Duplex Arteriography Prior to Femoral-Popliteal Reconstruction in Claudicants: A Proposal for a New Shortened Protocol

Peripheral Interventional Strategy Assessment (PISA) for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Revascularization: Preliminary Outcomes of a Multidisciplinary Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) still represents the gold standard for anatomical arterial mapping and revascularization decision-making in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), although DUS (Doppler Ultrasound) remains a primary non-invasive examination tool. The Global Vascular Guidelines established the importance of preoperative arterial mapping to guarantee an adequate in-line flow to the foot. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of DUS in guiding therapeutic vascular treatments on the basis of Global Vascular Guidelines without the need of a second-level examination.

METHODS

Between January 2022 and June 2022, all consecutive patients with CLTI to be revascularized underwent clinical examination and DUS without further diagnostic examinations. Primary outcomes assessed were technical success, and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 1-year amputation free survival, and time between evaluation and revascularization.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients with a mean age of 73.6 ± 8.5 years underwent lower limb revascularization. Technical success was 100%, and the 30-day mortality rate was 2.9%. Mean time between evaluation and revascularization was 29 ± 17 days. One-year amputation free survival was 97.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

DUS without further diagnostic examinations can accurately assess the status of the vascular tree and foot runoff, providing enough information about target vessels to guide revascularization strategies.

Ultrasound in the Modern Management of the Diabetic Foot Syndrome: A Multipurpose Versatile Toolkit

Ultrasound (US) is a noninvasive and versatile technology that in recent years found acceptance in almost all the medical specialties, with diagnostic and interventional applications. In the diabetic foot syndrome (DFS), US found specific indications mainly in the screening, quantification, and follow-up of the vascular component of the pathology, but also in the study of the deformities and structural modifications induced by neuropathy and in the diagnosis and surgical management of infections, especially those that induce anatomical changes, like abscesses and fasciitis. This review will summarize all these application of US, giving special attention to the vascular aspects, and on the predominant role that US gained in recent times to guide the indication to revascularization, on the new standardized approach to the study of the arterial tree of the limb and the foot, the so-called duplex ultrasound arterial mapping, which significantly increased the utilization of US to plan the revascularizations in this complex pathology. Outside the vascular fields, the diagnosis of neuropathy and infection and the intraoperative use of US in the surgical management of abscesses and fasciitis will be discussed, leaving the last part to the new and interesting applications of US in the management of DFU, a field that is still in evolution, offering new possibilities to the health care professionals involved in the management of these chronic wounds. The variety of applications both in diagnostic and operative fields makes US a rather versatile technology-a toolkit-that should have a special place among those at reach of the specialists of DFS care.

Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography to Contrast Arteriography for Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Lower Extremity Revascularization

In an effort to explore alternatives to contrast arteriography, we compared computed tomography angiography to contrast arteriography for defining anatomic features of patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization. From November 2003 to March 2004, 36 inpatients with chronic lower extremity ischemia underwent contrast arteriography and computed tomography angiography before undergoing lower extremity revascularization procedures. A Siemens 16 slice multiplanar computed tomography device with bolus tracking was used for these exams. The reports of these tests and images were compared prospectively, and the differences in the aorto-iliac segment, femoral-popliteal, and infrapopliteal segments were noted. The vessels were classified as mild disease (<50%), moderate disease (50%-70%), severe (71%-99%), and occluded. The studies and treatment plans based on these data were compared. The mean age was 76 ± 12 years (SD). Indications for the procedures included gangrene (45%), ischemic ulcer (32%), rest pain (19%), and severe claudication (3%); 69% were diabetics. Accuracy of computed tomography angiography in the aorto-iliac, femoral-popliteal, and infrapopliteal segments was 100%, 81%, and 59%, respectively. Thirteen of 18 (72%) of these disagreements resulted in a different procedure than that suggested by computed tomography angiography. A review of the data obtained in this series indicated that computed tomography angiography appears to be unable to obtain adequate information in this highly selected population at our institution.

Duplex ultrasound scanning of peripheral arterial disease of the lower limb

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reliability and applicability of duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS) of lower limb arteries, compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA), in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

DESIGN

A prospective, blinded, comparative study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 169 patients were examined by DUS and DSA. Intermittent claudication (IC) was present in 42 (25%) patients and critical limb ischaemia (CLI) in 127 (75%) patients. To allow segment-to-segment comparison, the arterial tree was divided into 15 segments. In total, 2535 segments were examined using kappa (κ) statistics to test the agreement.

RESULTS

The agreement between DUS and DSA was very good (κ>0.8) or good (0.8 ≥ κ>0.6) in most segments, but moderate (0.6 ≥ κ>0.4) in the tibio-peroneal trunk and the peroneal artery. Agreement between the two techniques was significantly better in the supragenicular (κ=0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-0.80)) than in the infragenicular segments (κ=0.63 (0.59-0.67)) (p<0.001). Similarly, the technical success rate was significantly higher in the supragenicular segments (DUS: 100%; DSA: 99%) than in the infragenicular segments (both 93%) (p<0.001). DUS was the best technique for imaging of the distal crural arteries (92% vs. 97%; p<0.001) and DSA was the best technique for imaging of the proximal crural arteries (95% vs. 91%; p<0.01). Neither the agreement nor the technical success rate was influenced by the severity of PAD, that is, IC versus CLI.

CONCLUSION

The agreement between DUS and DSA was generally good, irrespective of the severity of ischaemia. DUS performed better in the supragenicular arteries than in the infragenicular arteries. However, DUS compared favourably with DSA in both tibial vessels, particularly in the distal part, which makes DUS a useful non-invasive alternative to DSA.

Predictive factors of femoropopliteal patency after suboptimal duplex-guided balloon angioplasty and stenting: is recoil a bad sign?

Currently, the value of stenting during femoropopliteal balloon angioplasty (FPBA) remains unclear. Herein we evaluate the patency rates of successful duplex-guided balloon angioplasty (DAGBA) alone versus suboptimal DAGBA followed by stenting and the prestenting dissection versus recoil as potential indicators of stent success or failure. Over a period of 27 months, we performed 291 duplex-guided FPBAs (194 stenoses; 97 occlusions) on 244 limbs in 220 patients. Disabling claudication was the indication in 67%. Critical limb ischemia was the indication in the remaining 33%. Self-expanding nitinol stents were used when plaque dissection and/ or recoil caused diameter reduction > or = 40%. Serial follow-up duplex scans were obtained. Severe restenosis (> 70%) was measured by B-mode imaging and a peak systolic velocity ratio > 3. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 41 months (mean 10 +/- 8.3 months). The overall mean interval for restenosis and occlusion was 6.5 +/- 4.2 months and 5.6 +/- 6.1 months, respectively. Stents did affect overall patency results compared with not using stents. Reasons for stenting were plaque recoil, dissection, or both in 98 (53%), 44 (24%), and 42 (23%) cases, respectively. Six-month patency was 59%, 94%, and 69%, respectively. The difference between plaque recoil and dissection was significant (p<.04). The use of stents during FPBA may be associated with balloon angioplasty site failure in the femoropopliteal segment. To our knowledge, this is the first report ever to document plaque recoil as a predictor of balloon angioplasty site failure notwithstanding stent placement.

Limitations of and Lessons Learned from Clinical Experience of 1,020 Duplex Arteriography

Objective: Due to the inherent risks, deficiencies and cost associated with contrast arteriography (CA), our group has been utitilizing duplex arteriography (DA) for evaluating the arteries of the lower extremity for patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization. In an effort to further explore the strengths and weaknesses of DA, we reviewed our evolving experience with DA from January 1, 1998, to January 1, 2005.

Patients and Methods: The arterial segments starting from mid-abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries were studied in cross-sectional and longitudinal planes using a variety of scanheads of 7–4, 10–5, 12–5, 5–2 and 3–2 MHz extended operative frequency range to obtain high-quality B-mode, color and power Doppler images as well as velocity spectra. In 906 patients, 1,020 duplex arteriograms were obtained. The ages ranged from 30–98 years old with a mean of 73±11 (SD) years. Fifty percent of the patients were diabetics. Indications for the examination included: tissue loss (409), rest pain (221), claudication (310), acute ischemia (74), popliteal aneurysm (45), SFA aneurysm (2), abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) (10) and failing bypass (55). Prior procedures had been performed in 262. DA was performed by six technologists (4 of whom are MDs). In all, 207 DA were performed intraoperatively and the remainder, preoperatively.

Results: The resultant procedures based upon DA included: bypass to the popliteal artery (262) and bypass to an infrapopliteal artery (325), endovascular procedures (363), thrombectomy (11), embolectomy (9), inflow bypass procedures to the femoral arteries (46), débridment (4), amputation (8) and no intervention (75). The areas not visualized well included: iliac (73), femoral (26), popliteal (17), and infrapopliteal (221). Additional imaging after DA was deemed necessary in 102 cases to obtain enough information to plan lower extremity revascularization. Factors associated with increased need to obtain CA included: DM ( p<.001), infrapopliteal calcification ( p<.001), older age ( p = .01) and limb threatening ischemia ( p<.001). Factors not associated with the need to obtain CA included: which technologist performed the exam, whether the technologist has a medical degree and whether the patient underwent prior revascularization.

Conclusions: In 90% of patients reviewed, DA is able to obtain the needed information to plan lower extremity revascularization. Severe tibial vessel calcification is the most common cause of an incomplete DA exam and determines when alternative imaging modalities need to be obtained.

Preprocedural imaging: new options to reduce need for contrast angiography

In vascular surgery, the gold standard for evaluation of the lower-extremity arterial tree has long been contrast arteriography (CA). Associated risks of CA are well-documented and include severe allergic reactions, arterial injury and/or hemorrhage, and contrast-induced nephropathy. Increasingly, less-invasive techniques, with fewer inherent risks for complication, are being explored as diagnostic alternatives. Magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography angiography, and duplex arteriography, each offer distinct advantages, though are not without limitation. This review explores the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of these newer technologies and provides a comparison to CA as a means for defining the anatomic features of patients undergoing lower-extremity revascularization. This data suggests that noninvasive imaging technologies may, in the future, play an increasingly important role in the surgical evaluation of the patient with lower-extremity ischemia.

Duplex ultrasonography rarely changes management decisions in chronic lower extremity ischemia

The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of patients presenting with lower extremity pain whose treatment plan was altered by duplex ultrasonography. This prospective study evaluated all patients referred for lower extremity pain who had undergone a lower extremity arterial duplex scan. All patients underwent a history and physical examination by the same vascular surgeon. After the completion of the history and physical examination, the surgeon established a preliminary treatment plan. Subsequently, he reviewed the lower extremity duplex results and established a final treatment plan based on the history, physical examination, and duplex results. Treatment was labeled as either (1) conservative, (2) aggressive, or (3) the patient was considered to have no peripheral vascular disease. The proportion of patients whose primary treatment plan was altered by the addition of duplex ultrasonography was determined. Of 103 patients who entered the study, 7% had no peripheral vascular disease based on the history, physical examination, and duplex scan. Based on the history and physical examination alone, 48.5% were to be treated conservatively and 44.7% aggressively. After reviewing duplex results, the treatment plan was changed in only 5.9% of patients. There was no difference in treatment plan after the addition of the duplex results (p = 0.1025). Duplex ultrasonography remains a valuable tool in the evaluation of patients with lower extremity peripheral vascular disease; however, in most patients, the decision to treat conservatively or aggressively can be made without duplex scanning. All patients referred to the vascular clinic for lower extremity evaluation do not require a duplex scan.

Popliteal artery volume flow measurement: A new and reliable predictor of early patency after infrainguinal balloon angioplasty and subintimal dissection

OBJECTIVE

We have investigated whether popliteal artery volume flow (PAVF) measured immediately after balloon angioplasties of the superficial femoral artery-popliteal segments (SFA/POP) was predictive of early (30 days) and mid-term (6 months) arterial thrombosis.

METHODS

During the last 24 months, 203 patients (56% men) with a mean age of 73 +/- 9 years had 268 duplex-guided balloon angioplasties of the SFA/POP. Critical ischemia was the indication in 36%. Group I included 176 (66%) with stenoses, and group II had 92 (34%) with occlusions. All patients had completion duplex examinations that included three measurements of PAVF of below-the-knee popliteal artery.

RESULTS

Early (30 days) thrombosis of the treated femoropopliteal arterial segment developed in 10 patients (3.7%), three in group I (1.7%) and seven in group II (7.6%; P < .04). All 10 cases of early thrombosis were in patients with TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) class C (6/185, 3.2%) and D (4/26, 15%) lesions. Moreover, the 19% incidence (n = 4) of early thrombosis in patients with PAVF <100 mL/min (mean, 73 +/- 24 mL/min; range, 20 to 99 mL/min) was higher compared with the 2.4% rate for patients with higher flows (mean, 176 +/- 60 mL/min; range, 100 to 450 mL/min; P < .01). At 6 months of follow-up, femoropopliteal occlusions had developed in nine more patients, and it became apparent that low PAVF measurements were still predictive of thrombosis (29%) when compared with higher PAVF cases (6%; P < .002). Log-rank comparison of survival curves for cumulative primary stenosis-free patency in group I and group II demonstrated a statistically significant difference (P < .02). PAVF <100 mL/min and TASC classification were significant predictors of early (30 days) and mid-term (6 months) arterial thrombosis after femoropopliteal angioplasties. PAVF was the most powerful predictor of arterial thrombosis. The respective 6-month and 12-month limb salvage rates were 98% and 94% for patients with claudication and 88% and 85% for those with limb-threatening ischemia (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that low PAVF is the most powerful predictor of early (30 days) and mid-term (6 months) arterial thrombosis after femoropopliteal interventions. In the presence of a low postprocedure PAVF (<100 mL/min), one may consider not reversing the heparin or using intermittent calf compression, or both, to augment the arterial flow.

Computed tomographic angiography allows accurate planning of the setting and technique of open and percutaneous vascular interventions

BACKGROUND

Vascular surgeons can offer patients with arterial and venous disorders a multitude of endovascular and surgical options. Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has the potential to allow the development of an effective interventional strategy without subjecting patients to invasive diagnostic testing.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was reviewed comprising 6 consecutive months of arterial and venous procedures performed using an algorithm emphasizing CTA supplemented with other noninvasive imaging.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients underwent 90 arterial or venous procedures, the majority of which were based on CTA. Preprocedure plans matched a successful intervention in 35 of 40 (88%) procedures performed in the interventional suite, and 48 of 49 (98%) procedures performed in the surgical suite. Two of 40 patients treated initially in the interventional suite eventually required a surgical vascular procedure. The majority of procedures were therapeutic (86%) rather than diagnostic (14%).

CONCLUSIONS

An algorithm using CTA and supplemented with other noninvasive imaging allows safe and effective planning for open surgical and endovascular procedures.