Accuracy of artificial intelligence for tooth extraction decision-making in orthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Applications of artificial intelligence in orthodontics: a bibliometric and visual analysis

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the literature on artificial intelligence (AI) applications in orthodontics to provide a detailed overview of the current research trends, influential works, and future directions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A research strategy in The Web of Science Core Collection has been conducted to identify original articles regarding the use of AI in orthodontics. Articles were screened and selected by two independent reviewers and the following data were imported and processed for analysis: rankings, centrality metrics, publication trends, co-occurrence and clustering of keywords, journals, articles, authors, nations, and organizations. Data were analyzed using CiteSpace 6.3.R2 and VOSviewer.

RESULTS

Almost 83% of the 381 chosen articles were released in the last three and a half years. Studies were published either in highly impacted orthodontic journals and also in journals related to informatics engineering, computer science, and medical imaging. Two-thirds of the available literature originated from China, the USA, and South Korea. AI-driven cephalometric landmarking and automatic segmentation were the main areas of research.

CONCLUSIONS

This report offers a thorough overview of the AI current trend in orthodontics and it highlights prominent research areas focused on increasing the speed and efficiency of orthodontic care. Furthermore, it offers insight into potential directions for future research.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Collaborative research efforts will be necessary to strengthen the maturity and robustness of AI models and to make AI-based clinical research sufficiently reliable for routine orthodontic clinical practice.

Artificial intelligence for treatment planning and soft tissue outcome prediction of orthognathic treatment: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in treatment planning and outcome prediction in orthognathic treatment (OGT) has not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of AI in treatment planning and soft tissue outcome prediction in OGT.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Unrestricted search of indexed databases and reference lists of included studies.

DATA SELECTION

Clinical studies that addressed the focused question 'Is AI useful for treatment planning and soft tissue outcome prediction in OGT?' were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Study screening, selection and data extraction were performed independently by two authors. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's RoB and ROBINS-I tools for randomised and non-randomised clinical studies, respectively.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Eight clinical studies (seven retrospective cohort studies and one randomised controlled study) were included. Four studies assessed the role of AI for treatment decision making; and four studies assessed the accuracy of AI in soft tissue outcome prediction after OGT. In four studies, the level of agreement between AI and non-AI decision making was found to be clinically acceptable (at least 90%). In four studies, it was shown that AI can be used for soft tissue outcome prediction after OGT; however, predictions were not clinically acceptable for the lip and chin areas. All studies had a low to moderate RoB.

LIMITATIONS

Due to high methodological inconsistencies among the included studies, it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis and reporting biases assessment.

CONCLUSION

AI can be a useful aid to traditional treatment planning by facilitating clinical treatment decision making and providing a visualisation tool for soft tissue outcome prediction in OGT.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022366864.

Surveying the landscape of diagnostic imaging in dentistry's future: Four emerging technologies with promise

BACKGROUND

Advances in digital radiography for both intraoral and panoramic imaging and cone-beam computed tomography have led the way to an increase in diagnostic capabilities for the dental care profession. In this article, the authors provide information on 4 emerging technologies with promise.

TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED

The authors feature the following: artificial intelligence in the form of deep learning using convolutional neural networks, dental magnetic resonance imaging, stationary intraoral tomosynthesis, and second-generation cone-beam computed tomography sources based on carbon nanotube technology and multispectral imaging. The authors review and summarize articles featuring these technologies.

RESULTS

The history and background of these emerging technologies are previewed along with their development and potential impact on the practice of dental diagnostic imaging. The authors conclude that these emerging technologies have the potential to have a substantial influence on the practice of dentistry as these systems mature. The degree of influence most likely will vary, with artificial intelligence being the most influential of the 4.

CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The readers are informed about these emerging technologies and the potential effects on their practice going forward, giving them information on which to base decisions on adopting 1 or more of these technologies. The 4 technologies reviewed in this article have the potential to improve imaging diagnostics in dentistry thereby leading to better patient care and heightened professional satisfaction.

AI in Orthodontics: Revolutionizing Diagnostics and Treatment Planning-A Comprehensive Review

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has transformed various medical specialties, including orthodontics. AI has shown promising results in enhancing the accuracy of diagnoses, treatment planning, and predicting treatment outcomes. Its usage in orthodontic practices worldwide has increased with the availability of various AI applications and tools. This review explores the principles of AI, its applications in orthodontics, and its implementation in clinical practice. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on AI applications in dental diagnostics, cephalometric evaluation, skeletal age determination, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) evaluation, decision making, and patient telemonitoring. Due to study heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was possible. AI has demonstrated high efficacy in all these areas, but variations in performance and the need for manual supervision suggest caution in clinical settings. The complexity and unpredictability of AI algorithms call for cautious implementation and regular manual validation. Continuous AI learning, proper governance, and addressing privacy and ethical concerns are crucial for successful integration into orthodontic practice.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of remazolam in tooth extraction surgery: A randomized, single-blind, multi-center clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Dental extraction or tooth extraction is a common clinical radical treatment surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy and safety of remimazolam in tooth extraction surgery in a randomized, single-blind, multi-center clinical trial.

METHOD

Patients who underwent tooth extraction surgery at Jinan Stomatological Hospital from April 2022 to March 2023 were selected as the research subjects, and they were divided into a control group and an observation group using the random arrangement table method. The patients in the control group were anesthetized with midazolam, and the patients in the observation group were anesthetized with remimazolam. Collect the general demographic data of the patients, use the propensity score matching method (PSM) to balance the baseline data of the two groups, and use t-test, chi-square test, and analysis of variance to compare the hemodynamics, anesthesia maintenance period indicators, and alertness/Sedation scores and occurrence of adverse reactions.

RESULT

PSM matching was performed according to a 1:1 ratio, and 40 patients were included in the observation and control groups. There was no statistical significance in the baseline data of the two groups. Compared with T0, the hemodynamic indexes of both groups of patients increased at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 (P< 0.05), but the indexes at T0 and T2 were the same. The same (P> 0.05), and the indicators of the observation group at T1, T3, T4, and T5 were higher than those of the control group (P< 0.05); the administration time of the two groups of patients was the same (P> 0.05), but the observation group The recovery time and onset of effect were shorter than those in the control group (P< 0.05); at T0, the clinical behavior scores of the two groups of patients were the same (P> 0.05), and at T1, the scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (P< 0.05); at T0 and T1, the alertness/sedation scores of the patients in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, but at T2, the scores of the patients in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P< 0.05); the total clinical adverse reactions of the patients in the observation group were The incidence rate (5.00%) was lower than that of the control group (30.00%) (P< 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of remimazolam during tooth extraction can stabilize the patient's hemodynamics, shorten the recovery and onset time, stabilize the patient's behavior, have an excellent soothing effect, have fewer adverse reactions, and be safer, so it is worthy of use.

Discrepancies in the occlusal devices designed by an experienced dental laboratory technician and by 2 artificial intelligence-based automatic programs

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been developed for different applications, including the automatic design of occlusal devices; however, the design discrepancies of an experienced dental laboratory technician and these AI automatic programs remain unknown.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the overall, intaglio, and occlusal surface discrepancies of the occlusal device designs completed by an experienced dental laboratory technician and two AI automatic design programs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Virtually articulated maxillary and mandibular diagnostic casts were obtained in a standard tessellation language (STL) file format. Three groups were created depending on the operator or program used to design the occlusal devices: an experienced dental laboratory technician (control group) and two AI programs, namely Medit Splints from Medit (Medit group) and Automate from 3Shape A/S (3Shape group) (n=10). To minimize the discrepancies in the parameter designs among the groups tested, the same printing material and design parameters were selected. In the control group, the dental laboratory technician imported the articulated scans into a dental design program (DentalCAD) and designed a maxillary occlusal device. The occlusal device designs were exported in STL format. In the Medit and 3Shape groups, the diagnostic casts were imported into the respective AI programs. The AI programs automatically designed the occlusal device without any further operator intervention. The occlusal device designs were exported in STL format. Among the 10 occlusal designs of the control group, a random design (shuffle deck of cards) was used as a reference file to calculate the overall, intaglio, and occlusal discrepancies in the specimens of the AI groups by using a program (Medit Design). The root mean square (RMS) error was calculated. Kruskal-Wallis, and post hoc Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner pairwise comparison tests were used to analyze the trueness of the data. The Levene test was used to assess the precision data (α=.05).

RESULTS

Significant overall (P<.001), intaglio (P<.001), and occlusal RMS median value (P<.001) discrepancies were found among the groups. Significant overall RMS median discrepancies were observed between the control and the Medit groups (P<.001) and the control and 3Shape groups (P<.001). Additionally, significant intaglio RMS median discrepancies were found between the control and the Medit groups (P<.001), the Medit and 3Shape groups (P<.001), and the control and 3Shape groups (P=.008). Lastly, significant occlusal RMS median discrepancies were found between the control and the 3Shape groups (P<.001) and the Medit and 3Shape groups (P<.001). The AI-based software programs tested were able to automatically design occlusal devices with less than a 100-µm trueness discrepancy compared with the dental laboratory technician. The Levene test revealed significant overall (P<.001), intaglio (P<.001), and occlusal (P<.001) precision among the groups tested.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a dental laboratory technique influenced the overall, intaglio, and occlusal trueness of the occlusal device designs obtained. No differences were observed in the precision of occlusal device designs acquired among the groups tested.

What is the current state of artificial intelligence applications in dentistry and orthodontics?

BACKGROUND

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the medical field has the potential to bring about significant improvements in patient care and outcomes. AI is being used in dentistry and more specifically in orthodontics through the development of diagnostic imaging tools, the development of treatment planning tools, and the development of robotic surgery. The aim of this study is to present the latest emerging AI softwares and applications in dental field to benefit from.

TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED

Search strategies were conducted in three electronic databases, with no date limits in the following databases up to April 30, 2023: MEDLINE, PUBMED, and GOOGLE® SCHOLAR for articles related to AI in dentistry & orthodontics. No inclusion and exclusion criteria were used for the selection of the articles. Most of the articles included (n = 79) are reviews of the literature, retro/prospective studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and observational studies.

RESULTS

The use of AI in dentistry and orthodontics is a rapidly growing area of research and development, with the potential to revolutionize the field and bring about significant improvements in patient care and outcomes; this can save clinicians' chair-time and push for more individualized treatment plans. Results from the various studies reported in this review are suggestive that the accuracy of AI-based systems is quite promising and reliable.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

AI application in the healthcare field has proven to be efficient and helpful for the dentist to be more precise in diagnosis and clinical decision-making. These systems can simplify the tasks and provide results in quick time which can save dentists time and help them perform their duties more efficiently. These systems can be of greater aid and can be used as auxiliary support for dentists with lesser experience.

The knowledge, experience, and attitude on artificial intelligence-assisted cephalometric analysis: Survey of orthodontists and orthodontic students

INTRODUCTION

Artificial intelligence (AI) developed rapidly in orthodontics, and AI-based cephalometric applications have been adopted. This study aimed to assess AI-assisted cephalometric technologies related knowledge, experience, and attitude among orthodontists and orthodontic students; describe their subject view of the applications and related technologies in orthodontics; and identify associated factors.

METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey based on a professional tool (www.wjx.cn) was performed from October 11-17, 2022. Participants were recruited with a purposive and snowball sampling approach. Data was collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty valid questionnaires were collected and analyzed; 68.8% of the respondents agreed that AI-based cephalometric applications would replace manual and semiautomatic approaches. Practitioners using AI-assisted applications (87.5%) spent less time in cephalometric analysis than the other groups using other approaches, and 349 (72.7%) respondents considered AI-based applications could assist in obtaining more accurate analysis results. Lectures and training programs (56.0%) were the main sources of respondents' knowledge about AI. Knowledge level was associated with experience in AI-related clinical or scientific projects (P <0.001). Most respondents (88.8%) were interested in future AI applications in orthodontics.

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents are optimistic about the future of AI in orthodontics. AI-assisted cephalometric applications were believed to make clinical diagnostic analysis more convenient and straightforward for practitioners and even replace manual and semiautomatic approaches. The education and promotion of AI should be strengthened to elevate orthodontists' understanding.

Attitude, perception and barriers of dental professionals towards artificial intelligence

Aim

To know attitudes, perceptions and barriers towards the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in dentistry in India among undergraduate and postgraduate students.

Methodology

A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted among participants pursuing graduation and postgraduation. The questionnaire consisted of 23 close-ended and 2 open-ended questions divided into various sections of attitude, perception and barriers. The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0.

Result

Out of 937 responses, 55.2% responded that they get information about AI from social media platforms. 51.3% of respondents have basic knowledge about the use of AI in dentistry. 59.6% agreed that AI can be used as a "definitive diagnostic tool" in the diagnosis of diseases. 66.5% agreed that AI can be used for radiographic diagnosis of tooth caries. 71.3% stated that AI can be used as a "treatment planning tool" in dentistry. 55.7% stated that AI should be part of undergraduate dental training.

Conclusion

This study concluded that both dental students are aware of the concept of AI. Participants were positive when asked if AI can increase the efficiency of diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning procedures as well as in managing patient data. Both participants believed that the barriers to the introduction of AI in dentistry are a lack of technical resources and a lack of training personnel in college.

Ethical considerations on artificial intelligence in dentistry: A framework and checklist

OBJECTIVE

Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to the ability of machines to perform cognitive and intellectual human tasks. In dentistry, AI offers the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, improve patient outcomes and streamline workflows. The present study provides a framework and a checklist to evaluate AI applications in dentistry from this perspective.

METHODS

Lending from existing guidance documents, an initial draft of the checklist and an explanatory paper were derived and discussed among the groups members.

RESULTS

The checklist was consented to in an anonymous voting process by 29 Topic Group Dental Diagnostics and Digital Dentistry, ITU/WHO Focus Group AI on Health's members. Overall, 11 principles were identified (diversity, transparency, wellness, privacy protection, solidarity, equity, prudence, law and governance, sustainable development, accountability, and responsibility, respect of autonomy, decision-making).

CONCLUSIONS

Providers, patients, researchers, industry, and other stakeholders should consider these principles when developing, implementing, or receiving AI applications in dentistry.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

While AI has become increasingly commonplace in dentistry, there are ethical concerns around its usage, and users (providers, patients, and other stakeholders), as well as the industry should consider these when developing, implementing, or receiving AI applications based on comprehensive framework to address the associated ethical challenges.

Subregional pharyngeal changes after orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III patients analyzed by convolutional neural networks-based segmentation

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of fully automatic segmentation of pharyngeal volume of interests (VOIs) before and after orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III patients using a convolutional neural network (CNN) model and to investigate the clinical applicability of artificial intelligence for quantitative evaluation of treatment changes in pharyngeal VOIs.

METHODS

310 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were divided into a training set (n=150), validation set (n=40), and test set (n=120). The test datasets comprised matched pairs of pre- and posttreatment images of 60 skeletal Class III patients (mean age 23.1±5.0 years; ANB<-2⁰) who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with orthodontic treatment. A 3D U-Net CNNs model was applied for fully automatic segmentation and measurement of subregional pharyngeal volumes of pretreatment (T0) and posttreatment (T1) scans. The model's accuracy was compared to semi-automatic segmentation outcomes by humans using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volume similarity (VS). The correlation between surgical skeletal changes and model accuracy was obtained.

RESULTS

The proposed model achieved high performance of subregional pharyngeal segmentation on both T0 and T1 images, representing a significant T1-T0 difference of DSC only in the nasopharynx. Region-specific differences among pharyngeal VOIs, which were observed at T0, disappeared on the T1 images. The decreased DSC of nasopharyngeal segmentation after treatment was weakly correlated with the amount of maxillary advancement. There was no correlation between the mandibular setback amount and model accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed model offers fast and accurate subregional pharyngeal segmentation on both pretreatment and posttreatment CBCT images in skeletal Class III patients.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

We elucidated the clinical applicability of the CNNs model to quantitatively evaluate subregional pharyngeal changes after surgical-orthodontic treatment, which offers a basis for developing a fully integrated multiclass CNNs model to predict pharyngeal responses after dentoskeletal treatments.