Efficacy and tooth sensitivity of at-home bleaching in patients with esthetic restorations: a randomized clinical trial

Is at-home bleaching more effective on the upper arch than the lower arch? A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Teeth bleaching is one of the most popular aesthetic dental treatments, uses to address both extrinsic and intrinsic tooth discoloration. However, variations in bleaching efficacy between the upper and lower dental arches are commonly observed. Sublingual salivary glands may play a role in these differences by increasing saliva contamination of bleaching trays, which accelerates the degradation of bleaching gel and may reduce its effectiveness in the lower arch. This study aims is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of bleaching treatments in the upper and lowe arches.

METHODS

This study employed a prospective observational cohort design with a split-mouth approach. Thirty-two participants completed a three-week bleaching regimen using 16 % carbamide peroxide. Color changes were assessed using the CIELAB, CIEDE2000, and Whiteness Index for Dentistry (WID) formulas, with spectrophotometric measurements taken at baseline and weekly intervals.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences (p > 0.5) in bleaching efficacy for incisors between the two arches. However, upper canines demonstrated significantly greater bleaching effectiveness than lower canines by the second and third weeks (p < 0.05), as indicated by the CIELAB and CIEDE2000 formulas. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed using the WID formula.

CONCLUSION

While the lower canines exhibited slightly reduced bleaching effectiveness, these differences were not clinically noticeable, affirming the overall efficacy of the treatment for both arches.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

At-home bleaching treatment demonstrates equivalent effectiveness in both dental arches. While the lower canines may achieve a slightly reduced degree of bleaching, these differences are not clinically noticeable. Consequently, extending the duration of the bleaching treatment for the lower arch is unnecessary.

Does the use of a 3-mm extended tray during an at-home bleaching treatment increase gingival irritation? A randomized clinical trial

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Gingival irritation is a common side effect of at-home bleaching, but how the design of the bleaching tray affects its occurrence is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to determine whether a direct relationship is present between the design of bleaching trays and the risk of gingival irritation during at-home bleaching treatments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT06371664). Seventy-two participants were randomly assigned to 2 experimental groups: extended bleaching tray (3 mm) and nonextended bleaching tray (1 mm). Over a period of 3 weeks, participants underwent a nightguard dental bleaching treatment (6 to 8 hours) using 16% carbamide peroxide gel. Gingival irritation was evaluated subjectively by participants daily and objectively by clinicians at each visit. Tooth sensitivity was recorded daily using a 5-point numerical scale. Tooth color measurements were also made with a dental spectrophotometer. The risk of gingival irritation and the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity were analyzed with the Pearson chi squared test and Fisher exact test. The color analysis was conducted with the Student t test (α=.05).

RESULTS

Subjectively, the risk of gingival irritation was 66.7% in the extended group and 47.2% in the nonextended group, showing no statistically significant difference (P>.05). However, objectively, the risk of gingival irritation was significantly higher in the extended group (88.9%) compared with the nonextended group (63.9%) (P=.01(95% CI 1.06 to 1.83). Tooth sensitivity intensity was significantly higher in the extended tray group (P<.001), although the design did not significantly influence the risk of tooth sensitivity (P>.05). No significant differences were found between groups regarding color change (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an extended bleaching tray design increases the risk of gingival irritation and the intensity of tooth sensitivity. Therefore, the nonextended tray is recommended to minimize adverse reactions.

Clinical decision-making in tooth bleaching based on current evidence: A narrative review

OBJECTIVE

This review consolidates current knowledge on dentist-supervised tooth bleaching for vital teeth, drawing from systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that followed CONSORT guidelines.

DATA RESOURCES

MeSH and free terms like "tooth bleaching," "tooth whitening," "randomized clinical trial," and "systematic review" were used in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases STUDY SELECTION: Out of 839 articles, 444 were selected for full-text review, excluding case reports, non-randomized trials, literature reviews and those not directly related to tooth bleaching or RCTs not following CONSORT 2010. The remaining 203 studies were used to compare the dentist-supervised at-home and in-office clinical protocols, assessing factors such as color change, tooth sensitivity, and gingival irritation. In vitro studies were cited to support and explain basic concepts of different clinical decisions CONCLUSIONS: Daily at-home bleaching with 10 % carbamide peroxide or lower-concentration hydrogen peroxide over three to four weeks is effective. In-office bleaching with high-concentration hydrogen peroxide exhibits variations in protocols based on the HP concentration and gel's pH. Emerging technologies like violet LEDs and photobiomodulation with infrared lasers show promise in enhancing efficacy and reducing sensitivity, respectively, though more research is needed. The review underscores the importance of ongoing research into desensitization strategies to manage sensitivity related to bleaching.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Tooth bleaching is central to dental aesthetics, offering a range of options that can challenge clinicians. Adverse effects, particularly sensitivity, highlight the need for practice supported in protocols clinically tested and effective desensitization approaches.

A TRIPLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF A DESENSITIZING AGENT USED WITH AN AT-HOME BLEACHING TECHNIQUE

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine whether a sustained-release desensitizing gel containing 3% potassium nitrate and 0.11% fluoride ion reduces the risk of tooth sensitivity without compromising the effectiveness of bleaching treatment.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients were randomly assigned to 2 experimental groups: desensitizing gel and placebo. The desensitizing gel or placebo was applied for 30 minutes prior to the at-home vital bleaching gel application. A nightguard dental bleaching treatment (NGVB) using a 16% carbamide peroxide gel was performed for 6 hours over a 3-week period. Patients recorded their tooth sensitivity daily using a 5-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Whiteness index measurements were obtained using a dental spectrophotometer on the upper canines (right and left).

RESULTS

The overall risk of sensitivity was 37.5% in the desensitizing gel group compared to 87.5% in the placebo group, yielding a relative risk of 0.42 (95% CI 0.22-0.82), showing a statistically significant difference between the groups (P < .05). During the first week, patients in the placebo group exhibited a higher risk of experiencing mild sensitivity. However, no statistically significant differences in sensitivity intensity were observed overall or during the second and third weeks (P > .05). Regarding color change, the mean difference between groups in the first week was 5.25 (-0.22 to 10.71), in the second week 4.25 (-2.56 to 11.02), and in the third week 2.55(-4.11 to 9.22). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups at any time point (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a sustained-release desensitizing gel containing 3% potassium nitrate and 0.11% fluoride ion for 30 minutes prior to the bleaching agent effectively reduced sensitivity during at-home bleaching procedures. Furthermore, the desensitizing gel did not impact the effectiveness of the at-home bleaching treatment.

Trends and Gaps in Clinical Research on Tooth Bleaching: A Bibliometric Analysis of Studies Published From 2001 to 2024

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this bibliometric review is to address the main trends and development in dental whitening throughout the 21st century, as well as to identify knowledge gaps on the subject.

METHOD

A search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection database and information was extracted regarding the journal, authors, keywords, year of publication, number of citations, country, continent of the corresponding author. After reading the articles, data such as study design, type of bleaching technique, types of light sources used with the bleaching, occurrence of tooth sensitivity, and tooth color change analysis method were extracted.

RESULTS

The journal with the largest number of publications was "Operative dentistry" (n = 61), and the authors with the most articles were Loguercio AD (n = 82) and Reis A (n = 76). The productions are concentrated in Brazil, with emphasis on the State University Ponta Grossa. Most of the articles are randomized clinical studies that used the in-office bleaching technique with 35% hydrogen peroxide.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the most recent studies used light sources such as a violet LED during whitening; however, more studies are needed to prove the benefits in relation to color change and reduction of tooth sensitivity.

Tooth sensitivity in different arches post in-office dental bleaching: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI), as well as bleaching efficacy (BE) in the maxillary and mandibular arches after in-office dental bleaching.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

90 participants were randomly into two groups according to the arch (maxillary or mandibular) in which the patient will first receive a 35 % hydrogen peroxide gel (2 sessions; 1 × 30 min; 1 week apart). TS and GI were recorded immediately after, up to 1 h, 24 h and 48 h after bleaching, using the 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). BE was assessed before bleaching and 30 days after the end of the treatment (shade guide units [ΔSGU], CIELab [ΔEab], CIEDE2000 [ΔE00], and Whiteness Index for Dentistry [WID]). TS and GI were compared using McNemar's and paired t-test. BE were compared with Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (ΔSGU) and paired t-test (ΔEab, ΔE00, and WID) (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The risk and the intensity of TS was statistically higher for the mandibular arch (p < 0.003). The risk and intensity of GI did not differ between arches (p > 0.38). Both arches demonstrated significant BE (ΔSGU, ΔEab, ΔE00 and WID), without differences between them (p > 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In-office dental bleaching induces higher risk and the intensity of TS in the mandibular arch when compared to maxillary arch, without significant differences in gingival irritation, or bleaching efficacy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Most patients experience tooth sensitivity regardless of the dental arch involved. However, when performing in-office dental bleaching, clinicians should consider that the mandibular arch is more likely to experience greater sensitivity compared to the maxillary arch.

Effect of an experimental desensitizer with a hydroxyapatite-capsaicin composite applied before in-office dental bleaching on hydrogen peroxide diffusion, color and surface changes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a prior application of an experimental desensitizer containing a hydroxyapatite-capsaicin composite (HAp-CAP) in different concentrations on hydrogen peroxide (HP) diffusion into the pulp chamber, bleaching efficacy (BE) and on physical and chemical alterations of the enamel surface after in-office bleaching.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty sound premolars were randomized in five groups according to each experimental condition (n = 8): no bleaching (negative control), only bleaching (positive control), 0.1%, 1% and 5% of HAp-CAP. Four groups were submitted to in-office bleaching (HP 35%) post-desensitizer application. The HP concentration (µg/mL) on the pulp chamber was measured by UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The BE was measured by digital spectrophotometer (ΔEab, ΔE00 and ΔWID) before and after 7 days bleaching. Enamel tooth fragments obtained from twenty molars were submitted to the same experimental conditions and analyzed using FE-SEM and EDS, Vickers microhardness (VHN), Raman spectroscopy, and nanoroughness (Ra) by AFM to evaluate morphologic and chemical changes on enamel surface. All data were submitted to statistical analysis (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The groups treated with HAp-CAP exhibited a lower concentration of HP in the pulp chamber compared to only bleaching group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences observed in BE between HAp-CAP groups and only bleaching group (p > 0.05). Only HAp-CAP 5% showed no significant differences in VHN values when compared to no bleaching group (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences among any group in Ra values (p > 0.05). The groups submitted to HAp-CAP showed a higher mineral concentration when compared to only bleaching group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Desensitizers containing HAp-CAP up to 5% effectively reduce HP diffusion into the pulp chamber after in-office bleaching, without interfering to BE and Ra, as well as prevent enamel demineralization.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of desensitizers containing HAp-CAP during in-office bleaching treatments offers a promising approach to reduce the risk of pulp irritation caused by hydrogen peroxide diffusion, without compromising the bleaching effectiveness or causing surface roughness.

Effect of air-abrasion pretreatment with three desensitizing agents on efficacy of in-office tooth bleaching

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of air-abrasion of enamel with three different desensitizing powders on the whitening effect of a bleaching gel containing 40% H2O2, which was used for in-office tooth bleaching.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty human incisors, extracted and prepared, were acquired for this study and subsequently randomized into four groups (n = 10). The control group specimens underwent no pretreatment prior to the bleaching procedure, whereas the remaining three groups underwent air abrasion using distinct desensitizing powders; (a) Sylc, which contains bioglass 45S5; (b) BioMinF, which contains calcium phospho-fluoro-silicate glass; and (c) MI Pearls, which contains nano-hydroxyapatite, 1 h preceding the Opalescence Boost PF 40% bleaching procedure. Color measurements were conducted using a double-beam UV-Vis spectrophotometer at four distinct time points (prior to bleaching, 24 h, 15 days, and 30 days post-bleaching).

RESULTS

Tooth color change outcomes revealed that there were no statistically significant results with respect to the interaction of the two criteria (treatments and time) (p = 0.990). Additionally, there were no statistically significant results with respect to the main effects of treatments (p = 0.385), while there were statistically significant effects with respect to the time criterion (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the tested desensitizing powders prior the bleaching procedure did not affect the tooth color change induced by the tested bleaching agent.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Tooth color change and whiteness are not affected by air-abrasion desensitizing treatments when applied prior to in-office bleaching procedures.

Enhanced tooth bleaching with a hydrogen peroxide/titanium dioxide gel

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the effects of the titanium dioxide (TiO2) concentration and particle size in hydrogen peroxide (HP) on tooth bleaching effectiveness and enamel surface properties.

METHODS

TiO2 at different concentrations and particle sizes was incorporated into 40% HP gel to form an HP/TiO2 gel. The specimens were randomly divided into 8 groups: C1P20: HP + 1% TiO2 (20 nm); C3P20: HP + 3% TiO2 (20 nm); C5P20: HP + 5% TiO2 (20 nm); C1P100: HP + 1% TiO2 (100 nm); C3P100: HP + 3% TiO2 (100 nm); C5P100: HP + 5% TiO2 (100 nm); C0: HP with LED; and C0-woL: HP without LED. Bleaching was conducted over 2 sessions, each lasting 40 min with a 7-day interval. The color differences (ΔE00), whiteness index for dentistry (WID), surface microhardness, roughness, microstructure, and composition were assessed.

RESULTS

The concentration and particle size of TiO2 significantly affected ΔE00 and ΔWID values, with the C1P100 group showing the greatest ΔE00 values and C1P100, C3P100, and C5P100 groups showing the greatest ΔWID values (p < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in surface microhardness, roughness, microstructure or composition (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating 1% TiO2 with a particle size of 100 nm into HP constitutes an effective bleaching strategy to achieve desirable outcomes.

Effect of whitening toothpastes with different hydrogen peroxide concentrations: Penetration into the pulp chamber and color change

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the efficacy of simulated brushing with toothpastes containing different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (HP) in pulp chamber penetration and color change. Also, physical-chemical properties (concentration, pH and viscosity) were evaluated.

METHODS

Forty-nine premolars were divided into seven groups (n = 7): untreated (control); whitening gel (White Class 6 %, 6 %BG) with one 90  min application (6 %BG 90  min) and 14 applications of 90  min (6 %BG 14×90 min); toothpastes (Colgate Luminous White Glow 3 %, 3 %TP; Crest 3D White Brilliance 4 %, 4 %TP; Colgate Optic White Pro-Series 5 %, 5 %TP) and 6 %BG toothbrushing for 14 applications of 90 s. HP penetration into the pulp chamber was measured through UV-Vis spectrophotometry and color change with a spectrophotometer (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID). Initial concentration, pH, and viscosity were measured through Titration, Digital pH-meter, and Rheometer, respectively. Statistical analysis used one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

6 %BG (14×90 min) and 4 %TP groups showed acidic pH and higher concentrations of HP in the pulp chamber compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). On the other side, 3 %TP and 5 %TP groups showed alkaline pH, higher viscosity between the toothpastes and lower HP penetration (p < 0.05). The 6 %BG AH (14×90 min) group exhibited the most significant color change (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Brushing with whitening toothpaste with an acidic pH leads to greater HP penetration into pulp chamber; but, even when a high concentrated HP whitening toothpaste was used, a lower whitening effect was observed when compared to a two-week at-home bleaching.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Whitening toothpastes containing up to 5 % HP produced lower whitening effect than two-week at-home bleaching. Additionally, HP was detected within the pulp chamber which can potentially impact in tooth sensitivity.

At-home bleaching versus whitening toothpastes for treatment of tooth discoloration: a cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of whitening toothpastes and at-home bleaching for the treatment of tooth discoloration.

METHODOLOGY

A cost-effectiveness economic analysis was conducted, and eight randomized clinical trials were selected based on the whitening agent product used: blue covarine dentifrices (BCD), hydrogen peroxide dentifrices (HPD), dentifrices without bleaching agents (CD, negative control), and 10% carbamide peroxide (CP10, positive control) for at-home bleaching. The consumer/patient perspective was adopted, macro-costing techniques were used and a decision tree model was performed considering the costs in the American and Brazilian markets. The color change evaluation (ΔE*ab) was used to calculate the effectiveness of tooth bleaching. A probabilistic analysis was performed using a Monte Carlo simulation and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were obtained.

RESULTS

CP10 resulted in the highest cost-effectiveness compared to the use of dentifrices in both markets. In Brazil, HPD was more cost-effective than BCD and CD. In the US, the increased costs of HPD and BCD did not generate any whitening benefit compared to CD.

CONCLUSIONS

CP10 was more cost-effective than BCD and HPD for tooth bleaching from the perspectives of the Brazilian and American markets. Decision-making should consider the use of CP10 for treating tooth discoloration.

Prognosis in home dental bleaching: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the prognosis of at-home dental bleaching using low concentration bleaching products.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review was conducted was performed following the recommendations of the 2020 PRISMA statement and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO-CRD42022360530). The PICO question was "What is the prognosis of home teeth whitening treatment?". An advanced electronic search was made in three databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase.

RESULTS

The database search led to the retrieval of 225 articles. After elimination of duplicate references, the titles and abstracts of the articles were analyzed with respect to the eligibility criteria, and 24 studies were included for the development of the systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

Most authors state that the color remains stable between 1 and 2.5 years regardless of the type of bleaching agent or the forms of administration, and color stability in cases of severe discolorations presents a higher degree of recurrence.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Given the growing demand for dental cosmetic treatments, the following systematic review may aid the clinician's continuing education and evidence-based practice by providing knowledge on the field of at-home dental bleaching agents and their long-term effects.

Effect of an experimental desensitizing gel on bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity after in-office bleaching—a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS), and the efficacy of in-office bleaching after applying an experimental desensitizing gel composed of 10% calcium gluconate, 0.1% dexamethasone acetate, 10% potassium nitrate, and 5% glutaraldehyde.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a split-mouth, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 50 participants had their upper hemiarches randomized into experimental and placebo groups. Desensitizing and placebo gels were applied for 10 min before in-office bleaching (35% hydrogen peroxide, 1 × 50 min; two bleaching sessions; 1-week interval). TS was recorded immediately after bleaching, 1, 24, and 48 h after each session, with a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) and a five-point numerical rating scale (NRS). The color was recorded in all groups at baseline, 1 week after each session, and 1 month after the end of bleaching using shade guide units (ΔSGUs) and a spectrophotometer (ΔE_ab, ΔE₀₀, and ΔWI_D).

RESULTS

Most participants (96%) felt some discomfort during treatment regardless of the study group. The odds ratio for pain was 0.65 (95% CI 0.1 to 4.1; p = 1.0). The intensity of TS did not differ between groups (p > 0.31), and it was only 0.34 VAS units lower in the experimental group. A significant color change occurred in both groups regardless of the group.

CONCLUSIONS

The desensitizing experimental gel applied before in-office bleaching did not reduce the risk and the intensity of TS and did not affect color change.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although the experimental desensitizing agent with varying mechanisms of action did not jeopardize the color change, it did not reduce the risk or intensity of in-office bleaching.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

RBR-7T7D4D.