Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results

Digital versus conventional veneering of zirconia and cobalt chromium crowns: Fracture load before and after thermomechanical aging

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

To complement the digital workflow for manufacturing fixed dental prostheses, both high-strength frameworks and esthetic veneers should be designed and fabricated digitally. However, how the fracture load of digitally veneered restorations compares with conventionally fabricated restorations is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to examine the fracture load of digitally and conventionally veneered zirconia and cobalt chromium crowns initially and after thermomechanical aging.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Milled zirconia and cobalt chromium copings for a maxillary canine were fabricated (N=96). Digital veneers were milled and connected to the copings with a sintered ceramic slurry. The conventional veneers were fabricated by using a master mold, and the crowns were bonded to the cobalt chromium abutments. Half the specimens were subjected to 6000 thermal (5 °C to 55 °C, 60 seconds) and 1 200 000 mechanical (50 N, 1.5 Hz, 0.7 mm lateral movement) cycles opposed by steatite antagonists, and the fracture load was determined. Fracture types were categorized, and scanning electron microscopy performed. The data were analyzed with a 3-way global univariate analysis of variance, t test, the Pearson chi-squared test, and the Weibull modulus (α=.05).

RESULTS

Unlike the framework material (P=.316) and artificial aging (P=.064), the veneering protocol affected the fracture load (P=.007). Digital veneers (range: 2242 to 2929 N) led to lower values than conventional veneers (range: 2825 to 3166 N), which was significant for aged cobalt chromium copings (P=.024; 2242 versus 3107 N). Conventionally veneered crowns showed lower Weibull moduli after thermomechanical aging (range: 3.2 to 3.5) than initially (range: 7.8 to 11.4). The copings of all the zirconia specimens fractured, while chipping occurred with the cobalt chromium specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The high fracture load values of the veneered crowns, even after simulated 5-year aging, indicated sufficient mechanical properties (nearly 4-fold the average occlusal force of 600 N) for the successful clinical application of digitally veneered zirconia and cobalt chromium copings.

Overview of Several Typical Ceramic Materials for Restorative Dentistry

With the development of ceramic technology, prosthodontic ceramics are becoming a useful option for improving esthetic outcomes in dentistry. In this paper, various ceramic materials were reviewed and evaluated, and their advantages and disadvantages and indications in oral prosthodontics were analyzed objectively. The properties of resin-based ceramics, polycrystalline ceramics, and silicate ceramics were compared and analyzed. Resin-based ceramics may replace other ceramic materials in the CAD/CAM field.

Effect of external staining on the optical properties and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia of different thicknesses

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The effect of the number of external staining applications on the color, translucency, and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia is not known.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of glazing and repeated external staining on the color, translucency, and surface roughness of 2 types of monolithic zirconia with 2 different thicknesses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-two 10×10-mm monolithic zirconia blocks, of which 16 were super high translucent and 16 were high translucent, were milled. The thickness of half the blocks was 0.7 mm, and the others were 1.2-mm thick. Four specimens in each subgroup were colored with value stain, and the other half with yellow stain. Staining was repeated twice for each specimen. The color and translucency of each specimen were measured before overglazing as the baseline, after overglazing, and after each staining process by using a spectrophotometer. The surface roughness (Ra) was measured after overglazing, the first staining, and the second staining. Data were analyzed by using repeated measures ANOVA and the independent t test (α=.05).

RESULTS

The number of coloring, type of coloring, and thickness changed the optical properties of monolithic zirconia. a∗, b∗, L∗ Value and ΔE were affected by the stage of firing (glazing, first staining, and second staining) (P<.001). ΔE Increased after the first and second staining in each type and thickness of monolithic zirconia and each type of stain. The amount of ΔE change was more for the first staining stage. The color difference (ΔE) after overglazing ranged from 3.08 to 3.75. The highest changes in color were related to the first staining with yellow colorant of super-high-translucent monolithic zirconia (cubeX²) with 0.7-mm thickness (ΔE=17.62). The surface roughness of the specimens was affected by the number of colorings (P<.001). In all groups, the first staining increased the surface roughness, and the second staining decreased the surface roughness. The type of monolithic zirconia (P=.756), thickness (P=.735), and type of stain (P=.239) had no significant effect on the surface roughness.

CONCLUSIONS

The first stage of staining with both stains caused more color change in all types and thicknesses of monolithic zirconia. Translucency increased after glazing and decreased after the first and second staining. The first staining increased the surface roughness, and the second decreased the surface roughness.

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns

Objective

To assess the survival, failure, and complication rates of veneered and monolithic all‐ceramic implant‐supported single crowns (SCs).

Methods

Literature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until September 2020 for randomized, prospective, and retrospective clinical trials with follow‐up time of at least 1 year, evaluating the outcome of veneered and/or monolithic all‐ceramic SCs supported by titanium dental implants. Survival and complication rates were analyzed using robust Poisson's regression models.

Results

Forty‐nine RCTs and prospective studies reporting on 57 material cohorts were included. Meta‐analysis of the included studies indicated an estimated 3‐year survival rate of veneered‐reinforced glass‐ceramic implant‐supported SCs of 97.6% (95% CI: 87.0%–99.6%). The estimated 3‐year survival rates were 97.0% (95% CI: 94.0%–98.5%) for monolithic‐reinforced glass‐ceramic implant SCs, 96.9% (95% CI: 93.4%–98.6%) for veneered densely sintered alumina SCs, 96.3% (95% CI: 93.9%–97.7%) for veneered zirconia SCs, 96.1% (95% CI: 93.4%–97.8%) for monolithic zirconia SCs and only 36.3% (95% CI: 0.04%–87.7%) for resin‐matrix‐ceramic (RMC) SCs. With the exception of RMC SCs (p < 0.0001), the differences in survival rates between the materials did not reach statistical significance. Veneered SCs showed significantly (p = 0.017) higher annual ceramic chipping rates (1.65%) compared with monolithic SCs (0.39%). The location of the SCs, anterior vs. posterior, did not influence survival and chipping rates.

Conclusions

With the exception of RMC SCs, veneered and monolithic implant‐supported ceramic SCs showed favorable short‐term survival and complication rates. Significantly higher rates for ceramic chipping, however, were reported for veneered compared with monolithic ceramic SCs.

Patient Satisfaction with Implant-Supported Monolithic and Partially Veneered Zirconia Restorations

The digital workflow and the application of Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) to prosthodontics present the clinician with the possibility of adopting new materials that confer several advantages. Especially in the case of zirconia, these innovations have profoundly changed daily practice. This paper compares the satisfaction and perception of patients who received implant-supported single crowns (SC) and fixed partial dentures (FPD) made from zirconia, either monolithic or partially veneered, after 3 years of follow-up; the success and survival rate of these restorations were also measured. Forty patients, who had been previously treated with implant-supported SC or FPD, either monolithic or partially veneered, and submitted to a yearly maintenance program, were recalled 3 years after their treatment and requested to complete an 8-question questionnaire regarding their perceptions of the treatment. Any mechanical or biological complication that had occurred from the time of delivery was also recorded. Patients that experienced ≥1 complication were less likely to be prone to repeat the treatment. The 3-year success rate was 92.6% for monolithic restoration and 92.3% for partially veneered restoration, while the survival rate was 100% for both restorations. The 3-year follow-up found that monolithic and partially veneered zirconia restorations are both well-accepted treatment options, and patients preferred the veneered restorations (0.76, p < 0.05) from an aesthetic point of view. According to our results, monolithic and veneered zirconia restorations are both reliable treatment options and are both equally accepted by patients.

The effect of repeated surface treatment of zirconia on its bond strength to resin cement

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of repeated surface treatments on wettability and surface roughness for zirconia surface and bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics to resin cement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy blocks (10 × 10 × 3 mm) of zirconia-based ceramics were fabricated and divided into two groups according to the surface treatments: (A) 110 µm Al₂O₃ airborne-particle abrasion and (R) 110 µm silica modified Al₂O₃ airborne-particle abrasion. At stage 2, each group was subdivided into 5 groups according to the surface retreatments: (a) 110 µm Al₂O₃ airborne-particle abrasion, (r) 110 µm silica modified Al₂O₃ airborne-particle abrasion, (D) diamond bur, (Da) diamond bur + 110 µm Al₂O₃ airborne-particle abrasion, and (Dr) diamond bur + 110 µm silica modified Al₂O₃ airborne-particle abrasion. Cylinders of self-adhesive resin cement were cemented onto each treated ceramic surface and subjected to micro-shear bond strength test. Additional specimens were prepared for roughness and wettability analyses. The data were subjected to t-test and One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α=.05).

RESULTS

At stage 1, group R presented higher bond strength values than group A (P=.000). There was a statistically significant increase of bond strength at stage 2 for group A (P=.003). The diamond bur influenced the surface roughness, increasing the values (P=.023). Group R provided better wettability. Regardless of the applied surface treatment, most of failures were adhesive.

CONCLUSION

The combination of application and reapplication of Rocatec Plus showed the best results of bond strength. Surface retreatment and recementation might be an indicated clinical strategy.