Laparoscopic management of incisional hernias > or = 15 cm in diameter

Vermiform Appendix within Post-Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia: A Unique Case Report and Literature Review

Background: Appendicitis within incisional hernia is an extraordinarily rare postoperative complication with an incidence range from 0.08 to 1%. From the 14 cases that we found in the English literature, only three present appendixes vermiform in incisional hernia followed by laparoscopic surgery. Only two cases are treated minimally invasively by the laparoscopic approach. Case presentation: We introduce a 65-year-old man who had a laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection and had a lump found at the 12 mm trocar site in the right iliac area in the late postoperative phase. There were no complaints from the patient. A vermiform appendix was unexpectedly discovered in the sac of that incisional hernia during control CT scans performed by chemotherapists. Laparoscopic hernia repair without appendectomy was performed. Postoperative outcomes were excellent. Conclusions: Because of low incidence and a lack of distinctive clinical presentation of appendicitis within incisional hernia, there is a risk of delayed perioperative diagnosis and treatment. A CT scan might play an important role in verifying the diagnosis early. For better postoperative outcomes, if possible, laparoscopic surgery should be chosen.

"Slim-Mesh" Technique for Giant Ventral Hernia

Background and Objective:

We devised a sutureless “Slim-Mesh” technique to treat ventral hernias, including large-giant/massive ones, reduce intra- and postoperative complications, and lower operation time.

Methods:

Between September 1, 2009 and October 31, 2020, 43 patients with large (10 – 14.9 cm)-giant (15 – 19.9 cm) and massive (≥ 20 cm) ventral hernia were operated at our Department with the above technique. This was a prospective (79%)-retrospective study.

Results:

This study comprised 22 males and 21 females. Mean age was 63 years. Large-giant and massive hernias were found intraoperatively in 37 and 6 cases respectively. Mean operation time for all hernias was 116 minutes, 104 for large-giant hernias, and 190 for massive. In 53.4% of cases, hernia-neck operative measurement was larger than preoperative size. In 25.5% of cases, laparoscopy found satellite hernias previously undetected by ultrasound- and/or computed tomography scan. A composite mesh and a noncomposite mesh were used in 95% and 5% of cases respectively. For mesh fixation, titanium tacks and absorbable straps were used in 14% and 86% of cases respectively. Mean length of hospital stay was 2.3 days. Mean follow-up time was 3 years and 4 months. In our study, there were 5 early postoperative complications: 3 seromas, 1 trocar-site hernia, and 1 case of cystitis. We found 2 late small symptomless recurrences (4.6%).

Conclusion:

The sutureless “Slim-Mesh” technique facilitates intra-abdominal introduction, as well as the handling and fixation of giant and monster (36 × 26 cm) meshes. In our experience, “Slim-Mesh” is safe, simple, and fast, and economical even for large-giant/massive ventral hernia repair.

What Exactly is Meant by "Loss of Domain" for Ventral Hernia? Systematic Review of Definitions

Large ventral hernias are a significant surgical challenge. "Loss of domain" (LOD) expresses the relationship between hernia and abdominal volume, and is used to predict operative difficulty and success. This systematic review assessed whether different definitions of LOD are used in the literature. The PubMed database was searched for articles reporting large hernia repairs that explicitly described LOD. Two reviewers screened citations and extracted data from selected articles, focusing on the definitions used for LOD, study demographics, study design, and reporting surgical specialty. One hundred and seven articles were identified, 93 full-texts examined, and 77 were included in the systematic review. Sixty-seven articles were from the primary literature, and 10 articles were from the secondary literature. Twenty-eight articles (36%) gave a written definition for loss of domain. These varied and divided into six broad groupings; four described the loss of the right of domain, six described abdominal strap muscle contraction, five described the "second abdomen", five describing large irreducible hernias. Six gave miscellaneous definitions. Two articles gave multiple definitions. Twenty articles (26%) gave volumetric definitions; eight used the Tanaka method [hernia sac volume (HSV)/abdominal cavity volume] and five used the Sabbagh method [(HSV)/total peritoneal volume]. The definitions used for loss of domain were not dependent on the reporting specialty. Our systematic review revealed that multiple definitions of loss of domain are being used. These vary and are not interchangeable. Expert consensus on this matter is necessary to standardise this important concept for hernia surgeons.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of methods of mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Ventral hernia repairs are common and have high recurrence rates. They are usually repaired laparoscopically with an intraperitoneal mesh, which can be fixed in various ways. The aim was to evaluate the recurrence rates for the different fixation techniques.

METHODS

This systematic review included studies with human adults with a ventral hernia repaired with an intraperitoneal onlay mesh. The outcome was recurrence at least 6 months after operation. Cohort studies with 50 or more participants and all RCTs were included. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched on 22 September 2016. RCTs were assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool and cohort studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Studies comparing fixation techniques were included in a network meta-analysis, which allowed comparison of more than two fixation techniques.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies with a total of 6553 participants were included. The overall crude recurrence rates with the various fixation techniques were: absorbable tacks, 17·5 per cent (2 treatment groups); absorbable tacks with sutures, 0·7 per cent (3); permanent tacks, 7·7 per cent (20); permanent tacks with sutures, 6·0 per cent (25); and sutures, 1·5 per cent (6). Six studies were included in a network meta-analysis, which favoured fixation with sutures. Although statistical significance was not achieved, there was a 93 per cent chance of sutures being better than one of the other methods.

CONCLUSION

Both crude recurrence rates and the network meta-analysis favoured fixation with sutures during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Incisional Hernia Repair: What the Radiologist Needs to Know

OBJECTIVE

Incisional hernias are becoming more prevalent with increases in the obesity of the population and the complexity of abdominal surgeries. Radiologists' understanding of these hernias is limited. This article examines abdominal wall anatomy, surgical techniques, the role of imaging (current and emerging), and complications from the surgical perspective, to enhance to the role of the radiologist.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the relevant anatomy, surgical techniques, and postoperative complications in patients with incisional hernial repair can help the radiologist improve care.

Laparoscopic repair of ventral/incisional hernias with the "Slim-Mesh" technique without transabdominal fixation sutures: preliminary report on short/midterm results

This study details our experience with a new laparoscopic technique called "Slim-Mesh" without using transabdominal full-thickness stitches, to treat ventral and incisional hernias (V/IH). Since 2009-May 2015, 28 consecutive patients with V/IH were treated in our center, with this new SM technique. Fifty percent males were included in this retrospective study, averaging 59 years (range 31-81 years). Mean body mass index was 26 and VH size was <10 cm in 24 cases and in 4 cases was larger, up to 22 cm. Mean operative time in the 28 V/IH patients was 97 min (range 57-160 min) and in those with V/IH larger than 10 cm it was 135 min. In 14.2% of patients laparoscopy diagnosed others V/IH previously undetected by physical examination and CT-scan. In all patients a composite mesh was used, up to 30 cm in size. In this series we had one intraoperative complication (3.6%) with transient bradycardia, but no conversion occurred; no early postoperative complication was detected. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.0 days. Mean follow-up time was 40 months (range 13-78 months). Late surgical complications included one case (3.6%) of incisional hernia recurrence and one case of 10 mm trocar site incisional hernia. This new surgical technique for V/IH repair, makes easy the handling and fixation of the composite mesh without using transabdominal fixation sutures, and appears in our experience fast, and simple.

A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia

PURPOSE

Incisional hernia (IH) is one of the most frequent postoperative complications. Of all patients undergoing IH repair, a vast amount have a hernia which can be defined as a large incisional hernia (LIH). The aim of this study is to identify the preferred technique for LIH repair.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed and studies describing patients with IH with a diameter of 10 cm or a surface of 100 cm2 or more were included. Recurrence hazards per year were calculated for all techniques using a generalized linear model.

RESULTS

Fifty-five articles were included, containing 3,945 LIH repairs. Mesh reinforced techniques displayed better recurrence rates and hazards than techniques without mesh reinforcement. Of all the mesh techniques, sublay repair, sandwich technique with sublay mesh and aponeuroplasty with intraperitoneal mesh displayed the best results (recurrence rates of <3.6%, recurrence hazard <0.5% per year). Wound complications were frequent and most often seen after complex LIH repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of mesh during LIH repair displayed the best recurrence rates and hazards. If possible mesh in sublay position should be used in cases of LIH repair.

[Indications for laparoscopic treatment of large incisional hernias]

Hernia surgeons and patients have learned to appreciate the advantages of minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures. After overcoming the early learning curve phase, smaller wound surface areas, shorter operation times and briefer hospital stays have become routine. Severe surgery-related complications are rare. Patients with poor risk profiles (e.g. age >70 years, BMI >30 and nicotine consumption) profit especially from these advantages. This positive picture is clouded, however, by the need for an intraperitoneal mesh and specifically by the unchanged recurrence rate. The latter is not significantly lowered even by laparoscopic intraperitoneal on-lay mesh (laparoscopic IPOM) procedures. The current literature shows that irrespective of surgical technique, e.g. retromuscular mesh or laparoscopic IPOM, the risk profile and size of the hernia defect are independent factors that determine the prognosis for recurrence. While a cure of incisional hernia is no longer the only goal, the new indication scenario has two main goals: (a) for young patients at low risk or in patients for whom functional and morphological reconstruction of the abdominal wall are of primary importance, an open retromuscular mesh procedure is indicated (despite the higher morbidity) and (b) for older patients and chiefly for patients with a complex risk profile for whom treatment of the ventral hernia symptoms is paramount, laparoscopic procedures are indicated (due to the lower morbidity). This algorithm assumes that the treating surgeons have the requisite expertise and is discussed using the examples of four complex case reports.

Laparoscopic repair for recurrent incisional hernias: a single institute experience of 10 years

PURPOSE

The treatment of recurrent incisional hernias (RIH) has been associated with unsatisfactory postoperative (PO) morbidity and high failure rates. The aim of this study is to retrospectively investigate our single-center experience of laparoscopic repair (LR) for RIH.

METHODS

The case records of 69 patients with RIH who underwent LR in our institution between January 2002 and November 2011 were reviewed. The operative technique has been standardized and provides onlay placement of an ePTFE mesh fixed with titanium tacks. Patients' demographic data and comorbidities, intraoperative course, PO complications and recurrences at follow-up were systematically collected and analyzed. The influence of defect's size and obesity variables on clinical outcomes was also investigated.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 147.6 ± 71.2 min and mean hospital stay was 5.8 ± 1.8 days. No conversion occurred while five intraoperative complications (7.2 %) were recorded: three bowel injuries treated by laparoscopic sutures, one omentum bleeding and one epigastric vessel lesion. PO mortality was null, while overall morbidity was 13 % (9 patients) with a prevalence of seroma lasting over 8 weeks in six patients (8.7 %). Along a mean follow-up of 41 months (range 6-119), recurrence rate was 5.7 % (4 patients). Univariate analysis for width of defects and BMI showed no significant influence on patients' outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment for RIH remains controversial because of lack in literature of specific studies on this topic. Morbid obesity and large defects have been often associated with technical difficulties and worse results. Our 10 years' experience with LR provided satisfactory results in terms of PO morbidity and recurrence rate, despite any kind of patient selection.

Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Repair for giant incisional hernias is a challenge due to unacceptable high morbidity and recurrence rates. Several surgical techniques are available, but all are poorly documented. This systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the existing literature on repair for giant incisional hernia.

METHODS

Literature was identified through a systematic search on PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL. We only included studies with clearly defined surgical techniques and defect size of at least 15 cm. The heterogeneity of the studies precluded a meta-analysis. The analysis was based on the premises of a systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

We identified 14 studies (1,198 patients) including one randomised trial. Studies were mainly small and retrospective and highly heterogenic regarding design, outcome, inclusion, and exclusion criteria. The overall morbidity rate was median 32 % with a wide range between studies of 4-100 %. The mortality ranged from 0 to 5 % (median 0 %) and recurrence rate ranged from 0 to 53 % (median 5 %). Study follow-up ranged from 15 to 97 months (median 36 months). Mesh repair should always be used for patients undergoing repair for a giant hernia, and the sublay position may have advantages over onlay positioning. To avoid tension, it may be advisable to use a mesh in combination with a component separation technique. Inlay positioning of the mesh and repair without a mesh should be avoided.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence to optimise repair for giant hernias is weak due to the heterogeneity and the poor quality of studies. However, sublay positioning of the mesh perhaps in combination with a component separation technique may be advantageous compared with other surgical techniques for giant hernia repair. Giant hernia repair is a challenging surgical procedure and severely lack evidence-based research from high-quality, large-scaled randomised studies.

Short- and mid-term outcome after laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome after laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorrhaphy (LIVH) for fascial defect larger or equal than 15 cm in width with the outcome after LIVH in patients with hernia defect smaller than 15 cm.

METHODS

From 2003 through 2010, 350 patients were submitted to LIVH. In 70 cases, hernia defect was ≥15 cm in width and in 280 was <15 cm. Incisional hernias were often recurrent, double or multiorificial. In the group of larger hernias, the rate of obesity, recurrent hernia and multiorificial hernia was 27.1, 24.2 and 12.8 %, respectively, and in the group of smaller hernias 27.3, 16.1 and 2.8 %, respectively. Patients were interviewed using McGill pain score test to measure postoperative quality of life (QoL) in the mid-term.

RESULTS

LIVH for hernia ≥15 cm required longer surgical time (p = 0.034) and postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.0001). Besides, there were higher rate of postoperative prolonged ileus (p = 0.035) and polmonitis (p = 0.001). Overall recurrence rate was 2.6, 8.6 % for larger and 1.1 % for smaller incisional hernias, p = 0.045. Mc Gill pain test revealed no significant difference in the two groups of patients in postoperative QoL within 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic approach seems safe and effective even to repair large incisional hernia, the rate of recurrence was higher, but acceptable, if compared to smaller hernias. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of incisional hernias ≥15 cm managed by laparoscopy.

Staged laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair when faced with enterotomy or suspicion of an enterotomy

Enterotomy is a significant complication of laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair (LVHR) and can be devastating if missed. Enterotomy occurs in 2.6% of patients undergoing LVHR and is missed 21.8% of the time. Controversy exists regarding the management of known or potential enterotomies. Approaches for managing recognized enterotomies during hernia repair are usually employed immediately; in a nonstaged fashion; and include laparoscopic enterotomy repair with immediate LVHR, laparotomy for repair of enterotomy with concomitant LVHR, or conversion to laparotomy for both enterotomy and hernia repair. The staged approach for managing recognized or potential enterotomies is less commonly employed and involves laparoscopic repair of enterotomy, admission, and delayed but definitive laparoscopic hernia repair in the same hospitalization. The presence of known or potential enterotomies during LVHR presents a difficult problem and may be a contraindication for immediate placement of prosthetic because of increased risks posed for abdominal infection, reoperation, prosthetic removal, hernia recurrence, and death. The staged approach--with a 2- to 5-day delay--represents a safe solution to this challenging problem. We present 4 cases managed via staged approach due to an enterotomy, risk factors, and suspicion for missed or delayed enterotomies augmented by a review of the literature.

Sutureless laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in obese patients

Results of this study show that laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy as an outpatient procedure without transfascial suture fixation is feasible in obese patients.

Background and Objective:

Transfascial sutures (TFS) are a standard component of laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy (LVHR) that contribute to the durability of repair, but also pain and, resultantly, hospital stay. We sought to examine LVHR without TFS in obese patients with small abdominal wall hernias.

Methods:

Between September 2002 and December 2007, 174 patients underwent LVHR at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Patients with BMI >30kg/m² and small primary abdominal wall hernias were eligible for repair without TFS. Correlation between BMI, defect surface area, operative time, and postoperative stay was assessed.

Results:

Fourteen patients underwent LVHR with no TFS, 2 with normal BMI and recurrent hernia after open repair and 12 with BMI>30 kg/m² and primary small hernia. Mean age was 38.8 years. The average defect size was 5.3cm²; mean operative time (OT) was 42 minutes. Eleven patients (92%) were discharged home the day of surgery. No infectious or bleeding complications occurred. One patient required chronic pain management, and 8 patients (67%) developed seromas that resorbed spontaneously. There was no hernia recurrence at 7-month follow-up.

Conclusion:

LVHR is feasible without TFS provided the hernia defect is small. Surgery can be performed on an outpatient basis in obese individuals with minimal postoperative morbidity.

SILS Incisional Hernia Repair: Is It Feasible in Giant Hernias? A Report of Three Cases

Aim. Three incisional ventral abdominal wall hernias were repaired by placing a 20 × 30 cm composite mesh via single incision of 2 cm. Methods. All three cases had previous operations and presented with giant incisional defects clinically. The defects were repaired laparoscopically via single incision with the placement of a composite mesh of 20 × 30 cm. Nonabsorbable sutures were needed to hang and fix the mesh only in the first case. Double-crown technique was used in all of the cases to secure the mesh to the anterior abdominal wall. Results. The mean operation time was 120 minutes. The patients were mobilized and led for oral intake at the first postoperative day. No morbidity occurred. Conclusion. Abdominal incisional hernias can be repaired via single incision with a mesh application in experienced centers.