Differences in perceived intra-oral dryness in various dry-mouth patients as determined using the Regional Oral Dryness Inventory

Reliability of the electronic patient reported outcome measures for assessing xerostomia, dysphagia and quality of life in Spanish patients with head and neck cancer: a randomised crossover design

PURPOSE

To analyse reliability in terms of concordance (agreement) and equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) with an electronic modality (ePROM) of the recognised questionnaires assessing of xerostomia, dysphagia and quality of life (QoL) in Spanish patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). We hypothesised notable reliability and equivalence between the two modalities.

METHODS

A total of 24 patients (median age 63.00 years, undergone radiotherapy, either alone or in combination with surgery and/or chemotherapy, and suffering xerostomia) were randomised to either paper-based (PROM) or ePROM in a two-arm crossover design with a within-subject comparison of the two modalities (washout period 90 min). Outcome measures of interest were xerostomia: severity itself (Xerostomia Inventory, XI), perceived xerostomia (visual analogue scale, VAS), regional oral dryness (Regional Oral Dryness Inventory, RODI) and dry mouth/sticky saliva (specific head and neck module European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck Module, EORTC QLQ-H&N35 and updated EORTC QLQ-H&N43); dysphagia: swallowing burden (Eating Assessment Tool-10, EAT-10) and swallowing (EORTC QLQ-H&N35 and EORTC QLQ-H&N43); and QoL: global health (EORTC QLQ-Core 30, EORTC QLQ-C30). Data concerning the concordance between modalities was evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland Altman plots with limits of agreement. In addition, a two one-sided test to check equivalence with clinical importance changes. Finally, 1-week time span separated test and retest of ePROM (only electronic modality) using Wilcoxon test and ICCs.

RESULTS

There was excellent concordance (PROM versus ePROM 0.79-0.96) with most differences fell within the limits of agreement. The equivalence analysis showed that the difference between both modalities was not more than a tolerably small amount (P < 0.05), except for dysphagia and QoL. Analysis over time exhibited from good to excellent (0.81-0.93) test-retest stability for the majority of outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed ePROMs embedded into LAXER application have showed high level of reliability that supports their implementation in clinical practice, offering a convenient and efficient alternative to paper-based questionnaires. This study shows that electronic adaptations are possible despite the challenging older target population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study is part of the LAXER study (2021-11-04 / ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05106608).

Scent of relief: Mastic resin scent recovers salivation in chronic dry mouth patients

BACKGROUND

Olfactory stimulation with mastic resin, derived from the Pistacia lentiscus tree, demonstrated a bona fide sialagogic effect in healthy volunteers [1]. Its main volatile compound, α-pinene, also showed this effect. The current study aimed to validate the effect of mastic resin volatiles in chronic dry mouth patients with confirmed decreased saliva secretion.

METHODS

41 chronic dry mouth patients with decreased unstimulated saliva secretion (<0.25 mL/min) were exposed to mastic resin volatiles as part of the diagnostic routine at the Saliva Clinic of Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam. During their visit, dry-mouth questionnaires were conducted and samples of unstimulated whole saliva, chew-stimulated saliva, acid-stimulated saliva and mastic resin stimulated saliva were collected. Saliva flow rate, spinnbarkeit, pH, ion composition, MUC5B and MUC7 levels in all samples were analyzed.

RESULTS

Salivary flow rates increased by all stimuli when compared to the baseline unstimulated saliva (P<0.001). During olfactory mastic resin stimulation, the salivary spinnbarkeit (P<0.001) and sodium concentration (P<0.01) were increased compared to unstimulated saliva. MUC5B and MUC7 levels were increased during olfactory mastic resin stimulation compared to chew-stimulated saliva (P=0.016 and P<0.001, respectively). Spinnbarkeit correlated positively with MUC5B (R=0.399, P=0.002) and MUC7 levels (R=0.375, P=0.004). Results of dry-mouth questionnaires indicated reduced posterior palate dryness shortly after olfactory mastic resin stimulation (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Olfactory mastic resin stimulation increased mucous saliva secretion and reduced posterior palate dryness in a group of chronic dry mouth patients. These findings, validated in patients, underscore mastic resin scent as a beneficial and non-invasive sialagogic treatment for clinical applications.

Use and efficacy of dry-mouth interventions in Sjögren's disease patients and possible association with perceived oral dryness and patients' discomfort

OBJECTIVES

Sjögren's disease (SjD) patients use various interventions to relief their oral dryness. However, the use and efficacy of these interventions have only partially been evaluated. The present study aims to investigate whether there is an association between the perceived oral dryness and discomfort of SjD patients and their use of specific interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed among SjD patients, who completed several questionnaires to assess the severity of their oral dryness and an inventory of dry-mouth interventions. The perceived efficacy of each intervention was reported on a 5-point Likert-scale.

RESULTS

The questionnaires were returned by 92 SjD patients. For relief of oral dryness, they mostly used "eating fruit", "drinking tea", "moistening the lips", "drinking water, and "drinking small volumes" (> 50%). Three interventions had a frequency of use ranging from 2-6 times/day, whereas, "drinking water" and "drinking small volumes" showed higher frequencies (> 14). The highest overall efficacy (≥ 3.5) was reported for "chewing gum" and "using a mouth gel". Furthermore, various dry-mouth interventions showed significant associations with oral dryness scores and/or patients' discomfort. For example, "drinking small volumes" and "using XyliMelts" were associated with the Bother Index score.

CONCLUSION

Great variation was found in the use of dry-mouth interventions by the participants and the severity of the oral dryness and/or patients' discomfort seemed to affect their choice of intervention. Notably, the mostly used interventions did not show the highest reported efficacy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings might help SjD patients and clinicians in their choice of effective dry-mouth interventions.

World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII: Development of a Core Outcome Set for Dry Mouth: A Systematic Review of Outcome Domains for Xerostomia

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify all outcome domains used in clinical studies of xerostomia, that is, subjective sensation of dry mouth. This study is part of the extended project "World Workshop on Oral Medicine Outcomes Initiative for the Direction of Research" to develop a core outcome set for dry mouth.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. All clinical and observational studies that assessed xerostomia in human participants from 2001 to 2021 were included. Information on outcome domains was extracted and mapped to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy. Corresponding outcome measures were summarized.

RESULTS

From a total of 34,922 records retrieved, 688 articles involving 122,151 persons with xerostomia were included. There were 16 unique outcome domains and 166 outcome measures extracted. None of these domains or measures were consistently used across all the studies. The severity of xerostomia and physical functioning were the 2 most frequently assessed domains.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome domains and measures reported in clinical studies of xerostomia. This highlights the need for harmonization of dry mouth assessment to enhance comparability across studies and facilitate the synthesis of robust evidence for managing patients with xerostomia.

Salivary film thickness and MUC5B levels at various intra-oral surfaces

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we investigated the salivary film thickness and the MUC5B levels at various intra-oral locations in healthy volunteers, with a focus on the palate. Besides, measurements of the palatal surface area were included to explore the possible relationships between the palatal surface area and the palatal salivary film and MUC5B levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The salivary film thickness was determined using filter strips, which were pressed to the mucosal surfaces of five different intra-oral locations; conductance was then analysed using a Periotron. After elution of the strips, the MUC5B levels at various intra-oral locations were determined using ELISA. The palatal surface area was measured using an intra-oral scanner. The surface area was subsequently calculated using the software.

RESULTS

The anterior tongue had the thickest salivary film and also the highest levels of MUC5B, while the anterior palate had the thinnest salivary film and lowest MUC5B levels. There was no association between the palatal surface area and the salivary film thickness of the palate.

CONCLUSION

The salivary film and MUC5B levels are unequally distributed over the intra-oral regions of the soft tissues. The lack of association between the palatal surface area and the salivary film thickness indicates that a larger surface area is not associated with a relative thinner palatal salivary film.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of the current study increase our understanding of saliva distribution in the oral cavity and could be used as reference values for future studies.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Hyposalivation and Xerostomia in Childhood Cancer Survivors Following Different Treatment Modalities-A Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Late Effects 2 Clinical Study (DCCSS LATER 2)

Background: Limited data are available on the risk factors of salivary gland dysfunction in long-term childhood cancer survivors (CCS). The objective of this cross-sectional study, part of the multidisciplinary multicenter Dutch CCS Study Late Effects 2 (DCCSS LATER 2), was to assess the prevalence of and risk factors for hyposalivation and xerostomia in CCS. Methods: From February 2016 until March 2020, 292 CCS were included. Data with regard to gender, age at study, diagnosis, age at diagnosis, and treatment characteristics were collected, as well as the unstimulated (UWS) and stimulated whole salivary flow rate (SWS). Xerostomia was assessed with the Xerostomia Inventory (XI) questionnaire. Multivariable Poisson regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between potential risk factors and the occurrence of hyposalivation. Results: The minimum time between diagnosis and study enrollment was 15 years. The prevalence of hyposalivation was 32% and the prevalence of xerostomia was 9.4%. Hyposalivation and xerostomia were not significantly correlated. Risk factors for hyposalivation were female gender and a higher dose of radiotherapy (>12 Gy) to the salivary gland region. Conclusion: Considering the importance of saliva for oral health, screening for hyposalivation in CCS is suggested in order to provide optimal oral supportive care aimed to improve oral health.

The relationship between the severity of oral dryness and the use of dry-mouth interventions by various subgroups of dry-mouth patients

OBJECTIVE

Dry-mouth patients use different interventions to relieve their oral dryness. As recent studies showed that various subgroups of dry-mouth patients perceived different intra-oral regions as most dry, the present study investigated whether the use of dry-mouth interventions by various subgroups of dry-mouth patients was related to the perceived oral dryness as well as salivary flow rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Xerostomia Inventory (XI) scores, Regional Oral Dryness Score (RODI) scores and used dry-mouth interventions were extracted from the medical records of 528 patients visiting a saliva clinic. Based on their medical history, they were allocated into 6 subgroups.

RESULTS

The subgroups of dry-mouth patients used a wide range of interventions to relieve their oral dryness. Sjögren's syndrome patients used most interventions more frequently than patients with oral dryness due to use of a limited number of medications and controls. Patients using medications showed associations between the total XI score and dry-mouth interventions aimed at the entire mouth. In medication using patients and controls, the locally applied intervention "using mouth gel" was associated with RODI scores of the anterior tongue.

CONCLUSION

The use of dry-mouth interventions was associated with dry-mouth feelings. Use of interventions aimed to relieve dryness of the entire mouth was significantly associated with total XI score, while locally applied interventions were significantly associated with the severity of dryness at specific intra-oral regions, the anterior tongue in particular.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results will help clinicians to advise dry-mouth patients about the most suitable interventions for relief of oral dryness complaints.

Preferences of Sjögren's syndrome patients regarding potential new saliva substitutes

OBJECTIVES

Sjögren's syndrome (SS) patients should be involved in the development of new saliva substitutes at an early stage. The purpose of the current study was to explore the preferences of these patients regarding various product characteristics of potential new saliva substitutes.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A questionnaire was distributed among SS patients. They could anonymously indicate their preferences for saliva substitute characteristics using 5-point Likert scales.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine SS patients filled in the questionnaire. According to their opinion, the most ideal saliva substitute has a thin-watery consistency with a neutral flavour that should be applied as a spray. Patients demand a prolonged alleviation of dry mouth complaints and neutralization of harmful bacteria. The patients mainly object against the presence of artificial sweeteners and alcohol in saliva substitutes, but have limited objections against the presence of vegetable-based ingredients and natural enzymes. Major objections were against the potential side effects "bitter taste" and "discoloration of teeth". Age and severity of xerostomia affected desire of flavours. Younger patients preferred menthol flavour, while respondents with severe xerostomia preferred the use of "neutral flavours" significantly more.

CONCLUSION

The most ideal saliva substitute has thin-watery consistency in spray form with a neutral flavour and providing long alleviation of dry mouth complaints. Besides, it should not contain artificial sweeteners or alcohol, and should not have a bitter taste or cause discoloration of the teeth.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Investigating the opinion of SS patients provides tailoured insights into their preference, which may contribute to the development of more effective saliva substitutes.

The association between oral dryness and use of dry-mouth interventions in Sjögren's syndrome patients

Objective

Sjögren’s syndrome patients use different dry-mouth interventions for the relieve of their oral dryness. Recently, it was shown that patients with dry-mouth complaints have regional differences in perceived intra-oral dryness. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate whether the use of dry-mouth interventions is related to the perceived regional oral dryness.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study was performed among Sjögren’s patients. Volunteers could anonymously administer various questionnaires, including the Regional Oral Dryness Inventory (RODI), Xerostomia Inventory (XI), Bother Index (BI) and a list of dry-mouth interventions.

Results

Sjögren’s syndrome patients use a wide variety for the relieve of oral dryness. “Drinking water’’ and “moistening the lips’’ were used most frequently. Dry-mouth interventions, “drinking water’’, “rinsing of the mouth”, and “drinking small volumes” had significant associations with the RODI-scores of the posterior palate, and anterior and posterior tongue, respectively. On the other hand, “using mouth gel’’ had a significant association with the RODI-scores of the inside cheeks.

Conclusion

Sjögren’s syndrome patients are more likely to use mouth gels when their inside cheeks were experienced as most dry, while they drank water, rinsed their mouth or drank small volumes if the posterior palate, and anterior and posterior tongue were considered as dry. It can be concluded that intra-oral dryness affects dry-mouth perception and thereby also the use of the various dry-mouth interventions.

Clinical relevance

The therapeutic choice of dry-mouth interventions by Sjögren’s syndrome patients seems to some extent to be related to dryness at specific intra-oral regions.