Hernia sac of indirect inguinal hernia: invagination, excision, or ligation?

Is the transection of the hernia sac during laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty safe and feasible? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

There is a debate over whether to transect or completely reduce the hernia sac during laparoscopic tension-free repair of inguinal hernia. This study endeavors to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of two approaches, namely transected sac (TS) and completely reduced sac (RS), in laparoscopic tension-free repair of inguinal hernia. Utilizing a meta-analysis methodology, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of these techniques. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify comparative studies focusing on laparoscopic tension-free repair of inguinal hernia, specifically comparing TS and RS techniques. The selected studies were subjected to meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 8 studies, involving 2995 patients with inguinal hernia, were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis results revealed that the TS group had a higher incidence of seroma compared to the RS group [OR = 1.74, 95% CI (1.35, 2.25), P < 0.0001], and a prolonged time to return to normal activity postoperatively [MD = 0.99, 95% CI (0.85, 1.14), P < 0.00001]. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operation time [MD = -1.75, 95% CI (- 8.72, 5.22), P = 0.62], incidence of postoperative pain [OR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.41, 2.44), P = 1.00], overall postoperative complication rate [OR = 0.98, 95% CI (0.43, 2.20), P = 0.95], and recurrence rate fOR = 2.53, 95% CI (0.61, 10.39), P = 0.20]. Transected sac in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is associated with an increased incidence of seroma and a longer recovery time for patients to return to normal activity. Clinical trial registration Registration number is INPLASY20223110070.

Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: ten recommendations to optimize surgical outcomes

PURPOSE

Approximately 20 million individuals worldwide undergo inguinal hernia surgery annually. The Lichtenstein technique is the most commonly used surgical procedure in this setting. The objective of this study was to revisit this technique and present ten recommendations based on the best practices.

METHODS

PubMed and Scientific Electronic Library Online were used to systematically search for articles about the Lichtenstein technique and its modifications. Literature regarding this technique and surgical strategies to prevent chronic pain were the basis for formulating ten recommendations for best practices during Lichtenstein surgery.

RESULTS

Ten recommendations were proposed based on best practices in the Lichtenstein technique: neuroanatomical assessment, chronic pain prevention, pragmatic neurectomy, spermatic cord structure management, femoral canal assessment, hernia sac management, mesh characteristics, fixation, recurrence prevention, and surgical convalescence.

CONCLUSION

The ten recommendations are practical ways to achieve a safe and successful procedure. We fell that following these recommendations can improve surgical outcomes using the Lichtenstein technique.

The Lichtenstein technique is being used adequately in inguinal hernia repair: national analysis and review of the surgical technique

INTRODUCTION

it is estimated that approximately 20 million people undergo inguinal hernia surgery annually in the world, with the Lichtenstein technique being the most performed surgical procedure. The objective of this study is to analyze the knowledge of the technical principles used in the Lichtenstein technique.

METHOD

Survey-type intersectional study approved by the research ethics committee of São Camilo University Center (CAAE: 70036523.1.0000.0062). During the research period, 11,622 e-mails were sent to members of the main national surgical societies with research on the technical principles of Lichtenstein surgery. The survey was carried out using an electronic form with 10 multiple-choice questions. The form was answered anonymously on the SurveyMonkey and Google Forms platforms.

RESULT

744 responses were received to the electronic form. Based on this number of respondents, our survey has a confidence level of 95% with a margin of error of 3.5%. It was observed that there is no standardization of the technique among the majority of responders (53.4%). Many surgeons still perform digital dissection of the spermatic cord (47%). A small number of interviewees (15.2%) performed sutures with absorbable thread in the region of the internal oblique aponeurosis, while more than half (55.2%) continued to perform sutures with non-absorbable thread. Most surgeons use a small overlap or fix the mesh juxtaposed to the pubic symphysis (51%).

CONCLUSION

Our research identified that a small percentage of respondents adequately know the technical principles of Lichtenstein surgery. The result brings us new insights into the need to review Lichtenstein technique.

Sac invagination versus sac ligation in open Lichtenstein repair of indirect inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

To compare the outcomes of sac invagination and sac ligation in patients undergoing open Lichtenstein repair of indirect inguinal hernia.

METHODS

A systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards was conducted to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of sac invagination and sac ligation in patients undergoing open Lichtenstein repair of indirect inguinal hernia. Random effects modeling was applied to calculate pooled outcome data.

RESULTS

Analysis of 843 patients with 851 hernias from 6 randomized controlled trials suggested no difference between the sac invagination and sac ligation techniques in terms of recurrence (risk difference: 0.00, P = .91), chronic pain (risk difference: 0.00, P = .98), operative time (mean difference: -0.15, P = .89), hematoma (odds ratio: 0.93, P = .93), seroma (odds ratio: 1.00, P = 1.00), surgical site infection (odds ratio: 1.68, P = .40), or urinary retention (odds ratio: 0.85, P = .78); however, ligation of sac resulted in more early postoperative pain as measured by visual analog scale score at 6 hours postoperatively (mean difference: -0.92, P < .00001), at 12 hours postoperatively (mean difference: -0.94, P = .001), at 24 hours postoperatively (mean difference: -1.08, P < .00001), and on day 7 postoperatively (mean difference: -0.99, P = .009). The quality and certainty of the available evidence were moderate.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from randomized controlled trials with moderate certainty suggests that ligation of indirect inguinal hernia sac during open Lichtenstein repair may not improve the outcomes regarding recurrence, chronic pain, or operative complications but may result in more early postoperative pain. Future randomized controlled trials with more robust statistical power and methodological quality would help improve the available evidence's certainty.

A comparison of hernia sac ligation versus invagination in Lichtenstein tension-free mesh hernioplasty: does the type of hernia play a role in outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Management of the indirect hernial sac in inguinal hernia repairs has long been a subject of debate among general surgeons. Although hernial sac high ligation (HL) is a time-honored concept in groin hernia surgery, non-ligation/invagination is gaining popularity. This study was intended to compare the effects of hernia sac ligation and invagination in patients undergoing Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty (LMH). Another aim was to investigate the possible association between the hernial defect size and postoperative early pain in both groups.

METHODS

Patients with indirect inguinal hernia undergoing elective LMH under spinal anesthesia were included in this prospective randomized study. Patients were classified according to European Hernia Society (EHS) criteria and were randomized into two groups, HL and non-HL/invagination. Postoperative pain levels at 6, 12, and 24 h, 7 days, and 1 year were compared using a ten-point visual analog scale (VAS). In addition, recurrence was examined in the postoperative first year. Postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, drain use, and surgery times were evaluated as secondary outcomes. This study was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov . (The clinicaltrials.gov ID number is: NCT05308251).

RESULTS

Ninety-three out of a total of 108 patients were included in the study between January 2020 and January 2021 (HL group n = 44, non-HL group n = 49). Demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups. Mean VAS scores were significantly higher in the HL group at 6 and 12 h postoperatively (p < 0.05 and p = 0.036 respectively). While there was no difference in pain levels between the groups in EHS 1 and EHS 2 hernias (p > 0.05 for all), VAS scores were significantly higher in the ligation group in EHS 3 hernias (p < 0.05 for all). Recurrence and complication rates were unaffected with non-ligation at a median 18 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Hernia sac invagination was superior to ligation in patients who underwent LMH, as it reduced early postoperative pain levels without disturbing repair integrity. We therefore recommend that ligating the hernial sac be avoided, especially in EHS 3 patients who undergo LMH.

The undescended testis in children and adolescents part 2: evaluation and therapeutic approach

Undescended testis (UDT) is defined as failure of a testis to descend into the scrotum and it is a common reason for consultation in pediatric urology. As extensively discussed in "The undescended testis in children and adolescents: part 1", the failure of a testis to descend alters testicular germ-cells development, increasing the risk of infertility and testicular cancer in adulthood. Here, we present the second part of our review and analysis of this topic with the aim to propose an updated and well-informed approach to UDT together with a treatment flow chart that may be useful to guide pediatric surgeons and urologists in the care of these patients. The main goal of the management of patients with UDT is to diminish the risk of infertility and tumor development and is based on the clinical findings at the time of diagnosis.

Effect of complete reduction of hernia sac and transection of hernia sac during laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair on seroma

Introduction

This study investigated the effect of complete reduction and transection of the hernia sac during laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair on seroma.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on 1763 cases undergoing laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair in three centers from January 2017 to September 2019, among them, 311 patients with transection of hernia sac and 1452 patients with reduction of hernia sac, the data of the two groups were tested by t-test. Logistic univariate analysis was performed on 233 cases of postoperative seroma, and variables p < 0.05 in univariate analysis were included for multivariate analysis. Then, the transection group and the reduction group were matched with 1:1 propensity score matching, and the caliper value was set at 0.05. Finally, 274 patients matched in each group were analyzed by univariate analysis again to evaluate whether the transection of hernia sac had an impact on postoperative seroma.

Results

The results of univariate analysis of 233 patients with postoperative seroma showed that: ASA-3 p = 0.031, classification-L3 p < 0.001, surgery-TEP p < 0.001, transect group p = 0.005. The results of multivariate analysis show that: ASA-3 p < 0.001, classification-L3 p < 0.001, surgery-TEP p < 0.001, transect group p = 0.020. The results of univariate analysis after propensity score matching showed that transection of the hernia sac is significant for postoperative seroma (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Transection of the hernia sac during laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair can significantly lead to postoperative seroma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01599-8.

International guidelines for groin hernia management

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, more than 20 million patients undergo groin hernia repair annually. The many different approaches, treatment indications and a significant array of techniques for groin hernia repair warrant guidelines to standardize care, minimize complications, and improve results. The main goal of these guidelines is to improve patient outcomes, specifically to decrease recurrence rates and reduce chronic pain, the most frequent problems following groin hernia repair. They have been endorsed by all five continental hernia societies, the International Endo Hernia Society and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

METHODS

An expert group of international surgeons (the HerniaSurge Group) and one anesthesiologist pain expert was formed. The group consisted of members from all continents with specific experience in hernia-related research. Care was taken to include surgeons who perform different types of repair and had preferably performed research on groin hernia surgery. During the Group's first meeting, evidence-based medicine (EBM) training occurred and 166 key questions (KQ) were formulated. EBM rules were followed in complete literature searches (including a complete search by The Dutch Cochrane database) to January 1, 2015 and to July 1, 2015 for level 1 publications. The articles were scored by teams of two or three according to Oxford, SIGN and Grade methodologies. During five 2-day meetings, results were discussed with the working group members leading to 136 statements and 88 recommendations. Recommendations were graded as "strong" (recommendations) or "weak" (suggestions) and by consensus in some cases upgraded. In the Results and summary section below, the term "should" refers to a recommendation. The AGREE II instrument was used to validate the guidelines. An external review was performed by three international experts. They recommended the guidelines with high scores. The risk factors for inguinal hernia (IH) include: family history, previous contra-lateral hernia, male gender, age, abnormal collagen metabolism, prostatectomy, and low body mass index. Peri-operative risk factors for recurrence include poor surgical techniques, low surgical volumes, surgical inexperience and local anesthesia. These should be considered when treating IH patients. IH diagnosis can be confirmed by physical examination alone in the vast majority of patients with appropriate signs and symptoms. Rarely, ultrasound is necessary. Less commonly still, a dynamic MRI or CT scan or herniography may be needed. The EHS classification system is suggested to stratify IH patients for tailored treatment, research and audit. Symptomatic groin hernias should be treated surgically. Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic male IH patients may be managed with "watchful waiting" since their risk of hernia-related emergencies is low. The majority of these individuals will eventually require surgery; therefore, surgical risks and the watchful waiting strategy should be discussed with patients. Surgical treatment should be tailored to the surgeon's expertise, patient- and hernia-related characteristics and local/national resources. Furthermore, patient health-related, life style and social factors should all influence the shared decision-making process leading up to hernia management. Mesh repair is recommended as first choice, either by an open procedure or a laparo-endoscopic repair technique. One standard repair technique for all groin hernias does not exist. It is recommended that surgeons/surgical services provide both anterior and posterior approach options. Lichtenstein and laparo-endoscopic repair are best evaluated. Many other techniques need further evaluation. Provided that resources and expertise are available, laparo-endoscopic techniques have faster recovery times, lower chronic pain risk and are cost effective. There is discussion concerning laparo-endoscopic management of potential bilateral hernias (occult hernia issue). After patient consent, during TAPP, the contra-lateral side should be inspected. This is not suggested during unilateral TEP repair. After appropriate discussions with patients concerning results tissue repair (first choice is the Shouldice technique) can be offered. Day surgery is recommended for the majority of groin hernia repair provided aftercare is organized. Surgeons should be aware of the intrinsic characteristics of the meshes they use. Use of so-called low-weight mesh may have slight short-term benefits like reduced postoperative pain and shorter convalescence, but are not associated with better longer-term outcomes like recurrence and chronic pain. Mesh selection on weight alone is not recommended. The incidence of erosion seems higher with plug versus flat mesh. It is suggested not to use plug repair techniques. The use of other implants to replace the standard flat mesh in the Lichtenstein technique is currently not recommended. In almost all cases, mesh fixation in TEP is unnecessary. In both TEP and TAPP it is recommended to fix mesh in M3 hernias (large medial) to reduce recurrence risk. Antibiotic prophylaxis in average-risk patients in low-risk environments is not recommended in open surgery. In laparo-endoscopic repair it is never recommended. Local anesthesia in open repair has many advantages, and its use is recommended provided the surgeon is experienced in this technique. General anesthesia is suggested over regional in patients aged 65 and older as it might be associated with fewer complications like myocardial infarction, pneumonia and thromboembolism. Perioperative field blocks and/or subfascial/subcutaneous infiltrations are recommended in all cases of open repair. Patients are recommended to resume normal activities without restrictions as soon as they feel comfortable. Provided expertise is available, it is suggested that women with groin hernias undergo laparo-endoscopic repair in order to decrease the risk of chronic pain and avoid missing a femoral hernia. Watchful waiting is suggested in pregnant women as groin swelling most often consists of self-limited round ligament varicosities. Timely mesh repair by a laparo-endoscopic approach is suggested for femoral hernias provided expertise is available. All complications of groin hernia management are discussed in an extensive chapter on the topic. Overall, the incidence of clinically significant chronic pain is in the 10-12% range, decreasing over time. Debilitating chronic pain affecting normal daily activities or work ranges from 0.5 to 6%. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is defined as bothersome moderate pain impacting daily activities lasting at least 3 months postoperatively and decreasing over time. CPIP risk factors include: young age, female gender, high preoperative pain, early high postoperative pain, recurrent hernia and open repair. For CPIP the focus should be on nerve recognition in open surgery and, in selected cases, prophylactic pragmatic nerve resection (planned resection is not suggested). It is suggested that CPIP management be performed by multi-disciplinary teams. It is also suggested that CPIP be managed by a combination of pharmacological and interventional measures and, if this is unsuccessful, followed by, in selected cases (triple) neurectomy and (in selected cases) mesh removal. For recurrent hernia after anterior repair, posterior repair is recommended. If recurrence occurs after a posterior repair, an anterior repair is recommended. After a failed anterior and posterior approach, management by a specialist hernia surgeon is recommended. Risk factors for hernia incarceration/strangulation include: female gender, femoral hernia and a history of hospitalization related to groin hernia. It is suggested that treatment of emergencies be tailored according to patient- and hernia-related factors, local expertise and resources. Learning curves vary between different techniques. Probably about 100 supervised laparo-endoscopic repairs are needed to achieve the same results as open mesh surgery like Lichtenstein. It is suggested that case load per surgeon is more important than center volume. It is recommended that minimum requirements be developed to certify individuals as expert hernia surgeon. The same is true for the designation "Hernia Center". From a cost-effectiveness perspective, day-case laparoscopic IH repair with minimal use of disposables is recommended. The development and implementation of national groin hernia registries in every country (or region, in the case of small country populations) is suggested. They should include patient follow-up data and account for local healthcare structures. A dissemination and implementation plan of the guidelines will be developed by global (HerniaSurge), regional (international societies) and local (national chapters) initiatives through internet websites, social media and smartphone apps. An overarching plan to improve access to safe IH surgery in low-resource settings (LRSs) is needed. It is suggested that this plan contains simple guidelines and a sustainability strategy, independent of international aid. It is suggested that in LRSs the focus be on performing high-volume Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia using low-cost mesh. Three chapters discuss future research, guidelines for general practitioners and guidelines for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The HerniaSurge Group has developed these extensive and inclusive guidelines for the management of adult groin hernia patients. It is hoped that they will lead to better outcomes for groin hernia patients wherever they live. More knowledge, better training, national audit and specialization in groin hernia management will standardize care for these patients, lead to more effective and efficient healthcare and provide direction for future research.

Is the ligation of hernial sac necessary in herniotomy for children? A randomized controlled trial of evaluating surgical complications and duration

BACKGROUND

Herniotomy is a common operation done by pediatric surgeons. Recent studies have shown that high ligation in herniation in adult is not necessary, but this method was not fully evaluated in children. We compared non-ligation with high-ligation sac in herniotomy in terms of surgical complications and duration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled trial study was done on 104 children with inguinal hernia at Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, between 2011 and 2013. Patients were equally randomized to undergo herniotomy with ligation of sac at the internal ring level or to undergo herniotomy without sac ligation. Patients were followed up just after the operation, and in the 1(st), 6(th), and 12(th) weeks postoperation to discover early (scrotal hematoma, edema, wound infection, and postoperation fever) and late (adhesion and recurrence) complications. Also, duration of operation was recorded for each group.

RESULTS

The incidence of early complications (nine cases in high-ligation and eight cases in non-ligation group) was the same in both groups (P = 0.402). No late complication was observed in any group. The mean duration of operation in high-ligation group (18.84 ± 5.47 min) was significantly shorter than non-ligation group (21.46 ± 9.03 min) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Complications are the same in herniotomy with or without ligation of the sac, but the duration of the non-ligation procedure is shorter than that of high-ligation. We suggest that herniotomy without sac ligation in children be the procedure of choice to save time and also to prevent any other possible complications such as nerve damage, spermatic cord injury, or peritoneal tearing.