MJ1647, an open reading frame in the genome of the hyperthermophile Methanococcus jannaschii, encodes a very thermostable archaeal histone with a C-terminal extension

The Hypersaline Archaeal Histones HpyA and HstA Are DNA Binding Proteins That Defy Categorization According to Commonly Used Functional Criteria

Histone proteins are found across diverse lineages of Archaea, many of which package DNA and form chromatin. However, previous research has led to the hypothesis that the histone-like proteins of high-salt-adapted archaea, or halophiles, function differently. The sole histone protein encoded by the model halophilic species Halobacterium salinarum, HpyA, is nonessential and expressed at levels too low to enable genome-wide DNA packaging. Instead, HpyA mediates the transcriptional response to salt stress. Here we compare the features of genome-wide binding of HpyA to those of HstA, the sole histone of another model halophile, Haloferax volcanii. hstA, like hpyA, is a nonessential gene. To better understand HpyA and HstA functions, protein-DNA binding data (chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing [ChIP-seq]) of these halophilic histones are compared to publicly available ChIP-seq data from DNA binding proteins across all domains of life, including transcription factors (TFs), nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs), and histones. These analyses demonstrate that HpyA and HstA bind the genome infrequently in discrete regions, which is similar to TFs but unlike NAPs, which bind a much larger genomic fraction. However, unlike TFs that typically bind in intergenic regions, HpyA and HstA binding sites are located in both coding and intergenic regions. The genome-wide dinucleotide periodicity known to facilitate histone binding was undetectable in the genomes of both species. Instead, TF-like and histone-like binding sequence preferences were detected for HstA and HpyA, respectively. Taken together, these data suggest that halophilic archaeal histones are unlikely to facilitate genome-wide chromatin formation and that their function defies categorization as a TF, NAP, or histone. IMPORTANCE Most cells in eukaryotic species-from yeast to humans-possess histone proteins that pack and unpack DNA in response to environmental cues. These essential proteins regulate genes necessary for important cellular processes, including development and stress protection. Although the histone fold domain originated in the domain of life Archaea, the function of archaeal histone-like proteins is not well understood relative to those of eukaryotes. We recently discovered that, unlike histones of eukaryotes, histones in hypersaline-adapted archaeal species do not package DNA and can act as transcription factors (TFs) to regulate stress response gene expression. However, the function of histones across species of hypersaline-adapted archaea still remains unclear. Here, we compare hypersaline histone function to a variety of DNA binding proteins across the tree of life, revealing histone-like behavior in some respects and specific transcriptional regulatory function in others.

The Role of Archaeal Chromatin in Transcription

Genomic organization impacts accessibility and movement of information processing systems along DNA. DNA-bound proteins dynamically dictate gene expression and provide regulatory potential to tune transcription rates to match ever-changing environmental conditions. Archaeal genomes are typically small, circular, gene dense, and organized either by histone proteins that are homologous to their eukaryotic counterparts, or small basic proteins that function analogously to bacterial nucleoid proteins. We review here how archaeal genomes are organized and how such organization impacts archaeal gene expression, focusing on conserved DNA-binding proteins within the clade and the factors that are known to impact transcription initiation and elongation within protein-bound genomes.

TFS and Spt4/5 accelerate transcription through archaeal histone-based chromatin

RNA polymerase must surmount translocation barriers for continued transcription. In Eukarya and most Archaea, DNA-bound histone proteins represent the most common and troublesome barrier to transcription elongation. Eukaryotes encode a plethora of chromatin-remodeling complexes, histone-modification enzymes and transcription elongation factors to aid transcription through nucleosomes, while archaea seemingly lack machinery to remodel/modify histone-based chromatin and thus must rely on elongation factors to accelerate transcription through chromatin-barriers. TFS (TFIIS in Eukarya) and the Spt4-Spt5 complex are universally encoded in archaeal genomes, and here we demonstrate that both elongation factors, via different mechanisms, can accelerate transcription through archaeal histone-based chromatin. Histone proteins in Thermococcus kodakarensis are sufficiently abundant to completely wrap all genomic DNA, resulting in a consistent protein barrier to transcription elongation. TFS-enhanced cleavage of RNAs in backtracked transcription complexes reactivates stalled RNAPs and dramatically accelerates transcription through histone-barriers, while Spt4-Spt5 changes to clamp-domain dynamics play a lesser-role in stabilizing transcription. Repeated attempts to delete TFS, Spt4 and Spt5 from the T. kodakarensis genome were not successful, and the essentiality of both conserved transcription elongation factors suggests that both conserved elongation factors play important roles in transcription regulation in vivo, including mechanisms to accelerate transcription through downstream protein barriers.

Transcriptional repression: conserved and evolved features

The regulation of gene expression by transcriptional repression is an ancient and conserved mechanism that manifests itself in diverse ways. Here we summarize conserved pathways for transcriptional repression prevalent throughout all forms of life, as well as indirect mechanisms that appear to have originated in eukaryotes, consistent with the unique chromatin environment of eukaryotic genes. The direct interactions between transcriptional repressors and the core transcriptional machinery in bacteria and archaea are sufficient to generate a sophisticated suite of mechanisms that provide flexible control. These direct interactions contrast with the activity of corepressors, which provide an additional regulatory control in eukaryotes. Their modulation of chromatin structure represents an indirect pathway to downregulate transcription, and their diversity and modulation provide additional complexity suited to the requirements of elaborate eukaryotic repression patterns. New findings indicate that corepressors are not necessarily restricted to generating a single stereotypic output, but can rather exhibit diverse functional responses depending on the context in which they are recruited, providing a hitherto unsuspected additional source of diversity in transcriptional control. Mechanisms within eukaryotes appear to be highly conserved, with novel aspects chiefly represented by addition of lineage-specific corepressor scaffolds that provide additional opportunities for recruiting the same core machinery.

Histone variants--ancient wrap artists of the epigenome

Histones wrap DNA to form nucleosome particles that compact eukaryotic genomes. Variant histones have evolved crucial roles in chromosome segregation, transcriptional regulation, DNA repair, sperm packaging and other processes. 'Universal' histone variants emerged early in eukaryotic evolution and were later displaced for bulk packaging roles by the canonical histones (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4), the synthesis of which is coupled to DNA replication. Further specializations of histone variants have evolved in some lineages to perform additional tasks. Differences among histone variants in their stability, DNA wrapping, specialized domains that regulate access to DNA, and post-translational modifications, underlie the diverse functions that histones have acquired in evolution.

Nanoarchaeal origin of histone H3?

NEQ288, one of two archaeal histones in Nanoarchaeum equitans, has a unique four-residue insertion that closely resembles an insertion in the eukaryotic histone H3 lineage. NEQ288 bound DNA but did not compact DNA in vitro in the absence of NEQ348, the second N. equitans archaeal histone. The properties of NEQ288 suggest an intermediate between the archaeal and H3 histone lineages and an evolutionary step toward the now-mandatory assembly of eukaryotic histones into heterodimers.

Mutational analysis of genes encoding chromatin proteins in the archaeon Methanococcus voltae indicates their involvement in the regulation of gene expression

Several genes for chromatin proteins are known in Archaea. These include histones and histone-like proteins in Euryarchaeota, and a DNA binding protein, Alba, which was first detected in the crenarchaeote Sulfolobus solfataricus and is thought to be involved in transcriptional regulation. The methanogenic archaeon Methanococcus voltae harbors four genes coding for all these three types of chromatin proteins. Deletion mutants for the two histone genes ( hstAand hstB), the gene encoding the histone-like protein ( hmvA) and the gene for the Alba homologue ( albA) have now been constructed in this organism. Although all single mutants were viable, deletion of hstA resulted in slow growth. Two transcripts were detected for each of the two histone genes. These were expressed in different relative amounts, which were correlated with different growth phases. Cell extracts obtained from the different mutants exhibited altered protein patterns, as revealed by 2D gel electrophoresis, indicating that the chromatin proteins are involved in gene regulation in M. voltae.

Mutational analysis of differences in thermostability between histones from mesophilic and hyperthermophilic archaea

Amino acid residues responsible for the large difference in thermostability between HMfB and HFoB, archaeal histones from the hyperthermophile Methanothermus fervidus and the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, respectively, have been identified by site-specific mutagenesis. The thermal denaturation of approximately 70 archaeal histone variants has been monitored by circular dichroism, and the data generated were fit to a two-state unfolding model (dimer-->two random coil monomers) to obtain a standard-state (1M) melting temperature for each variant dimer. The results of single-, double-, and triple-residue substitutions reveal that the much higher stability of rHMfB dimers, relative to rHFoB dimers, is conferred predominantly by improved intermolecular hydrophobic interactions near the center of the histone dimer core and by additional favorable ion pairs on the dimer surface.