Anesthetic methods in reoperative carotid surgery

Reoperation for Recurrent Carotid Stenosis: A Ten-Year Experience

Owing to the supposed risks of reoperation, carotid stenting has been proposed as a treatment for carotid restenosis. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of carotid reoperation. From March 1988 to March 1997, 40 patients, 18 men and 22 women (mean age: 65 years) underwent a total of 43 redo carotid procedures by our group. Two patients had both sides repaired and one required a second reoperation. Symptomatic recurrent carotid stenosis (>70%) was the indication in 25 reoperations and asymptomatic high-grade stenosis (>80%) was the indication in 18. The initial operation in 35 reoperations was carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with primary closure and in eight it was CEA with a prosthetic patch. The interval to recurrence was less in the 24 reoperations in patients who had myointimal hyperplasia (21 months) compared with 17 reoperations in patients with recurrent atherosclerosis (90 months). The other two reoperations were for an intimal flap 2 months after the original CEA, and for operative dilation of fibromuscular dysplastic bands missed on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), distal to the site of a previous CEA.

The technique of reoperation included redo CEA in two, CEA with vein patch in eight, CEA with prosthetic patch in 22, vein interposition graft in five, and prosthetic interposition graft in five. In addition, operative dilation with an arterial dilator was used in one reoperation.

No perioperative strokes or deaths occurred other than one patient who died from cardiac complications following combined CEA and coronary artery bypass grafting. Operative morbidity consisted of pneumonia in one patient, reversible cranial nerve injury in four, and hematoma requiring evacuation in two. During follow-up (mean: 34 months), carotid occlusion resulted in a mild stroke in one patient, there were 10 late deaths not related to carotid disease, one patient required a reoperation, and three patients were lost to follow-up.

The authors conclude that reoperation for recurrent carotid stenosis, using standard vascular techniques, is both safe and effective; it should continue to be the mainstay of treatment when intervention is required.

Regional or general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy? Evidence from published prospective and retrospective studies

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under regional or general anesthesia for any new neurologic impairment, stroke, stroke and/or death, death, and myocardial infarction.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

SETTING

A search of the National Library of Medicine of the United States PUBMED from 1966 up to June 11, 2005, with the following key words: "carotid surgery or endarterectomy and regional anesthesia."

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Forty-eight studies (14 prospective and 34 retrospective) were analyzed. The optimal information size was achieved only when all studies were analyzed together (prospective and retrospective). Regional anesthesia reduced the rate of any new neurologic impairment (odds ratio = 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.75; p < 0.00001), stroke (0.54 [0.43-0.68], p < 0.00001), stroke and/or death (0.62 [0.49-0.78], p < 0.0001), death (0.65 [0.48-0.87], p = 0.004), and myocardial infarction (0.50 [0.36-0.70], p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The number of patients included in randomized controlled trials or even in prospective studies is too low to allow any conclusions on the differences in outcome between the 2 anesthetic techniques. Better outcomes are suggested when results from retrospective studies are added.

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in people with recently symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are significant perioperative risks which may be lessened by performing the operation under local rather than general anaesthetic.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the risks of endarterectomy under local compared with general anaesthetic.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Stroke Group trials register (April 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2002), and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to 1994). We handsearched 13 relevant journals up to 2002, and searched the reference lists of articles identified. We also advertised the review in Vascular News (a newspaper for European vascular specialists) in August 2001.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials and non-randomised studies comparing carotid endarterectomy under local versus general anaesthetic.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer selected studies for inclusion and another independently checked the decisions. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and independently extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven randomised trials involving 554 operations, and 41 non-randomised studies involving 25622 operations were included. The methodological quality of the non-randomised trials was questionable. Eleven of the non-randomised studies were prospective and 29 reported on a consecutive series of patients. In nine non-randomised studies the number of arteries, as opposed to the number of patients, was unclear. Meta-analysis of the non-randomised studies showed that the use of local anaesthetic was associated with significant reductions in the odds of death (35 studies), stroke (31 studies), stroke or death (26 studies), myocardial infarction (22 studies), and pulmonary complications (7 studies), within 30 days of the operation. Meta-analysis of the randomised studies showed that the use of local anaesthetic was associated with a significant reduction in local haemorrhage (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.79) within 30 days of the operation, but there was no evidence of a reduction in the odds of operative stroke. However, the trials were too small to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn, and in some studies intention-to-treat analyses were not possible because of exclusions.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials comparing carotid endarterectomy performed under local and general anaesthetic. Non-randomised studies suggest potential benefits with the use of local anaesthetic, but these studies may be biased. More randomised studies are needed.

Reoperation for carotid stenosis is as safe as primary carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

Patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis are sometimes referred for carotid angioplasty and stenting because of reports that carotid reoperation has a higher complication rate than primary carotid endarterectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a difference exists between outcomes of primary carotid endarterectomy and reoperative carotid surgery.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for all carotid operations performed from September 1993 through March 1998 by vascular surgery faculty at a single academic center. The results of primary carotid endarterectomy and operation for recurrent carotid stenosis were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 390 operations were performed on 352 patients. Indications for primary carotid endarterectomy (n = 350) were asymptomatic high-grade stenosis in 42% of the cases, amaurosis fugax and transient ischemic symptoms in 35%, global symptoms in 14%, and previous stroke in 9%. Indications for reoperative carotid surgery (n = 40) were symptomatic recurrent lesions in 50% of the cases and progressive high-grade asymptomatic stenoses in 50%. The results of primary carotid endarterectomy were no postoperative deaths, an overall stroke rate of 1.1% (three postoperative strokes, one preoperative stroke after angiography), and no permanent cranial nerve deficits. The results of operations for recurrent carotid stenosis were no postoperative deaths, no postoperative strokes, and no permanent cranial nerve deficits. In the primary carotid endarterectomy group, the mean hospital length of stay was 2.6 +/- 1. 1 days and the mean hospital cost was $9700. In the reoperative group, the mean length of stay was 2.6 +/- 1.5 days and the mean cost was $13,700. The higher cost of redo surgery is accounted for by a higher preoperative cerebral angiography rate (90%) in redo cases as compared with primary endarterectomy (40%).

CONCLUSION

In this series of 390 carotid operations, the procedure-related stroke/death rate was 0.8%. There were no differences between the stroke-death rates after primary carotid endarterectomy and operation for recurrent carotid stenosis. Operation for recurrent carotid stenosis is as safe and effective as primary carotid endarterectomy and should continue to be standard treatment.