1
|
Chisholm RA, Fung T, Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Bourg NA, Brockelman WY, Bunyavejchewin S, Chang-Yang CH, Chen YY, Chuyong GB, Condit R, Dattaraja HS, Davies SJ, Ediriweera S, Ewango CEN, Fernando ES, Gunatilleke IAUN, Gunatilleke CVS, Hao Z, Howe RW, Kenfack D, Yao TL, Makana JR, McMahon SM, Mi X, Bt. Mohamad M, Myers JA, Nathalang A, Pérez ÁJ, Phumsathan S, Pongpattananurak N, Ren H, Rodriguez LJV, Sukumar R, Sun IF, Suresh HS, Thomas DW, Thompson J, Uriarte M, Valencia R, Wang X, Wolf AT, Zimmerman JK. Assessing the spatial scale of synchrony in forest tree population dynamics. Proc Biol Sci 2024; 291:20240486. [PMID: 39564678 PMCID: PMC11577278 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 10/15/2024] [Indexed: 11/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Populations of forest trees exhibit large temporal fluctuations, but little is known about the synchrony of these fluctuations across space, including their sign, magnitude, causes and characteristic scales. These have important implications for metapopulation persistence and theoretical community ecology. Using data from permanent forest plots spanning local, regional and global spatial scales, we measured spatial synchrony in tree population growth rates over sub-decadal and decadal timescales and explored the relationship of synchrony to geographical distance. Synchrony was high at local scales of less than 1 km, with estimated Pearson correlations of approximately 0.6-0.8 between species' population growth rates across pairs of quadrats. Synchrony decayed by approximately 17-44% with each order of magnitude increase in distance but was still detectably positive at distances of 100 km and beyond. Dispersal cannot explain observed large-scale synchrony because typical seed dispersal distances (<100 m) are far too short to couple the dynamics of distant forests on decadal timescales. We attribute the observed synchrony in forest dynamics primarily to the effect of spatially synchronous environmental drivers (the Moran effect), in particular climate, although pests, pathogens and anthropogenic drivers may play a role for some species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan A. Chisholm
- Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore117558, Singapore
| | - Tak Fung
- Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore117558, Singapore
| | - Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira
- Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian’s National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA22630, USA
- Forest Global Earth Observatory, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Washington, DC20013, USA
| | - Norman A. Bourg
- Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian’s National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA22630, USA
| | - Warren Y. Brockelman
- National Biobank of Thailand, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Science Park, Paholyothin Road, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani12120, Thailand
- Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Phutthamonthon 4 Road, Nakhon Pathom73170, Thailand
| | - Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin
- Department of Forest Biology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok10900, Thailand
- Thai Long-term Forest Ecological Research Project, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok10900, Thailand
| | - Chia-Hao Chang-Yang
- Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung80424
| | - Yu-Yun Chen
- Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien97401
| | - George B. Chuyong
- Department of Plant Science, University of Buea, BueaPO Box 63, Cameroon
| | | | | | - Stuart J. Davies
- Forest Global Earth Observatory, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Washington, DC20013, USA
| | - Sisira Ediriweera
- Department of Science and Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Uva Wellassa University, Badulla90000, Sri Lanka
| | - Corneille E. N. Ewango
- Faculty of Sustainable Management of Renewable Resources, University of Kisangani, KisanganiR408, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Edwino S. Fernando
- Department of Forest Biological Sciences, The University of the Philippines - Los Baños, Laguna4031, Philippines
- Institute of Biology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, 1101, Philippines
| | | | | | - Zhanqing Hao
- State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning110164
| | - Robert W. Howe
- Department of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, WI54311, USA
| | - David Kenfack
- Department of Botany, MRC-166, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC20013-7012, USA
| | - Tze Leong Yao
- Forestry and Environment Division, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, Selangor52109, Malaysia
| | - Jean-Remy Makana
- Faculty of Sciences, University of Kisangani, KisanganiR408, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Sean M. McMahon
- Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, MD21037-0028, USA
- Forest Global Earth Observatory, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Washington, DC20013, USA
| | - Xiangcheng Mi
- Zhejiang Qianjiangyuan Forest Biodiversity National Observation and Research Station, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100093
- National Botanical Garden, Beijing100093
| | - Mohizah Bt. Mohamad
- International Affairs Division, Forest Department Sarawak, Tkt 13, Bangunan Baitulmakmur 2, Medan Raya, Petra Jaya, Kuching, Sarawak93050, Malaysia
| | - Jonathan A. Myers
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO63130, USA
| | - Anuttara Nathalang
- National Biobank of Thailand, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Science Park, Paholyothin Road, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani12120, Thailand
| | - Álvaro J. Pérez
- Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Apartado, Quito17-01-2184, Ecuador
| | - Sangsan Phumsathan
- Thai Long-term Forest Ecological Research Project, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok10900, Thailand
- Department of Conservation, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok10900, Thailand
| | - Nantachai Pongpattananurak
- Department of Forest Biology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok10900, Thailand
- Thai Long-term Forest Ecological Research Project, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok10900, Thailand
| | - Haibao Ren
- Zhejiang Qianjiangyuan Forest Biodiversity National Observation and Research Station, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100093
- National Botanical Garden, Beijing100093
| | | | - Raman Sukumar
- Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560012, India
| | - I-Fang Sun
- Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien97401
| | - Hebbalalu S. Suresh
- Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560012, India
| | - Duncan W. Thomas
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR97331, USA
| | - Jill Thompson
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, MidlothianEH26 0QB, UK
| | - Maria Uriarte
- Department of Ecology, Evolution & Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY10027, USA
| | - Renato Valencia
- Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Apartado, Quito17-01-2184, Ecuador
| | - Xugao Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silvicuture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning110164
| | - Amy T. Wolf
- Department of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, WI54311, USA
| | - Jess K. Zimmerman
- Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR00925, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Riscassi AL, Scanlon TM, Galloway JN. Factors influencing seasonal chemistry patterns in Virginia mountain streams. BIOGEOCHEMISTRY 2024; 167:1175-1201. [PMID: 39430223 PMCID: PMC11489209 DOI: 10.1007/s10533-024-01163-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 10/22/2024]
Abstract
The relative influence of seasonal patterns in hydrological flow and seasonal differences in biological and geochemical activity on stream chemistry patterns is difficult to discern because they covary; temperate systems are characterized by lower mean flow in the summer (i.e. corresponding to deeper flow paths, elevated temperature, and biological activity), and higher mean flow in the winter (i.e. corresponding to shallower flow paths, depressed temperature, and biological dormancy). Using 2018 data, when seasonal stream flow conditions reversed, and two prior conventional water years, the relationship between monthly acid-relevant analyte concentrations and streamflow were compared within and between winter and summer to provide insight into controls on characteristic seasonal chemistry patterns at two mid-Appalachian sites with distinct geology (weatherable mafic and weather resistant siliciclastic). Acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) increased (1) with lower flow, in both seasons and (2) in summer, for all flow conditions. The compounding impacts resulted in a doubling of concentration from typical winter with high flow to summer with low flow at both sites. Base cation patterns tracked ANC at the mafic site, resulting in an ~ 60% increase of from winter with high flow to summer with low flow; distinctions between summer and winter contributed more to the seasonal pattern (72%) than changes in flow. Sulfate increased at the mafic site (1) with higher flow, in both seasons and (2) in winter, for all flow conditions, resulting in an ~ 50% increase from summer with low flow to winter with high flow; distinctions between winter and summer conditions and flow contributed similarly (40-60%) to the typical seasonal chemical pattern. The biogeochemical mechanism driving differences in stream chemistry between summer and winter for the same flow conditions is likely increased rates of natural acidification from elevated soil respiration in summer, resulting in greater bedrock weathering and sulfate adsorption. Findings highlight the significance and consistency of growing vs dormant season variations in temperature and biological activity in driving intra-annual patterns of stream solutes. This data set informs parameterization of hydro-biogeochemical models of stream chemistry in a changing climate at a biologically relevant, seasonal, timescale. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10533-024-01163-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami L. Riscassi
- Environmental Sciences Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Todd M. Scanlon
- Environmental Sciences Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - James N. Galloway
- Environmental Sciences Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sambaraju KR, Srivastava V, Barker BS, Keena MA, Ormsby MD, Carroll AL. Editorial: Forest insect invasions - risk mapping approaches and applications. FRONTIERS IN INSECT SCIENCE 2024; 4:1378061. [PMID: 38562660 PMCID: PMC10982495 DOI: 10.3389/finsc.2024.1378061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Kishan R. Sambaraju
- Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Service, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Vivek Srivastava
- Forest Insect Disturbance Ecology Laboratory, Department of Forest & Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Office of the Chief Forester, Ministry of Forests, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Brittany S. Barker
- Oregon Integrated Pest Management Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States
- Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States
| | - Melody A. Keena
- United States Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Hamden, CT, United States
| | - Michael D. Ormsby
- Office of the Chief Biosecurity Officer, Biosecurity New Zealand, Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Allan L. Carroll
- Forest Insect Disturbance Ecology Laboratory, Department of Forest & Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mu Y, Lindenmayer D, Zheng S, Yang Y, Wang D, Liu J. Size-focused conservation may fail to protect the world's oldest trees. Curr Biol 2023; 33:4641-4649.e3. [PMID: 37820721 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.09.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Old trees are irreplaceable natural resources that provide multifaceted benefits to humans. Current conservation strategies focus primarily on large-sized trees that were often considered old. However, some studies have demonstrated that small trees can be more than thousands of years old, suggesting that conventional size-focused perceptions may hamper the efficiency of current conservation strategies for old trees. Here, we compiled paired age and diameter data using tree-ring records sampled from 121,918 trees from 269 species around the world to detect whether tree size is a strong predictor of age for old trees and whether the spatial distribution of small old trees differs from that of large old trees. We found that tree size was a weak predictor of age for old trees, and diameter explained only 10% of the total age variance of old trees. Unlike large-sized trees that are mainly in warm, wet environments and protected, small old trees are predominantly in cold, dry environments and mostly unprotected, indicating that size-focused conservation failed to protect some of the oldest trees. To conserve old trees, comprehensive old-tree recognition systems are needed that consider not only tree size but also age and external characteristics. Protected areas designed for small old trees are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumei Mu
- MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - David Lindenmayer
- Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
| | - Shilu Zheng
- MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Yongchuan Yang
- Key Laboratory of Eco-Environment of Three Gorges Region, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
| | - Deyi Wang
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jiajia Liu
- MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China; Institute of Eco-Chongming, Shanghai 202183, China.
| |
Collapse
|