BRAF V600E-mutated diffuse glioma in an adult patient: a case report and review

Comprehensive molecular characterization of long-term glioblastoma survivors

Fewer than 5 % glioblastoma (GBM) patients survive over five years and are termed long-term survivors (LTS), yet their molecular background is unclear. The present cohort included 72 isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GBM patients, consisting of 35 LTS and 37 short-term survivors (STS), and we employed whole exome sequencing, RNA-seq and DNA methylation array to delineate this largest LTS cohort to date. Although LTS and STS demonstrated analogous clinical characters and classical GBM biomarkers, CASC5 (P = 0.002) and SPEN (P = 0.013) mutations were enriched in LTS, whereas gene-to-gene fusions were concentrated in STS (P = 0.007). Importantly, LTS exhibited higher tumor mutation burden (P < 0.001) and copy number (CN) increase (P = 0.013), but lower mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity score (P < 0.001) and CN decrease (P = 0.026). Additionally, LTS demonstrated hypermethylated genome (P < 0.001) relative to STS. Differentially expressed and methylated genes both enriched in olfactory transduction. Further, analysis of the tumor microenvironment revealed higher infiltration of M1 macrophages (P = 0.043), B cells (P = 0.016), class-switched memory B cells (P = 0.002), central memory CD4+ T cells (P = 0.031) and CD4+ Th1 cells (P = 0.005) in LTS. We also separately analyzed a subset of patients who were methylation class-defined GBM, contributing 70.8 % of the entire cohort, and obtained similar results relative to prior analyses. Finally, we demonstrated that LTS and STS could be distinguished using a subset of molecular features. Taken together, the present study delineated unique molecular attributes of LTS GBM.

Analysis of Histomorphologic/Molecular Association and Immune Checkpoint Regulators in Epithelioid Glioblastoma and Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma: Are These Tumors Potential Candidates for Immune Checkpoint Blockade?

Accurate diagnosis of Epithelioid glioblastoma (eGB) and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) is sometimes challenging owing to overlapping histologic and genetic features. There are limited reports on the immune profile of these tumors. In this study, we assessed 21 PXA [15 PXA Grade 2 (PXAG2); 6 PXA Grade 3 (PXAG3)] and 14 eGB for their histopathological and molecular association. Further, their immune profile was compared with GB, IDH1 wild-type (wt) (n-18). Morphologically, PXAG2 mostly differed from eGB; however, it was occasionally difficult to differentiate PXAG3 from eGB due to their epithelioid pattern and less obvious degenerative features. PXAG2 showed predominantly diffuse, whereas variable positivity for epithelial and glial markers was seen in PXAG3 and eGB. All cases showed retained nuclear ATRX and INI-1 . H3K27M or IDH1 mutation was seen in none. P53 mutation was more common in eGB, followed by PXAG3, and least common in PXAG2. BRAF V600E mutation was observed in 66.67% PXAG2, 33.33% PXAG3, and 50% eGB, with 100% concordance between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and sequencing. Thirty-six percent eGB, 33% PXAG3, and 61% PXAG2 harbored CDKN2A homozygous deletion. EGFR amplification was observed in 14% eGB and 66% of GB, IDH wt. PDL1 and CTLA-4 expression was higher in eGB (71.4% and 57.1%), PXAG3 (66.6% and100%), and PXAG2 (60% & 66.7%) as compared with GB, IDH wt (38.8% and 16.7%). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were also observed in a majority of eGB and PXA (90% to 100%) in contrast to GB, IDH wt (66%). This analysis highlights the homogenous molecular and immune profile of eGB and PXA, suggesting the possibility that histologically and molecularly, these two entities represent 2 ends of a continuous spectrum with PXAG3 lying in between. Higher upregulation of PDL1, CTLA-4, and increased tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in these tumors as compared with GB, IDH wt suggests potential candidature for immunotherapy.

Clinical and radiological findings of glioblastomas harboring a BRAF V600E mutation

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and radiological characteristics of glioblastomas (GBMs) harboring a BRAF mutation. Sequencing analysis of BRAF, IDH1/2, and TERT promoters was performed on GBM samples of patients older than 15 years. The clinical, pathological, and radiological data of patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into three groups according to their BRAF and IDH1/2 status: BRAF group, IDH group, and BRAF/IDH-wild-type (WT) group. Among 179 GBM cases, we identified nine cases with a BRAF mutation and nine with IDH mutation. The WT group had 161 cases. Age at onset in the BRAF group was significantly lower compared to the WT group and was similar to the IDH group. In cases with negative IDH1-R132H staining and age < 55 years, 15.2% were BRAF-mutant cases. Similar to the IDH group, overall survival of the BRAF group was significantly longer compared with the WT group. Among nine cases in the BRAF group, three cases had hemorrhagic onset and prior lesions were observed in two cases. In conclusion, age < 55 years, being IDH1-R132H negative, with hemorrhagic onset or the presence of prior lesions are factors that signal recommendation of BRAF analysis for adult GBM patients.

The Association Between Radioiodine Refractory in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, Sodium/Iodide Symporter Expression, and BRAF V600E Mutation

Objective

To study the association between radioiodine refractory papillary thyroid carcinoma, sodium/iodide symporter (NIS) expression, and the BRAF ^V600E mutation.

Methods

A study was conducted on 30 radioiodine refractory papillary thyroid carcinoma patients and 30 radioiodine-avid papillary thyroid carcinoma patients. The expressions of sodium/iodide symporter and BRAF ^V600E mutated protein were determined by immunohistochemistry using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.

Results

The mutated BRAF ^V600E protein was identified in 26 radioiodine refractory papillary thyroid carcinoma subjects (86.7%) and 22 radioiodine-avid papillary thyroid carcinoma subjects (73.3%), with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.3). Sodium/iodide symporter expression was detected in 4 of 30 cases (13.3%) from the radioiodine-avid papillary thyroid carcinoma group but was negative for all radioiodine refractory cases. There was no association between sodium/iodide symporter expression and radioiodine refractory papillary thyroid carcinoma (P = 0.11). Cases with positive NIS expression were likely negative for BRAF ^V600E mutation (3/4; P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Papillary thyroid carcinomas with BRAF ^V600E mutation were more likely to be negative for NIS expression. BRAF ^V600E mutation and NIS expressions cannot be used to predict radioiodine sensitivity.

BRAF AMP Frequently Co-occurs With IDH1/2, TP53, and ATRX Mutations in Adult Patients With Gliomas and Is Associated With Poorer Survival Than That of Patients Harboring BRAF V600E

Abnormal RAS/RAF signaling plays a critical role in glioma. Although it is known that the V600E mutation of v-raf murine viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF^V600E) and BRAF amplification (BRAF^AMP) both result in constitutive activation of the RAS/RAF pathway, whether BRAF^V600E and BRAF^AMP have different effects on the survival of glioma patients needs to be clarified. Using cBioPortal, we retrieved studies of both mutations and copy number variations of the BRAF gene in CNS/brain tumors and investigated data from 69 nonredundant glioma patients. The BRAF mutation group had significantly more male patients (64.00% vs. 36.84%; P = 0.046) and a higher occurrence of glioblastoma multiforme (66.00% vs. 31.58%; P = 0.013) compared to those in the other group. The BRAF^AMP group had significantly more patients with the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) (73.68% vs. 18.00%; P = 0.000), tumor protein p53 (TP53) (73.68% vs. 30.00%; P = 0.002), and alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X linked (ATRX) (63.16% vs. 18.00%; P = 0.001) than the mutation group. The BRAF^AMP and IDH1/2^WT cohort had lower overall survival compared with the BRAF^AMP and IDH1/2^MT groups (P = 0.001) and the BRAF mutation cohort (P = 0.019), including the BRAF^V600E (P = 0.033) and BRAF^non-V600E (P = 0.029) groups, using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and the log rank (Mantel–Cox) test. The BRAF^AMP and IDH1/2^WT genotype was found to be an independent predictive factor for glioma with BRAF mutation and BRAF^AMP using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (HR = 0.138, P = 0.018). Our findings indicate that BRAF^AMP frequently occurs with IDH1/2, TP53, and ATRX mutations. Adult patients with glioma with BRAF^AMP and IDH1/2^WT had worse prognoses compared with those with BRAF mutation and BRAF^AMP and IDH1/2^MT. This suggests that the assessment of the status of BRAF^AMP and IDH1/2 in adult glioma/glioblastoma patients has prognostic value as these patients have relatively short survival times and may benefit from personalized targeted therapy using BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors.

Multidisciplinary Therapy Managed Recurrent Glioblastoma in a BRAF-V600E Mutant Pregnant Female: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant intracranial tumor in adults. However, the overall management of GBM in pregnancy is rarely reported. How to balance the therapeutic benefits to the mother and risks to the fetus remains hugely challenging for clinicians. The application of specific targeting therapy combined with conventional treatment sheds light on a longer lifetime for the patients suffering from GBM. Case Presentation: We present a pregnant female at 20 weeks gestation diagnosed with GBM. Surgical resection was initially performed without adjuvant therapy, and the tumor recurred de novo 2 months later. A secondary craniotomy and cesarean section were performed simultaneously at 32 weeks gestation, both the patient and infant were survived. She was subsequently treated with traditional chemo-radiotherapy. No other identified genetic alterations indicating an optimistic prognosis were detected except for BRAF V600E mutation. Thus, the BRAF inhibitor was placed on her with achieving a good clinical outcome of more than 2-year survival without recurrence. Conclusion: Personalized multidisciplinary therapy should be considered when GBMs occur in pregnancy. Response to the therapy in this presenting case suggests that BRAF V600E mutation is a favorable biomarker for GBM. The mortality of GBM might be reduced through genetic testing and targeted treatment. However, more studies must be conducted to confirm our observation.

Spinal cord anaplastic astrocytoma with BRAF V600E mutation: A case report and review of literature

A 17-year-old female complained of lower extremity pain that progressed to low back pain accompanied by paraparesis. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a mass in the conus medullaris of the spinal cord at the thoracic spine 11-12 level. The patient underwent resection of the mass. The pathological diagnosis was anaplastic astrocytoma based on the densely proliferating astrocytic tumor cells without necrosis or microvascular proliferation. The patient received chemoradiotherapy with oral temozolomide and a total of 54 Gy of local irradiation, followed by 24 courses of temozolomide as maintenance chemotherapy. The patient survived for 8 years without tumor recurrence following the initial treatment. Genetic analysis of the tumor revealed a BRAF V600E mutation that has not yet been reported in spinal cord high-grade gliomas (HGGs). In recent years, the molecular therapy targeting the BRAF V600E mutation has been applied in clinical practice for several cancer types. Although the frequency in spinal cord HGGs is uncertain, it is necessary to investigate BRAF V600E mutation as a potential therapeutic target in the future.

Updates in prognostic markers for gliomas

Gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults. The traditional classification of gliomas has been based on histologic features and tumor grade. The advent of sophisticated molecular diagnostic techniques has led to a deeper understanding of genomic drivers implicated in gliomagenesis, some of which have important prognostic implications. These advances have led to an extensive revision of the World Health Organization classification of diffuse gliomas to include molecular markers such as isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation, 1p/19q codeletion, and histone mutations as integral components of brain tumor classification. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of molecular prognostic factors for patients with gliomas, including those mentioned above, but also extending to others such as telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation, glioma cytosine-phosphate-guanine island methylator phenotype DNA methylation, and epidermal growth factor receptor alterations.

Incorporating Advances in Molecular Pathology Into Brain Tumor Diagnostics

Recent advances in molecular pathology have reshaped the practice of brain tumor diagnostics. The classification of gliomas has been restructured with the discovery of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 mutations in the vast majority of lower grade infiltrating gliomas and secondary glioblastomas (GBM), with IDH-mutant astrocytomas further characterized by TP53 and ATRX mutations. Whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion in conjunction with IDH mutations now define oligodendrogliomas, which are also enriched for CIC, FUBP1, PI3K, NOTCH1, and TERT-p mutations. IDH-wild-type (wt) infiltrating astrocytomas are mostly primary GBMs and are characterized by EGFR, PTEN, TP53, NF1, RB1, PDGFRA, and CDKN2A/B alterations, TERT-p mutations, and characteristic copy number alterations including gains of chromosome 7 and losses of 10. Other clinically and genetically distinct infiltrating astrocytomas include the aggressive H3K27M-mutant midline gliomas, and smaller subsets that occur in the setting of NF1 or have BRAF V600E mutations. Low-grade pediatric gliomas are both genetically and biologically distinct from their adult counterparts and often harbor a single driver event often involving BRAF, FGFR1, or MYB/MYBL1 genes. Large scale genomic and epigenomic analyses have identified distinct subgroups of ependymomas tightly linked to tumor location and clinical behavior. The diagnosis of embryonal neoplasms also integrates molecular testing: (I) 4 molecularly defined, biologically distinct subtypes of medulloblastomas are now recognized; (II) 3 histologic entities have now been reclassified under a diagnosis of "embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR), C19MC-altered"; and (III) atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) now require SMARCB1 (INI1) or SMARCA4 (BRG1) alterations for their diagnosis. We discuss the practical use of contemporary biomarkers for an integrative diagnosis of central nervous system neoplasia.

Towards an advanced cell-based in vitro glioma model system

The modulation of tumor growth and development in vitro has always been one of the key factors in the research of the malignant transformation, including gliomas, prevalent and most deadly cancers of the brain. Indeed, cellular and molecular biology research employing in vitro model cell-based systems have great potential to advance both the mechanistic understanding and the treatment of human glial tumors, as it facilitates not only the understanding of glioma biology and its regulatory mechanisms Additionally they promise to afford the screening of the putative anti-tumor agents and alternative treatment approaches in a personalized manner, i.e. by virtue of using the patient-derived tumor material for such tests. However, in order to become reliable and representative, glioma model systems need to move towards including most inherent cancer features such as local hypoxia, specific genetic aberrations, native tumor microenvironment, and the three-dimensional extracellular matrix. This review starts with a brief introduction on the general epidemiological and molecular characteristics of gliomas followed by an overview of the cell-based in vitro models currently used in glioma research. As a conclusion, we suggest approaches to move to innovative cell-based in vitro glioma models. We consider that main criteria for selecting these approaches should include the adequate resemblance to the key in vivo characteristics, robustness, cost-effectiveness and ease to use, as well as the amenability to high throughput handling to allow the standardized drug screening.

Clinicopathological and genetic association between epithelioid glioblastoma and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma

Epithelioid glioblastoma (eGBM) is a rare variant of GBM which was adopted in the 2016 WHO classification. eGBM and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) sometimes show overlapping features histologically and genetically, such as epithelioid pattern and a highly frequent V600E mutation in the gene for vRAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), respectively. Accurate diagnosis of these rare tumors is challenging according to the new criteria in the revised 2016 WHO classification. It is an urgent task to elucidate the biological properties of the tumors and to select appropriate treatment. Twenty consecutive cases diagnosed as PXA or eGBM histologically were investigated. Twelve of the 20 cases were PXAs and eight were eGBMs. Morphologically, mitotic activity, necrosis and degenerative changes such as intracellular lipid accumulation, eosinophilic granular bodies and reticulin fiber deposits were scored. Immunohistochemical and molecular biological assessment for isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2 (IDH1/2), α-thalassemia/mental-retardation-syndrome-X-linked gene (ATRX), p53, BRAF, telomere reverse transcriptase promoter (TERT-p), H3F3A, and integrase interactor 1 (INI1) were performed. eGBM tended to lack the degenerative changes characteristic for PXA. Of the 20 cases tested, Sanger technique showed no mutation in IDH1/2. BRAF mutation at T1799 > A (V600E) was detected in 4/12 (33.3%) PXA and 4/8 (50.0%) eGBM, while TERT-p mutation was detected at C228 > T in 2/12 (16.7%) PXA and at C250 > T in 1/8 (12.5%) eGBM. Retained nuclear ATRX was observed in 12/12 (100%) PXA and 6/7 (85.7%) eGBM while p53 mutation was observed in 2/10 (20%) PXA and 7/7 (100%) eGBM. All tumors retained INI1 expression in their nuclei. None of the tumors harbored H3F3A mutation. One PXA without BRAF mutation acquired TERT-p mutation at recurrence and one eGBM harbored both BRAF and TERT-p mutation. Molecular biological similarity between eGBM and PXA was suggested in our series, while degenerative changes reflected the features of PXA. It was speculated that the common genetic alterations for development and progression of eGBM and PXA might include BRAF and TERT-p mutations.

Intraventricular Epithelioid Glioblastoma: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Epithelioid glioblastoma, a high-grade, diffuse astrocytic tumor variant, comprises closely packed epithelioid cells and rhabdoid cells. This rare tumor usually develops in the cerebral cortex and diencephalon; however, in the case reported here, it was located intraventricularly.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 47-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with a right intraventricular mass that had rapidly increased in size. On discovery of the tumor 3 years earlier at the referring hospital, the mass was small, calcified, and attached to the periventricular parenchyma. Over the next 2 years, the mass grew slowly, as observed on periodic magnetic resonance imaging scans. Forty days before the referral, the patient experienced headache and nausea, and marked growth and intratumoral hemorrhage were visible on a computed tomography scan of the head. The tumor was partially removed via a superior parietal lobule corticotomy. Histopathological examination confirmed an isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild-type epithelioid glioblastoma with a BRAF V600E mutation, but the original slow-growing lesion was no longer detected. Consequently, we assume that in this case, a low-grade glioma transformed into an aggressively malignant epithelioid glioblastoma.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the first case of an intraventricular epithelioid glioblastoma that might have arisen from a low-grade glioma with calcification. We recommend including this tumor variant in the differential diagnosis of lateral ventricle tumors.

Oncodomains: A protein domain-centric framework for analyzing rare variants in tumor samples

The fight against cancer is hindered by its highly heterogeneous nature. Genome-wide sequencing studies have shown that individual malignancies contain many mutations that range from those commonly found in tumor genomes to rare somatic variants present only in a small fraction of lesions. Such rare somatic variants dominate the landscape of genomic mutations in cancer, yet efforts to correlate somatic mutations found in one or few individuals with functional roles have been largely unsuccessful. Traditional methods for identifying somatic variants that drive cancer are 'gene-centric' in that they consider only somatic variants within a particular gene and make no comparison to other similar genes in the same family that may play a similar role in cancer. In this work, we present oncodomain hotspots, a new 'domain-centric' method for identifying clusters of somatic mutations across entire gene families using protein domain models. Our analysis confirms that our approach creates a framework for leveraging structural and functional information encapsulated by protein domains into the analysis of somatic variants in cancer, enabling the assessment of even rare somatic variants by comparison to similar genes. Our results reveal a vast landscape of somatic variants that act at the level of domain families altering pathways known to be involved with cancer such as protein phosphorylation, signaling, gene regulation, and cell metabolism. Due to oncodomain hotspots' unique ability to assess rare variants, we expect our method to become an important tool for the analysis of sequenced tumor genomes, complementing existing methods.