Laparoscopic hernia complexity predicts operative time and length of stay

Analysis of Factors Associated with Same-Day Discharge After Robotic Transversus Abdominis Release for Incisional Hernia Repairs

Background: Advancement in surgery has shifted numerous procedures to a same-day discharge (SDD) setting. In this study, we evaluated factors related to SDD after robotic transversus abdominis release (rTAR). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained hernia databank was performed. Patients who underwent rTAR for incisional hernias were assigned to either the SDD group (length of stay [LOS] <1) or the inpatient group (LOS ≥1 day). Pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables were compared. Predictors of SDD were explored through a logistic regression, and a mediation analysis was performed to assess their effect on the LOS. Results: Out of the 167 patients included, 53 patients were discharged the same day. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, history of coronary artery disease, and wound infection were significantly higher in the inpatient group. Overall, median LOS was 1 (0-2). Postoperative complications did not differ between SDD and inpatient groups except for Clavien-Dindo Grade-II (1 versus 14, respectively; P = .039). Thirty-day readmission rates were comparable (P = .229). A binary logistic regression to predict factors associated with SDD rTAR showed statistical significance in age, operative time, mesh area, and history of wound infection. Mediation analysis showed that mesh size indirectly affected the LOS through the operative time (a = 0.54; b = 0.46; P < .001). An age >46-year-old, an operative time beyond 217 minutes, and a mesh size >475 cm² increased the probability of an inpatient stay (area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curves: 0.69, 0.81, and 0.82, respectively). Conclusion: The pre- and intraoperative factors associated with SDD rTAR were age, history of wound infection, operative time, and mesh area. Further studies are needed to investigate the appropriateness of discharge decisions while balancing patients' benefits, resource utilization, and costs.

Epidural anesthesia for post-operative pain is associated with a higher incidence of complications following open ventral hernia repair

INTRODUCTION

Ventral/incisional hernia repair is a common procedure. Epidural anesthesia for post-operative pain control has been used to attempt to limit opioids. The complications associated with epidural anesthesia are starting to be recognized in open ventral hernia repair patients.

METHODS

Data were abstracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) participant use data file for 2015. Adult patients with an open ventral hernia repair were identified. In an effort to identify complex hernias, patients who required the implantation of mesh and remained inpatient for 2 or more days were included. Patients with epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia (epidural group) were compared to those with general anesthesia alone (non-epidural). Descriptive statistics and complications were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1943 patients met inclusion criteria: 1009 patients (51.9%) in the non-epidural group and 934 (48.1%) in the epidural group. There were fewer clean cases in the epidural group (63.2%) than the non-epidural group (68.8%, p = 0.007). Otherwise, there was no difference in gender, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and current smoking status. There were more pulmonary emboli in the epidural group (1.39%) compared to the non-epidural group (0.50%, p = 0.04). Urinary tract infection was also significantly higher in the epidural group (3.10%) compared to the non-epidural group (1.59%, p = 0.03). Transfusions were also administered to more of the epidural patients (5.14%) compared to non-epidural patients (2.78%, p = 0.007). The rates of other post-operative complications were not statistically significant between the two groups. Total length of stay in the hospital was also greater in the epidural group (6.7 vs. 5.0 days, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This is an association with the use of epidural anesthesia in open ventral hernia repairs and an increased incidence of pulmonary emboli, transfusions, and urinary tract infections, as well as an increased length of stay.

Case Difficulty, Postgraduate Year, and Resident Surgeon Stress: Effects on Operative Times

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate resident operative times in relation to postgraduate year (PGY), case difficulty and resident stress while performing a single surgical procedure.

DESIGN

We prospectively examined operative times for 268 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and analyzed relationships between PGY, case difficulty, and resident surgeon stress utilizing electrodermal activity. Each case operative times were divided into 3 separate time periods. Case Start and End times were recorded, as well as the time between the start of the operation and the time until the cystic structures were divided (Division). Case difficulty was determined by multiple trained observers with a high inter-rater concordance.

SETTING

University of Missouri, a tertiary academic medical institution.

PARTICIPANTS

All categorical general surgery residents at our institution.

RESULTS

For each operative time period examined during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, operative time increased, with each incremental increase in difficulty resulting in approximately 130% longer times. Minimal differences in operative times were seen between PGY levels, except during the easiest cases (Start-End times: 38.5 ± 10.4 minutes vs 34.2 ± 10.8 minutes vs 28.9 ± 10.9 minutes, p 0.002). Resident stress poorly correlated with operative times regardless of case difficulty (Pearson coefficient range 0.0-0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Operative times are longer with increasing case difficulty. PGY level and resident surgeon stress appear to have minimal to no correlation with operative times, regardless of case difficulty.

Emergent Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repairs

BACKGROUND

Emergent repairs of incarcerated and strangulated ventral hernia repairs (VHR) are associated with higher perioperative morbidity and mortality than those repaired electively. Despite increasing utilization of minimally invasive techniques in elective repairs, the role for laparoscopy in emergent VHR is not well defined, and its feasibility has been demonstrated only in single center studies.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2009-2016) was queried for emergent VHR. Laparoscopic and open techniques were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 11,075 patients who underwent emergent ventral and incisional hernia repairs were identified: 85.5% open ventral hernia repair (OVHR), 14.5% laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR). Patients who underwent emergent OVHRs were older, more comorbid, and more likely to be septic at the time of surgery than those undergoing emergent LVHRs. Emergent OVHR patients were more likely to have minor complications (22.1% versus 11.0%; OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.069-2.834). After controlling for confounding variables, LVHR and OVHR had similar outcomes, with the exception of higher rates of superficial surgical site infection in OVHR (5.0% versus 1.8%; odd's ratio (OR) 2.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.176-6.138). Following multivariate analysis, laparoscopic approach demonstrated similar outcomes in major complications, reoperation, and 30-d mortality compared to open repairs. However, when controlling for other confounding factors, LVHR had reduced length of stay compared to OVHR (6.7 versus 4.0 d; 1.6 d longer, standard error 0.77, P < 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent LVHR is associated with fewer superficial surgical site infection and shorter length of stay than OVHR but no difference in major complications, reoperation or 30-d mortality is associated with LVHR in the emergency setting.

Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study with costs analysis on 269 patients

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes and institutional costs of elective laparoscopic and open incisional hernia mesh repairs and to identify independent predictors of prolonged operative time and hospital length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

Retrospective observational cohort study on 269 consecutive patients who underwent elective incisional hernia mesh repair, laparoscopic group (N = 94) and open group (N = 175), between May 2004 and July 2014.

RESULTS

Operative time was shorter in the laparoscopic versus open group (p < 0.0001). Perioperative morbidity and mortality were similar in the two groups. Patients in the laparoscopic group were discharged a median of 2 days earlier (p < 0.0001). At a median follow-up over 50 months, no difference in hernia recurrence was detected between the groups. In laparoscopic group total institutional costs were lower (p = 0.02). At Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders, large wall defect (W3) and higher operative risk (ASA score 3-4) were associated with prolonged operative time, while midline hernia site was associated with increased hospital LOS. Open surgical approach was associated with prolongation of both operative time and LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic approach may be considered safely to all patients for incisional hernia repair, regardless of patients' characteristics (age, gender, BMI, ASA score, comorbidities) and size of the wall defect (W2-3), with the advantage of shorter operating time and hospital LOS that yields reduced total institutional costs. Patients with higher ASA score and large hernia defects are at risk of prolonged operative time, while an open approach is associated with longer duration of surgical operation and hospital LOS.

Assessing the safety of outpatient ventral hernia repair: a NSQIP analysis of 7666 patients

PURPOSE

Given the paucity of literature on outpatient ventral hernia repair (VHR), and that assessment of the safety of outpatient surgical procedures is becoming an active area of investigation, we have performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis benchmarking rates of 30-day complications and readmissions and identifying predictive factors for these outcomes.

METHODS

National surgical quality improvement project data files from 2011 to 2012 were reviewed to collect data on all patients undergoing outpatient VHR during that period. The incidence of 30-day peri-operative complication and unplanned readmission was surveyed. We created a multivariate regression model to identify predictive factors for overall, surgical, and medical complications and unplanned readmissions with proper risk adjustment.

RESULTS

30-day complication and readmission rates in outpatient VHR were acceptably low. 3% of the queried outpatients experienced an overall complication, 2.1% a surgical complication, and 1.1% a medical complication. 3.3% of all patients were readmitted within 30 days. Upon multivariate analysis, predictors of overall complications included age, BMI, history of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and total operation time, predictors of surgical complications included age, BMI, total operation time, predictors of medical complications included total operation time, and predictors of unplanned readmissions included history of COPD, bleeding disorder, American Society of Anesthesiologists Class 3, 4, or 5, total operation time, and use of the laparoscopic technique.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated that the risk of peri-operative morbidity in VHR as granularly defined in our study is low in the outpatient setting. Identification of predictive factors will be important to patient risk stratification.