Efficacy of auriculotherapy in the control of pain, edema, and trismus following surgical extraction of the lower third molars: a split-mouth, randomized, placebo-controlled, and triple-blind study

Acupuncture relieves postoperative pain of mixed hemorrhoids through the P2X7/ERK axis in dorsal root ganglion

Haemorrhoids are a common anorectal disease primarily treated through surgery, often leading to complications such as pain. The efficacy of acupuncture in relieving postoperative pain in mixed haemorrhoids has not been well-documented. This study included 90 patients undergoing haemorrhoid surgery and their Visual Analogue Score (VAS), inflammatory factor levels, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), and analgesic drug use were accessed. A rat incisional pain model was also constructed to monitor behavioral responses, with assessments including Sucrose Preference Test (SPT) and Open Field Test (OFT). The levels of ATP and proinflammatory cytokines in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) were measured using luciferase assay and ELISA. We also examined P2×7 and ERK1/2 levels in DRG tissues of anal incisional pain rat model. In a Chronic Constriction Injury (CCI) rat model treated with BzATP, a potent agonist for P2×7 receptors, followed by acupuncture for 15 days, postoperative pain and behavioral responses were observed and assessed, alongside mechanistic studies of ATP and inflammatory factors in DRG tissues. Patients receiving acupuncture had significantly lower VAS scores, reduced levels of inflammatory factors, improved depression scores, and decreased analgesic drug use. In the animal model, acupuncture increased pain thresholds, improved behavioral responses, reduced ATP content and inflammatory factors, and modulated the P2×7/ERK axis. In the CCI model, BzATP increased P2×7 and ERK1/2 levels, pain sensitivity, and anxiety, which were mitigated by acupuncture. Our data suggest that acupuncture significantly alleviates postoperative pain following haemorrhoid surgery and modulates the pain response through the P2×7/ERK axis.

What is the most effective method for reducing pain during debonding procedures? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the most effective methods in controlling pain during debonding procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic searches in published and unpublished studies were performed. Restricted to the English language and publication date up to 23/3/2024, the searches in published literature covered the following databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Tripe, Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed Central. However, unpublished literature was searched at ClinicalTrials.gov, National Research Register, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Lists of all eligible studies were checked for further scrutiny. Risk of bias for randomized and non-randomized control trials was assessed using ROB2 and ROBINS Cochrane tools.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs and two non-RCTs were included. All the reviewed articles studied the pain during debonding events and included 886 patients aged between 12-65. They used different scales such as VAS, NRS, Wong-Baker faces, and others scales. Two studies have shown that the lift-off plier causes less pain than other pliers when comparing different types of dental instruments. However, when comparing different adjunctive techniques, two studies have found that using a wafer causes less pain, while two studies have reported no significant difference between methods and one study has found that using finger pressure causes less pain. In addition, three separate studies have found that utilizing an ultrasonic device, as well as a thermal device and laser radiation, can lead to lower pain scores. Furthermore, two studies have demonstrated that using medication has a positive impact on reducing pain.

CONCLUSIONS

According to reported evidence, applying finger pressure is more effective in relieving pain in the anterior teeth, while wafer biting is more effective in the posterior teeth. Pain-relieving medications like paracetamol or ibuprofen can also effectively reduce debonding pain. Promising procedures, such as using diode or Er-YAG lasers, and thermal devices, may also be effective, but further studies are needed to confirm their efficacy. The protocol of this systematic review was registered with the PROSPERO International Database under ID number CRD42024529190. This review follows the guidelines established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and the instructions provided in the Cochrane Handbook.

Acupuncture as a Complementary Treatment Modality in the Post-Anesthesia Care Setting: A Feasibility Study

Introduction: Postoperative pain management and postoperative nausea and vomiting are a persistent challenge for both health care providers and patients. Acupuncture is an effective and safe modality for the management of pain and nausea, and has the potential to play a key role in postoperative pain management. This study explores the utility and feasibility of acupuncture in the immediate postoperative setting. Methods: In a retrospective case-control study, 22 patients who underwent elective surgeries and received acupuncture in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were compared with 88 case controls. Indications for acupuncture therapy included persistent pain, nausea, or anxiety. Patient satisfaction and symptom improvement after acupuncture were assessed. PACU nurses and patients were queried on their perspectives on using this therapy. Demographic data, perioperative opioid consumption, pain score in the PACU, incidence of postoperative nausea, PACU length of stay, and unintended hospital admission were assessed. The groups with/without acupuncture were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Results: A total of 78.9% of patients receiving acupuncture felt improvement in their symptoms. 94.7% of recovery nurses who cared for patients who received acupuncture felt that it was helpful and 78.9% did not believe it was disruptive. Patients who opted for acupuncture had a statistically significant higher overall median (interquartile range) pain score in the PACU (7.0 [5.2, 9.5] vs. 5.0 [3.0, 7.0], p = 0.009) and higher postoperative opioid consumption (22.5 [9.8, 44.8] vs. 15.0 [0.0, 30.0], p = 0. 03). There was no difference between total perioperative opioid consumption between groups (p = 0.94). Conclusions: Most patients who received acupuncture therapy in the PACU were satisfied with their therapy and would recommend it to future patients undergoing surgery. Most recovery nurses felt it was helpful, was not disruptive, and would like to see it utilized in the PACU.