Assessing aesthetic outcomes after trigonocephaly correction

CranioRate: An Image-Based, Deep-Phenotyping Analysis Toolset and Online Clinician Interface for Metopic Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and management of metopic craniosynostosis involve subjective decision-making at the point of care. The purpose of this work was to describe a quantitative severity metric and point-of-care user interface to aid clinicians in the management of metopic craniosynostosis and to provide a platform for future research through deep phenotyping.

METHODS

Two machine-learning algorithms were developed that quantify the severity of craniosynostosis-a supervised model specific to metopic craniosynostosis [Metopic Severity Score (MSS)] and an unsupervised model used for cranial morphology in general [Cranial Morphology Deviation (CMD)]. Computed tomographic (CT) images from multiple institutions were compiled to establish the spectrum of severity, and a point-of-care tool was developed and validated.

RESULTS

Over the study period (2019 to 2021), 254 patients with metopic craniosynostosis and 92 control patients who underwent CT scanning between the ages of 6 and 18 months were included. CT scans were processed using an unsupervised machine-learning based dysmorphology quantification tool, CranioRate. The average MSS was 0.0 ± 1.0 for normal controls and 4.9 ± 2.3 ( P < 0.001) for those with metopic synostosis. The average CMD was 85.2 ± 19.2 for normal controls and 189.9 ± 43.4 ( P < 0.001) for those with metopic synostosis. A point-of-care user interface (craniorate.org) has processed 46 CT images from 10 institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

The resulting quantification of severity using MSS and CMD has shown an improved capacity, relative to conventional measures, to automatically classify normal controls versus patients with metopic synostosis. The authors have mathematically described, in an objective and quantifiable manner, the distribution of phenotypes in metopic craniosynostosis.

A Suture-specific Photo Score for Metopic Synostosis

Head shape assessments in children with metopic synostosis are a relevant outcome measure in addition to functional measures, such as neurocognitive outcomes, behavioral outcomes, and visual functioning outcomes. However, consensus on head shape assessments in children with metopic synostosis is lacking. The aim of this study is to develop a reproducible and reliable suture-specific photo score that can be used for cross-center comparison of phenotypical severity of metopic synostosis and evaluation of esthetic outcome of treatment later in childhood. We conducted a retrospective study among nonsyndromic metopic synostosis patients aged <18 years. Preoperative and postoperative photosets of patients with metopic synostosis from 6 expert centers were included. The photo score was discussed in the group of expert craniofacial plastic surgeons and pediatric neurosurgeons. Interrater reliability was determined with modified weighted Fleiss' kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients. Correlation between individual photo score items with overall phenotype was assessed using Spearman correlation analyses. The metopic synostosis photo score contained the following items: "wedging of the forehead", "hypotelorism", "temporal hollowing", "biparietal widening,"and an assessment of "overall phenotype". Items were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from normal to severe. We found moderate interrater reliability for all items, but substantial agreement for the summed scores. Correlation with overall phenotype was lowest for biparietal widening. To conclude, although agreement on individual photo score items was suboptimal, the agreement on the summed score was substantial, which indicates there is consensus on the overall severity of the metopic synostosis phenotype.

The Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Classification of Craniofacial Deformities

Positional cranial deformities are a common finding in toddlers, yet differentiation from craniosynostosis can be challenging. The aim of this study was to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify craniofacial deformities based on 2D images generated using photogrammetry as a radiation-free imaging technique. A total of 487 patients with photogrammetry scans were included in this retrospective cohort study: children with craniosynostosis (n = 227), positional deformities (n = 206), and healthy children (n = 54). Three two-dimensional images were extracted from each photogrammetry scan. The datasets were divided into training, validation, and test sets. During the training, fine-tuned ResNet-152s were utilized. The performance was quantified using tenfold cross-validation. For the detection of craniosynostosis, sensitivity was at 0.94 with a specificity of 0.85. Regarding the differentiation of the five existing classes (trigonocephaly, scaphocephaly, positional plagiocephaly left, positional plagiocephaly right, and healthy), sensitivity ranged from 0.45 (positional plagiocephaly left) to 0.95 (scaphocephaly) and specificity ranged from 0.87 (positional plagiocephaly right) to 0.97 (scaphocephaly). We present a CNN-based approach to classify craniofacial deformities on two-dimensional images with promising results. A larger dataset would be required to identify rarer forms of craniosynostosis as well. The chosen 2D approach enables future applications for digital cameras or smartphones.

Aesthetic results in children with single suture craniosynostosis: proposal for a modified Whitaker classification

OBJECTIVE

Aesthetic assessment after surgery for non-syndromic single suture craniosynostosis (SSC) is crucial. Surgeons' evaluation is generally based on Whitaker classification, while parental impression is generally neglected. The aim of this paper is to compare aesthetic perceptions of parents and surgeons after surgery for SSC, expressed by a 10-item questionnaire that complement Whitaker's classification.

METHODS

The authors submitted a 10-item questionnaire integrating Whitaker's classification in order to evaluate the degree of satisfaction, the detailed aesthetics results and the need for surgical revision, to surgeons and parents of a consecutive series of patients operated for SSC between January 2007 and December 2018. The results were collected blindly.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were included in the study. Scaphocephaly and trigonocephaly were the two most frequent craniosynostosis. Parents and surgeons general aesthetics evaluation and average rating for Whitaker's classification were 1.86 vs 1.67 (p = 0.69) and 1.19 vs 1.1 (p = 0.45) respectively. Parents' evaluation for scar perception and alopecia (p < 0.00001), the presence of bony crest (0.002), bony bump (p < 0.00001), or other bone irregularities (p = 0.02) are significantly worse when compared to surgeons' perception.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents seem to be more sensitive to the detection of some aesthetic anomalies and their opinion should not be neglected. The authors propose a modified Whitaker classification based on their results to better stratify the aesthetic outcome after surgery for SSC.

Do standard surgical techniques lead to satisfying aesthetic results in nonsyndromic sagittal suture synostosis?

OBJECTIVE

Surgical correction of synostotic cranial sutures is typically performed early in an affected child's life. Depending on the severity of the cranial synostoses, different aspects of the surgical treatment may have varying degrees of importance. In this sense, the aesthetic appearance in children with normal neurological development in single-suture synostosis plays an important role in self-perception and social acceptance for both the patients themselves and their caregivers. Therefore, in this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the aesthetic outcome after surgical correction in a cohort of patients with nonsyndromic sagittal suture synostosis.

METHODS

Between December 2002 and December 2019, a total of 99 patients underwent surgical correction of a synostotic sagittal suture at the Medical University of Vienna. Depending on their age, patients underwent either an extended midline strip craniectomy (EMSC) (< 4 months) or a modified pi procedure (MPP) (≥ 4 months). After the surgical procedure, the outcome was evaluated by the treating neurosurgeon at 1- and 12-month follow-up visits, and after approximately 5 years, before the patient entered elementary school. In addition to that, the patients' caregivers were asked to evaluate the aesthetic outcome of the surgical procedure after 12 months. These results were then compared to evaluate potential differences in the perception of the surgical outcome.

RESULTS

After 12 months, the majority of the included patients were evaluated as having a good aesthetic outcome by the treating neurosurgeon (97%) and by their caregivers (89%). These differences did not show statistical significance (p = 0.11). Similarly, no differences in the aesthetic outcome depending on the surgical procedure performed could be found (p = 0.55). At the last follow-up visit, before entering elementary school, all available patients had an excellent or good surgical outcome. Moreover, the majority of caregivers (73%) reported that their child had a normal head shape appearance after surgical correction.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study have suggested that surgical correction of sagittal suture synostosis by simple operative techniques leads to a good aesthetic outcome and a normal head shape appearance in the majority of patients. An analysis of the evaluation of the surgical outcome by either the treating neurosurgeon or the patient caregivers showed comparable results and, thus, early intervention with simple surgical techniques can be recommended.

Photogrammetric evaluation of corrective surgery for trigonocephaly

The aim of this study was to capture preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up head shapes of male trigonocephaly patients who underwent fronto-orbital remodelling (FOR), using three-dimensional (3D) photography. Fifty-seven male infants with metopic synostosis operated on using standardized FOR during a 5-year period were included. All measurements were compared with those of an age-matched healthy control cohort (n = 253 for early postoperative comparison, n = 43 for the 1-year follow-up comparison) to determine the effect of FOR at 14 days and at 1 year post-surgery. Intracranial volume, frontal angle, nasofrontal angle, interfrontoparietal-interparietal ratio, and inter-orbital distances were measured 1 day preoperatively, 14 days and 1 year postoperatively. Mean age at surgery was 9.7 ± 1.1 months. Prior to surgery, boys with metopic synostosis showed a reduced intracranial volume (-7.0%, P < 0.001), frontal angle (-10.2%, P < 0.001), interfrontoparietal-interparietal ratio (-4.9%, P < 0.01), and orbital distances (-6.5%, P < 0.001) compared to the reference group, but values did not differ significantly from the specific control group after surgery (all P> 0.05). This was consistent by the time of the follow-up examination. Corrective surgery should therefore aim to achieve volume expansion and correction of the deformity. Furthermore, 3D photogrammetry provides a valuable alternative to computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of metopic synostosis, significantly reducing the amount of radiation exposure to the brain.

Commissuroplasty for macrostomia: surgical technique and long-term aesthetic and functional results assessment

BACKGROUND

Macrostomia or lateral cleft lip is a rare congenital deformity. In this article we describe a surgical technique of macrostomia repair developed. The objective of this article is to assess the results of our surgical technique and to validate a method for macrostomia surgical result evaluation.

METHODS

We included retrospectively patients with unilateral and bilateral macrostomia, operated from 1995 to 2014 in our department. First part of the study was a satisfaction questionnaire completed by patients. The second part was subjective evaluation of frontal photography (closed mouth, wide open and smiling) by surgeons and lay people with a questionnaire. Both group completed a second questionnaire within one to six months.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients answered the questionnaire. The satisfaction for all patients were considered as very good for 38.9% (n = 7) of patients and good for 44.4% (n = 8). 21 patients were photographed, 5 isolated macrostomia, 13 macrostomia with minor facial asymmetry and 3 with a major asymmetry. Surgeons evaluated the result as very good for isolated macrostomia and good for syndromic macrostomia. Layperson evaluated the result as good in isolated macrostomia and macrostomia with minor facial asymmetry and average with major facial asymmetry. P < 0.0001. The evolution of the results between medical and non-medical assessors in our two questionnaires, were non-significant.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we propose a new methodology to assess commissuroplasty surgical results, with a 3 type of evaluator: patients, surgeons and laypeople. We present a simple surgical technique, that allows good results in syndromic and isolated macrostomia.

Clinical and aesthetic outcome analysis of a case series of trigonocephaly patients after early fronto-orbital advancement

The timing of operation for trigonocephaly is recommended before the age of 1 year. To evaluate the outcome of a consecutive series operated in a single centre, the current study was performed. The study cohort comprised a retrospective single-centre series of 20 patients with trigonocephaly operated before the age of 12 months. Intra- and postoperative clinical data, as well as aesthetic outcome measured by two-dimensional asymmetry index (2D AI) and correction of the curvature on lateral and pictures from above were evaluated. Furthermore, to evaluate postoperative aesthetic outcome, a new classification (Grades I-IV) was proposed. The mean age of the cohort was 7.9 months. 2D AI changed from 0.049 pre- to 0.03 postoperatively (P=0.165). The correction of the curvature in lateral pictures yielded a significant change on postoperative pictures (P=0.002) as well as on pictures from above. Using the proposed classification, 16/20 (80%) patients had a postoperative outcome of Grade I, 4/20 (20%) Grade II. In patients operated before the age of 12 months an excellent (Grade I, AI <0.03) or good aesthetic (Grade II, adequate parents' or surgeon's opinion) result could be reached in all patients.

Statistical shape analyses of trigonocephaly patients

PURPOSE

Surgery is the first treatment option for patients with metopic craniosynostosis. Fronto-orbital advancement is the preferred method for correction of isolated trigonocephaly, but it is hard to understand whether surgery has been successful mainly in an early period. We aim to investigate the shape differences in the head shapes of trigonocephaly patients compared between preoperative and postoperative term.

METHODS

Cranial shape data were collected from the two-dimensional digital images. The Generalized Procrustes analysis was used to obtain mean shapes of the preoperative and postoperative term. The shape deformation of the frontal calvarium from preoperative to the postoperative term was evaluated using the thin-plate spline (TPS) method.

RESULTS

There was significant cranial shape difference between preoperative and postoperative term. The high-level deformations for preoperative to postoperative term determined seen in TPS graphic. Highest deformation was observed at the bifrontal dimension especially at nasion and posterior edge of the forehead.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we showed that the shape difference and structural deformation of the calvarium were correlated with the metopic craniosynostosis. The present study also shows that preoperative and postoperative head shapes of patients with trigonocephaly can be compared using the landmark-based geometrical morphometric method by taking into consideration the topographic distribution.