Carotid artery stenosis: treatment by angioplasty with or without stent

Surgical management of acute complications and critical restenosis following carotid artery stenting

Carotid artery angioplasty with stenting (CAS) is being increasingly used in the treatment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis. As in other catheter-based approaches to the treatment of arterial disease, surgical intervention may be required because of either acute complications or correct critical restenosis. We have reviewed our experience managing early complications and critical in-stent restenoses after CAS in a tertiary care university hospital and a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. During the last 5 years, 22 carotid arteries (21 patients) underwent CAS. One patient developed thrombosis and rupture of the carotid artery during stenting. Two other patients (3 arteries) developed critical restenosis within 12 months. Subsequent surgical reconstructions included an internal carotid artery (ICA)-to-external carotid artery (ECA) transposition and a common carotid artery (CCA)-to-ICA bypass with reversed saphenous vein (RSV). The patient who underwent CCA-to-ICA bypass later required subclavian-to-ICA bypass because of rapidly progressive intimal hyperplasia and subsequent occlusion of the CCA. The other patient has not had surgical repair because of his deteriorating condition and significant co-morbidities. During the same time period, two additional patients were referred from outside institutions specifically for surgical intervention after carotid stenting. One had delayed rupture of the carotid artery 1 day after stenting and underwent urgent surgical repair. Another patient had early, critical restenosis within the stent and underwent placement of a CCA-to-ICA interposition graft using RSV. Acute treatment failures after CAS can be successfully managed using standard surgical techniques. Patients who develop critical in-stent restenosis requiring surgical repair may need more challenging surgical reconstructions to maintain cerebral perfusion.

"Seat belt and air bag" technique for cerebral protection during carotid stenting

PURPOSE

To present a 2-device technique for cerebral protection during carotid stenting of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in patients with high-grade lesions, contralateral occlusion, and/or an aberrant or nonfunctioning circle of Willis.

TECHNIQUE

A reverse flow system (Parodi Anti-Embolism System [PAES]) is first placed with a 260-cm exchange wire in the common carotid artery 3 cm below the carotid bifurcation. Flow reversal is obtained by inflating the balloons in the external and common carotid arteries. Via an external connector, a guidewire and E-Trap filter are delivered to the distal ICA with active suction from a syringe on the PAES catheter. Once the filter is above the stenosis, the reversed flow is discontinued, and the procedure proceeds under cerebral protection with the filter.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of 2 existing cerebral protection devices could, at least in theory, achieve what neither of them could independently. The "seat belt and air bag" approach may represent the ideal means of treating ICA stenoses in patients with a non-functioning circle of Willis.

Endovascular treatment of severe symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: early and late outcome

OBJECTIVES

To report a 6 year experience with carotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (CPTA) in a selected group of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed our experience after performing 54 CPTAs, with (n=18) or without (n=36) stent deployment, over a period of 6 years from 1993 to 1999. All patients, except one, suffered from focal hemispheric neurologic symptoms. During the same time period 284 patients underwent carotid endarterectomy. The selection of the 54 patients (16%) for CPTA was based on the carotid angiogram and the sole inclusion criterion for endovascular treatment was a short, concentric, and smooth stenosis of more than 70% without ulceration or severe calcification. All patients who had a patent internal carotid artery after the last control were invited for a clinical duplex examination and all duplex examinations were carried out by a single experienced observer.

RESULTS

Early outcome (<30 days): CPTA was judged technically successful in 50 cases (93%). Ten patients (18%) experienced a neurological event in relation to the procedure and one patient (2%) suffered a major stroke. One stent occluded within 30 days.

LATE OUTCOME

Forty-six patients (85%) entered the follow-up study after a median of 34 months (range 1-80 months). Six patients (13%) had recurrent symptoms. The colour-duplex examination (n=45) showed internal carotid artery occlusion in 2 patients (5%), and restenosis (>70%) in 10 patients (22%). We found no significant difference in the reoccurrence of neurological symptoms or the rate of restenosis between patients treated with and without stent (Log Rank 0.28, p=0,59). ICA was patent without restenosis in 60% after 48 months in patients treated with CPTA alone, and in 76% after 3 months in patients treated with a stent (N.S.).

CONCLUSION

CPTA in a selected group of patients has a mortality and major stroke rate comparable to that of carotid endarterectomy. However, the risk of transient neurological events was high, as well as the incidence of restenosis (>70%) after 3 years. We still consider CPTA an experimental procedure. The indications for this treatment must be clarified if CPTA should be an alternative to surgery with a comparable neurological complication rate.

Internal to external carotid artery transposition to repair recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting

Recently, carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a treatment option for carotid artery stenosis. Since the procedure is new, management of its complications is not standardized. This case report describes one method of arterial reconstruction after failed CAS. A 64-year-old male underwent CAS of his right internal carotid artery (ICA) for an asymptomatic 65% stenosis. Seven months later the stented area had narrowed to 95%. Arteriography revealed that the common and external carotid arteries (ECA) were free of disease so we elected to perform a transposition of the distal ICA onto the proximal ECA. The ECA and its branches were completely mobilized and the ascending pharyngeal and lingual arteries divided. The ICA was divided distal to the stent. Transection of the occipital artery provided an arteriotomy for an end ICA to side ECA anastamosis, thus preserving ECA flow. Postoperative surveillance after 8 months has revealed no recurrent stenosis. Operative repair of restenosis after CAS may be challenging if standard endarterectomy is not possible. Other options for reconstruction are feasible but if the common and external carotid arteries are disease-free, an ICA to ECA transposition provides a simple all-arterial repair that avoids bypass and prosthetic material.

The ICAROS registry of carotid artery stenting. Imaging in Carotid Angioplasties and Risk of Stroke

ICAROS (Imaging in Carotid Angioplasties and Risk Of Stroke) is a multicenter international registry of carotid artery stenting designed to determine the criteria for identifying patients at higher or lower risk of periprocedural stroke and restenosis at 1 year. The aim of the registry is to improve patient selection and consequently reduce the risk of cerebral embolization during carotid stenting. The registry is open to all interventionists performing carotid stenting, and the participants are free to apply their own endovascular techniques and devices, including cerebral protection mechanisms. All cerebral ischemic events following the procedure will be reported. Follow-up surveillance to 1 year will include periodic duplex scanning and neurological examinations. Echographic plaque images will be standardized for comparison, processed for echodensity, and analyzed by computer at the Registry Center. Correlation will be investigated between the echographic index (gray-scale median) and the risk of embolism and outcome of carotid stenting.

Initial evaluation of carotid angioplasty and stenting with three different cerebral protection devices

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to assess the effectiveness of cerebral protection devices during carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement.

METHODS

Between September 1998 and September 1999, carotid angioplasty and stenting were performed in 46 patients with symptomatic (39.1%) or asymptomatic (60.9%) severe carotid artery stenosis. Wallstents were used in all patients with selective predilatation. Cerebral protection devices were used in 25 of these patients. Primary end points were perioperative neurologic complications and mortality. Data were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

The overall combined end point of all neurologic deficits and death rate was 4.34%. Two neurologic events (one transient ischemic attack and one minor stroke) occurred in the unprotected group (9.53%) versus none in the group with cerebral protection. This difference is not statistically significant. The mortality rate was 0% for both groups. On an intention to treat basis, the overall technical success rate for carotid angioplasty was 97.8%, and for placement of cerebral protection devices it was 100%. An important number of particles of different sizes were captured in all cases in which cerebral protection devices were used.

CONCLUSION

Experience has shown that cerebral protection during carotid angioplasty and stenting is technically feasible and appears to be effective in preventing procedure-related neurologic complications. Further investigation is warranted.

Estimating the contemporary in-hospital costs of carotid endarterectomy

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the treatment of choice for symptomatic carotid stenosis and selective asymptomatic lesions. Alternative approaches have recently been championed under the guise of increased efficacy and decreased cost. The purpose of this study was to determine the results and in-hospital costs of CEA in a university hospital in the modern era. A retrospective chart review was undertaken for all patients undergoing CEA between January 1995 and December 1997. This corresponded to the implementation of a clinical path and extended efforts toward cost reduction. Patients undergoing combined CEA and cardiopulmonary bypass were excluded (n = 3). Cost was analyzed by the hospital Office of Program Planning using TSI (Transition Systems, Inc.) software. Direct costs are related to the utilization of clinical resources and are therefore manageable by clinicians (bed, room, supplies, nursing staff, OR staff, radiology, pharmacy, etc.). Total costs additionally include administration and overhead costs not directly chargeable to patient accounts. The results of this study showed that CEA can be safely performed with brief hospital stays and reasonable hospital costs. Results of alternative interventions for the treatment of carotid stenosis should be compared to these contemporary data.