Archaeal histone stability, DNA binding, and transcription inhibition above 90 degrees C

DNA-bridging by an archaeal histone variant via a unique tetramerisation interface

In eukaryotes, histone paralogues form obligate heterodimers such as H3/H4 and H2A/H2B that assemble into octameric nucleosome particles. Archaeal histones are dimeric and assemble on DNA into 'hypernucleosome' particles of varying sizes with each dimer wrapping 30 bp of DNA. These are composed of canonical and variant histone paralogues, but the function of these variants is poorly understood. Here, we characterise the structure and function of the histone paralogue MJ1647 from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii that has a unique C-terminal extension enabling homotetramerisation. The 1.9 Å X-ray structure of a dimeric MJ1647 species, structural modelling of the tetramer, and site-directed mutagenesis reveal that the C-terminal tetramerization module consists of two alpha helices in a handshake arrangement. Unlike canonical histones, MJ1647 tetramers can bridge two DNA molecules in vitro. Using single-molecule tethered particle motion and DNA binding assays, we show that MJ1647 tetramers bind ~60 bp DNA and compact DNA in a highly cooperative manner. We furthermore show that MJ1647 effectively competes with the transcription machinery to block access to the promoter in vitro. To the best of our knowledge, MJ1647 is the first histone shown to have DNA bridging properties, which has important implications for genome structure and gene expression in archaea.

Growth temperature and chromatinization in archaea

DNA in cells is associated with proteins that constrain its structure and affect DNA-templated processes including transcription and replication. HU and histones are the main constituents of chromatin in bacteria and eukaryotes, respectively, with few exceptions. Archaea, in contrast, have diverse repertoires of nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs). To analyse the evolutionary and ecological drivers of this diversity, we combined a phylogenomic survey of known and predicted NAPs with quantitative proteomic data. We identify the Diaforarchaea as a hotbed of NAP gain and loss, and experimentally validate candidate NAPs in two members of this clade, Thermoplasma volcanium and Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis. Proteomic analysis across a diverse sample of 19 archaea revealed that NAP investment varies from <0.03% to >5% of total protein. This variation is predicted by growth temperature. We propose that high levels of chromatinization have evolved as a mechanism to prevent uncontrolled helix denaturation at higher temperatures, with implications for the origin of chromatin in both archaea and eukaryotes.

An archaeal histone-like protein regulates gene expression in response to salt stress

Histones, ubiquitous in eukaryotes as DNA-packing proteins, find their evolutionary origins in archaea. Unlike the characterized histone proteins of a number of methanogenic and themophilic archaea, previous research indicated that HpyA, the sole histone encoded in the model halophile Halobacterium salinarum, is not involved in DNA packaging. Instead, it was found to have widespread but subtle effects on gene expression and to maintain wild type cell morphology. However, the precise function of halophilic histone-like proteins remain unclear. Here we use quantitative phenotyping, genetics, and functional genomics to investigate HpyA function. These experiments revealed that HpyA is important for growth and rod-shaped morphology in reduced salinity. HpyA preferentially binds DNA at discrete genomic sites under low salt to regulate expression of ion uptake, particularly iron. HpyA also globally but indirectly activates other ion uptake and nucleotide biosynthesis pathways in a salt-dependent manner. Taken together, these results demonstrate an alternative function for an archaeal histone-like protein as a transcriptional regulator, with its function tuned to the physiological stressors of the hypersaline environment.

Chromatinization of Escherichia coli with archaeal histones

Nucleosomes restrict DNA accessibility throughout eukaryotic genomes, with repercussions for replication, transcription, and other DNA-templated processes. How this globally restrictive organization emerged during evolution remains poorly understood. Here, to better understand the challenges associated with establishing globally restrictive chromatin, we express histones in a naive system that has not evolved to deal with nucleosomal structures: Escherichia coli. We find that histone proteins from the archaeon Methanothermus fervidus assemble on the E. coli chromosome in vivo and protect DNA from micrococcal nuclease digestion, allowing us to map binding footprints genome-wide. We show that higher nucleosome occupancy at promoters is associated with lower transcript levels, consistent with local repressive effects. Surprisingly, however, this sudden enforced chromatinization has only mild repercussions for growth unless cells experience topological stress. Our results suggest that histones can become established as ubiquitous chromatin proteins without interfering critically with key DNA-templated processes.

The Role of Archaeal Chromatin in Transcription

Genomic organization impacts accessibility and movement of information processing systems along DNA. DNA-bound proteins dynamically dictate gene expression and provide regulatory potential to tune transcription rates to match ever-changing environmental conditions. Archaeal genomes are typically small, circular, gene dense, and organized either by histone proteins that are homologous to their eukaryotic counterparts, or small basic proteins that function analogously to bacterial nucleoid proteins. We review here how archaeal genomes are organized and how such organization impacts archaeal gene expression, focusing on conserved DNA-binding proteins within the clade and the factors that are known to impact transcription initiation and elongation within protein-bound genomes.

Transcription Regulation in Archaea

The known diversity of metabolic strategies and physiological adaptations of archaeal species to extreme environments is extraordinary. Accurate and responsive mechanisms to ensure that gene expression patterns match the needs of the cell necessitate regulatory strategies that control the activities and output of the archaeal transcription apparatus. Archaea are reliant on a single RNA polymerase for all transcription, and many of the known regulatory mechanisms employed for archaeal transcription mimic strategies also employed for eukaryotic and bacterial species. Novel mechanisms of transcription regulation have become apparent by increasingly sophisticated in vivo and in vitro investigations of archaeal species. This review emphasizes recent progress in understanding archaeal transcription regulatory mechanisms and highlights insights gained from studies of the influence of archaeal chromatin on transcription.

Growth-Phase-Specific Modulation of Cell Morphology and Gene Expression by an Archaeal Histone Protein

In all three domains of life, organisms use nonspecific DNA-binding proteins to compact and organize the genome as well as to regulate transcription on a global scale. Histone is the primary eukaryotic nucleoprotein, and its evolutionary roots can be traced to the archaea. However, not all archaea use this protein as the primary DNA-packaging component, raising questions regarding the role of histones in archaeal chromatin function. Here, quantitative phenotyping, transcriptomic, and proteomic assays were performed on deletion and overexpression mutants of the sole histone protein of the hypersaline-adapted haloarchaeal model organism Halobacterium salinarum. This protein is highly conserved among all sequenced haloarchaeal species and maintains hallmark residues required for eukaryotic histone functions. Surprisingly, despite this conservation at the sequence level, unlike in other archaea or eukaryotes, H. salinarum histone is required to regulate cell shape but is not necessary for survival. Genome-wide expression changes in histone deletion strains were global, significant but subtle in terms of fold change, bidirectional, and growth phase dependent. Mass spectrometric proteomic identification of proteins from chromatin enrichments yielded levels of histone and putative nucleoid-associated proteins similar to those of transcription factors, consistent with an open and transcriptionally active genome. Taken together, these data suggest that histone in H. salinarum plays a minor role in DNA compaction but important roles in growth-phase-dependent gene expression and regulation of cell shape. Histone function in haloarchaea more closely resembles a regulator of gene expression than a chromatin-organizing protein like canonical eukaryotic histone.

Histones comprise the major protein component of eukaryotic chromatin and are required for both genome packaging and global regulation of expression. The current paradigm maintains that archaea whose genes encode histone also use these proteins to package DNA. In contrast, here we demonstrate that the sole histone encoded in the genome of the salt-adapted archaeon Halobacterium salinarum is both unessential and unlikely to be involved in DNA compaction despite conservation of residues important for eukaryotic histones. Rather, H. salinarum histone is required for global regulation of gene expression and cell shape. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that H. salinarum histone, strongly conserved across all other known salt-adapted archaea, serves a novel role in gene regulation and cell shape maintenance. Given that archaea possess the ancestral form of eukaryotic histone, this study has important implications for understanding the evolution of histone function.

Mechanisms of Evolutionary Innovation Point to Genetic Control Logic as the Key Difference Between Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes

The evolution of life from the simplest, original form to complex, intelligent animal life occurred through a number of key innovations. Here we present a new tool to analyze these key innovations by proposing that the process of evolutionary innovation may follow one of three underlying processes, namely a Random Walk, a Critical Path, or a Many Paths process, and in some instances may also constitute a "Pull-up the Ladder" event. Our analysis is based on the occurrence of function in modern biology, rather than specific structure or mechanism. A function in modern biology may be classified in this way either on the basis of its evolution or the basis of its modern mechanism. Characterizing key innovations in this way helps identify the likelihood that an innovation could arise. In this paper, we describe the classification, and methods to classify functional features of modern organisms into these three classes based on the analysis of how a function is implemented in modern biology. We present the application of our categorization to the evolution of eukaryotic gene control. We use this approach to support the argument that there are few, and possibly no basic chemical differences between the functional constituents of the machinery of gene control between eukaryotes, bacteria and archaea. This suggests that the difference between eukaryotes and prokaryotes that allows the former to develop the complex genetic architecture seen in animals and plants is something other than their chemistry. We tentatively identify the difference as a difference in control logic, that prokaryotic genes are by default 'on' and eukaryotic genes are by default 'off.' The Many Paths evolutionary process suggests that, from a 'default off' starting point, the evolution of the genetic complexity of higher eukaryotes is a high probability event.

Chromatin structure and dynamics in hot environments: architectural proteins and DNA topoisomerases of thermophilic archaea

In all organisms of the three living domains (Bacteria, Archaea, Eucarya) chromosome-associated proteins play a key role in genome functional organization. They not only compact and shape the genome structure, but also regulate its dynamics, which is essential to allow complex genome functions. Elucidation of chromatin composition and regulation is a critical issue in biology, because of the intimate connection of chromatin with all the essential information processes (transcription, replication, recombination, and repair). Chromatin proteins include architectural proteins and DNA topoisomerases, which regulate genome structure and remodelling at two hierarchical levels. This review is focussed on architectural proteins and topoisomerases from hyperthermophilic Archaea. In these organisms, which live at high environmental temperature (>80 °C <113 °C), chromatin proteins and modulation of the DNA secondary structure are concerned with the problem of DNA stabilization against heat denaturation while maintaining its metabolic activity.

Transcriptional activation in the context of repression mediated by archaeal histones

Many archaea (including all the methanogens, nearly all euryarchaeotes, and some crenarchaeotes) use histones as components of the chromatin that compacts their genomes. The archaeal histones are homo- and heterodimers that pair on DNA to form tetrasomes (as the eukaryotic histones H3 and H4 do). The resulting DNA packaging is known to interfere with assembly of the archaeal transcription apparatus at promoters; the ability of transcriptional activation to function in repressive archaeal chromatin has not yet been explored in vitro. Using four of the Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (Mja) histones, we have examined activation of the model Mja rb2 transcription unit by the Mja transcriptional activator Ptr2 in this simplified-chromatin context. Using hydroxyl radical footprinting, we find that the Ptr2-specific rb2 upstream activating site is a preferred histone-localizing site that nucleates histone: DNA-binding radiating from the rb2 promoter. Nevertheless, Ptr2 competes effectively with histones for access to the rb2 promoter and most potently activates transcription in vitro at histone concentrations that extensively coat DNA and essentially silence basal transcription.

The Sac10b homolog in Methanococcus maripaludis binds DNA at specific sites

The Sac10b protein family, also known as Alba, is widely distributed in Archaea. Sac10b homologs in thermophilic Sulfolobus species are very abundant. They bind both DNA and RNA with high affinity and without sequence specificity, and their physiological functions are still not fully understood. Mma10b from the euryarchaeote Methanococcus maripaludis is a mesophilic member of the Sac10b family. Mma10b is not abundant and constitutes only approximately 0.01% of the total cellular protein. Disruption of mma10b resulted in poor growth of the mutant in minimal medium at near the optimal growth temperature but had no detectable effect on growth in rich medium. Quantitative proteomics, real time reverse transcription-PCR, and enzyme assays revealed that the expression levels of some genes involved in CO(2) assimilation and other activities were changed in the Deltamma10b mutant. Chromatin immunoprecipitation suggested a direct association of Mma10b with an 18-bp DNA binding motif in vivo. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays and DNase I footprinting confirmed that Mma10b preferentially binds specific sequences of DNA with an apparent Kd in the 100 nM range. These results suggested that the physiological role of Mma10b in the mesophilic methanococci is greatly diverged from that of homologs in thermophiles.

Archaeal transcriptional regulation – variation on a bacterial theme?

There is now an increasing body of data available on the DNA-binding properties of several putative transcriptional regulators in the Archaeal domain of life. The evidence points to simple models of promoter occlusion or facilitated recruitment of basal machinery for repressors and activators, respectively. However, little is known about the co-factor requirements, in vivo mechanisms and targets of many of these regulators. It is anticipated that the application of post-genomic technologies will begin to shed light on this fascinating area.

Thermoadaptation trait revealed by the genome sequence of thermophilic Geobacillus kaustophilus

We present herein the first complete genome sequence of a thermophilic Bacillus-related species, Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426, which is composed of a 3.54 Mb chromosome and a 47.9 kb plasmid, along with a comparative analysis with five other mesophilic bacillar genomes. Upon orthologous grouping of the six bacillar sequenced genomes, it was found that 1257 common orthologous groups composed of 1308 genes (37%) are shared by all the bacilli, whereas 839 genes (24%) in the G.kaustophilus genome were found to be unique to that species. We were able to find the first prokaryotic sperm protamine P1 homolog, polyamine synthase, polyamine ABC transporter and RNA methylase in the 839 unique genes; these may contribute to thermophily by stabilizing the nucleic acids. Contrasting results were obtained from the principal component analysis (PCA) of the amino acid composition and synonymous codon usage for highlighting the thermophilic signature of the G.kaustophilus genome. Only in the PCA of the amino acid composition were the Bacillus-related species located near, but were distinguishable from, the borderline distinguishing thermophiles from mesophiles on the second principal axis. Further analysis revealed some asymmetric amino acid substitutions between the thermophiles and the mesophiles, which are possibly associated with the thermoadaptation of the organism.

Transcription by an archaeal RNA polymerase is slowed but not blocked by an archaeal nucleosome

Archaeal RNA polymerases (RNAPs) are closely related to eukaryotic RNAPs, and in Euryarchaea, genomic DNA is wrapped and compacted by histones into archaeal nucleosomes. In eukaryotes, transcription of DNA bound into nucleosomes is facilitated by histone tail modifications and chromatin remodeling complexes, but archaeal histones do not have histone tails and archaeal genome sequences provide no evidence for archaeal homologs of eukaryotic chromatin remodeling complexes. We have therefore investigated the ability of an archaeal RNAP, purified from Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus, to transcribe DNA bound into an archaeal nucleosome by HMtA2, an archaeal histone from M. thermautotrophicus. To do so, we constructed a template that allows transcript elongation to be separated from transcription initiation, on which archaeal nucleosome assembly is positioned downstream from the site of transcription initiation. At 58 degrees C, in the absence of an archaeal nucleosome, M. thermautotrophicus RNAP transcribed this template DNA at a rate of approximately 20 nucleotides per second. With an archaeal nucleosome present, transcript elongation was slowed but not blocked, with transcription pausing at sites before and within the archaeal nucleosome. With additional HMtA2 binding, complexes were obtained that also incorporated the upstream regulatory region. This inhibited transcription presumably by preventing archaeal TATA-box binding protein, general transcription factor TFB, and RNAP access and thus inhibiting transcription initiation.

Physical and functional interaction of the archaeal single-stranded DNA-binding protein SSB with RNA polymerase

Archaeal transcription utilizes a complex multisubunit RNA polymerase and the basal transcription factors TBP and TF(II)B, closely resembling its eukaryal counterpart. We have uncovered a tight physical and functional interaction between RNA polymerase and the single-stranded DNA-binding protein SSB in Sulfolobus solfataricus. SSB stimulates transcription from promoters in vitro under TBP-limiting conditions and supports transcription in the absence of TBP. SSB also rescues transcription from repression by reconstituted chromatin. We demonstrate the potential for promoter melting by SSB, suggesting a plausible basis for the stimulation of transcription. This stimulation requires both the single-stranded DNA-binding domain and the acidic C-terminal tail of the SSB. The tail forms a stable interaction with RNA polymerase. These data reveal an unexpected role for single-stranded DNA-binding proteins in transcription in archaea.

Archaeal chromatin and transcription

Archaea contain a variety of sequence-independent DNA binding proteins consistent with the evolution of several different, sometimes overlapping and exchangeable solutions to the problem of genome compaction. Some of these proteins undergo residue-specific post-translational lysine acetylation or methylation, hinting at analogues of the histone modifications that regulate eukaryotic chromatin structure and transcription. Archaeal transcription initiation most closely resembles the eukaryotic RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) system, but Archaea do not appear to have homologues of the multisubunit complexes that remodel eukaryotic chromatin and activate RNAPII initiation. In contrast, they have sequence-specific regulators that repress and perhaps activate archaeal transcription by mechanisms superficially similar to the bacterial paradigm of regulating promoter binding by RNAP. Repressors compete with archaeal TATA-box binding protein (TBP) and TFB for the TATA-box and TFB-recognition elements (BRE) of the archaeal promoter, or with archaeal RNAP for the site of transcription initiation. Transcript-specific regulation by repressors binding to sites of transcript initiation is consistent with such sites having very little sequence conservation. However, most Archaea have only one TBP and/or TFB that presumably must therefore bind to similar TATA-box and BRE sequences upstream of most genes. Repressors that function by competing with TBP and/or TFB binding must therefore also make additional contacts with transcript-specific regulatory sites adjacent or remote from the TATA-box/BRE region. The fate of the archaeal TBP and TFB following transcription initiation remains to be determined. Based on functional homology with their eukaryotic RNAPII-system counterparts, archaeal TBP and possibly also TFB should remain bound to the TATA-box/BRE region after transcription initiation. However, this seems unlikely as it might limit repressor competition at this site to only the first round of transcription initiation.

Activation of archaeal transcription by recruitment of the TATA-binding protein

The hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii encodes two putative transcription regulators, Ptr1 and Ptr2, that are members of the Lrp/AsnC family of bacterial transcription regulators. In contrast, this archaeon's RNA polymerase and core transcription factors are of eukaryotic type. Using the M. jannaschii high-temperature in vitro transcription system, we show that Ptr2 is a potent transcriptional activator, and that it conveys its stimulatory effects on its cognate eukaryal-type transcription machinery from an upstream activating region composed of two Ptr2-binding sites. Transcriptional activation is generated, at least in part, by Ptr2-mediated recruitment of the TATA-binding protein to the promoter.

Holding it together: chromatin in the Archaea

Recently, several advances have been made in the understanding of the form and function of archaeal chromatin. Remarkable parallels can be drawn between the structure and modification of chromatin components in the archaeal and the eukaryotic domains of life. Indeed, it now appears that key components of the hugely complex eukaryotic chromatin regulatory machinery were established before the divergence of the archaeal and eukaryotic lineages.

Mechanism and regulation of transcription in archaea

The archaeal basal transcription machinery resembles the core components of the eucaryal RNA polymerase II apparatus. Thus, studies of the archaeal basal machinery over the last few years have shed light on fundamentally conserved aspects of the mechanisms of transcription pre-initiation complex assembly in both eucarya and archaea. Intriguingly, it has become increasingly apparent that regulators of archaeal transcription resemble regulators initially identified in bacteria. The presence of these shared bacterial-archaeal regulators has given insight into the evolution of gene regulatory processes in all three domains of life.

The archaeal TFIIEalpha homologue facilitates transcription initiation by enhancing TATA-box recognition

Transcription from many archaeal promoters can be reconstituted in vitro using recombinant TATA-box binding protein (TBP) and transcription factor B (TFB)--homologues of eukaryal TBP and TFIIB--together with purified RNA polymerase (RNAP). However, all archaeal genomes sequenced to date reveal the presence of TFE, a homologue of the alpha-subunit of the eukaryal general transcription factor, TFIIE. We show that, while TFE is not absolutely required for transcription in the reconstituted in vitro system, it nonetheless plays a stimulatory role on some promoters and under certain conditions. Mutagenesis of the TATA box or reduction of TBP concentration in transcription reactions sensitizes a promoter to TFE addition. Conversely, saturating reactions with TBP de-sensitizes promoters to TFE. These results suggest that TFE facilitates or stabilizes interactions between TBP and the TATA box.

Ecologic genomics of DNA: upstream bending in prokaryotic promoters

After our analysis of the distribution of predicted intrinsic curvature along all available complete prokaryotic genomes, the genomes were divided into two groups. Curvature distribution in all prokaryotes of the first group indicated a substantial fraction of promoters characterized by intrinsic DNA curvature located within or upstream of the promoter region. We did not find this peculiar DNA curvature distribution in prokaryotes in the second group. Remarkably, all bacteria of the first group were mesophilic, whereas many prokaryotes of the second group were hyperthermophilic. We hypothesize that DNA curvature plays a biologic role in gene regulation in mesophilic as opposed to hyperthermophilic prokaryotes, i.e., DNA curvature presumably has a functional adaptive significance determined by temperature selection.

Growth phase-dependent expression and degradation of histones in the thermophilic archaeon Thermococcus zilligii

HTz is a member of the archaeal histone family. The archaeal histones have primary sequences and structural similarity to the eukaryal histone fold domain, and are thought to resemble the archetypal ancestor of the eukaryal nucleosome core histones. The effects of growth phase on the total soluble proteins from Thermococcus zilligii, isolated after various stages of growth from mid-logarithmic to late stationary phase, were examined by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. On entry into stationary phase, at least 11 proteins were detected that changed considerably in level. One of these proteins was identified by Western hybridization as HTz. The level of HTz decreased dramatically as cells entered stationary phase, and it could not be detected by late stationary phase. Unexpectedly, the Western hybridization detected a second protein, with an estimated molecular mass of approximately 14 kDa, which paralleled the decrease in level of HTz. Native purified HTz was shown to retain complete activity after prolonged incubation at the growth temperature of the organism, suggesting that the decrease in HTz was a specific cell-regulated process. Analysis of native purified HTz by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry revealed the molecular masses of HTz1 and HTz2 to be 7204 +/- 3 Da and 7016 +/- 3 Da respectively. The only non-covalent species that was detected corresponded to the molecular mass of an HTz1-HTz2 heterodimer. Northern analyses of T. zilligii total RNA with an htz1 gene probe indicated a rapid decrease in expression of htz1 with progression of the growth phase, and complete repression of htz1 transcript synthesis by late logarithmic phase. Three proteins that changed in level with growth phase were identified by N-terminal sequence analysis. The first was homologous to a hypothetical protein conserved in all Archaea sequenced to date, the second to the Sac10b family of archaeal DNA-binding proteins and the third to the C-terminal region of the leucine-responsive regulatory family of DNA-binding proteins (LRPs).

Negative constrained DNA supercoiling in archaeal nucleosomes

Archaeal histones have significant sequence and structural similarity to their eukaryal counterparts. However, whereas DNA is wrapped in negatively constrained supercoils in eukaryal nucleosomes, it has been reported that DNA is positively supercoiled by archaeal nucleosomes. This was inferred from experiments performed at low temperature and low salt concentrations, conditions markedly different from those expected for many archaea in vivo. Here, we report that the archaeal histones HMf and HTz wrap DNA in negatively constrained supercoils in buffers containing potassium glutamate (K-Glu) above 300 mM, either at 37 degrees C or at 70 degrees C. This suggests that high salt concentrations allow an alternate archaeal nucleosome topology: a left-handed tetramer rather than the right-handed tetramer seen in low salt conditions. In contrast, the archaeal histone MkaH produces DNA negative supercoiling at all salt concentrations, suggesting that this duality of structure is not possible for this atypical protein, which is formed by the association of two histone folds in a single polypeptide. These results extend the already remarkable similarity between archaeal and eukaryal nucleosomes, as it has been recently shown that DNA can be wrapped into either positive or negative supercoils around the H3/H4 tetramer. Negative supercoiling could correspond to the predominant physiological mode of DNA supercoiling in archaeal nucleosomes.

Thermophilic and halophilic extremophiles

The microbiology of extremely hot or saline habitats is a fast moving field with many new successes in the enrichment and isolation of new organisms and in an understanding of molecular factors that impart stability on thermostable and halophilic biomolecules. The results of these studies have shed new light on our understanding of prokaryotic diversity and structural biochemistry.

Analysis of DNA compaction profile and intracellular contents of archaeal histones from Pyrococcus kodakaraensis KOD1

Two histone genes, hpkA and hpkB, from hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 strain were cloned, sequenced, and expressed in Escherichia coli cells. Both hpkA and hpkB genes encoded a protein of 67 amino acids, however they possessed the different molecular weight (HpkA, 7,378:HpkB, 7,167). Deduced amino acid sequences of HpkA and HpkB were homologous to other archaeal histones and eucaryal core histones (H2A, H4). Gel mobility shift assays by purified proteins demonstrated that HpkB possessed higher affinity to DNA and more extensive ability to compact DNA than HpkA. HpkB prevented double stranded DNA from thermal denaturation in less amount than HpkA in vitro. In order to investigate intracellular contents of HpkA and HpkB in KOD1 cells, immunoblot analysis was performed by using anti-HpkA antisera obtained from immunized BALB/c mice, showing that HpkA was less abundantly expressed than HpkB in KOD1 cells. These results suggest that HpkB plays a major role to protect double stranded DNA from thermal denaturation in vivo.

NMR structure and comparison of the archaeal histone HFoB from the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum with HMfB from the hyperthermophile Methanothermus fervidus

The solution-state structure of the recombinant archaeal histone rHFoB, from the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, has been determined by two- and three-dimensional (3D) proton homonuclear correlated nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods. On the basis of 951 nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE)-derived distance restraints, rHFoB monomers form the histone fold and assemble into symmetric (rHFoB)2 dimers that have a structure consistent with assembly into archaeal nucleosomes. rHFoB exhibits approximately 78% sequence homology with rHMfB from the hyperthermophile Methanothermus fervidus, and the results obtained demonstrate that these two proteins have very similar 3D structures, with a root-mean-square deviation for backbone atoms of 0.65 +/- 0.13 A2. (rHFoB)2 dimers however unfold at lower temperatures and require a higher salt environment for stability than (rHMfB)2 dimers, and comparing the structures, we predict that these differences result from unfavorable surface-located ionic interactions and a larger, more solvent-accessible cavity adjacent to residue G36 in the hydrophobic core of (rHFoB)2.

Thermodynamic stability of archaeal histones

The temperature, salt, and pH dependencies of unfolding of four recombinant (r) archaeal histones (rHFoB from the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, and rHMfA, rHMfB, and rHPyA1 from the hyperthermophiles Methanothermus fervidus and Pyrococcus strain GB-3a) have been determined by circular dichroism spectroscopy (CD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The thermal unfolding of these proteins is > 90% reversible, with concentration-dependent apparent Tm values and asymmetric unfolding transitions that are fit well by a two-state unfolding model in which a histone dimer unfolds to two random coil monomers. rHPyA1 dimers are stable in the absence of salt, whereas rHMfA, rHMfB, and rHFoB dimers unfold at 20 degrees C and pH 2 in solutions containing < 200 mM, < 400 mM, and < 1.5 M KCl, respectively. rHMfA, rHMfB, and rHFoB also experience significant cold denaturation in low salt concentrations and at low pH. The midpoint of thermal unfolding of a 1 M protein solution (T degree value) and the temperature dependency of the free energy of unfolding have been established for each histone, and both parameters correlate with the growth temperature of the originating archaeon. The changes in heat capacity upon unfolding are similar for the four histones, indicating that enhanced thermostability is not obtained by altering the curvature of the stability curve. Rather, the stability curves for the histones from the hyperthermophiles are displaced vertically to higher energies and laterally to higher Tmax values relative to the stability curve for rHFoB. The maximal free energies of unfolding for rHFoB, rHMfA, rHMfB, and rHPyA1 are 7.2, 15.5, 14.6, and 17.2 kcal/mol at 32, 35, 40, and 44 degrees C, respectively. T degree values for rHFoB, rHMfA, rHMfB, and rHPyA1 are 75, 104, 113, and 114 degrees C, respectively, at pH 5 in 0.2 M KCl. Structural features within the conserved histone fold that might confer these stability differences are discussed.