1
|
Parker SG, Joyner J, Thomas R, Van Dellen J, Mohamed S, Jakkalasaibaba R, Blake H, Shanmuganandan A, Albadry W, Panascia J, Gray W, Vig S. A Ventral Hernia Management Pathway; A "Getting It Right First Time" approach to Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. Am Surg 2024; 90:1714-1726. [PMID: 38584505 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241241650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is an emerging specialty, involving complex multi-stage operations in patients with high medical and surgical risk. At our hospital, we have developed a growing interest in AWR, with a commitment to improving outcomes through a regular complex hernia MDT. An MDT approach to these patients is increasingly recognized as the path forward in management to optimize patients and improve outcomes. METHODS We conducted a literature review and combined this with our experiential knowledge of managing these cases to create a pathway for the management of our abdominal wall patients. This was done under the auspices of GIRFT (Getting It Right First Time) as a quality improvement project at our hospital. RESULTS We describe, in detail, our current AWR pathway, including the checklists and information documents we use with a stepwise evidence and experience-based approach to identifying the multiple factors associated with good outcomes. We explore the current literature and discuss our best practice pathway. CONCLUSION In this emerging specialty, there is limited guidance on the management of these patients. Our pathway, the "Complex Hernia Bundle," currently provides guidance for our abdominal wall team and may well be one that could be adopted/adapted by other centers where challenging hernia cases are undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel G Parker
- The Abdominal Wall Unit, Croydon University Hospital, Thornton Heath, London, UK
| | - James Joyner
- The Abdominal Wall Unit, Croydon University Hospital, Thornton Heath, London, UK
| | - Rhys Thomas
- The Abdominal Wall Unit, Croydon University Hospital, Thornton Heath, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Van Dellen
- The Abdominal Wall Unit, Croydon University Hospital, Thornton Heath, London, UK
| | - Said Mohamed
- The Abdominal Wall Unit, Croydon University Hospital, Thornton Heath, London, UK
| | | | - Helena Blake
- The Abdominal Wall Unit, Croydon University Hospital, Thornton Heath, London, UK
| | - Arun Shanmuganandan
- The Abdominal Wall Unit, Croydon University Hospital, Thornton Heath, London, UK
| | - Waleed Albadry
- Plastics Surgery Department, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Julia Panascia
- The Abdominal Wall Unit, Croydon University Hospital, Thornton Heath, London, UK
| | - William Gray
- The Abdominal Wall Unit, Croydon University Hospital, Thornton Heath, London, UK
| | - Stella Vig
- The Abdominal Wall Unit, Croydon University Hospital, Thornton Heath, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
López-Cano M, Hernández-Granados P, Morales-Conde S, Ríos A, Pereira-Rodríguez JA. Abdominal wall surgery units accreditation. The Spanish model. Cir Esp 2024; 102:283-290. [PMID: 38296193 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
The Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) deems it essential to define and regulate the acquisition of high-specialization competencies within General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Surgery and proposes the Regulation for the accreditation of specialized surgical units. The AEC aims to define specialized surgical units as those functional elements of the health system that meet the defined requirements regarding their provision, solvency, and specialization in care, teaching, and research. In this paper we present the proposed accreditation model for Abdominal Wall Surgery Units, as well as the results of a survey conducted to assess the status of such units in our country. The model presented represents one of the pioneering initiatives worldwide concerning the accreditation of Abdominal Wall Surgery Units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel López-Cano
- Unidad de Cirugía de Pared Abdominal Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebrón, Barcelona Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Pilar Hernández-Granados
- Unidad de Pared Abdominal Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Spain
| | - Salvador Morales-Conde
- Serviciode Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena. Sevilla Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain
| | - Antonio Ríos
- Unidad de Pared Abdominal Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca Universidad de Murcia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Köckerling F, Morales-Conde S, Simons M, Casanova D, East B, de Beaux A, Henriksen N, Roka S, Felice A. Certified Fellowship in Abdominal Wall Surgery-A Collaboration Between the UEMS and the European Hernia Society. JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL SURGERY : JAWS 2024; 3:12945. [PMID: 38711962 PMCID: PMC11070935 DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2024.12945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Background: Abdominal wall surgery (AWS) is characterised by the increasing caseload and the complexity of the surgical procedures. The introduction of a tailored approach to AWS utilising laparoendoscopic, robotic and/or open techniques requires the surgeon to master several surgical techniques. All of which have an associated learning curve, and the necessary knowledge/experience to know which operation is the right one for the individual patient. However, the reality in general surgery training shows that training in just a limited number of procedures is not enough. By the end of general surgery training, many chief residents do not feel they are yet ready to carry out surgery independently. Therefore, hernia surgery experts and societies have called for the introduction of a Fellowship in Abdominal Wall Surgery. Methods: The UEMS (Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes, European Union of Medical Specialists) in collaboration with the European Hernia Society (EHS) introduced a fellowship by examination in 2019. As a prerequisite, candidates must complete further training of at least 2 years with a special focus on abdominal wall surgery after having completed their training in general surgery. To be eligible for the examination, candidates must provide evidence of having performed 300 hernia procedures. In addition, candidates must have accrued sufficient "knowledge points" by attending abdominal wall surgery congresses, courses and clinical visitations, and engaged in scientific activities. On meeting the requirements, a candidate may be admitted to the written and oral examination. Results: To date, three examinations have been held on the occasion of the Annual Congress of the European Hernia Society in Copenhagen (2021), Manchester (2022) and Barcelona (2023). Having met the requirements, 48 surgeons passed the written and oral examination and were awarded the Fellow European Board of Surgery-Abdominal Wall Surgery certificate. During this time period, a further 25 surgeons applied to sit the examination but did not fulfil all the criteria to be eligible for the examination. Fifty experienced abdominal wall surgeons applied to become an Honorary Fellow European Board of Surgery-Abdominal Wall Surgery. Fourty eight were successful in their application. Conclusion: The Fellowship of the European Board of Surgery - Abdominal Wall Surgery by examination has been successfully introduced at European level by the joint work of the UEMS and the EHS. The examination is also open to surgeons who work outside the European area, if they can fulfil the eligibility criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinand Köckerling
- Hernia Center, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Daniel Casanova
- Department of Surgery, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Barbora East
- 3rd Department of Surgery and 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University at Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | - Andrew de Beaux
- NHS Lothian and Oxford University Hospitals, University of Edinburgh Sire Murrayfield Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Nadia Henriksen
- Department of Hepatic and Gastrointestinal Disease, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Sebastian Roka
- Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria
| | - Arthur Felice
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lorenz R, Paasch C, Stechemesser B, Reinpold W, Niebuhr H, Fortelny RH, Mayer F, Köckerling F, Mantke R. Long-term evaluation of the Hernia Compact course of the German Hernia School. Hernia 2024; 28:621-628. [PMID: 38393496 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-02966-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since 2011, the German Hernia Society has developed the German Hernia School (GHS) as a standardized hernia surgery training program for younger surgeons, consisting of the Hernia Compact basic module. It is a standardized three day training program (cadaver workshop, ultrasound simulation training, and hands-on training). After 12 years of experience, a survey was conducted to evaluate the long term effect of this training. METHOD Using an anonymous online-questionnaire, we contacted from September 2023 to October 2023 the Hernia Compact course participants via the congress organizer "Weitmeer" and the German Hernia Society. This online questionnaire contains 18 multiple choice questions regarding participants' age, gender, professional experience, participation in other modules of the German Hernia School, the effect of the course on their daily practice and their specific interest in hernia and abdominal wall surgery. RESULTS A total of 146 participants responded to the anonymous online questionnaire. A majority of 132 of 146 participants (90.42%) responded that this course improved the quality of surgical and hernia training (n = 146, no missing data). 141 of 146 individuals (96.58%) recommended the course to surgical colleagues (n = 146, no missing data). There were 89.73% of participants, (n = 146, no missing data) that developed a specific interest in hernia and abdominal wall surgery after the course. For 78.08% (n = 146, no missing data) of participants hernia and abdominal wall surgery was one of the most important activities in their daily surgical practice. CONCLUSION The standardized Hernia Compact basic course of the German Hernia School appears to have a huge impact on the quality of hernia surgery training in Germany and Austria. It might also help generate a specific interest in hernia surgery among participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Lorenz
- 3+CHIRURGEN Hernia Center, Klosterstrasse 34/35, 13581, Berlin, Germany.
- Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstrasse 29, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
| | - C Paasch
- Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstrasse 29, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
| | - B Stechemesser
- Hernia Center Cologne, PAN-Klinik, Zeppelinstrasse 1, 50667, Cologne, Germany
| | - W Reinpold
- Hamburger Hernien Centrum, Harburg (an der Helios Mariahilf Klinik), Stader Str. 203c, 21075, Hamburg, Germany
| | - H Niebuhr
- Hamburger Hernien Centrum, Eppendorf, Eppendorfer Baum 8, 20249, Hamburg, Germany
| | - R H Fortelny
- Department of General Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160, Vienna, Austria
- Medical Faculty, Sigmund Freud University, Freudplatz 3, 1020, Vienna, Austria
| | - F Mayer
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - F Köckerling
- Vivantes Humboldt Hospital Berlin, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charite' University Medicine, Am Nordgraben 2, 13509, Berlin, Germany
| | - R Mantke
- Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstrasse 29, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chan KY, Raftery N, Abdelhafiz T, Rayis A, Johnston S. Parastomal hernia repairs: A nationwide cohort study in the Republic of Ireland. Surgeon 2024; 22:92-98. [PMID: 37838612 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the context of improving colorectal cancer outcomes, post-survivorship quality of life has become an important outcome measure. Parastomal hernias and their associated morbidity remain largely under-reported and under-appreciated. Despite their burden, conservative management is common. This study aims to provide a national overview on the current trends in parastomal hernia repairs (PHRs). METHODS All PHRs performed in public hospitals across the country between 1/2017 to 7/2022 were identified retrospectively from the National Quality Assurance and Improvement System (NQAIS) database. Anonymised patient characteristics and quality indices were extracted for statistical analysis. RESULTS A total of 565 PHRs, 64.1 % elective and the remainder emergent, were identified across 27 hospitals. The 8 national colorectal units performed 67.3 % of all repairs. While 42.3 % of PHRs were standalone procedures, reversal of Hartmann's procedure was the commonest simultaneous procedure in the remainder. The median age, ASA and Charlson Co-Morbidity Index were 64 years (19), 3(1) and 3(10) respectively. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 16.25 days (SD = 29.84). Linear regression analysis associated ASA (95 % CI 0.58-16.08, p < 0.035) and emergency admissions (95 % CI 5.86-25.55, P < 0.002) with a significantly longer LOS, with the latter also associated with more frequent emergency re-admissions (95 % CI 0.18-0.82, p < 0.002). CONCLUSION Patients undergoing emergency PHR were older and significantly more comorbid. Consequently, these patients were subjected to longer hospital stays, more frequent readmissions and overall higher hospital costs. Multidisciplinary perioperative optimisation and standardised referral pathways should underpin the shift towards elective PHRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kin Yik Chan
- Department of Surgery, Midland Regional Hospital Tullamore, Co.Offaly, R35NY51, Ireland.
| | - Nicola Raftery
- Department of Surgery, Midland Regional Hospital Tullamore, Co.Offaly, R35NY51, Ireland
| | - Tarig Abdelhafiz
- Department of Surgery, Midland Regional Hospital Tullamore, Co.Offaly, R35NY51, Ireland
| | - Abubakr Rayis
- Department of Surgery, Midland Regional Hospital Tullamore, Co.Offaly, R35NY51, Ireland
| | - Sean Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Midland Regional Hospital Tullamore, Co.Offaly, R35NY51, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Willms AG, Schaaf S, Schwab R. Analysis of surgical quality indicators after certification as a Hernia Center. Updates Surg 2024; 76:255-264. [PMID: 36811182 PMCID: PMC10805962 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01449-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Certifications are an increasingly used tool of quality management in the health care system. The primary goal is to improve the quality of treatment due to implemented measures based on a defined catalog of criteria and standardization of the treatment processes. However, the extent to which this affects medical and health-economic indicators is unknown. Therefore, the study aims to examine the possible effects of the certification as a Reference Center for Hernia Surgery on the treatment quality and reimbursement dimensions. The observation and recording periods were defined as 3 years before (2013-2015) and 3 years after certification as a "Reference Center for Hernia Surgery" (2016-2018). Possible changes due to the certification were examined based on multidimensional data collection and analysis. In addition, the aspects of structure, process and result quality, and the reimbursement situation were reported. One thousand three hundred and nineteen cases before and one thousand four hundred and three cases after certification were included. After the certification, the patients were older (58.1 ± 16.1 vs. 64.0 ± 16.1 years, p < 0.01), had a higher CMI (1.01 vs. 1.06), and a higher ASA score (< III 86.9 vs. 85.5%, p < 0.01). The interventions became more complex (e.g., recurrent incisional hernias 0.5% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.01). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly reduced for incisional hernias (8.8 ± 5.8 vs. 6.7 ± 4.1 days, p < 0.001). The reoperation rate for incisional hernias also decreased significantly from 8.24 to 3.66% (p = 0.04). The postoperative complication rate for inguinal hernias was significantly reduced (3.1 vs. 1.1%, p = 0.002). The reimbursement of the hernia center increased by 27.6%. There were positive changes in process and outcome quality and reimbursement after the certification, which supports the effectivity of certifications in hernia surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnulf Gregor Willms
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Hernia Reference Center of the German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital, Lesserstr. 180, 22049, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Schaaf
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Hernia Reference Center of the German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Robert Schwab
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Hernia Reference Center of the German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Adams ST, Scott M, West C, Walsh CJ. Separating the components of an abdominal wall fellowship. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024; 106:2-8. [PMID: 36374299 PMCID: PMC10757876 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Complex abdominal wall reconstruction is an emerging subspecialty yet, despite the abundance of abdominal wall hernias requiring treatment and the increasing complexity of this type of surgery, there are few opportunities for surgeons to gain subspecialist training in this field. In this paper we discuss the need for focused training in complex abdominal wall reconstruction, outline some of the problems that may be hindering the availability of such opportunities and propose potential solutions to these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ST Adams
- St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
- Wirral University Teaching Hospitals (WUTH) NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - M Scott
- St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - C West
- St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - CJ Walsh
- Wirral University Teaching Hospitals (WUTH) NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Parker SG, Blake H, Zhao S, van Dellen J, Mohamed S, Albadry W, Akhtar H, Franczak B, Jakkalasaibaba R, Rothnie A, Thomas R. An established abdominal wall multidisciplinary team improves patient care and aids surgical decision making with complex ventral hernia patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024; 106:29-35. [PMID: 36927113 PMCID: PMC10757872 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is an emerging subspecialty within general surgery. The practice of multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings to aid decision making and improve patient care has been demonstrated, with widespread acceptance. This study presents our initial experience of over 150 cases of complex hernia patients discussed in a newly established MDT setting. METHODS From February 2020 to July 2022 (30-month period), abdominal wall MDTs were held bimonthly. Key stakeholders included upper and lower gastrointestinal surgeons, a gastrointestinal specialist radiologist, a plastic surgeon, a high-risk anaesthetist and two junior doctors integrated into the AWR clinical team. Meetings were held online, where patient history, past medical and surgical history, hernia characteristics and up-to-date computed tomography scans were discussed. RESULTS Some 156 patients were discussed over 18 meetings within the above period. Ninety-five (61%) patients were recommended for surgery, and 61 (39%) patients were recommended for conservative management or referred elsewhere. Seventy-eight (82%) patients were directly waitlisted, whereas seventeen (18%) required preoperative optimisation: three (18%) for smoking cessation, eleven (65%) for weight-loss management and three (18%) for specialist diabetic assessment and management. In total, 92 (59%) patients (including operative and nonoperative management) have been discharged to primary care. DISCUSSION A multidisciplinary forum for complex abdominal wall patients is a safe process that facilitates decision making, promotes education and improves patient care. As the AWR subspecialty evolves, our view is that the "complex hernia MDT" will become commonplace. We present our experience and share advice for others planning to establish an AWR centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SG Parker
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | - H Blake
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | - S Zhao
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | | | - S Mohamed
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | - W Albadry
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - H Akhtar
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | | | | | - A Rothnie
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | - R Thomas
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Spivak J, Chan PH, Prentice HA, Paxton EW, Brill ER. Mesh-based inguinal hernia repairs in an integrated healthcare system and surgeon and hospital volume: a cohort study of 110,808 patients from over a decade. Hernia 2023; 27:1209-1223. [PMID: 37148362 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02796-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to describe a cohort of patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair within a United States-based integrated healthcare system (IHS) and evaluate the risk for postoperative events by surgeon and hospital volume within each surgical approach, open, laparoscopic, and robotic. METHODS Patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent their first inguinal hernia repair were identified for a cohort study (2010-2020). Average annual surgeon and hospital volume were broken into quartiles with the lowest volume quartile as the reference group. Multiple Cox regression evaluated risk for ipsilateral reoperation following repair by volume. All analyses were stratified by surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic). RESULTS 110,808 patients underwent 131,629 inguinal hernia repairs during the study years; procedures were performed by 897 surgeons at 36 hospitals. Most repairs were open (65.4%), followed by laparoscopic (33.5%) and robotic (1.1%). Reoperation rates at 5 and 10 years of follow-up were 2.4% and 3.4%, respectively; rates were similar across surgical groups. In adjusted analysis, surgeons with higher laparoscopic volumes had a lower reoperation risk (27-46 average annual repairs: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.74; ≥ 47 repairs: HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44-0.64) compared to those in the lowest volume quartile (< 14 average annual repairs). No differences in reoperation rates were observed in reference to surgeon or hospital volume following open or robotic inguinal hernia repair. CONCLUSION High-volume surgeons may reduce reoperation risk following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. We hope to better identify additional risk factors for inguinal hernia repair complications and improve patient outcomes with future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Spivak
- Department of Surgery, The Permanente Medical Group, Walnut Creek, CA, USA
| | - P H Chan
- Medical Device Surveillance & Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - H A Prentice
- Medical Device Surveillance & Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - E W Paxton
- Medical Device Surveillance & Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - E R Brill
- Department of Surgery, The Permanente Medical Group, Santa Clara, CA, 95051, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
de Beaux A, Becker S, Parent T, Temporal G, Kummer R, Allouard C, East B. Hernia Basecamp-A Free to Use, Online Hernia Learning Platform. Analysis of Its Use Since Launch in June 2021. JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL SURGERY : JAWS 2023; 2:11803. [PMID: 38312406 PMCID: PMC10831634 DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2023.11803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Introduction: Hernia Basecamp is an online learning platform hosted within the WebSurg website. One of the drivers of its development was to cover the syllabus of the UEMS AWS examination, but it is a learning resource in its own right. There are currently 205 video lectures, with a number of them selected to create 10 modules of 3 h each with UEMS CME accreditation. The aim of this study was to review the Hernia Basecamp usage since launch in June 2021. Methods: The Hernia Basecamp WebSurg platform was interrogated using Matomo Analytics in January 2023 (19 month period since launch). Data on the number of visits, pages looked at and time spent on the platform per visit, along with the number of CME modules taken and passed were collected. Results: Users from 146 countries visited the Hernia Basecamp site 17,171 times (6,586 times, 38.4% in first 9 months). The top 5 countries by visitors were the United Kingdom, Mexico, Spain, United States and Germany (accounting for 29.4% of the visits). The average time spent per visit was 11 min 37 s (range: 47 s-49 min 4 s), and the number of pages/videos viewed per visit was 8.1 (range: 2-21). The number of UEMS CME modules taken was 675, and 326 (48%) of these tests were passed. Conclusion: In the first 19 months from launch, Hernia Basecamp provided over 3,000 h of hernia education. The UEMS approved CME accreditation tests were commonly used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. de Beaux
- Spire Murrayfield Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - S. Becker
- WebSurg, The Online University of IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - T. Parent
- WebSurg, The Online University of IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - G. Temporal
- WebSurg, The Online University of IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - R. Kummer
- Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | | | - B. East
- 3rd Department of Surgery, 1st Medical Faculty of Charles University at Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hernia as a sub-speciality: is it a global solution? Hernia 2023; 27:193-194. [PMID: 36522585 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02720-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
12
|
Gram-Hanssen A, Öberg S, Rosenberg J. A Critical Appraisal of the Chronic Pain Rate After Inguinal Hernia Repair. JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL SURGERY : JAWS 2023; 2:10972. [PMID: 38312409 PMCID: PMC10831660 DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2023.10972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Purpose: To critically appraise highly cited studies reporting on the rate of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Methods: Google Scholar was searched on 23 May 2022. We only included publications with more than 10 citations per year since publication and more than 100 citations in total. Both reports of original data and systematic reviews were included. Risk of bias and quality of the included studies were assessed with either the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Prevalence Studies or the AMSTAR 2 depending on study design. Results: Twenty studies were included and evaluated. The rate of chronic postoperative inguinal pain of any degree ranged from 10%-63%, and the rate of moderate-to-severe pain ranged from 1%-18%. All studies reported the rate of pain of any degree, and most studies reported the rate of moderate-to-severe pain influencing daily activities. Studies used different temporal definitions of chronic pain, but most studies defined it as pain persisting either three or six months postoperatively. Ten studies used unvalidated questionnaires or significantly modified versions of validated questionnaires. Eleven studies primarily included patients receiving open repair. Included studies had median 21 citations per year (range 10-39) and median 387 citations in total (range 127-788). Conclusion: The rates of chronic postoperative inguinal pain reported in the included highly cited studies are possibly inaccurate, excessive, and outdated. New prospective studies based on uniform definitions and standards of measurement are warranted to better assess a contemporary chronic pain rate after inguinal hernia repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Gram-Hanssen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
The use of botulinum toxin in the acute management of symptomatic complex incisional hernia: a case series. HERNIA : THE JOURNAL OF HERNIAS AND ABDOMINAL WALL SURGERY 2023; 27:593-599. [PMID: 36633705 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02739-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Complications of incisional hernia are amongst the commonest presentations to the emergency surgical take. Outcomes from emergency hernia repair are poor, particularly for those with complex defects and for the growing population of comorbid, high-risk patients. Attempts to avoid emergency surgery by improving success rates of non-operative management could prove hugely beneficial. Botulinum toxin A (Botox) is already used in the elective management of incisional hernia and this study evaluates if the relaxation produced could be used to augment the outcomes of conservative management of acutely presenting incisional hernia. METHODS Patients presenting between October 2020 and April 2022 without evidence of visceral ischaemia, who had been selected for a non-operative approach, were given 300 units of Botox under image guidance to the abdominal wall in addition to standard conservative measures. RESULTS Twelve patients were eligible for Botox administration. Median age was 75 years and median BMI was 36.45 kg/m2. All patients were high risk; minimum ASA score was 3, and median frailty score was 5. In ten patients, symptoms resolved following Botox allowing for discharge without further complication. Seven subsequently referred on to the abdominal wall team. Symptoms did not settle in the two remaining patients; one required emergency laparotomy and the second was palliated. CONCLUSION Botox may be a useful adjunct to established non-operative measures in patients with acute presentations of incisional hernia. It may improve the acute symptoms, eliminate the need for high-risk emergency surgery, or provide a bridge to abdominal wall reconstruction.
Collapse
|
14
|
Fernandez-Alberti J, Mata L, Orrego F, Medina P, Bogetti D, Porto EA, Pirchi DE. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: impact of surgical time in the learning curve. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:2826-2832. [PMID: 36477644 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09807-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE One of the procedures that has become very popular thanks to the advantages of minimally invasive approach is the laparoscopic treatment of inguinocrural hernias. As a disadvantage, it would imply a longer learning curve when compared to the conventional approach. There is no consensus about the number of procedures required to dominate this surgical technique, since according to bibliography it ranges from 20 to 240. METHODS We analyzed and compared the progress of 18 third year surgical residents while they were introducing into laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernioplasties between June 2013 and May 2018. RESULTS Between June 2013 and May 2018, 1282 laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasties were performed (71 procedures per resident). Mean surgical time was for unilateral: 62.13 min (SD ± 15.54; range 30-105 min) for the first third (Q1) vs 54.61 min (SD ± 15.38; range 30-100 min) for the last third (Q3): p < 0.0001. For bilateral were: 92.59 min (SD ± 21.89; range 50-160 min) for Q1 vs 84.48 min (SD ± 20.52; range 30-130 min) for Q3: p < 0.05. Accepting an alpha error of 5% and considering an association power of 80%, there would be needed 61 cases per surgeon to achieve a significant reduction in surgical time. CONCLUSION In a center with high-volume in TAPP and under a supervised training program, it is feasible to achieve a reduction in surgical time. Randomized studies with a larger number of cases are necessary to confirm this finding and draw more robust and objective conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lautaro Mata
- General Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Perdriel 74, 1280, CABA, Argentina
| | - Facundo Orrego
- General Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Perdriel 74, 1280, CABA, Argentina
| | - Pablo Medina
- Abdominal Wall Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Perdriel 74, 1280, CABA, Argentina
| | - Diego Bogetti
- General Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Perdriel 74, 1280, CABA, Argentina
| | - Eduardo Agustin Porto
- Abdominal Wall Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Perdriel 74, 1280, CABA, Argentina
| | - Daniel Enrique Pirchi
- Director of General Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Perdriel 74, 1280, CABA, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vierstraete M, Simons M, Borch K, de Beaux A, East B, Reinpold W, Stabilini C, Muysoms F. Description of the Current Da Vinci ® Training Pathway for Robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery by the European Hernia Society. JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL SURGERY : JAWS 2022; 1:10914. [PMID: 38314150 PMCID: PMC10831684 DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2022.10914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Background: Robot assisted laparoscopic abdominal wall surgery (RAWS) has seen a rapid adoption in recent years. The safe introduction of the robot platform in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias is important to safeguard the patient from harm during the learning curve. The scope of this paper is to describe the current European training curriculum in RAWS. Methods and Analysis: The pathway to competence in RAWS will depend on the robot platform, experience in other abdominal procedures (novice to expert) and experience in the abdominal wall repair techniques. An overview of the learning curve effect in the initial case series of several early adopters in RAWS was reviewed. In European centres, current training for surgeons wanting to adopt RAWS is managed by the specific technology-based training organized by the company providing the robot. It consists of four phases where phases I and II are preclinical, while phases III and IV focus on the introduction of the robotic platform into surgical practice. Conclusion: On behalf of the Robotic Surgery Task Force of the European Hernia Society (EHS) we believe that the EHS should play an important role in the clinical phases III and IV training. Courses organized in collaboration with the robot provider on relevant surgical anatomy of the abdominal wall and procedural steps in complex abdominal wall reconstruction like transversus abdominis release are essential. Whereas the robot provider should be responsible for the preclinical phases I and II to gain familiarity in the specific robot platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maarten Simons
- Department of Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Knut Borch
- General Surgical Department, Hernia Center, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Barbora East
- 3rd Department of Surgery, 1st Medical Faculty at Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | - Wolfgang Reinpold
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Helios Mariahilf Hospital ATOS Klinik Fleetinsel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cesare Stabilini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche (DISC), Università Degli Studi di Genova, ITA Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| | - Filip Muysoms
- Department of General Surgery, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hernia Defect Closure With Barbed Suture: An Assessment of Patient-reported Outcomes in Extraperitoneal Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY, ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES 2022; 32:494-500. [PMID: 35882011 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary closure of a fascial defect during ventral hernia repair is associated with lower rates of recurrence and better patient satisfaction compared with bridging repairs. Robotic surgery offers enhanced ability to close these defects and this has likely been aided by the use of barbed suture. The goal of this study was to evaluate the perioperative safety and the long-term outcomes for the use of barbed suture for the primary closure of hernia defects during robotic ventral hernia repair (rVHR) with mesh. METHODS This is a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent rVHR with the use of a barbed suture for fascial defect closure from August 2018 to August 2020 in an academic center. All the patients included were queried by phone to complete a quality of life assessment to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Subjective sense of a bulge and pain at the previous hernia site has been shown to correlate with hernia recurrence. These questions were used in conjunction with a Hernia-related Quality of Life Survey (HerQles) score to assess a patient's quality of life. RESULTS A total of 81 patients with 102 hernias were analyzed. Sixty patients (74%) were successfully reached and completed the PRO form at median postoperative day 356 (range: 43 to 818). Eight patients (13% of patients with PRO data) claimed to have both a bulge and pain at their previous hernia site, concerning for possible recurrence. Median overall HerQLes score was 82 [Interquartile Range (IQR): 54 to 99]. Patients with a single hernia defect, when compared with those with multiple defects, had a lower rate of both a bulge (15% vs. 30%) and symptoms (33% vs. 48%), as well as a higher median HerQLes score (85 vs. 62) at the time of PRO follow-up. Patients with previous hernia repair had a lower median HerQLes score of 65 (IQR: 43 to 90) versus 88 (IQR: 62-100). These patients also had a higher rate of sensing a bulge (29% vs. 18%), whereas a sense of symptoms at the site was less (33% vs. 44%). CONCLUSIONS Barbed suture for fascial defect closure in rVHR was found to be safe with an acceptable rate of possible recurrence by the use of PRO data. Patients with multiple hernias and previous repairs had a higher likelihood of recurrence and a lower quality of life after rVHR.
Collapse
|
17
|
Wegdam JA, de Jong DLC, de Vries Reilingh TS, Schipper EE, Bouvy ND, Nienhuijs SW. Assessing Textbook Outcome After Implementation of Transversus Abdominis Release in a Regional Hospital. JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL SURGERY : JAWS 2022; 1:10517. [PMID: 38314160 PMCID: PMC10831686 DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2022.10517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Background: The posterior component separation technique with transversus abdominis release (TAR) was introduced in 2012 as an alternative to the classic anterior component separation technique (Ramirez). This study describes outcome and learning curve of TAR, five years after implementation of this new technique in a regional hospital in the Netherlands. Methods: A standardized work up protocol, based on the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, was used to implement the TAR. The TAR technique as described by Novitsky was performed. After each 20 procedures, outcome parameters were evaluated and new quality measurements implemented. Primary outcome measure was Textbook Outcome, the rate of patients with an uneventful clinical postoperative course after TAR. Textbook Outcome is defined by a maximum of 7 days hospitalization without any complication (wound or systemic), reoperation or readmittance, within the first 90 postoperative days, and without a recurrence during follow up. The number of patients with a Textbook Outcome compared to the total number of consecutively performed TARs is depicted as the institutional learning curve. Secondary outcome measures were the details and incidences of the surgical site and systemic complications within 90 days, as well as long-term recurrences. Results: From 2016, sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent a TAR. Textbook Outcome was 35% and the institutional learning curve did not flatten after 69 procedures. Systemic complications occurred in 48%, wound complications in 41%, and recurrences in 4%. Separate analyses of three successive cohorts of each 20 TARs demonstrated that both Textbook Outcome (10%, 30% and 55%, respectively) and the rate of surgical site events (45%, 15%, and 10%) significantly (p < 0.05) improved with more experience. Conclusion: Implementation of the open transversus abdominis release demonstrated that outcome was positively correlated to an increasing number of TARs performed. TAR has a long learning curve, only partially determined by the technical aspects of the operation. Implementation of the TAR requires a solid plan. Building, and maintaining, an adequate setting for patients with complex ventral hernias is the real challenge and driving force to improve outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Nicole D. Bouvy
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jiménez DR, López-Cano M, Gonçalves VR, Tremolosa MV, Serra JS, Bravo-Salva A, Rodríguez JAP. Understanding patient-reported knowledge of hernia surgery: a quantitative study. Hernia 2022; 26:761-768. [PMID: 34669079 PMCID: PMC9200871 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02521-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to gather information on patient-reported knowledge (PRK) in the field of hernia surgery. METHODS A prospective quantitative study was designed to explore different aspects of PRK and opinions regarding hernia surgery. Patients referred for the first time to a surgical service with a presumed diagnosis of hernia and eventual hernia repair were eligible, and those who gave consent completed a simple self-assessment questionnaire before the clinical visit. RESULTS The study population included 449 patients (72.8% men, mean age 61.5). Twenty (4.5%) patients did not have hernia on physical examination. The patient's perceived health status was "neither bad nor good" or "good" in 56.6% of cases. Also, more patients considered that hernia repair would be an easy procedure (35.1%) rather than a difficult one (9.8%). Although patients were referred by their family physicians, 32 (7.1%) answered negatively to the question of coming to the visit to assess the presence of a hernia. The most important reason of the medical visit was to receive medical advice (77.7%), to be operated on as soon as possible (40.1%) or to be included in the surgical waiting list (35.9%). Also, 46.1% of the patients considered that they should undergo a hernia repair and 56.8% that surgery will be a definitive solution. CONCLUSION PRK of patients referred for the first time to an abdominal wall surgery unit with a presumed diagnosis of hernia was quite limited and there is still a long way towards improving knowledge of hernia surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Rosselló Jiménez
- Geriatric Service, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M López-Cano
- Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - V Rodrigues Gonçalves
- Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Verdaguer Tremolosa
- Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Saludes Serra
- Service of Anesthesia and Resuscitation, Hospital Universitario de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragoa, Spain
| | - A Bravo-Salva
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J A Pereira Rodríguez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kollias V, Reid J, Udayasiri D, Granger J, Karatassas A, Hensman I, Maddern G. Towards a complete cycle of care: a multidisciplinary pathway to improve outcomes in complex abdominal wall hernia repair. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:2025-2036. [PMID: 35635058 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The burden of complex abdominal wall hernia (CAWH) is increasing, with associated high morbidity and healthcare costs. This study evaluates current evidenoptce regarding multidisciplinary care for CAWH patients to improve patient outcomes. METHODS A systematic review of Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify proposed or established multidisciplinary team (MDT) pathways, necessary MDT constituents, and to evaluate patient outcomes. The pre-optimization pathways were then compared with a recent Delphi consensus statement. RESULTS Seven articles matched the relevant search criteria. Three were concept articles, without prospective data analysis. Four were case series that applied multidisciplinary care and included limited data analyses with outcomes reported up to 50 months. The consensus was that CAWH MDT requires multiple clinical specialties, including hernia, upper gastrointestinal, colorectal and/or plastic and reconstructive surgeons, along with allied health specialists, radiologists, anaesthetists/pain specialists and infectious diseases consultants. A successful MDT should aim to achieve pre-optimization and plan the definitive repair. These pre-optimization pathways were similar to the recent Delphi consensus by international hernia experts. Using these data, we propose a CAWH multidisciplinary pathway model in an Australian tertiary hospital involving a stepwise approach with well-defined referral criteria, perioperative high-risk management with pre-optimization, surgical planning, postoperative care and follow-up protocols. This pathway incorporates prospective data collection in a Clinical Quality Registry (CQR) to validate its appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS CAWH MDT can provide comprehensive, patient-centred care with improved postoperative outcomes. CQR are important to better evaluate long-term outcomes and ensure rigorous quality control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Kollias
- Department of General Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jessica Reid
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Dilshan Udayasiri
- Department of General Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jeremy Granger
- Department of General Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alex Karatassas
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Indran Hensman
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Guy Maddern
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Podolsky D, Ghanem OM, Tunder K, Iqbal E, Novitsky YW. Current practices in complex abdominal wall reconstruction in the Americas: need for national guidelines? Surg Endosc 2021; 36:4834-4838. [PMID: 34786641 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08831-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Component separation (CS) procedures have become an important part of surgeons' armamentarium. However, the exact criteria for training, procedure/mesh choice, as well as patient selection for CS remains undefined. Herein we aimed to identify trends in CS utilization between various cohorts of practicing surgeons. STUDY DESIGN Members of the Americas Hernia Society were queried using an online survey. Responders were stratified according to their experience, practice profile (private vs academic, general vs hernia surgery), and volume (low (< 10/year) vs high) of CS procedures. We used Chi-squared tests to evaluate significant associations between surgeon characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS 275 responses with overwhelming male preponderance (88%) were collected. The two most common self-identifiers were "general" (66%) and "hernia" (28%) surgeon. PCS was the most commonly (67%) used type of CS; endoscopic ACS was least common (3%). Low-volume surgeons were more likely to utilize the ACS (p < 0.05). Only 7% of respondents learned PCS during their residency, as compared to 36% that use ACS. 65% felt 0-10 cases was sufficient to become proficient in their preferred technique. 10 cm-wide defect was the most common indication for CS; 23% used it for 5-8 cm defects. Self-identified "hernia" and high-volume surgeons were more likely to use synthetic mesh in the setting of previous wound infections and/or contaminated field (p < 0.05). More general/low-volume surgeons use biologic mesh. Contraindications to elective CS varied widely in the cohort, and 9.5% would repair poorly optimized patients electively. Severe morbid obesity was the most feared comorbidity to preclude CS. CONCLUSION The use of CS varies widely between surgeons. In this cohort, we discovered that PCS was the most commonly used technique, especially by hernia/high-volume surgeons. There are differences in mesh utilization between high-volume and low-volume surgeons, specifically in contaminated fields. Despite its prevalence, CS training, indications/contraindications, and patient selection must be better defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Podolsky
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington, 6th floor, South Knuckle, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Omar M Ghanem
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kelly Tunder
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington, 6th floor, South Knuckle, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Emaad Iqbal
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington, 6th floor, South Knuckle, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Yuri W Novitsky
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington, 6th floor, South Knuckle, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grove TN, Kontovounisios C, Montgomery A, Heniford BT, Windsor ACJ, Warren OJ. Perioperative optimization in complex abdominal wall hernias: Delphi consensus statement. BJS Open 2021; 5:6375607. [PMID: 34568888 PMCID: PMC8473840 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of incisional hernia after major abdominal surgery via a midline laparotomy is 20-41 per cent with short-term follow-up, and over 50 per cent in those surviving an abdominal catastrophe. Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) requires complex operations, often involving mesh resection, management of scarred skin, fistula takedown, component separation or flap reconstruction. Patients tend to have more complex conditions, with multiple co-morbidities predisposing them to a vicious cycle of complications and, subsequently, hernia recurrence. Currently there appears to be variance in perioperative practice and minimal guidance globally. The aim of this Delphi consensus was to provide a clear benchmark of care for the preoperative assessment and perioperative optimization of patients undergoing AWR. METHODS The Delphi method was used to achieve consensus from invited experts in the field of AWR. Thirty-two hernia surgeons from recognized hernia societies globally took part. The process included two rounds of anonymous web-based voting with response analysis and formal feedback, concluding with a live round of voting followed by discussion at an international conference. Consensus for a strong recommendation was achieved with 80 per cent agreement, and a weak recommendation with 75 per cent agreement. RESULTS Consensus was obtained on 52 statements including surgical assessment, preoperative assessment, perioperative optimization, multidisciplinary team and decision-making, and quality-of-life assessment. Forty-six achieved over 80 per cent agreement; 14 statements achieved over 95 per cent agreement. CONCLUSION Clear consensus recommendations from a global group of experts in the AWR field are presented in this study. These should be used as a baseline for surgeons and centres managing abdominal wall hernias and performing complex AWR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T N Grove
- Department of Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - C Kontovounisios
- Department of Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of General Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Montgomery
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital SUS, Malmö, Sweden
| | - B T Heniford
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - O J Warren
- Department of Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
MacDonald S, Johnson PM. Wide variation in surgical techniques to repair incisional hernias: a survey of practice patterns among general surgeons. BMC Surg 2021; 21:259. [PMID: 34030665 PMCID: PMC8145827 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01261-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this research was to examine the self-reported practice patterns of Canadian general surgeons regarding the elective repair of incisional hernias. METHODS A mail survey was sent to all general surgeons in Canada. Data were collected regarding surgeon training, years in practice, practice setting and management of incisional hernias. Surgeons were asked to describe their usual surgical approach for a patient with a midline incisional hernia and a 10 × 6 cm fascial defect. RESULTS Of the 1876 surveys mailed out 555 (30%) were returned and 483 surgeons indicated that they perform incisional hernia repair. The majority (62%) have been in practice > 10 years and 73% regularly repair incisional hernias. In response to the clinical scenario of a patient with an incisional hernia, 74% indicated that they would perform an open repair and 18% would perform a laparoscopic repair. Ninety eight percent of surgeons would use mesh, 73% would perform primary fascial closure and 47% would perform a component separation. The most common locations for mesh placement were intraperitoneal (46%) and retrorectus/preperitoneal (48%). The most common repair, which was reported by 37% of surgeons, was an open operation, with mesh, with primary fascial closure and a component separation. CONCLUSIONS While almost all surgeons who perform incisional hernia repairs would use permanent mesh, there was substantial variation reported in surgical approach, mesh location, fascial closure and use of component separation techniques. It is unclear how this variability may impact healthcare resources and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon MacDonald
- Division of General Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Paul M Johnson
- Division of General Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. .,Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. .,QEII Health Sciences Centre, Room 806 Victoria Building, VGH Site, 1276 South Park St., Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Robotic abdominal wall repair: adoption and early outcomes in a large academic medical center. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:383-392. [PMID: 34018122 PMCID: PMC8136367 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01251-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Robotic-assisted abdominal wall repair (RAWR) has seen an exponential adoption over the last 5 years. Skepticism surrounding the safety, efficacy, and cost continues to limit a more widespread adoption of the platform. We describe our initial experience of 312 patients undergoing RAWR at a large academic center. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing any RAWR from July 1, 2016 to March 18, 2020 was completed. Patient specific, operation specific, and 30-day outcomes specific data were collected. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess factors associated with 30-day complications. There was a steady adoption of RAWR over the study period. A total of 312 patient were included, 138 (44%) were abdominal wall repairs and 174 (56%) were inguinal repairs. The mean age of the cohort was 54.2 years (SD 16), 69% were males, and the mean BMI was 29 kg/m2 (SD 4.8). There were two reported intraoperative events and nine operative conversions. 60 patients had at least one complication at 30-days. These include: 52 seromas, 4 hematomas, 2 surgical-site infections, 1 deep venous thrombus, and 1 recurrence at 30-days. BMI, type of hernia, and sex were not associated with complications at 30-days. The use of absorbable mesh, longer hospital stay, operative conversion, previous repair, and expert hernia surgeon were significant predictors of 30-day complications. Age, operative conversion, and previous repair were the only predictors of 30-day complications on multivariate regression. Our initial experience of 312 patients demonstrates the adoption and comparable short-term outcomes for a wide variety of robotic-assisted hernia repairs.
Collapse
|
24
|
Characterizing hernia centers in the United States: what defines a hernia center? Hernia 2021; 26:251-257. [PMID: 33871743 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02411-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A universal definition for what constitutes a hernia center does not exist. The purpose of this study was to characterize hernia centers in the United States by analyzing hernia centers and their non-hernia center counterparts. METHODS A web-based search was conducted to identify defining features of hernia centers including faculty demographics and composition, research output, research funding, clinical trials, and website content. Hernia centers and non-hernia centers were compared. RESULTS Most hernia centers (n = 36) are in urban areas (89%) and distributed evenly across regions of the United States. Hernia centers are associated with University program types (p = 0.001) while non-hernia centers are associated with University-Affiliate (p = 0.001) and Community (p = 0.02) program types. Hernia centers are associated with Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative participation (p = 0.01) and Center of Excellence by the Surgical Review Corporation certification (p = 0.005). Hernia centers are associated with presence of active clinical trials (p < 0.001) and number of clinical trials (p < 0.001). Hernia centers are associated with industry-sponsored trials (p < 0.001) but are not associated with NIH-sponsored trials. Fifty percent of hernia centers have PRS faculty. The vast majority of hernia center websites describe hernias treated (92%) and repair techniques (89%). The majority of hernia center mission statements emphasize an individualized care plan (61%) and multidisciplinary care (57%). Only 39% of websites and 17% of mission statements mention research. CONCLUSION In the United States, hernia centers are clinically oriented, multidisciplinary surgical teams at predominantly urban, University programs that may use this title to attract patient referrals and industry sponsorship of clinical trials.
Collapse
|
25
|
Martínez-Hoed J, Cordero-Bermúdez K, García-Pastor P, Pous-Serrano S, Ortiz-Cubero JA. The inguinal hernia management in Costa Rica according to a survey between surgeons: result comparison with 2018 International Groin Hernia Guidelines. BMC Surg 2021; 21:152. [PMID: 33743667 PMCID: PMC7981829 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01156-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inguinal hernia surgery is a frequent procedure among general surgeons in Costa Rica, but the management and technique are not uniform. The International Guideline for Groin Hernia management was published in 2018 to standardize the inguinal hernia surgery, but the diffusion of the guidelines and its adherence have been extremely varied. Purpose Collect and analyze the current reality regarding groin hernia management in Costa Rica. Secondly evaluate the diffusion and development comparing it to the guideline’s recommendations. Method Questionnaire of 42 single and multiple answer questions according to the topics of the International Guideline directed
to general surgeons. Diffusion of the inquiry through surgical and hernia association chats and email. Timeframe June–December 2019. Results 64 surveys were collected, which is a representative number of the general surgeons national college. The most frequent procedure between these was the abdominal wall surgery. Every surgeon did more than 52 groin hernia surgeries in one year, most of them outpatients. The epidural anesthesia was used the most and Lichtenstein’s technique was the most frequently used (64%). 68% of the surgeons know how to perform a minimally invasive inguinal hernia surgery but with variable volumes. 38% of participants considered themselves experts in groin hernia management and 52% did not know the 2018 International Guideline. The recommendations of such guideline are followed only partially. Conclusions The 2018 Hernia Surge International Guidelines have low diffusion among Costa Rican surgeons. The laparoscopic approach is widely accepted but there are no studies to assess the results and the quality. There should be protocols and studies adapted to Costa Rica’s national situation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-021-01156-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús Martínez-Hoed
- General Surgery Department, R. A. Calderón Guardia Hospital, San José, Costa Rica. .,Integrated Group for Complex Hernia Treatment, Calderón Guardia Hospital, San José, Costa Rica. .,General Surgery, Metropolitan Hospital, San José, Costa Rica. .,Costa Rica Hernia Association, San José, Costa Rica.
| | - Katherine Cordero-Bermúdez
- General Surgery Department, R. A. Calderón Guardia Hospital, San José, Costa Rica.,Costa Rica Hernia Association, San José, Costa Rica.,General Surgery, Clínica Bíblica Hospital, San José, Costa Rica
| | - Providencia García-Pastor
- General Surgery At Hospital Politécnico y Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,Short Stay and Wall Surgery Unit, Hospital Politécnico y Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Salvador Pous-Serrano
- General Surgery At Hospital Politécnico y Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,Short Stay and Wall Surgery Unit, Hospital Politécnico y Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - José A Ortiz-Cubero
- General Surgery Department, R. A. Calderón Guardia Hospital, San José, Costa Rica.,Integrated Group for Complex Hernia Treatment, Calderón Guardia Hospital, San José, Costa Rica
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Litigation claims following laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs. Hernia 2020; 24:1113-1120. [PMID: 32232613 PMCID: PMC7520411 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02173-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Groin hernia repair is the most frequently performed general surgical operation in the UK. Complications from laparoscopic and open repair are well recognised; however, potential differences are yet to be considered in relation to litigation. Methods Administrative data were obtained and analysed from the NHS Litigation Authority for inguinal hernia-related claims from 1995 to 2016. Claims identified as using an open or laparoscopic approach were compared. Results 880 claims were made, 760 had been settled. 88 laparoscopic and 241 open procedures were identified; 65% laparoscopic and 63% open hernia claims were found to be in favour of the claimant. Payouts totalled to 4.1GBP/4.8EUR/5.3USD million and 9.4GBP/11.0EUR/12.1USD million for laparoscopic (mean 82,824GBP/96,579EUR/106,453USD) and open (mean 66,796GBP/77,892EUR/85,852USD) approaches, respectively. The most common reasons for claim initiation were visceral/vascular injury (54%) in the laparoscopic group, and testicular complications or chronic pain (35%) in the open group. Additional procedures were necessary for 48% and 44% of laparoscopic and open claims, respectively. The highest average payouts were associated with visceral injury, (laparoscopic 116,482GBP/135,820EUR/149,715USD; open 199,103GBP/232,246EUR/255,905USD) and vascular injury (laparoscopic 88,624GBP/103,369EUR/113,892USD; open 64,460GBP/75,163EUR/82,870USD). Additional procedures resulted in an average payout of 93,352GBP/108,917EUR/120,008USD (laparoscopic) and 60,408GBP/70,506EUR/77,657USD (open). The most common additional procedures were corrective visceral/vascular repairs, orchidectomy and recurrent hernia repair. Conclusions The rate of litigation for clinical negligence in inguinal hernia surgery in the UK is increasing. Whilst there has been a recent increase in laparoscopic hernia repair claims, the volume and burden of claims related to open procedures remain greater.
Collapse
|
27
|
Zolin SJ, Fafaj A, Krpata DM. Transversus abdominis release (TAR): what are the real indications and where is the limit? Hernia 2020; 24:333-340. [PMID: 32152808 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02150-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review literature surrounding transversus abdominis release (TAR) for incisional hernia repair, with the aim of describing key preoperative and technical considerations for this procedure. METHODS Existing literature on TAR was reviewed and synthesized with the clinical experience and approach to TAR from a high-volume hernia center. RESULTS Recommendations regarding patient selection, optimization and technique for TAR are presented. CONCLUSIONS While published outcomes of TAR from expert centers are favorable, potentially devastating complications may result when TAR is performed incorrectly or in suboptimal clinical situations. Appropriate patient selection, optimization, and surgeon expertise are necessary if TAR is to be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Zolin
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A100-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| | - A Fafaj
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A100-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - D M Krpata
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A100-133, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jolissaint JS, Dieffenbach BV, Tsai TC, Pernar LI, Shoji BT, Ashley SW, Tavakkoli A. Surgical site occurrences, not body mass index, increase the long-term risk of ventral hernia recurrence. Surgery 2020; 167:765-771. [PMID: 32063341 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence rates after ventral hernia repair vary widely and evidence about risk factors for recurrence are conflicting. There is little evidence for risk factors for long-term recurrence. METHODS Patients who underwent ventral hernia repair at our institution and were captured in the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2002 and 2015 were included. We reviewed all demographic, procedural, and hernia-specific data. RESULTS Six hundred and thirty patients were included for analysis with a median follow-up of 4.9 years (inter-quartile range, 2-7.3 years). By univariate analysis, index hernia repairs were more likely to recur if defect size was ≥4 cm (P = .019), no mesh was used (P = .026), or if the repair was for a recurrent hernia (P = .001). Five-year cumulative incidence of recurrence and reoperation was 24.3% and 16.0%, respectively. Patients with a perioperative surgical site occurrence, which included superficial, deep-incisional, and organ space surgical site infections as well as wound disruption, had a 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence of 54.9% compared with 22.6% for those without surgical site occurrence. By multivariable analysis, non-primary hernia repair (hazard ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.4, P = .005) and any postoperative surgical site occurrence (hazard ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.6, P = .02) were the only risk factors predictive of recurrence. Patient body mass index had no independent effect on recurrence. CONCLUSION 1 in 4 patients undergoing an open ventral hernia repair will have a recurrence after 5 years, and this risk is doubled among patients who experience any perioperative surgical site occurrence. After controlling for patient comorbidities, including body mass index, hernia size, and mesh position, the most significant risk factor for recurrence after ventral hernia repair was a non-primary hernia and surgical site occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S Jolissaint
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | | | - Thomas C Tsai
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Brent T Shoji
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Stanley W Ashley
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Laboratory for Metabolic and Surgical Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ali Tavakkoli
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Laboratory for Metabolic and Surgical Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Abdominal Wall and Clinically Meaningful Benefit. What Are We Talking About? Cir Esp 2020; 99:171-173. [PMID: 32063298 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
30
|
Influencing Factors on the Outcome in Female Groin Hernia Repair: A Registry-based Multivariable Analysis of 15,601 Patients. Ann Surg 2020; 270:1-9. [PMID: 30921052 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Based on an analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry, this study aims to identify all factors influencing the outcome in female groin hernia repair. BACKGROUND In a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, female sex was found to be a significant risk factor for recurrence. In the guidelines, the totally extraperitoneal patch plasty (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) laparo-endoscopic techniques are recommended for female groin hernia repair. However, even when complying with the guidelines, a less favorable outcome must be expected than in men. To date, there is no study in the literature for analysis of all factors influencing the outcome in female groin hernia repair. METHODS In all, 15,601 female patients from the Herniamed Registry who had undergone primary unilateral groin hernia repair with the Lichtenstein, Shouldice, TEP or TAPP technique, and for whom 1-year follow-up was available, were selected between September 1, 2009 and July 1, 2017. Using multivariable analyses, influencing factors on the various outcome parameters were identified. RESULTS In the multivariable analysis, a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications, complication-related reoperations, recurrences, and pain on exertion was found only for the Lichtenstein technique. No negative influence on the outcome was identified for the TEP, TAPP, or Shouldice techniques. Relevant risk factors for occurrence of perioperative complications, recurrences, and chronic pain were preoperative pain, existing risk factors, larger defects, a higher body mass index (BMI), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification and postoperative complications. Higher age had a negative association with postoperative complications and positive association with pain rates. CONCLUSIONS Female groin hernia repair should be performed with the TEP or TAPP laparo-endoscopic technique, or, alternatively, with the Shouldice technique, if there is no evidence of a femoral hernia. By contrast, the Lichtenstein technique has disadvantages in terms of postoperative complications, recurrences, and pain on exertion. Important risk factors for an unfavorable outcome are preoperative pain, existing risk factors, higher ASA classification, higher BMI, and postoperative complications. A higher age and larger defects have an unfavorable impact on postoperative complications and a more favorable impact on chronic pain.
Collapse
|
31
|
Merola G, Cavallaro G, Iorio O, Frascio M, Pontecorvi E, Corcione F, Andreuccetti J, Pignata G, Stabilini C, Bracale U. Learning curve in open inguinal hernia repair: a quality improvement multicentre study about Lichtenstein technique. Hernia 2019; 24:651-659. [DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02064-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
32
|
Köckerling F, Sheen AJ, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Cuccurullo D, Fortelny R, Friis-Andersen H, Gillion JF, Gorjanc J, Kopelman D, Lopez-Cano M, Morales-Conde S, Österberg J, Reinpold W, Simmermacher RKJ, Smietanski M, Weyhe D, Simons MP. The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 2019; 23:1081-1091. [PMID: 31754953 PMCID: PMC6938469 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02062-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Accreditation and Certification of Hernia Centers and Surgeons (ACCESS) Group of the European Hernia Society (EHS) recognizes that there is a growing need to train specialist abdominal wall surgeons. The most important and relevant argument for this proposal and statement is the growing acceptance of the increasing complexity of abdominal wall surgery due to newer techniques, more challenging cases and the required 'tailored' approach to such surgery. There is now also an increasing public awareness with social media, whereby optimal treatment results are demanded by patients. However, to date the complexity of abdominal wall surgery has not been properly or adequately defined in the current literature. METHODS A systematic search of the available literature was performed in May 2019 using Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Springer Link, and the Cochrane Library, with 75 publications identified as relevant. In addition, an analysis of data from the Herniamed Hernia Registry was performed. The percentage of patients with hernia- or patient-related characteristics which unfavorably impacted the outcome of inguinal and incisional hernia repair was also calculated. RESULTS All present guidelines for abdominal wall surgery recommend the utilization of a 'tailored' approach. This relies on the prerequisite that any surgical technique used has already been mastered, as well as the recognized learning curves for each of the several techniques that can be used for both inguinal hernia (Lichtenstein, TEP, TAPP, Shouldice) and incisional hernia repairs (laparoscopic IPOM, open sublay, open IPOM, open onlay, open or endoscopic component separation technique). Other hernia- and patient-related characteristics that have recognized complexity include emergency surgery, obesity, recurrent hernias, bilateral inguinal hernias, groin hernia in women, scrotal hernias, large defects, high ASA scores, > 80 years of age, increased medical risk factors and previous lower abdominal surgery. The proportion of patients with at least one of these characteristics in the Herniamed Hernia Registry in the case of both inguinal and incisional hernia is noted to be relatively high at around 70%. In general surgery training approximately 50-100 hernia repairs on average are performed by each trainee, with around only 25 laparo-endoscopic procedures. CONCLUSION A tailored approach is now employed and seen more so in hernia surgery and this fact is referred to and highlighted in the contemporaneous hernia guidelines published to date. In addition, with the increasing complexity of abdominal wall surgery, the number of procedures actually performed by trainees is no longer considered adequate to overcome any recognized learning curve. Therefore, to supplement general surgery training young surgeons should be offered a clinical fellowship to obtain an additional qualification as an abdominal wall surgeon and thus improve their clinical and operative experience under supervision in this field. Practicing general surgeons with a special interest in hernia surgery can undertake intensive further training in this area by participating in clinical work shadowing in hernia centers, workshops and congresses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Köckerling
- Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany.
| | - A J Sheen
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - F Berrevoet
- Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - G Campanelli
- General and Day Surgery Unit, Center of Research and High Specialization for the Pathologies of Abdominal Wall and Surgical Treatment and Repair of Abdominal Hernia, Milano Hernia Center, Instituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insurbria, Milan, Italy
| | - D Cuccurullo
- Department of General, Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, Chief Week Surgery Departmental Unit, A.O. dei Colli Monaldi Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - R Fortelny
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery, Wilhelminenspital, 1160, Vienna, Austria
- Medical Faculty of Sigmund Freud University, 1020, Vienna, Austria
| | - H Friis-Andersen
- Surgical Department, Horsens Regional Hospital, Aarhus University, Sundvey 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark
| | - J F Gillion
- Unité de Chirurgie Viscérale, Hôpital Privé d'Antony, 1, Rue Velpeau, 92160, Antony, France
| | - J Gorjanc
- Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Spitalgasse 26, 9300, St. Veit an der Glan, Austria
| | - D Kopelman
- Department of Surgery Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - M Lopez-Cano
- Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Morales-Conde
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Av. Manuel Siurot, s/n, 41013, Seville, Spain
| | - J Österberg
- Department of Surgery, Mora Hospital, 79285, Mora, Sweden
| | - W Reinpold
- Wilhelmsburger Krankenhaus Gross-Sand, Gross-Sand 3, 21107, Hamburg, Germany
| | - R K J Simmermacher
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelbergglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Smietanski
- Department of General Surgery and Hernia Centre, Hospital in Puck, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - D Weyhe
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Hospital for Visceral Surgery, Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Georgstr. 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - M P Simons
- Department of Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abdominal wall hernia surgery in The Netherlands: a national survey. Hernia 2019; 24:601-611. [PMID: 31506770 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02048-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In The Netherlands, the quality of abdominal wall hernia surgery is largely unknown due to the lack of a hernia registry. This study was designed to assess the current state of abdominal wall hernia surgery in The Netherlands, to create a starting point for future evaluation of new quality measures. METHODS Dutch hernia management indicators and recently proposed European Hernia Society (EHS) requirements for accredited/certified hernia centers were used. The number of Dutch hospitals that meet the four main EHS requirements (on volume, experience, use of a registry and quality control) was assessed by analyzing governmental information and the results of a survey amongst all 1.554 Dutch general surgeons. RESULTS The survey was representative with 426 respondents (27%) from all 75 hospitals. Fifty-one percent of the hospitals had a median inguinal repair volume of more than 290 (14-1.238) per year. An open or laparo-endoscopic inguinal repair technique was not related to hospital volume. Experienced hernia surgeons, use of a registry and a structured quality control were reported to be present in, respectively, 97%, 39%, and 15% of the hospitals. Consensus in answers between the respondents per hospital was low (< 20%). Two hospitals (3%) met all four requirements for accreditation. CONCLUSION This descriptive analysis demonstrates that hernia surgery in the Netherlands is performed in every hospital, by all types of surgeons, using many different techniques. If the suggested EHS requirements are used as a measuring rod, only 3% of the Dutch hospitals could be accredited as a hernia center.
Collapse
|
34
|
Pereira JA, Bravo-Salva A, Montcusí B, Pérez-Farre S, Fresno de Prado L, López-Cano M. Incisional hernia recurrence after open elective repair: expertise in abdominal wall surgery matters. BMC Surg 2019; 19:103. [PMID: 31391112 PMCID: PMC6686257 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0569-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence after incisional hernia repair is one of the major problems related with this operation. Our objective is to analyze the influence of abdominal wall surgery expertise in the results of the open elective repair of incisional hernia. METHODS We have compiled the data of a cohort of patients who received surgery for an incisional hernia from July 2012 to December 2015 in a University Hospital. Data were collected prospectively and registered in the Spanish Register of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG). The short- and long-term complications between the groups of patients operated on by the Abdominal Wall Surgery (AWS) unit and groups operated on by surgeons outside of the specialized abdominal wall group (GS) were compared. RESULTS During the study period, a total of 237 patients were operated on by the open approach (114 AWS; 123 GS). One hundred seventy-five patients completed a median follow-up of 36.6 months [standard deviation (SD) = 6]. Groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and complexity of hernia. Complications were similar in both groups. Patients in the AWS group presented fewer recurrences (12.0% vs. 28.9%; P = 0.005). The cumulative incidence of recurrence was higher in the GS group [log rank 13.370; P < 0.001; odds ratio (OR) = 37.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 30.3-45.4]. In the multivariate analysis, surgery performed by the AWS unit was related to fewer recurrences (OR = 0.19; 95%CI = 0.07-0.58; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Incisional hernia surgery is associated with better results in terms of recurrence when it is performed in a specialized abdominal wall unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Pereira
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Parc de Salut Mar. Hospital del Mar. P, Marítim 23-25, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. .,Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Dr. Aiguader 80, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - A Bravo-Salva
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Parc de Salut Mar. Hospital del Mar. P, Marítim 23-25, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Montcusí
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Parc de Salut Mar. Hospital del Mar. P, Marítim 23-25, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Pérez-Farre
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Parc de Salut Mar. Hospital del Mar. P, Marítim 23-25, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Fresno de Prado
- Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Dr. Aiguader 80, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M López-Cano
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Passeig Vall d'Hebrón 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.,Departament de Cirurgia. Vall d'Hebrón, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebrón 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Faylona J. Teaching and learning laparoendoscopic hernia in the Philippines problems and solutions. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL AND HERNIA SURGERY 2019. [DOI: 10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_15_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
36
|
Gorjanc J, Jakomin T, Hubad A, Golob K. How to teach and learn transabdominal preperitoneal effectively – Experience with introducing transabdominal preperitoneal repair in ten general hospitals in Slovenia (2013–2018). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL AND HERNIA SURGERY 2019. [DOI: 10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_29_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|