Missing the forest for the trees? A high rate of motor and language impairments in Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder in a chart review of inpatient adolescents

Effects of Neurodevelopmental Disorders on the Clinical Presentations and Therapeutic Outcomes of Children and Adolescents with Severe Mood Disorders: A Multicenter Observational Study

Individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are more susceptible to developing severe or resistant mood disorders. However, they often face challenges in accessing specific treatments. To understand the barriers to treatment in this group, we conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational study on 305 adolescents referred to specialized care (mean age 14.38 ± 0.13 years, 57% girls, 9% bipolar disorder, 91% depressive disorders). NDDs were categorized based on the number of co-occurring NDDs for each subject (none: 67%, one: 18%, two: 7%, three: 5%, four and more: 2%). We explored the predictive value of the number of NDDs on various clinical and therapeutic factors. The analysis revealed significant associations between the number of NDDs and the duration of mood symptoms, persistent irritability, associated disruptive behavioral disorders, lower scores on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) at baseline, and polypharmacy. The number of NDDs did not correlate with the use of antidepressants, the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) at discharge, or changes in the CGAS score during the stay. The challenges in distinguishing mood disorders from chronic emotional and behavioral difficulties may contribute to the difficulties in accessing specific care for mood disorders. These results suggest that treatments for mood disorders demonstrate comparable effectiveness when provided regardless of the associations with NDDs.

A Delphi consensus among experts on assessment and treatment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore consensus among clinicians and researchers on how to assess and treat Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD).

Methods

The Delphi method was used to organize data collected from an initial sample of 23 child psychiatrists and psychologists. Three rounds of closed/open questions were needed to achieve the objective.

Results

Fifteen experts in the field completed the whole study. Finally, 122 proposals were validated and 5 were rejected. Globally, consensus was more easily reached on items regarding assessment than on those regarding treatment. Specifically, experts agreed that intensity, frequency, and impact of DMDD symptoms needed to be measured across settings, including with parents, siblings, peers, and teachers. While a low level of consensus emerged regarding optimal pharmacological treatment, the use of psychoeducation, behavior-focused therapies (e.g., dialectical behavior therapy, chain analysis, exposure, relaxation), and systemic approaches (parent management training, family therapy, parent-child interaction therapy) met with a high degree of consensus.

Conclusion

This study presents recommendations that reached a certain degree of consensus among researchers and clinicians regarding the assessment and treatment of youths with DMDD. These findings may be useful to clinicians working with this population and to researchers since they also highlight non-consensual areas that need to be further investigated.

Hard-to-treat or hard-to-catch? Clinical features and therapeutic outcomes of help-seeking foster care youths with mood disorders

Introduction

The high level of emotional problems in youths placed in foster care contrasts with the limited use of evidence-based treatments. This study aims to better characterize the clinical features and therapeutic outcomes of foster care youths with mood disorders.

Methods

A secondary analysis of data collected in the context of a French-Canadian clinical research network on pediatric mood disorders in four sites was conducted to compare three groups of patients with depressive or bipolar disorder: those without exposure to child welfare intervention (WCWI, n = 181), those who received non-placement psychosocial intervention (NPI, n = 62), and those in placement interventions (PI, n = 41).

Results

We observed a very high rate of academic problems in patients in the groups NPI/PI compared to those in the WCWI group. Patients in the PI group had more disruptive behavioral disorders (OR = 6.87, 95% CI [3.25-14.52]), trauma-related disorders (OR = 3.78, 95% CI [1.6-8.94]), and any neurodevelopmental disorders (OR = 2.73, 95% CI [1.36-5.49]) compared to the other groups (NPI/WCWI). Among inpatients, the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale and the change in the Children Global Assessment Scale during the hospital stay did not differ across the three groups. We observed a higher prescription rate of antipsychotics in the PI group compared to the NPI/WCWI groups, but no significant difference for antidepressants and mood stabilizers.

Discussion

These findings support the view that, when provided with dedicated support, fostered inpatient youths can improve in a range comparable to other inpatients. Undetected neurodevelopmental disorders and academic problems are likely important contributors of the burden of mood disorders in these youths.

Navigating in Troubled Waters: The Developmental Roots of Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder

Wiggins et al.¹ recently used data from 3 longitudinal studies spanning preschool and early school children to form an empirically derived framework for early childhood disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (EC-DMDD), ie, a theoretical entity based on all DMDD criteria except the age at onset. The authors showed that the presence of EC-DMDD strongly predicted irritability-related syndromes at early school-ages. The most striking result is that virtually all youths with DMDD had chronic irritability in preschool years (>99%), a finding that challenges the view that DMDD cannot be diagnosed before 6 years of age. In our opinion, the developmental view on DMDD adopted by the authors is particularly welcome to address some of the nosological issues encountered with this disorder.