What happens to the rectus abdominus fascia after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair?

Closing the gap: medialization of fascia with laparoscopic incisional hernia repair

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic incisional hernioplasty (LIH) bridges the fascial gap between the rectus muscles with a posteriorly placed mesh, and is a low recurrence alternative to other reconstructions. It is unclear if this repair optimizes the function of the abdominal wall. We hypothesize that significant medialization of the fascial edges occurs in patients who undergo LIH.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty-eight patients underwent LIH by a single surgeon between 2004 and 2012. 44 of these had pre- and postoperative CT scans that illustrated the gap between the rectus muscles. All 44 patients underwent LIH with polyester composite mesh, with suture and tack fixation. The distance between the fascial edges on the pre- and postoperative CT scans was compared. Percent medialization was calculated for each defect.

RESULTS

Average fascial separation reduction was 0.8 cm (6.56-5.76 cm, 12.2 % medialization, p < 0.0001). 36 of 44 patients demonstrated a reduction in hernia defect width (81.8 %): these defects reduced 1.09 cm (6.47-5.38 cm, 16.9 % medialization, p < 0.0001). In defects wider than 5 cm, the width reduced by 0.94 cm (8.48-7.54 cm, n = 26, 10.6 % medialization, p = 0.004). The use of meshes ≥500 cm(2) reduced the defect by 0.95 cm (8.42-7.47 cm, 11.23 % medialization, n = 22, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant medialization of the rectus muscles is evident in most patients undergoing LIH. Although the rectus muscles are not ideally approximated, this may help improve the function of the anterior abdominal wall. Further technical refinements and material improvements may improve the reconstructive results of the LIH.

Bulging of the mesh after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernias

Although not a hernia recurrence, symptomatic bulging after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair requires a new repair.

Background and Objectives:

To investigate the prevalence, diagnosis, clinical significance, and treatment strategies for bulging in the area of laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia that is caused by mesh protrusion through the hernia opening, but with intact peripheral fixation of the mesh and actually a still sufficient repair.

Methods:

Medical records of all 765 patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were reviewed, and all patients with a swelling in the repaired area were identified and analyzed.

Results:

Twenty-nine patients were identified. They all underwent a computed tomography assessment. Seventeen patients (2.2% of the total group) had a hernia recurrence; in an additional 12 patients (1.6%), radiologic examinations indicated only bulging of the mesh but no recurrence. Bulging was associated with pain in 4 patients who underwent relaparoscopy and got a new, larger mesh tightly stretched over the entire previous repair. Eight asymptomatic patients decided on “watchful waiting.” All patients remained symptom free during a median follow-up of 22 months.

Conclusion:

Symptomatic bulging, though not a recurrence, requires a new repair and must be considered as an important negative outcome of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. In asymptomatic patients, “watchful waiting” seems justified.

Preliminary experience and development of an algorithm for the optimal use of the laparoscopic component separation technique for myofascial advancement during ventral incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Component separation technique (CST) enables rectus abdominus medialization, but may cause wound complications. Few published outcomes exist involving laparoscopic CST. Our aim was to examine feasibility and outcomes involving open and laparoscopic (lap) CST during ventral incisional hernia repair (VIHR) and present an algorithm for ventral herniorrhaphy.

STUDY DESIGN

Our design was a retrospective cohort study. Over 22 months, 28 patients underwent one of the following: (i) unilateral (U-) lap CST with open VIHR [n = 5], (ii) bilateral (B-) lap CST with open VIHR [n = 7], (iii) B-lap CST with lap VIHR [n = 8], or (iv) B-open CST with open VIHR [n = 8]. Indications for open VIHR included mesh removal, concomitant visceral procedure, wound revision, thin/ulcerated skin, abdominal wall tumor, frozen abdomen, and/or off-midline hernia. During open VIHR, CST was performed in the Ramirez fashion. Lap CST was performed before intraperitoneal access in lap VIHR and after retrorectus dissection in open VIHR. Patient surveillance consisted of clinical encounters and telephone interviews.

RESULTS

Groups were similar regarding age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, hernia width, operative time, and hospital stay. Six of the 20 patients who underwent open VIHR developed wound complications, and two required early reoperation. Four of the six with concomitant visceral procedures had wound complications. No laparoscopic VIHR patients had a wound complication. Based on 11 months' follow-up, one open VIHR patient has concern for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic CST is feasible during open and laparoscopic VIHR, but it appears most beneficial for wound healing after laparoscopic VIHR. During open VIHR, laparoscopic CST may not substantially reduce wound complications.

Early Results of Midline Hernia Repair Using a Minimally Invasive Component Separation Technique

A minimally invasive component separation may lead to a dynamic abdominal wall after hernia repair, with reduced complications. We present early results of our patients undergoing this technique. Five patients were selected for open midline repairs; three with chronic infections, one with a prior midline skin graft, and one who desired a primary, tension-free repair. These three males and two females had a mean age of 50.8 ± 21.1 years and body mass index of 30.9 ± 6.2. The mean number of previous abdominal operations was 7 ± 3.4 and previous attempted hernia repairs were 4 ± 2.7. All patients had a midline laparotomy with lysis of adhesions. An endoscopic component separation was then performed bilaterally. Drains were left in the dissection bed. All patients had the midline closed; four received biologic mesh underlays. Mean operative time was 227 minutes ± 49. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 9.2 days ± 3.6. Early median follow-up was 6 months (range 0.25–9). Two patients required postop transfusions, and two patients had mild complications of the midline wound (hematoma, infection). To date, one recurrence was diagnosed by CT scan. Early evaluation of adopting the minimally invasive (MIS) component separation demonstrates minimal complications and good initial outcomes.

Polyester-based mesh for ventral hernia repair: is it safe?

INTRODUCTION

The ideal prosthetic material for ventral hernia repair has yet to be described. Each prosthetic material has unique advantages and disadvantages in terms of tissue ingrowth, adhesion formation, and shrinkage profiles. Polyester-based mesh has shown minimal shrinkage and excellent tissue ingrowth in animal models. However, the macroporous, braided nature of this material has raised several concerns regarding the incidence of infections, fistulas, and bowel obstructions. We have reviewed our experience with polyester-based mesh for the repair of ventral hernias.

METHODS

All patients undergoing ventral hernia repair at the Case Comprehensive Hernia Center at University Hospitals of Cleveland from December 2005 to April 2008 were included. Laparoscopic cases underwent intraperitoneal placement of a polyester-based mesh with a collagen hydrogel anti-adhesive barrier. The mesh was sized for at least 4 cm of fascial overlap, and transfascial fixation sutures and titanium spiral tacks were used routinely to secure the mesh to the abdominal wall. Those cases deemed inappropriate for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair underwent open repair. Open ventral hernia repairs were performed using a retrorectus repair, placing the mesh in an extraperitoneal position. Unprotected polyester mesh was used in these cases. Pertinent data included patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative outcomes, and long-term follow-up evaluation.

RESULTS

During the study period 109 patients underwent ventral hernia repair with polyester mesh. Seventy-nine patients had a laparoscopic repair, and 30 patients had an open repair. The mean age was 57 years, with a mean body mass index of 33 kg/m(2), and American Society of Anesthesia score of 2.6. The patients had undergone 2.1 prior abdominal surgical procedures, and 42 patients had recurrent hernias. Surgical details for the laparoscopic repair and open repair were as follows: mean defect size, 116 versus 403 cm(2); mesh size, 367 versus 1,055 cm(2); and surgical times, 132 versus 170 minutes, respectively. The average hospital stay was 4.2 days for the laparoscopic repair and 5.8 days for the open repair groups. With a mean follow-up period of 14 months (range, 2-28 mo) in the laparoscopic repair group, 1 patient (1.4%) developed a mesh infection (with a history of a prior methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus mesh infection), 1 patient (1.4%) developed a small-bowel obstruction remote to the mesh on re-exploration, and there were no fistulas. With a mean follow-up period of 11 months (range, 2-21 mo) in the open repair group, 3 wound infections (13%) occurred, 2 involved the mesh, which was salvaged with local wound care in 1, and required partial mesh resection in the other, and there were no bowel obstructions or fistulas during the follow-up evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that in this complex group of patients, polyester mesh placed during ventral hernia repair results in acceptable infection rates, and no direct bowel complications or fistulas. Given the macroporous nature of the mesh, each case of infection was treated successfully with local wound measures or partial mesh resection. Polyester-based meshes with an anti-adhesive barrier appear safe for intraperitoneal placement.

Recurrences after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: lessons learned from 505 repairs

BACKGROUND

All hernia recurrences in a series of 505 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of a ventral hernia (n=291) or incisional hernia (n=214) were analyzed to identify factors responsible for the recurrence.

METHODS

In all laparoscopic repairs, an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis overlapping the hernia margins by >or=3 cm was fixed with a double ring of tacks alone (n=206) or with tacks as well as sutures (n=299). During the mean follow-up time of 31.3 +/- 18.4 months, nine patients (1.8%) had a recurrence, eight of which were repaired laparoscopically. Operative reports and videotapes of all initial repairs and repairs of recurrences were analyzed.

RESULTS

All recurrences followed an incisional hernia repair (p<0.001). Five recurrences developed after mesh fixation with both tacks and sutures and four after mesh fixation with tacks alone (p=1.0). All recurrences were at the site of the apparently sufficient original incision scar: in eight patients, the recurrent hernia was attached to the mesh; in one, it developed in another part of the scar. All initial repairs had been performed without technical errors. Upon repair of the recurrences, a new, larger mesh was placed over the entire incision, not just the hernia. There were no re-recurrences during follow-up (mean 19.8+/-10.3 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence after incisional hernia repair appears to be due primarily to disregard for the principle that the whole incision--not just the hernia--must be repaired. Our experience supports the idea that the entire incision has a potential for hernia development. Insufficient coverage of the incision scar is a risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia.

Differences in polypropylene shrinkage depending on mesh position in an experimental study

BACKGROUND

Polypropylene (PP) mesh is one of the most frequent materials used in hernia repair. We have experimentally evaluated the shrinkage of PP mesh depending on the place of implantation.

METHODS

In 15 New Zealand rabbits a muscular defect measuring 3 x 3 cm was created in both pararectal sides of the abdominal wall. The defect was repaired using a PP mesh measuring 5 x 3.5 cm that was placed in the right side in the sublay location and in the left side in the onlay location. Five animals were killed on the 30th, 60th, and 90th postoperative days. Macroscopic measurement and microscopic study of the prosthesis-host tissue interfaces were performed.

RESULTS

One rabbit was killed because of severe infection in the onlay mesh. Another 2 infections were tolerated in the onlay mesh side. All the prostheses were integrated in the host tissue at death. In the macroscopic evaluation the mesh areas were reduced by 25.92% on the 30th day, by 28.67% on the 60th day, and by 29.02% on the 90th day. The mesh shrinkage was greater in the onlay group than in the sublay group at the 3 time intervals. More inflammatory leukocyte and mononuclear responses also were seen in the onlay group.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations support the theory of PP mesh shrinkage as a consequence of the incorporation of the biomaterial to the scarring tissue. This shrinkage is significantly more intense if the meshes are placed in the onlay position.