be used to prevent recipient sites in head and neck surgery.