Robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair (TARUP): observational study on the operative time during the learning curve

Multicenter observational study comparing robotic retrorectus and open preperitoneal mesh repair for treatment of primary ventral hernias

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the long-term surgical outcomes of the open preperitoneal (PREPER) approach versus a robot-assisted Transabdominal Retromuscular Umbilical Prothesis (rTARUP) approach in primary ventral hernia repair.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary ventral hernia repair using either the PREPER or rTARUP technique were recruited. Data were collected on demographics, hernia, and mesh dimensions, as well as perioperative outcomes. Patients were contacted by telephone and assessed using the EuraHS-QoL and PINCH-Phone questionnaires to gather information on reoperations, recurrences, and patient reported outcomes. Clinical evaluations were conducted if recurrence was suspected.

RESULTS

The analysis included 82 patients having a PREPER repair and 80 patients having a rTARUP repair, with on overall follow-up time of 6.2 and 5.1 years respectively. BMI was higher in the rTARUP group (p = 0.007), and hernia and mesh sizes were significantly larger in the rTARUP group (p < 0.0001). No significant differences in 30-day complications were observed (p = 0.77). Recurrence rates were 0.0% in the PREPER group and 2.5% in the rTARUP group (p = 0.24). EuraHS-QoL scores showed low levels of pain, restriction of activities, and esthetic discomfort in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The PREPER and rTARUP techniques demonstrate favorable long-term outcomes, with low recurrence rates and high quality of life. No clear advantage of one approach over the other was observed in the treatment of small-to medium sized midline hernias. Considering evidence indicating longer operative times and higher costs associated with the robotic platform, its use may provide limited added value in cases of low complexity with inherently low complication and recurrence rates.

Cranial approach for preperitoneal/pretransversalis enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (PeTEP) hernia repair: a novel technique description and early outcomes

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive techniques are widely used to treat abdominal wall defects. This study describes a cranial approach for performing the total preperitoneal/pretransversalis enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (PeTEP) technique and presents early outcomes for treating primary ventral hernias (PVH), midline trocar site incisional hernias (IHs), both associated with rectus diastasis, as well as lateral IHs.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted from October 2023 to September 2024, identifying cases where the cranial PeTEP technique was employed, using data from a multicentric prospectively maintained database. The cranial approach involved dissection of the preperitoneal fatty rhomboid, extending the dissection across the preperitoneal and transversalis fascial plane to the semilunar lines laterally and the pubis caudally. For lateral defects, the dissection extended beyond the ipsilateral semilunar line, surpassing the lateral edge of the defect.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients underwent elective endoscopic hernia repair: 62.5% PVH, 29.2% midline IH, and 8.3% lateral IH. The mean defect area was 6.32 ± 6.13 cm2, and the average mesh size was 497.21.41 ± 202.71 cm2. The surgical site occurrences rate was 8.3%, with no surgical site infections or recurrences at a mean follow-up of 5.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The cranial PeTEP technique was a safe, effective, and reproducible method for repairing PVH and small-medium IHs associated with rectus diastasis in a selected cohort of patients. It facilitated large preperitoneal mesh placement without entering the retromuscular plane and avoided posterior component separation in lateral defects. Larger studies with extended follow-up are needed to confirm these promising results.

Short‑term outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic onlay repair for diastasis recti and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta‑analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic onlay repair (ENDOR) approach is gaining traction as a promising technique for the treatment of diastasis recti and associated ventral hernia. However, comprehensive evidence regarding its perioperative and short-term outcomes remains scarce. The objective of this meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive summary of the existing evidence concerning perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL until August 1st, 2024. Articles reporting outcomes of ENDOR in adult population diagnosed with diastasis recti associated or not with primary or incisional ventral hernia were included. Primary outcomes were evaluated based on safety and short-term measures, including intraoperative and short-term postoperative characteristics. A fixed effects model was used for meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies (480 patients) were identified. Minimally invasive ENDOR resulted in an intraoperative complications and conversion rate of 1.0% [95% CI 0.0-2.0%]. The rate of seroma was 25% [95% CI 12.0-39.0%], the one of surgical site infection was 1% [95% CI 0.0-2.0%] and the rate of hematoma was 2% [95% CI 1.0-3.0%]. After a median follow-up of 16 months (1.8-39), the rate of recurrence was 2% [95% CI 0.0-3.0%].

CONCLUSIONS

The minimally invasive ENDOR approach stands out as a safe and effective method for diastasis recti and associated ventral hernia repair in selected patients, exhibiting low rates of intraoperative complications and yielding favorable outcomes. Prospero registry Registration number: CRD42024573235.

Lateral single-dock robot-assisted retro-rectus ventral hernia repair (rTARUP/rTARM): observational study on long-term follow-up

Robot-assisted surgery for ventral hernias has gained popularity among surgeons in hospitals equipped with robotic platforms, despite the limited availability of high-level prospective data. Moreover, research on long-term outcomes of ventral hernia repair remains particularly challenging. This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients operated for a ventral hernia with a robot-assisted repair using a self-fixating retro-rectus synthetic mesh with a lateral docking transabdominal approach (rTARUP/rTARM). The study is a mono-centric cohort study of a consecutive series of patients with a midline ventral hernia, including both primary and incisional hernias, treated with a robot-assisted lateral approach utilizing a self-fixating retro-rectus mesh. The patients were identified from a prospective online registry database and subsequently contacted for follow-up assessment. Among the 526 ventral hernia repairs registered between September 2016 and December 2019, 198 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Long-term follow-up with valid data on recurrence was achieved in 162 patients (82%). Valid data from the EuraHS Quality-of-Life (QoL) questionnaire were available for 111 patients (56%). The recurrence rate after rTARUP, with a median follow-up of 4.5 years, was 3.7% in 162 patients with valid recurrence data. The rTARUP procedure can be performed with a low complication rate of 6.1% and favorable long-term results on QoL. The robot-assisted transabdominal retromuscular approach is a safe and effective surgical technique with a low recurrence rate and favorable QoL scoring over time. It combines the favorable retro-rectus mesh position with minimal invasive surgery, however care should be taken on adopting the technique too early in the robot-training pathway since it does pose some anatomic challenges and requires advanced robotic skills.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on robotic assisted ventral hernia repair: the ROVER review

INTRODUCTION

Robotic surgery for ventral hernia repair (VHR) is gaining attention for its potential advantages over laparoscopic and open techniques. This approach combines the advantages of minimally invasive surgery with the ability to perform technically challenging procedures, often required in open surgery but difficult with conventional laparoscopy. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of robotic VHR compared to other surgical approaches, focusing on postoperative complications, operative time, and costs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis were conducted, including 67 studies from January 2010 to May 2023 on Robotic VHR compared with other techniques. Primary outcome was 30-days postoperative complications; SSI, SSO, seroma, mortality, recurrence, length of hospital stay, operative time and costs were analysed as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Robotic surgery was associated with longer operative times compared to both laparoscopic (MD 64.67 min; p < 0.001) and open repairs (MD 69.69 min; p < 0.001). However, it resulted, compared to open surgery, in fewer SSIs (OR 0.62; p 0.05), mortality (OR 0.44; p 0.04) and shorter hospital stay (MD -3.77 days; p < 0.001). No differences were found in overall complications or length of stay between robotic and laparoscopic approaches but higher costs and longer operative times were reported in robotic VHR.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the currently available low-quality evidence, robotic VHR appears to offer limited advantages compared to laparoscopic techniques. However, when compared to open approaches, robotic VHR may demonstrate reduced postoperative complications and shorter hospital stays even if an higher rate of seroma formation was retrieved probably related to technical details. Nevertheless, longer operative times and higher costs remain significant limitations. Further high-quality comparative studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Robotic Surgical Procedures for Ventral Hernia Repair

The recent availability of robotic platforms has facilitated the adoption of advanced minimally invasive ventral hernia repair. Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair is an evolving field with many new techniques and acronyms for different accesses and approaches. This paper aims to describe the four currently most used procedures for robotic ventral hernia repair, all of which are MIS sublay repairs; robotic Trans-Abdominal-Preperitoneal (r-TAPP), robotic Trans-Abdominal-Retromuscular-Mesh (r-TARM), robotic Extended-Totally-Extra-Peritoneal (r-E-TEP), and robotic Transversus-Abdominis-Release (RoboTAR). Their descriptions are supported by illustrations. The paper describes trocar placement, practical tips and tricks, and briefly discusses the indications for each procedure. Furthermore, technical details such as the incision of the flap, access to the correct anatomical planes, dissection techniques, handling of the hernia sac, mesh choice and placement, and restoration of the abdominal wall layers are described. In conclusion, robotic ventral hernia repair has gained wide acceptance with promising postoperative results. There are many different techniques and approaches available, and this paper describes the four most commonly performed procedures in a detailed step-by-step fashion.

Mini-invasive surgery for diastasis recti: an overview on different approaches

Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is an acquired condition defined by a widening of the linea alba exceeding 2 cm and the subsequent separation between the two medial margins of the rectus muscles, accompanied by a laxity of the ventral abdominal muscles, and often by ventral midline hernias. It is a quite common problem in women after pregnancy. In addition to the aesthetic implications resulting from the swelling of the anterior abdominal wall in the case of increased pressure within the abdominal cavity, DRA leads to several physical functional disorders, including muscle weakness, prolapses of the pelvic organs, urinary and fecal incontinence, low back and pelvic pain and sexual dysfunction. The management of diastasis recti can be conservative, with physiotherapy and specific physical exercises, but, especially in case of concomitant hernia, surgery can be considered as the first choice of treatment in order to restore the midline and repair the hernia. Through recent years, a large amount of mini-invasive surgical techniques has been proposed, approaching the abdominal differently, and to date there is still lack of evidence on the optimal choice for surgeons and patients. So, the present review aims to give the reader an overview on the different techniques proposed, focusing on the three main categories of approaches (pre-aponeurotic, retro-muscular and pre-peritoneal), their specific features and results, with a view on the newly proposed robotic approaches that can theoretically reproduce each single technique.

Primary ventral and incisional hernias: comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Primary ventral and incisional hernias are frequent conditions that impact the quality of life of patients. Surgical techniques for ventral hernia repair are constantly evolving and abdominal wall surgery has turned into a highly specialized field.

METHODS

This is a narrative review of the most recent and relevant literature on the treatment of primary ventral and incisional hernias performed by eight experts in ventral hernia surgery from across the world and includes review of classification systems, preoperative measures, descriptions of surgical techniques, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Repairs of primary ventral and incisional hernias range from simple open procedures in healthy patients with small defects to complex procedures when patients are co-morbid and have large defects. Optimizing patient-related risk factors before surgery is important to decrease complication rates. Surgical repair techniques from open repairs to minimally invasive procedures are described in detail in the review. Minimally invasive techniques are technically more demanding and take longer, but decrease the risk of surgical-site infections and shorten the duration of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of ventral hernias aims to improve the quality of life of patients. The risks and benefits of procedures should be weighed against patients' complaints and co-morbidities. Optimizing patient-related risk factors before surgery is important.

Robotic trans-abdominal retromuscular hernia repair for medium-sized midline hernias: midterm outcomes and surgical site occurrence (SSO) analysis in 120 patients

Robotic surgery has become a popular method for treating ventral hernias due to its promising peri-operative outcomes. However, the long-term results of this approach are still unclear. In this study, 120 patients underwent robotic trans-abdominal retromuscular mesh placement (r-TARM) with a mean follow-up period of 18.1 months. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the robotic approach reporting peri-operative and midterm outcomes. Additionally, we examined possible risk factors that may contribute to the development of surgical site occurrences (SSOs). Between January 2021 and September 2023, 120 patients underwent r-TARM for midline hernias, including 39 primary, 71 incisional, and 10 recurrent cases. A retrospective analysis was performed. A logistic regression model was used to identify possible patient risk factors for SSO development. The average operative time was 153.5 ± 47.2 min, and there were no open or laparoscopic approach conversions. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.9 ± 0.9 days. We observed SSO in 16 patients (13.3%). One patient (0.8%) required angiographic embolization due to post-operative parietal bleeding. The mean follow-up time was 18.1 ± 7.8 months, and we observed hernia recurrence in only one (0.8%) patient. The logistic regression model did not identify any possible risk factors for SSO. r-TARM is a safe and effective method for treating ventral hernias not requiring posterior component separation. Our results indicate that patient and hernia characteristics were not predictive of SSO. Midterm outcomes are encouraging, though longer follow-up is needed.

Learning Curves for Robotic-Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair

Importance

Although the use of robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs has increased significantly over the last decade, the experience surgeons need to achieve comparable outcomes with more established laparoscopic and open approaches has not been well characterized.

Objective

To estimate the learning curves for robotic-assisted ventral (incisional and umbilical) hernia repair.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included Medicare fee-for-service patients (≥18 years) enrolled in Medicare Part A and Part B with no managed care undergoing ventral hernia repairs between 2010 and 2020. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate reoperation rates for hernia recurrence, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, mesh placement, and hospital characteristics. Analyses were conducted from October 2023 to July 2024.

Exposure

Incremental robotic-assisted hernia repair volume.

Main Outcome and Measure

Reoperation for hernia recurrence within 7 years of index hernia repair.

Results

This study comprised 160 379 Medicare patients (mean [SD] age, 69 [11] years), of whom 93 272 (58.2%) were female, 13 799 (8.6%) were Black, 3124 (2.0%) were Hispanic, and 138 311 (86.2%) were White. Among these patients, 12 609 (7.9%) underwent robotic-assisted hernia repairs, 32 337 (20.2%) laparoscopic repairs, and 115 433 (71.9%) open repairs. This study also included 23 580 surgeons, with 5074 performing robotic-assisted hernia repairs. The national reoperation rates for hernia recurrence after laparoscopic and open repairs were 12.5% (95% CI, 12.06%-12.94%) and 12.9% (95% CI, 12.70%-13.15%), respectively. Reoperation rates decreased as the number of robotic-assisted cases increased, from 14.2% (95% CI, 13.34%-14.97%) at 10 cases to 7.6% (95% CI, 6.75-8.37) at 50 cases. Surgeons needed at least 19 (95% CI, 16-22) robotic-assisted hernia repairs or 16 (95% CI, 13-19) repairs to achieve outcomes equivalent to those of laparoscopic and open procedures. Few surgeons (285 surgeons [5.7%]) performed enough robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs to achieve necessary volume nationally to overcome the learning curve.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of 23 580 surgeons who performed ventral hernia repairs between 2010 and 2020, increasing experience with robotic-assisted hernia repairs was associated with improved long-term reoperation rates for hernia recurrence. However, the majority of surgeons did not perform enough cases to reach reoperation rates equivalent to more established laparoscopic and open approaches.

Robot-Assisted Extraperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair-Experience From the First 160 Consecutive Operations With Lateral eTEP and eTAR Techniques

Introduction

There is a growing consensus on the benefits of retro-muscular (RM) mesh positioning, highlighted by its recommendation in the latest edition of EHS guidelines. The eTEP method has facilitated minimally invasive hernia repairs with retro-muscular mesh placement. With the increasing availability of robotic systems, there has been a corresponding increase in robotic adaptations of minimally invasive techniques involving retro-muscular mesh placement.

Materials and Methods

All patients who underwent robotic ventral hernia repair using the lateral extraperitoneal eTEP technique at Kempten Hospital between September 2019 and December 2023 were includes in the study. Preoperative characteristics, perioperative parameters, postoperative parameters, and hernia-specific parameters, were retrospectively analyzed using the hospital information system.

Results

160 patients were operated using a lateral approach eTEP technique during the observation period, 111 (69.38%) for incisional hernia repair and 49 (30.63%) for primary hernia repair. 43 cases required TAR (30 unilateral TAR and 13 bilateral TAR). 139 patients had a medial (86.98%), seven patients (4.14%) a lateral and 14 patients (8.88%) a combined hernia defect. The median operative time was 143 min (range: 53 min-495 min). The median length of hospital stay was 3 days (range: 2-16). There was one intraoperative complication. The postoperative complication rate was 6.25% (10 patients), with 1.72% (2 patients) requiring reoperation. Sonographic follow-up examinations revealed seromas in 5 patients, with 4 located in the retromuscular mesh space and 1 in the former hernia sac. None of these seromas required surgical intervention.

Conclusion

The "lateral approach" of robotic eTEP provides a safe surgical method for treating ventral hernias using minimally invasive techniques and mesh augmentation in the retro-muscular space. Further studies are necessary to compare extraperitoneal with transperitoneal methods.

"Fully endoscopic preperitoneal ascending suprapubic approach for minimally invasive repair of anterior and lateral abdominal wall hernias"

PURPOSE

The aim of this work is to describe the rational, feasibility and clinical and Quality-of-life improvement results of a fully endoscopic preperitoneal repair for midline and lateral abdominal wall hernias, starting from the space of Retzius in a "bottom-to-up" approach.

METHODS

An observational prospective data-collected and quality of life study is performed in selected patients with less than 10 cm. in diameter midline and lateral abdominal wall hernias. A suprapubic upward e-TEP technique from a previously dissected Retzius space, is performed in all cases. The surgical goal is to perform a total free-tension abdominal wall reconstruction followed by a prosthetic hernioplasty. Clinical Data is classified in preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables, including a quality-of-life clinical evaluation based on an improvement of HerQLes score.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients underwent this approach from September 2017 to October 2022 in a single-surgeon practice. A total restoration of the previous abdominal wall anatomy and a prosthetic repair were achieved in all cases. The mean operative time was 142.53 min, with a significant shorter time in lateral hernias approach. Minor complications (Clavien-Dindo I) were collected in 10% of the patients. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo IIIb) occurred in 6.66% of the patients. The mean pain at discharge was 1.83 VAS, with a significant lower pain in M-eTEP approach for lateral hernias. The mean hospital stay was 42.4 h. No seroma, hematoma, chronic pain, or recurrence was observed in the mean follow-up (20.33 months). A clinical and quality of life improvement was found in 92.9% of the patients, measured by a minimal clinical important difference (MCID) between preoperative and postoperative HerQLes score.

CONCLUSION

Despite being a technically demanding approach, the results obtained by this approach are compatible in safety and feasibility with other minimally invasive preperitoneal hernia repair techniques, in addition to obtaining a significant improvement in the quality of life of patients.

Proposal for encoding the surgical treatment in abdominal wall pathology based on a multidimensional analysis of history

OBJECTIVE

To develop a multidimensional method that allows to identify different treatment concepts, techniques, protagonists, and their connections in surgical pathology of the abdominal wall throughout its historical development, serving as a basis or guide for the future.

METHOD

First, an extensive and rigorous review of the literature was conducted to search for and group the different treatments described in the most common abdominal wall pathologies, including both groin and ventral hernias. Then, all treatment approaches were chronologically ordered and grouped according to their author, surgical approach, and method of approach. With all the information gathered, a table was created following a rational and multidimensional criterion that allows for the encoding of the set.

RESULTS

21 treatment modalities were identified and distributed into 8 groups. Additionally, 3 types of authors were detected: the creator, the innovator, and the popularizer. The assignment of values to different dimensions allowed us to obtain an alphanumeric code representative of the set.

CONCLUSION

Multidimensional historical analysis allows analytical objectivity and set encoding. Its practical scope should be investigated.

First report of robotic retromuscular incisional hernia repair with Hugo Ras™ surgical system

Treatment of incisional hernia is a rapidly evolving field of surgery, with actual trends being oriented toward retromuscular/preperitoneal mesh placement. The diffusion of robotic surgery is constantly growing in different surgical specialties and is gaining widespread acceptance for abdominal wall reconstruction. Recently, novel robotic platforms have entered into the market. In this study, we present the first transabdominal retromuscular incisional hernia repair performed with the new Hugo RAS™ system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The surgical team had previous robotic experience and completed an official 2-day session running incisional hernia repair on human cadaver lab. Operating room setting and trocar layout were planned. The patient presented a 4 × 4 cm midline incisional hernia and was scheduled for transabdominal retromuscular incisional hernia repair at our Institution. A description of the operative room setup, robotic arm configuration and docking/tilt angles is provided. Docking time, operative time, and console time were 15, 95, and 75 min, respectively. All the surgical steps were completed without critical surgical errors or high-priority alarms. Neither intraoperative complications nor conversion to open surgery was recorded. Postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. The safety and the feasibility of these procedures will require further analysis and larger patients' sample sizes for procedural standardization and potential integration into minimally invasive abdominal wall reconstruction programs.

Outcomes of Robotic Transabdominal Retromuscular Repair: 3-Year Follow-up

Background

Our study addresses the gap in ventral hernia repair literature, regarding the long-term effectiveness of robotic transabdominal retrorectus umbilical prosthetic repair (r-TARUP) for primary and incisional ventral hernias. This study aimed to report the 3-year recurrence rates and overall patient outcomes including quality of life.

Method

A retrospective review of prospective collected data analyzed 101 elective r-TARUP patients from August 2018 to January 2022. Data collected included demographics, hernia sizes, mesh types, postoperative outcomes and the European Hernia Society Quality of Life questionnaire (EuraHS-QoL) before and after surgery.

Results

The average age of the group of patients was 53, having a mean body mass index (BMI) of 32 kg/m, with 54% incisional and 46% primary hernias, with mean length and width of 4.4 cm and 6.1 cm, utilizing synthetic 58% and bioabsorbable 42% mesh types. The majority were classified as Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) class I wounds. Postoperative complications included seroma (2%), hematoma (3%), which required surgical intervention, with no significant correlation to mesh type. A strong positive correlation was found between Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) and increased length of hospital stay (correlation coefficient: 0.731, p < 0.001). Preoperative quality of life assessments demonstrated statistically significant improvements when compared to postoperative assessments at 3 years, with a mean (±SD) of 61.61 ± 5.29 vs. 13.84 ± 2.6 (p < 0.001). Mean follow up of 34.4 months with no hernia recurrence at 1 year and 3 recurrence at the 2-3 years follow up (3.2%).

Conclusion

The r-TARUP technique has proven to be safe and effective for repairing primary and incisional ventral hernias, with a low recurrence rate during this follow up period with a noticeable improvement in quality of life (QoL).

The emerging role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The role of robotics has grown exponentially. There is an active interest amongst practitioners in the transferability of the potential benefits into plastic and reconstructive surgery; however, many plastic surgeons report lack of widespread implementation, training, or clinical exposure. We report the current evidence base, and surgical opportunities, alongside key barriers, and limitations to overcome, to develop the use of robotics within the field. This systematic review of PubMed, Medline, and Embase has been conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024524237). Preclinical, educational, and clinical articles were included, within the scope of plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2, 181, articles were screened; 176 articles met the inclusion criteria across lymph node dissection, flap and microsurgery, vaginoplasty, craniofacial reconstruction, abdominal wall reconstruction and transoral robotic surgery (TOR). A number of benefits have been reported including technical advantages such as better visualisation, improved precision and accuracy, and tremor reduction. Patient benefits include lower rate of complications and quicker recovery; however, there is a longer operative duration in some categories. Cost presents a significant barrier to implementation. Robotic surgery presents an exciting opportunity to improve patient outcomes and surgical ease of use, with feasibility for many subspecialities demonstrated in this review. However, further higher quality comparative research with careful case selection, which is adequately powered, as well as the inclusion of cost-analysis, is necessary to fully understand the true benefit for patient care, and justification for resource utilisation.

[Is vTAPP for small ventral hernias a potential «gold standard» for less than 24 hours hospitalization?]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of vTAPP for small/M3W1 hernias compared to IPOM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively recruited group of patients. Study objects were patients undergoing ventral laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (vTAPP) for primary Midline/Lateral Small hernias up to 2 cm. The control group comprised patients after IPOM procedure.

RESULTS

We analyzed 179 patients: vTAPP (n=132) and IPOM groups (n=47). The vTAPP group was characterized by significantly shorter hospitals-stay (Q1-Q3: 8-70 hours, p<0.001), fewer relapses (n=2, p=0.047) and slightly longer surgery (Q1-Q3: 40-80 min, p=0.037). Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed 3.39 times more profitable vTAPP compared to IPOM.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair is a safe and effective method not requiring special tools and consumables. This approach is applicable as an outpatient (or <24h hospital-stay) method.

[Roboticassisted incisional hernia surgery-Retromuscular techniques]

The trend to minimally invasive surgery has also made its way into the surgical treatment of incisional hernias. Unlike other areas of visceral surgery, recent years have seen a resurgence of open sublay repair in incisional hernia procedures, primarily due to the recognition of the retromuscular layer as the optimal mesh placement site. Additionally, with the growing availability of robotic systems in visceral surgery, these procedures are increasingly being offered in the form of minimally invasive procedures. These methods can be categorized based on the access routes: robotic-assisted transperitoneal procedures (e.g., r‑Rives, r‑TARUP, r‑TAR) and total extraperitoneal hernia repair (e.g., r‑eTEP, r‑eTAR). Notably, the introduction of transversus abdominis muscle release enables the robotic-assisted treatment of larger and more complex hernia cases with complete fascial closure. With respect to the comparison with open surgery required in retromuscular hernia treatment, the currently available literature on incisional hernia repair seems to show initial advantages of robotic-assisted surgery in the perioperative course. New technologies create new possibilities. In the context of surgical training the use of surgical robot systems with double consoles opens up completely new perspectives. Furthermore, the robot enables the implementation of models of artificial intelligence and augmented reality and could therefore open up novel dimensions in surgery.

Robotic Retromuscular (Recurrent) Parastomal Hernia Repair (r-Pauli-Repair) With Synthetically Reinforced Biological Mesh; Technique, Early Experience, and Short-Term Follow-Up

Introduction: Parastomal hernia repair remains a challenge. We describe a robotic retromuscular non-keyhole mesh repair using a synthetically reinforced biological mesh (Ovitex) for the repair of complex and/or recurrent parastomal hernia and technical modifications we made along the way to improve our technique. Methods: All patients underwent the described retromuscular parastomal hernia repair. Data was collected in a database and a retrospective analysis was performed on direct postoperative results and early follow-up. Results: Eleven patients underwent the operation. Median follow-up was 12 months. Median LOS was 6 days. Two recurrences occurred. One patient suffered postoperative hematoma and skin necrosis, which healed completely, but did lead to a recurrence. One patient had a significant seroma, which subsided without intervention. Both recurrences were reoperated, and a local repair was performed. Conclusion: This paper is the first to describe a modified robotic Pauli repair for complex and recurrent parastomal hernia, using a synthetically reinforced biological mesh. Results are satisfying so far, especially considering the complexity of the cases.

Postoperative Analgesics Score as a Predictor of Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair: Lessons Learned From a Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is a common complication after inguinal hernia surgery and occurs in up to 10-14% of cases. CPIP has a significant impact on daily life, work ability and thus compromises quality of life. The aim of this retrospective study was an in-depth analysis of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair to further refine the prediction of the onset of CPIP reliably.

METHODS

A single center retrospective analysis of patients with who underwent open or minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair from 2016 to 2021 was carried out. Complication rates, detailed analysis of postoperative pain medication and quality of life using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire were assessed.

RESULTS

Out of 596 consecutive procedures, 344 patients were included in detailed analyses. While patient cohorts were different in terms of age and co-morbidities, and the prevalence of CPIP was 12.2% without differences between the surgical procedures (Lichtenstein: 12.8%; TEP 10.9%; TAPP 13.5%). Postoperative pain was evaluated using a newly developed analgesic score. Patients who developed CPIP later had a significant higher consumption of analgesics at discharge (p = 0.016). As additional risk factors for CPIP younger patient age and postoperative complications were identified.

CONCLUSION

The prospective use of the analgesic score established here could be helpful to identify patients that are at risk to develop CPIP. These patients could benefit from a structured follow-up to allow early therapeutic intervention to prevent chronification and restore the quality of life.

Long-Term Outcomes After Epigastric Hernia Repair in Women-A Nationwide Database Study

Aim: Women have the highest prevalence of epigastric hernia repair. Outcomes after epigastric hernia repair are rarely reported independently, although pathology and surgical techniques may be different than for other primary ventral hernias. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes after epigastric hernia repairs in women on a nationwide basis. Methods: Nationwide cohort study from the Danish Hernia Database. Complete data from women undergoing elective epigastric hernia repair during a 12 years period (2007-2018) was extracted. A 100% follow-up was obtained by combining data from the National Civil Register. The primary outcome was operation for recurrence, secondary outcomes were readmission and operation for complications. Outcomes for open sutured repair, open mesh repair mesh, and laparoscopic repairs were compared. Results: In total, 3,031 women underwent elective epigastric hernia repair during the study period. Some 1,671 (55.1%) women underwent open sutured repair, 796 (26.3%) underwent open mesh repair, and 564 (18.6%) underwent laparoscopic repair. Follow-up was median 4.8 years. Operation for recurrence was higher after sutured repairs than after open mesh and laparoscopic repairs (7.7% vs. 3.3%, vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001). The risk of operation for complications was slightly higher after open mesh repair compared with sutured repair and laparoscopic repair (2.6% vs. 1.2%, vs. 2.0%, p = 0.032), with more operations for wound complications in the open mesh group (2.0%, p = 0.006). Conclusion: More than half of the women underwent a suture-based repair, although mesh repair reduces risk of recurrence. Open mesh repair had the lowest risk of recurrence, but on the expense of slightly increased risk of wound-related complications.

Preliminary robotic abdominal wall reconstruction experience: single-centre outcomes of the first 150 cases

PURPOSE

Robotic surgery offers new possibilities in repairing complex hernias with a minimally invasive approach. This study aimed to analyze our preliminary results.

METHODS

Between November 2015 and February 2020, 150 patients underwent robotic reconstruction for abdominal wall defects (77 primary and 73 incisional). A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was conducted to evaluate the short-term outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 176.9 ± 72.1 min. No conversion to open or laparoscopic approach occurred. The mean hospital length of stay was 2.6 ± 1.6. According to Clavien-Dindo classification, two (grade III) complications following retromuscular mesh placement (1.3%) occurred. One patient (0.7%) required surgical revision due to small bowel occlusion following an intraparietal hernia. The 30-day readmission rate was 0.6%, and the mortality was nihil.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic surgery is valuable for safely completing challenging surgical procedures like complex abdominal wall reconstruction, with low conversion and complication rates. A stepwise approach to the different surgical techniques is essential to optimize the outcomes and maximize the benefits of the robotic approach.

The adoption of oncoplastic surgery: Is there a learning curve?

INTRODUCTION

Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) is a form of breast conservation surgery involving partial mastectomy followed by volume displacement or replacement surgery. As the field of OPS is growing, we sought to determine if there was a learning curve to this surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients who underwent OPS over a 6-year period with a single surgeon formally trained in both Plastic Surgery and Breast Oncology. Cumulative summation analysis (CUSUM) was performed on mean operative time to generate the learning curve and learning curve phases. Outcomes were compared between phases to determine significance.

RESULTS

Mean operative time decreased significantly across the 6-year period, generating three distinct learning curve phases: Learner phase (cases 1-23), Competence phase (24-73), and Mastery phase (74 and greater). The overall positive margin rate was 10.9% and there was no significant difference in rates between phases (p = 0.49). Overall complication rates, reoperation rates, and locoregional recurrence remained the same across all phases (p = 0.16; p = 0.65; p = 0.41). The rate of partial nipple loss decreased between phases (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

As with many complex operations, there does appear to be a learning curve with OPS, as the operative time and the rates of partial nipple loss decreased over time.

Prospective cohort study on mesh shrinkage measured with MRI after robot-assisted minimal invasive retrorectus ventral hernia repair using an iron-oxide-loaded polyvinylidene fluoride mesh

BACKGROUND

Mesh-reinforced ventral hernia repair is considered the gold standard treatment for all but the smallest of hernias. Human data on mesh shrinkage in the retrorectus mesh position is lacking. A prospective observational cohort study was performed to measure mesh shrinkage in robot-assisted minimal invasive retrorectus repair of ventral hernias.

METHODS

A cohort of 20 patients underwent a robot-assisted minimal invasive retrorectus repair of their ventral hernia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging was performed one month and thirteen months after implantation of an iron-oxide-impregnated polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh to assess the decrease in mesh surface area. Inter-rater reliability among three radiologists regarding measurement of the mesh dimensions was analyzed. Quality of Life scoring was evaluated.

RESULTS

The inter-rater reliability between the radiologists reported as the intra-class correlations proved to be excellent for mesh width (ICC 0.95), length (ICC 0.98) and surface area (ICC 0.99). Between MRI measurements at one month and thirteen months postoperatively, there was a significant increase in mesh surface area (+ 12.0 cm², p = 0.0013) and mesh width (+ 0.8 cm, p < 0.001), while the length of the mesh remained unchanged (-0.1 cm, p = 0.754). Quality of Life Scoring showed a significant improvement in Quality of Life after one month and a further improvement at thirteen months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There was an excellent inter-rater reliability between three radiologists when measuring width, length, and surface area of an iron-oxide-impregnated PVDF mesh using MRI visualization. Mesh shrinkage was not observed, instead the effective mesh surface area and width of the mesh increased.

Comparison of outcomes of the extended-view totally extraperitoneal rives-stoppa (eTEP-RS) and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM-plus) for W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair-a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The eTEP technique is a new approach that has recently gained popularity in abdominal wall hernia surgery. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the eTEP-RS and IPOM-plus procedures in W1 and W2 midline incisional abdominal wall hernia (IAWH) repairs performed by the same surgeon.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of laparoscopic abdominal wall repairs performed on 61 patients with eTEP between November 2018 and April 2022 and on 67 patients with IPOM-plus between January 2016 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 74 out of 128 patients, 30 in the eTEP-RS group and 44 in the IPOM-plus group, who underwent W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 24 months in the eTEP-RS group and 45 months in the IPOM-plus group.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, sex, BMI, ASA score, or active smoking. No difference was seen between the two groups in terms of the mean defect area (MDA, 28.17 cm² vs. 27.41 cm², p = 0.84), but the mean mesh area (MMA) and mesh/defect (M/D) ratio were higher in the eTEP-RS group (404.11 cm² vs. 267.85 cm², p < 0.001 and 20.96 vs. 12.36, p = 0.004). In the eTEP-RS group, the hospital length of stay (LOS) (1.48 days vs. 2.58 days, p < 0.001) and pain on the first and 10th postoperative days were significantly lower (p < 0.001), while the operative time was significantly longer (204.07 min vs. 88.33 min, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of intraoperative complications (p = 0.56), seroma formation (p = 0.83), or recurrence (p = 0.83).

CONCLUSION

The eTEP-RS technique has advantages over the IPOM-plus approach, such as a shorter LOS and less early postoperative pain with W1-W2 midline IAWH repair. However, the eTEP technique has a longer operative time.

Less postoperative pain and shorter length of stay after robot-assisted retrorectus hernia repair (rRetrorectus) compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for small or medium-sized ventral hernias

BACKGROUND

The optimal repair of ventral hernia remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the results after robotic-assisted laparoscopic transabdominal repair with retrorectus mesh placement (rRetrorectus) compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for patients with small- or medium-sized ventral hernia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective rRetrorectus or IPOM repair for small or medium-sized primary ventral or incisional hernias. The primary outcome was the postoperative need for transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block or epidural analgesia, secondary outcomes were length of stay and postoperative complications. All patients were followed for 30 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients were included undergoing rRetrorectus (n = 27) and IPOM (n = 32). Patients in the two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, comorbidities, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), and type of hernia. The median fascial defect area was slightly larger in the rRetrorectus group (9 cm² vs. 6.2 cm², P = 0.031). The duration of surgery was longer for rRetrorectus (median 117.2 min. vs. 84.4, P = 0.003), whereas the postoperative need for TAP block or epidural analgesia was less after rRetrorectus compared with IPOM (3.7% versus 43.7%, P = 0.002). There were no severe complications or reoperations after either procedure. The length of stay was shorter after rRetrorectus (median 0 vs. 1 day, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

rRetrorectus was associated with reduced postoperative analgesic requirement and shorter length of stay compared with laparoscopic IPOM. Registration Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT05320055.

[Robot-assisted extraperitoneal ventral hernia repair-Experience from the first 61 consecutive operations with eTEP and eTAR techniques]

BACKGROUND

As in many other fields of surgery, robotically assisted surgical procedures have been established in the treatment of ventral hernias in recent years. The use of the robot can combine the demands of a minimally invasive approach and retromuscular mesh placement. In addition to a transabdominal approach, these procedures can also be performed using an extraperitoneal approach.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that robotic total extraperitoneal management of abdominal wall hernias is safe and efficient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all robotically operated patients on ventral hernia using extraperitoneal eTEP technique from September 2019 to May 2022 was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 61 ventral hernias were operated on using the robotic eTEP technique during the study period. In 14 patients retro-rectal dissection was extended laterally by an extraperitoneal transversus abdominis release (eTAR) because of the hernia size or a lateral hernia localization. In all cases, an uncoated synthetic mesh was placed in the retromuscular position with complete closure of the hernia defects. The median hernia defect area was 30 cm² (4-308 cm²). The median mesh size was 540 cm² (300-1350 cm²). The median mesh defect ratio (MDR) was 17.78 (3.06-145). One intraoperative and three postoperative complications were encountered. Neither conversion nor reoperation were required.

CONCLUSION

The robotic extraperitoneal eTEP technique enables the required retromuscular mesh placement in a minimally invasive approach. With the possibility of a combination with a transversus abdominis release, even complex findings can be treated using this technique.

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of emergency surgery for adult emergency hospital admissions with common acute gastrointestinal conditions: the ESORT study

Background

Evidence is required on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of emergency surgery compared with non-emergency surgery strategies (including medical management, non-surgical procedures and elective surgery) for patients admitted to hospital with common acute gastrointestinal conditions.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the relative (1) clinical effectiveness of two strategies (i.e. emergency surgery vs. non-emergency surgery strategies) for five common acute conditions presenting as emergency admissions; (2) cost-effectiveness for five common acute conditions presenting as emergency admissions; and (3) clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the alternative strategies for specific patient subgroups.

Methods

The records of adults admitted as emergencies with acute appendicitis, cholelithiasis, diverticular disease, abdominal wall hernia or intestinal obstruction to 175 acute hospitals in England between 1 April 2010 and 31 December 2019 were extracted from Hospital Episode Statistics and linked to mortality data from the Office for National Statistics. Eligibility was determined using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, diagnosis codes, which were agreed by clinical panel consensus. Patients having emergency surgery were identified from Office of Population Censuses and Surveys procedure codes. The study addressed the potential for unmeasured confounding with an instrumental variable design. The instrumental variable was each hospital’s propensity to use emergency surgery compared with non-emergency surgery strategies. The primary outcome was the ‘number of days alive and out of hospital’ at 90 days. We reported the relative effectiveness of the alternative strategies overall, and for prespecified subgroups (i.e. age, number of comorbidities and frailty level). The cost-effectiveness analyses used resource use and mortality from the linked data to derive estimates of incremental costs, quality-adjusted life-years and incremental net monetary benefits at 1 year.

Results

Cohort sizes were as follows: 268,144 admissions with appendicitis, 240,977 admissions with cholelithiasis, 138,869 admissions with diverticular disease, 106,432 admissions with a hernia and 133,073 admissions with an intestinal obstruction. Overall, at 1 year, the average number of days alive and out of hospitals at 90 days, costs and quality-adjusted life-years were similar following either strategy, after adjusting for confounding. For each of the five conditions, overall, the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around the incremental net monetary benefit estimates all included zero. For patients with severe frailty, emergency surgery led to a reduced number of days alive and out of hospital and was not cost-effective compared with non-emergency surgery, with incremental net monetary benefit estimates of –£18,727 (95% CI –£23,900 to –£13,600) for appendicitis, –£7700 (95% CI –£13,000 to –£2370) for cholelithiasis, –£9230 (95% CI –£24,300 to £5860) for diverticular disease, –£16,600 (95% CI –£21,100 to –£12,000) for hernias and –£19,300 (95% CI –£25,600 to –£13,000) for intestinal obstructions. For patients who were ‘fit’, emergency surgery was relatively cost-effective, with estimated incremental net monetary benefit estimates of £5180 (95% CI £684 to £9680) for diverticular disease, £2040 (95% CI £996 to £3090) for hernias, £7850 (95% CI £5020 to £10,700) for intestinal obstructions, £369 (95% CI –£728 to £1460) for appendicitis and £718 (95% CI £294 to £1140) for cholelithiasis. Public and patient involvement translation workshop participants emphasised that these findings should be made widely available to inform future decisions about surgery.

Limitations

The instrumental variable approach did not eliminate the risk of confounding, and the acute hospital perspective excluded costs to other providers.

Conclusions

Neither strategy was more cost-effective overall. For patients with severe frailty, non-emergency surgery strategies were relatively cost-effective. For patients who were fit, emergency surgery was more cost-effective.

Future work

For patients with multiple long-term conditions, further research is required to assess the benefits and costs of emergency surgery.

Study registration

This study is registered as reviewregistry784.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (IHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 1. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Robotic Ventral Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Uncomplicated Spigelian Hernia

Spigelian hernias are rare herniations through the Spigelian fascia, with an incidence rate of 0.12-2.0% of all hernias. Diagnosis may be difficult due to a potential lack of symptoms until complications arise. Therefore, imaging with either ultrasound or CT with oral contrast is recommended to confirm the diagnosis if a Spigelian hernia is suspected. Once the diagnosis has been established, it is essential that operative repair be performed as soon as possible because 24% of Spigelian hernias become incarcerated, and 27% of Spigelian hernias lead to strangulation. Management options include open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic surgery. This case report discusses the management of a 47-year-old man with an uncomplicated Spigelian hernia that was repaired with the robotic ventral transabdominal preperitoneal repair technique.

Robotic hernia surgery IV. English version : Robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results

The surgical treatment of parastomal hernias is considered complex and is known to be prone to complications. Traditionally, this condition was treated using relocation techniques or local suture repairs. Since then, several mesh-based techniques have been proposed and are nowadays used in minimally invasive surgery. Since the introduction of robot-assisted surgery to the field of abdominal wall surgery, several adaptations to these techniques have been made, which may significantly improve patient outcomes. In this contribution, we provide an overview of available techniques in robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair. Technical considerations and preliminary results of robot-assisted modified Sugarbaker repair, robot-assisted Pauli technique, and minimally invasive use of a funnel-shaped mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernias are presented. Furthermore, challenges in robot-assisted ileal conduit parastomal hernia repair are discussed. These techniques are illustrated by photographic and video material. Besides providing a comprehensive overview of robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair, this article focuses on the specific advantages of robot-assisted techniques in the treatment of this condition.

Description of the Current Da Vinci® Training Pathway for Robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery by the European Hernia Society

Background: Robot assisted laparoscopic abdominal wall surgery (RAWS) has seen a rapid adoption in recent years. The safe introduction of the robot platform in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias is important to safeguard the patient from harm during the learning curve. The scope of this paper is to describe the current European training curriculum in RAWS. Methods and Analysis: The pathway to competence in RAWS will depend on the robot platform, experience in other abdominal procedures (novice to expert) and experience in the abdominal wall repair techniques. An overview of the learning curve effect in the initial case series of several early adopters in RAWS was reviewed. In European centres, current training for surgeons wanting to adopt RAWS is managed by the specific technology-based training organized by the company providing the robot. It consists of four phases where phases I and II are preclinical, while phases III and IV focus on the introduction of the robotic platform into surgical practice. Conclusion: On behalf of the Robotic Surgery Task Force of the European Hernia Society (EHS) we believe that the EHS should play an important role in the clinical phases III and IV training. Courses organized in collaboration with the robot provider on relevant surgical anatomy of the abdominal wall and procedural steps in complex abdominal wall reconstruction like transversus abdominis release are essential. Whereas the robot provider should be responsible for the preclinical phases I and II to gain familiarity in the specific robot platform.

Establishment of minimally invasive ventral hernia repair with extraperitoneal mesh placement in a primary care hospital using the robotic platform

Background

The progressive availability of robotic surgical systems opens new perspectives in abdominal wall surgery due to excellent visibility and dexterity of instruments. While complex hernias until today were treated primarily through an open access, we evaluated if this promising technology is suitable for treating the entire spectrum of a hernia center, including complex hernias.

Material/methods

In 2017, minimally invasive hernia surgery with extraperitoneal mesh placement was started in Kempten hospital. Since 2019, a Da Vinci X system has been available for this purpose. In order to observe the process of transition we retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent ventral hernia repair in the department of general and visceral surgery at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020 and were indicated for mesh implantation.

Results

In 2016, the percentage of minimally invasive procedures was 37.3%. In all of these cases an intraperitoneal mesh was implanted into the abdominal cavity. Open surgery was performed in 62.7%, of which an a retromuscular mesh was implanted in 75.7%, an intraperitoneal mesh in 21.6%, and an onlay mesh in 2.7%. In 2020, minimally invasive surgery accounted for 87.5%, of which 85.7% were performed robotically and 14.3 laparoscopically. In 94.3% of these minimally invasively treated patients the mesh was implanted in extraperitoneal position (75.8% in retromuscular and 24.2% in preperitoneal position). The percentage of complex hernias increased from 20.3% to 35.0% during the same period.

Conclusion

The majority of ventral hernia procedures can be performed safely using the robot in a minimally invasive technique with extraperitoneal mesh placement without leading to an increase in complications. Robotically-assisted hernia repair is a promising new technique that is also practical for complex hernias.

[Robotic hernia surgery IV. German version : Robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results]

The surgical treatment of parastomal hernias is considered complex and is known to be prone to complications. Traditionally, this condition was treated using relocation techniques or local suture repairs. Since then, several mesh-based techniques have been proposed and are nowadays used in minimally invasive surgery. Since the introduction of robot-assisted surgery to the field of abdominal wall surgery, several adaptations to these techniques have been made, which may significantly improve patient outcomes. In this contribution, we provide an overview of available techniques in robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair. Technical considerations and preliminary results of robot-assisted modified Sugarbaker repair, robot-assisted Pauli technique, and minimally invasive use of a funnel-shaped mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernias are presented. Furthermore, challenges in robot-assisted ileal conduit parastomal hernia repair are discussed. These techniques are illustrated by photographic and video material. Besides providing a comprehensive overview of robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair, this article focuses on the specific advantages of robot-assisted techniques in the treatment of this condition.

The first case of robotic-assisted transabdominal retrorectus repair for incisional hernia in Japan

Extraperitoneal mesh repair for ventral hernia has garnered attention and its rate has been increasing due to concerns for the potential complications of intraperitoneal mesh repair. Recently, robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair is highlighted as a solution to the technically demanding nature of laparoscopic transabdominal or enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal retrorectus ventral hernia repair. A 78-year-old man, who had undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy 10 months earlier, presented with an incisional hernia of European Hernia Society Classification M3W2, length 4 cm, width 5 cm with rectus diastasis. A right single-docking robotic-assisted transabdominal retrorectus repair was performed using a 21 by 14 cm self-gripping mesh and anterior wall reconstruction was done by 0 barbed nonabsorbable running suture. There were no complications and recurrence observed during a 7 months postoperative period. Single-docking robotic-assisted transabdominal retrorectus repair was considered a good option for midline moderate-size incisional hernias from the point of view of the ease of suturing, adequateness of dissection and prevention of bowel injury.

Short-term complications after minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair: no need for preoperative weight loss or smoking cessation?

PURPOSE

Obesity and smoking are associated with postoperative wound complications following open hernia repair. However, with the advancements in minimally invasive surgical techniques, we hypothesized that obese and/or smoking patients undergoing minimally invasive repairs were not subjected to an increased risk of postoperative surgical complications. As opposed to nonobese and/or nonsmoking patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including patients undergoing minimally invasive retromuscular repair at a single university hospital. Patients were divided into two groups according to exposure; obese vs. nonobese and smoking vs. nonsmoking. One month postoperatively, all patients underwent clinical follow-up. The main outcome was surgical site occurrence (SSO).

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients were included, undergoing both laparoscopic (n = 32) and robotic (n = 62) retromuscular repair. Of these, 7.7% of the obese patients had SSO when compared with 19.1% of the nonobese patients. A total of 17.2% of the nonsmokers had SSO compared with 13.3% of the active smokers. Of the nonsmokers, 12.5% developed seroma and 6.2% hematoma postoperatively, the corresponding numbers were 13.3% and 0% among the active smokers. After multivariable analysis, there was no significant risk factors for developing postoperative SSO.

CONCLUSION

There was no association between obesity or smoking and surgical complication in patients undergoing minimally invasive retromuscular repair. If the results of the current study are confirmed, patients who are unable to obtain weight loss or smoking cessation may be offered minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair without inducing an increased risk of short-term complications.

The extended-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach for incisional abdominal wall hernias: results from a single center

BACKGROUND

The extended-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach is a promising technique for abdominal wall hernias and has increased in popularity among hernia surgeons in recent years. This study aims to present the results of applying the laparoscopic eTEP approach for incisional abdominal wall hernias (IAWHs).

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected dataset of 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic eTEP for IAWHs between October 2018 and March 2021 (median follow-up of 15 months).

RESULTS

Thirty patients (8 male, 22 female) with a mean age, mean body mass index, and median ASA score of 53.5, 30.8, and 2, respectively, underwent the eTEP procedure for incisional abdominal wall hernias. In total, 11 (36.7%) patients had a recurrent IAWH. Seventeen (56.7%) patients were treated with eTEP RivesStoppa (eTEP-RS), whereas 10 (33.3%) patients needed the eTEP transversus abdominis release (eTEP-TAR) procedure. In three patients, conversions to other procedures (laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh-plus (IPOM-Plus) and open RivesStoppa) were needed due to intraoperative complications: iatrogenic perforation to the intestine and large peritoneal tear causing loss of the working space. The mean operative time and mean length of stay (LOS) were 203.5 min and 1.5 days for eTEP-RS and 291.5 min and 1.6 days for eTEP-TAR, respectively. Two patients developed asymptomatic seromas, and one patient developed an asymptomatic hematoma; all were treated conservatively. Only one recurrence was observed over the course of the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The eTEP approach is a safe and feasible option for IAWH repair and a valuable addition to the armamentarium of hernia surgeons.

Robotic retromuscular abdominal wall repair using an inverted TEP (iTEP) approach: surgical technique and short-term outcomes

PURPOSE

Robotic retromuscular abdominal wall repair (RAWR) for ventral hernias can be performed transabdominal or extraperitoneal by using an enhanced view totally extraperitoneal repair (eTEP). For defects in the meso- or epigastric region, an inverted approach can be used, starting the development of the totally extraperitoneal plane in the suprapubic region and progressing in a caudal-to-cranial direction (inverted TEP, iTEP). The aim of the study is to present the surgical technique and to report the short-term outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed, including patients who underwent a robotic RAWR using the iTEP approach between December 2019 and January 2022. The surgical technique was described, and patients' characteristics and intra- and postoperative parameters were studied and compared to the TARUP technique (robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair).

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were treated with an iTEP approach, and 14 patients underwent a TARUP procedure. The median length of stay was 1 day (range 1-3), and there were no intraoperative complications in both groups. One patient (3%) required reoperation after an iTEP approach for a small bowel internal herniation due to a rupture of the posterior rectus sheath. There were no recurrences or mortality with a median follow-up of 15 months (range 3-29) in the iTEP group, compared to 35 months (range 29-37) in the TARUP group.

CONCLUSION

For defects in the upper abdominal region, a robotic RAWR with an iTEP approach appears to be safe and feasible. Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the late recurrence rate.

Can a Fully Articulating Electromechanical Laparoscopic Needle Driver Compare with a Robotic Platform in Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair?

Background: Enhanced laparoscopic instruments are filling the gap between straight-stick laparoscopic equipment and robotic platforms. We sought to evaluate the performance and cost of the HandX™ device during mesh fixation and peritoneal flap closure of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repairs. Methods: The video recordings of a consecutive series of TAPP surgeries using the articulated needle driver device were compared with a series of surgeries on the DaVinci robotic platform by a single surgeon. Two critical steps of the procedure were analyzed: mesh fixation and peritoneal closure. A cost analysis between the two platforms was completed. Results: We analyzed 27 cases using the new needle driver and 27 cases using the DaVinci Surgical Robotic system. To evaluate the learning curve (LC) with the HandX device, we created three groups (G1, G2, and G3). The two latter groups were combined and called after LC. Mean fixation time using the DaVinci system was 258.1 seconds (±100.4) compared with 391.5 (±95.9) using the articulating handheld laparoscopic needle driver after LC (P < .001). The average time for peritoneal closure was 418.6 (±192.1) seconds for DaVinci and 634.5 (±159.5) seconds for HandX (P < .001). When comparing the after-LC HandX cases and the DaVinci system stratified by side, there was no significant difference in peritoneal closure in the right side (520.1 seconds (84.3) with the HandX versus 444.2 seconds (229.7) using the DaVinci system (P = .353). When evaluating direct cost of the instruments, HandX cases had a lower cost (310 USD) when compared with the cost of using DaVinci (973 USD). Conclusions: The new smart articulating needle driver may be a cost-effective means of bringing some of the benefits of the robotic platform to laparoscopy.

Guidelines for Treatment of Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias From the European and Americas Hernia Societies-A Web-Based Survey on Surgeons' Opinion

Background and aims: The European and Americas Hernia Society's (EHS and AHS) Guidelines on the treatment of primary midline ventral hernias were launched to guide surgeons. As a part of a dissemination plan of the guideline, this study aimed to evaluate the level of consensus between recommendations and the current surgical practices of EHS and AHS members before implementation. Material and methods: A questionnaire was constructed including questions on the current practice of the members and nine selected key recommendations from the guidelines. An on-stage consensus voting was performed at the EHS Congress in Hamburg 2019 followed by a SurveyMonkey sent to all EHS and AHS members. Consensus with a recommendation was defined as an agreement of ≥70%. Results: A total of 178 votes were collected in Hamburg. A further 499/1,754 (28.4%) of EHS and 150/1,100 (13.6%) of AHS members participated in the SurveyMonkey. A consensus was reached for 7/9 (78%) of the recommendations. The two recommendations that did not reach consensus were on indication and the technique used for laparoscopic repair. In current practice, more AHS participants used a preformed patch; 50.7% (76/150) compared with EHS participants 32.1% (160/499), p < 0.001. Conclusion: A consensus was achieved for most recommendations given by the new guideline for the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Recommendations that did not reach consensus were on indication and technique for laparoscopic repair, which may reflect the lack of evidence on these topics.

Robotic transabdominal retromuscular rectus diastasis (r-TARRD) repair: a new approach

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to present our innovative robotic approach for the treatment of rectus diastasis with concurrent primary or incisional ventral hernias.

METHODS

We performed 45 r-TARRD repairs for symptomatic rectus diastasis with concomitant associated ventral/incisional umbilical and/or epigastric hernias between January 2019 and January 2020. Data on patient demographics, type of hernia, operative time, complications, recurrence rate, and hospital stay were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up was scheduled at 1, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

45 patients (13 M, 32 F) underwent r-TARRD repair. Mean age was 54.8 years (range 31-68) and mean BMI was 26.74 kg/m² (range 21.1-31). Mean ASA was 2.2 (range 1-3). In all patients we used a polypropylene mesh 25 × 15 cm, properly shaped. Mean operative time was 192 min (range 115-260). Mean hospital stay 4.2 days (range 2-7). No conversion to laparoscopy or open surgery and no major complications occurred. At 1-month follow-up one mesh infection (2.22%) was observed and it was treated conservatively. Four recurrences (8.88%) were reported at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted TARRD repair is conceived as a novel alternative minimally invasive procedure for RD with concurrent midline defects ensuring a primary fascial defect closure and mesh implantation in a sublay position with a wide overlap. It is important to better evaluate the suture that should be used to perform the repair, and multicenter studies with standardization of patient's demographics, RD characteristics, and long-term follow-up outcomes are mandatory to assess the effectiveness and durability of r-TARDD repair.

Mid-term results of VTEP (Ventral hernia repair by Totally ExtraPeritoneal approach)

BACKGROUND

Techniques of retromuscular repair of ventral hernias aim at avoiding complications linked to intraperitoneal patch. Aim of the study was to evaluate results of the VTEP technique.

METHODS

On 187 patients who underwent a VTEP, evaluation was carried out on 128 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The surgical technique consisted of creating connection between both retro-rectus spaces, by division of the medial edges of the posterior sheath and deploying the patch in the retromuscular patch without fixation. The posterior sheath was repaired in 16 cases. The patients were sent a questionnaire and invitation to have physical examination by the surgeon.

RESULTS

The mean hernia and patch size were 9 (1-50) and 225 (50-500) cm², respectively. The mean follow-up was 21.2 (12-35) months; 120 (93.7%) patients were evaluated, 21 by physical examination, 41 by questionnaire, 58 by telephone and 8 (6.3%) were lost to follow-up. Hundred (83%) patients felt no pain at rest, and 88 (73%) during effort. Among patients who felt some degree of pain, the mean VAS value was 2 (1-4) at rest and 2.6 (1-7) during effort. Two recurrences occurred, 3 patients were worried about a persisting diastasis bulging at the upper border of the patch and 8 patients in which the posterior sheath was not repaired complained they felt that their upper abdomen was somewhat distended or swollen.

CONCLUSION

The VTEP procedure provides a low level of chronic pain but can entail some drawbacks, such as the swollen abdomen, which can be attributed to the absence of repair of the posterior sheath. It may be that restoring or preserving structural integrity of the abdominal belt formed by the posterior sheath constitutes a key point in retromuscular techniques.

Robotic hernia repair II. English version : Robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair (rv‑TAPP and r‑Rives or r‑TARUP). Video report and results of a series of 118 patients

Endoscopic management of umbilical and incisional hernias has adapted to the limitations of conventional laparoscopic instruments over the past 30 years. This includes the development of meshes for intraperitoneal placement (intraperitoneal onlay mesh, IPOM), with antiadhesive coatings; however, adhesions do occur in a significant proportion of these patients. Minimally invasive procedures result in fewer perioperative complications, but with a slightly higher recurrence rate. With the ergonomic resources of robotics, which offers angled instruments, it is now possible to implant meshes in a minimally invasively manner in different abdominal wall layers while achieving morphologic and functional reconstruction of the abdominal wall. This video article presents the treatment of ventral and incisional hernias with mesh implantation into the preperitoneal space (robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal ventral hernia repair, r‑ventral TAPP) as well as into the retrorectus space (r-Rives and robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic repair, r‑TARUP, respectively). The results of a cohort study of 118 consecutive patients are presented and discussed with regard to the added value of the robotic technique in extraperitoneal mesh implantation and in the training of residents.

ROBotic Utility for Surgical Treatment of hernias (ROBUST hernia project)

We describe the evolution in hernia repair approaches in our practice during the first 3 years of adopting robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery. For inguinal hernia repair, we began using the robotic platform for complex hernias, and the use of open repair decreased from 17% to 6%. For primary ventral hernias, open procedures decreased from 59% to 10% and for incisional ventral hernias, from 48% to 11%. Moreover, a large shift in mesh position for ventral hernias was seen, with an increase of the retromuscular position from 20% to 82% and a decrease of intraperitoneal mesh position from 48% to 10%. The robotic platform seems to hold a significant potential for complex inguinal hernias, in addition to ventral and incisional hernias which require component separation. A shorter hospital stay and less postoperative complications might make the adoption of the robotic platform for abdominal wall surgery a valuable proposition.

Predictors of low quality of life after open inguinal hernia repair using the EuraHS-QoL score: prospective multicentric cohort study across 33 hospitals

PURPOSE

Evidence about factors influencing quality of life after inguinal hernia surgery is scarce. This study aimed to assess patient's Quality of Life (QoL) after open inguinal hernia repair and to identify predictors of low QoL at 3 months after surgery, to guide practice and inform patients at high risk.

METHODS

Prospective multicentric cohort study including consecutive patients undergoing elective open inguinal hernia repair in Portuguese hospitals (October-December 2019). The primary outcome was Quality of Life at 3 months after surgery, using the EuraHS-QoL score (higher score correlates with lower QoL). Low QoL was defined as the higher EuraHS-QoL score tertile and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors.

RESULTS

893 patients were included from 33 hospitals. The majority were men [89.9% (800/891)], had unilateral hernias 88.7% (774/872) and the most common surgical technique was Lichtenstein's repair [52.9% (472/893)]. The median QoL score was 24 (IQR 10-40) before surgery and 2 (IQR 0-10) at 3 months after surgery, showing significant improvement (p < 0.001). After adjustment, low QoL at 3 months was associated with low preoperative QoL (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.21-2.57, p = 0.003), non-absorbable mesh fixation (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.12-2.41, p = 0.011), severe immediate postoperative pain (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.66-5.11, p < 0.001) and minor postoperative complications (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.30-3.84, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of the EuraHS-QoL score preoperatively to inform consent. Although significant improvement in QoL is expected after surgery, high scores before surgery are associated with low postoperative QoL. Caution should be taken with non-absorbable mesh fixation and immediate postoperative pain control should be optimised.

Case Report: 21 Cases of Umbilical Hernia Repair Using a Laparoscopic Cephalic Approach Plus a Posterior Sheath and Extraperitoneal Approach

Purpose: In this study, a novel surgical technique was developed for umbilical hernias, in which a laparoscopic cephalic approach plus a posterior sheath and an extraperitoneal approach was employed. The aim of this study was to determine the results of this new technique. Methods: From 2019 to 2020, 21 patients (81.8% men) with an umbilical hernia underwent a laparoscopic cephalic approach plus a posterior sheath and extraperitoneal approach, performed by two surgeons specializing in abdominal wall surgery, in two academic hospitals. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, operation time, blood loss, and hernia recurrence were assessed. Results: Twenty-one cases of umbilical hernia were successfully completed. The size of the hernia ring was 1.5-3 cm², with an average of 2.39 ± 0.47 cm². The operation time was 120-240 min (average, 177.3 ± 42.15 min), and the blood loss volume was 30-40 ml (average, 33.73 ± 3.55 ml). The mean follow-up period was 6 months, and there were no short-term complications and no cases of recurrence. Conclusion: A laparoscopic cephalic approach plus a posterior sheath and extraperitoneal approach is a safe alternative for the repair of an umbilical hernia. The intraoperative complication rate was low.

Innovations in surgical treatment of rectus abdominis diastasis: a review of mini-invasive techniques

Abdominal rectus diastasis (RD) is characterized by thinning and widening of the linea alba, combined with laxity of the ventral abdominal musculature. This condition is associated with bulging of abdominal content, and it is mostly acquired during pregnancy or obesity. Symptoms include pain and discomfort in the abdomen, musculoskeletal and uro-gynecological problems in addition to negative body image and impaired quality of life. In this review we present current knowledge on the novel surgical mini-invasive techniques for treatment of RD. The aim of our study is to discuss the use of a standard classification to define pathological RD and possible indications for a minimally invasive repair, considering complications, patients' satisfaction and recurrence rate. A PubMed search of the literature has been conducted in January 2020 including the most recent articles using the following criteria among the interventions for RD: mini-invasive surgery, laparoscopic, endoscopy and robotic procedures. Minimally invasive surgical treatment options for rectus diastasis are poorly investigated and indications for repair are still debated. Guidelines are mandatory to standardize surgical management of RD.

[Robotic hernia repair : Part II: Robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair (rv-TAPP and r-Rives or r-TARUP). Video report and results of a series of 118 patients]

Endoscopic management of umbilical and incisional hernias has adapted to the limitations of conventional laparoscopic instruments over the past 30 years. This includes the development of meshes for intraperitoneal placement (intraperitoneal onlay mesh, IPOM), with antiadhesive coatings; however, adhesions do occur in a significant proportion of these patients. Minimally invasive procedures result in fewer perioperative complications, but with a slightly higher recurrence rate. With the ergonomic resources of robotics, which offers angled instruments, it is now possible to implant meshes in a minimally invasively manner in different abdominal wall layers while achieving morphologic and functional reconstruction of the abdominal wall. This video article presents the treatment of ventral and incisional hernias with mesh implantation into the preperitoneal space (robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal ventral hernia repair, r‑ventral TAPP) as well as into the retrorectus space (r-Rives and robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic repair, r‑TARUP, respectively). The results of a cohort study of 118 consecutive patients are presented and discussed with regard to the added value of the robotic technique in extraperitoneal mesh implantation and in the training of residents.

Comparison of outcomes in rectus abdominis diastasis repair-which data do we need in a hernia registry?

INTRODUCTION

Rectus abdominis diastasis (RAD) ± concomitant hernia is a complex hernia entity of growing significance in everyday clinical practice. Due to a multitude of described surgical techniques, a so far missing universally accepted classification and hardly existing comparative studies, there are no clear recommendations in guidelines. Therefore, "RAD ± concomitant hernia" will be documented as a separate hernia entity in the Herniamed Registry in the future. For this purpose, an appropriate case report form will be developed on the basis of the existing literature.

METHODS

A systematic search of the available literature was performed in March 2021 using Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Embase, Springer Link, and the Cochrane Library. 93 publications were identified as relevant for this topic.

RESULTS

In total 45 different surgical techniques for the repair of RAD ± concomitant hernia were identified in the surgical literature. RAD ± concomitant hernia is predominantly repaired by plastic but also by general surgeons. Classification of RAD ± concomitant hernia is based on a proposal of the German Hernia Society and the International Endohernia Society. Surgical techniques are summarized as groups subject to certain aspects: Techniques with abdominoplasty, open techniques, mini-less-open and endoscopic sublay techniques, mini-less-open and endoscopic subcutaneous/preaponeurotic techniques and laparoscopic techniques. Additional data impacting the outcome are also recorded as is the case for other hernia entities. Despite the complexity of this topic, documentation of RAD ± concomitant hernia has not proved to be any more cumbersome than for any of the other hernia entities when using this classification.

CONCLUSION

Using the case report form described here, the complex hernia entity RAD ± concomitant hernia can be recorded in a registry for proper analysis of comparative treatment options.

SubCutaneous OnLay endoscopic Approach (SCOLA) for midline ventral hernias associated with diastasis recti

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgery for diastasis recti has gained attention in the recent past, with several reports with different names and particularities being suggested by the authors. SCOLA (Subcutaneous OnLay endoscopic Approach) is an example of this technique, described here in standardized technique.

DESCRIPTION OF THE TECHNIQUE

Basic steps to perform the procedure are detailed, beginning with patient and surgical team positioning, including trocar placement and tips and tricks of the subcutaneous dissection, steps needed to achieve full dissection of the preaponeurotic space, diastasis recti plication, mesh positioning and fixation and drain positioning with fixation of the umbilical stalk.

DISCUSSION

Regardless of different names and small technical variations, endoscopic pre-aponeurotic mesh positioning can be performed with well-established steps on a reproducible fashion, aiming to achieve better results. Careful attention should be paid to appropriate patient selection and drain placement to reduce seroma rate, the most common complication.