Comparing routine administrative data with registry data for assessing quality of hospital care in patients with inguinal hernia

Is the annual hospital volume associated with recurrence and chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) syndrome after inguinal hernia repair in laparo-endoscopic or open mesh technique (Lichtenstein)?

BACKGROUND

In major surgery, several studies have shown a correlation between high annual hospital volume (hospital caseload) and better outcome. Therefore, centralization is recommended. However, in inguinal hernia surgery the data are limited.

METHODS

The study is based on a retrospective analysis of prospective data from the German Herniamed Registry collected between 2009 and 2018. Out of the total of 731,982 patients operated on in 737 institutions, patients who had undergone inguinal hernia repair in Lichtenstein or in laparo-endoscopic (TAPP/TEP) technique were included. Hospitals were divided into three annual caseload categories: Low volume: ≤ 75 cases; middle volume: 76-199 cases; high volume: ≥ 200 cases. The relationship between hospital volume and the outcome parameters was analyzed using multivariable binary logistic models.

RESULTS

222,487 patients were enrolled in analysis, with 70.4% hernias operated on in laparo-endoscopic technique and 29.6% cases in open mesh technique. Overall, the outcome after laparo-endoscopic repair was significantly favorable except for the intraoperative complications (worse) and recurrence rate (no significant difference). Descriptive and multivariable analysis identified a long operating time as the main factor associated with an unfavorable outcome. In low-volume hospitals the risk was higher for intraoperative complications as well as for postoperative complications in both techniques. There was a significantly favorable association between the recurrence rate and hospital volume but only after laparo-endoscopic repair. Patients who were operated on in a low-volume center experienced significantly less pain across all three pain categories, independently of the technique used.

CONCLUSIONS

While hospital volume has a favorable association with most outcome parameters, this varied in accordance with the operative technique used. In contrast to open surgery, laparo-endoscopic surgery in a low-volume hospital (≤ 75) has the disadvantage of a higher recurrence rate. Long operating time is the most detrimental factor, proving that surgeon proficiency is of paramount importance. However, chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) syndrome is significantly less frequent in patients operated on in low-volume hospitals; this result is difficult to explain but may be due to a closer patient-surgeon relationship in these institutions.

Laparoscopic vs. Open-Groin Hernia Repair in Romania-A Populational Study

Background/Objectives: Groin hernia repair is a common surgical procedure worldwide, with increasing adoption of minimally invasive techniques. However, the adoption of laparoscopic repair varies significantly across healthcare systems. This study aims to analyze trends in laparoscopic versus open-groin hernia repair in Romania over a five-year period (2019-2023), assessing differences in hospital types, reimbursement policies, and patient outcomes. Methods: This nationwide retrospective study examined 76,553 groin hernia repairs from the National Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) database, including 231 public and 41 private hospitals. Patients were categorized as laparoscopic (13,282 cases) or open repair (63,271 cases). Statistical analysis included logistic regression and non-parametric tests to assess factors influencing surgical approach selection, hospitalization duration, and case complexity. Results: Laparoscopic repair accounted for 17.3% of all groin hernia procedures, with higher adoption in private hospitals (54.7%) than in public hospitals (14.6%). Laparoscopic procedures increased from 14.1% in 2019 to 20% in 2023. Hospitalization was shorter in private hospitals (1.78 vs. 4.80 days in public hospitals). Reimbursement rates showed minimal differentiation between laparoscopic and open repair, suggesting no financial incentive for minimally invasive surgery in public hospitals. Conclusions: Despite a steady increase in laparoscopic hernia repair, its adoption in Romania remains limited compared to Western Europe. Private hospitals lead in minimally invasive surgery, while public hospitals predominantly rely on open repair due to reimbursement policies and resource constraints. Adjusting DRG-based reimbursement, expanding training, and implementing a national hernia registry could improve outcomes and access to minimally invasive surgery.

Nationwide analysis of open groin hernia repairs in Italy from 2015 to 2020

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed operations in general surgery. A total of 130.000 inguinal hernia repairs are performed yearly in Italy, and approximately 20 million inguinal hernias are treated worldwide annually. This report represents the trend analysis in inguinal hernia repair in Italy from a nationwide dataset for the 6-year period from 2015 to 2020.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on regional hospital discharge records, all the inguinal hernia repairs performed in public and private hospitals in Italy between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed based on diagnosis and procedure codes. For the aim of this study, data from the AgeNas (The National Agency for Regional Health Services) data source were analyzed.

RESULTS

Elective inguinal hernia repairs outnumbered urgent operations over the 6-year study period, ranging from 122,737 operations in 2015 to 65,780 in 2020 as absolute numbers, and from 87.96 to 83.3% of total procedures in 2019 and 2020 respectively, with an annual change ranging from - 66.58%, between 2020 and 2019, to - 2.49%, between 2019 and 2018 (mean = - 18.74%; CI =- 46.7%-9.22%; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale review of groin hernia data from a nationwide Italian dataset provides a unique opportunity to obtain a snapshot of open groin hernia repair activity. More specifically, there is a trend to perform more elective than urgent procedures and there is a steady decrease in the amount of open hernia repairs in favor to laparoscopy.

Lichtenstein versus TIPP versus TAPP versus TEP for primary inguinal hernia, a matched propensity score study on the French Club Hernie Registry

PURPOSE

Groin hernia repair is one of the most frequent operation performed worldwide. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is the most common and challenging complication after surgical repair with subsequent high socio-economic impact. The aim of this study was to compare the one-year CPIP rates between Lichtenstein, trans-inguinal pre-peritoneal (TIPP), trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) and totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) repair techniques on the French Hernia Registry.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2021, 15,161 primary groin hernia repairs with 1-year follow-up were available on the register. Using propensity score (PS) matching, matched pairs were formed. Each group was compared in pairs independently; Lichtenstein versus TIPP, TEP and TAPP, TIPP versus TEP and TAPP and finally TEP versus TAPP.

RESULTS

After PS matching analysis, Lichtenstein group showed disadvantage over TIPP, TAPP and TEP groups with significantly more CPIP at one year (15.2% vs 9.6%, p < 0.0001; 15.9% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.0001 and 16.1% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.002, respectively). The 1-year CPIP rates were similar comparing TIPP versus TAPP and TEP groups (9.3% vs 10.5%, p = 0.19 and 9.8% vs 11.8%, p = 0.05, respectively). There was significantly less CPIP rate after TAPP versus TEP repair (1.00% vs 11.9%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This register-based study confirms the higher CPIP risk after Lichtenstein repair compared to the pre-peritoneal repair techniques. TIPP leads to comparable CPIP rates than TAPP and TEP repairs.

Gender differences in epigastric hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis of 15,925 patients from the Herniamed registry

INTRODUCTION

In recent surgical literature, gender-specific differences in the outcome of hernia surgery has been analyzed. We already know that female patients are at higher risk to develop chronic postoperative pain after inguinal, incisional, and umbilical hernia surgery. In this study, we evaluated the impact of gender on the outcome after epigastric hernia surgery.

METHODS

A covariable-adjusted matched-paired analysis with data derived from the Herniamed registry was performed. In total of 15,925 patients with 1-year follow-up data were included in the study. Propensity score matching was performed for the 7786 female (48.9%) and 8139 male (51.1%) patients, creating 6350 pairs (81.6%).

RESULTS

Matched-paired analysis revealed a significant disadvantage for female patients for pain on exertion (12.1% vs. 7.6%; p < 0.001) compared to male patients. The same effect was demonstrated for pain at rest (6.2% in female patients vs. 4.1% in male patients; p < 0.001) and pain requiring treatment (4.6% in female patients vs. 3.1% in male patients; p < 0.001). All other outcome parameters showed no significant differences between female and male patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients are at a higher risk for chronic pain after elective epigastric hernia repairs compared to the male patient population. These results complete findings of previous studies showing the same effect in inguinal, umbilical, and incisional hernia repair.

Data quality validation of the Spanish Incisional Hernia Surgery Registry (EVEREG): pilot study

PURPOSE

The Spanish Incisional Hernia Surgery Registry (EVEREG) was promoted by the Abdominal Wall Section of the Spanish Association of Surgeons, starting data collection in July 2012 and currently has more than 14,000 cases. The objective of this study was to validate the data collected through a pilot audit process.

METHODS

A sample of hospitals participating in the EVEREG registry since the beginning was selected. Patients registered in these centers in the 2012-2020 period were included. A stratified random sampling was carried out, with the inclusion of 10% of registered cases per center with a minimum of 20 cases per center. At each participating center, two researchers not belonging to the center undergoing the audit checked (on site or telematically) the concordance between the data in the registry and the data contained in the case history of each patient.

RESULTS

330 patients have been analyzed, out of a total of 2673 registered, in 9 participating centers. The average accuracy has been 95.7%. Incorrect data 1.5% and missing data 2.3% CONCLUSION: The group of pilot hospitals from this EVERG incisional hernia surgery registry shows a very high precision of 95.7%. The confirmation of these findings in all the centers participating in the registry will make it possible to guarantee the quality of the studies made and their comparability with other similar national registries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

nnTrial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT03899012.

Outpatient inguinal hernia repair in Spain: a population-based study of 1,163,039 patients-clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with the choice of day surgery

Reducing inpatient admissions and health care costs is a central aspiration of worldwide health systems. This study aimed to evaluate trends in outpatient surgery in inguinal hernia repair (IHR) and factors related to the outpatient setting in Spain. A retrospective cohort study (Record-Strobe compliant) of 1,163,039 patients who underwent IHR from January 2004 to December 2019 was conducted. Data were extracted from the public clinical administrative database CMBD ("Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos"). The primary outcome was the outpatient surgery rate. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify clinical and socioeconomic factors related to the outpatient setting. The overall proportion of outpatient repairs was 30.7% in 2004 and 54.2% in 2019 (p < 0.001). Treatment in a public hospital was the most remarkable factor associated with the likelihood of receiving an outpatient procedure (OR 3.408; p < 0.001). There were also significant differences favouring outpatient procedures for patients with public insurance (OR 2.351; p < 0.001), unilateral hernia (OR 2.903; p < 0.001), primary hernia (OR 1.937; p < 0.0005), age < 65 years (OR 1.747; p < 0.001) and open surgery (OR 1.610; p < 0.001). Only 9% of patients who pay for their intervention privately or 15% of those covered by private insurance were treated as outpatients. Spain has significantly increased the rate of outpatient IHR over the last 16 years. However, the figures obtained still leave a significant margin for improvement. Important questions about the acceptance of outpatient settings remain to be answered. Outpatient inguinal hernia repair in Spain. A population-based study of 1,163,039 patients: clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with the choice of day surgery.

Inguinal hernia repairs performed for recurrence in Spain: population-based study of 16 years and 1,302,788 patients

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to assess data on inguinal hernia repairs (IHR) performed for recurrence over a 16 year period (2004-2019) in Spain.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 1,302,788 patients who underwent IHR from January 2004 to December 2019 was conducted. Data were extracted from the Spanish Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) of the Health Ministry database. The primary objective was to analyse the proportion of IHR performed by recurrence. As secondary objectives, we evaluated factors related to recurrent hernia (analysed by univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis) and trends in the recurrent case rate over the 16 year period.

RESULTS

We identified 95,025 patients (7.3% of all IHR) who underwent surgery for recurrent inguinal hernia. Patients undergoing recurrent IHR were more likely to be male (OR 1.687, 95% CI 1.645-1.730), elderly (age > 74 years), and more complicated when they arrived in the operating room (gangrene OR 3.951, 95% CI 3.734-4.180; occlusion OR 1.905, 95% CI 1.853-1.960), and thus had more surgical site occurrences and related mortality. The proportion of IHR performed for recurrence has been dropping over the years (8.7% in 2004 vs. 6.5% in 2019, p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The rate of recurrent IHR in Spain (2004-2019) is 7.3%. Recurrent IHR correlates to emergent and complicated surgery and thus to a worst outcome. The trend of this 16 year period is of decreasing operated recurrent inguinal hernia. This is good news even though the improvement is slight and certainly insufficient. Establishing and optimising the rate of hernia recurrence is important for patients and for the health-care system.

Inguinal hernia repair in inpatient children: a nationwide analysis of German administrative data

Background

Contrary to adult inguinal hernia surgery, large-scale investigations using registries or administrative data are missing in paediatric surgery. We aimed to fill this gap by analysing German administrative hospital data to describe the current reality of inpatient hernia surgery in children.

Methods

We analysed aggregated data files bought from the German federals statistics office on hospital reimbursement data separately for principal diagnoses of inguinal hernia in children and for herniotomies in inpatients. Developments over time were assessed via regression and differences between groups with nonparametric comparisons.

Results

Principal diagnoses of hernias were decreasing over time with the exception of male bilateral and female bilateral incarcerated hernias in the first year of life which increased. The vast majority of operations were conducted via the open approach and laparoscopy was increasingly only used for females older than 1 year of age. Recurrent hernia repair was scarce. Rates of inguinal hernia repair were higher in both sexes the younger the patient was, but were also decreasing in all age groups despite a population growth since 2012. The amount of inguinal hernia repairs by paediatric surgeons compared to adult surgeons increased by 1.5% per year.

Conclusions

Our results corroborate previous findings of age and sex distribution. It demonstrates that inpatient hernia repair is primarily open surgery with herniorrhaphy and that recurrences seem to be rare. We observed decreasing rates of hernia repairs over time and as this has been described before in England, future studies should try to elucidate this development.

Level of evidence

III.

Are immunosuppressive conditions and preoperative corticosteroid treatment risk factors in inguinal hernia repair?

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppressive conditions and/or preoperative corticosteroid treatment have a negative influence on wound healing and can, therefore, lead to higher rates of surgical site infections (SSIs) and seromas. For inguinal hernia, no such studies have been carried out to date.

METHODS

In an analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry, 2312 of 142,488 (1.6%) patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair had an anamnestic history of an immunosuppressive condition and/or preoperative corticosteroid treatment. Using propensity score matching, 2297 (99.4%) pairs with comparative patient characteristics were formed. These were then compared using the following primary outcome criteria: intra- and postoperative complications, complication-related reoperations, recurrence at one-year follow-up, pain on exertion, pain at rest, and chronic pain requiring treatment at one-year follow-up. Of the 2297 matched pairs with primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair, 82.76% were male patients. 1010 (44.0%) were operated in laparo-endoscopic techniques (TEP, TAPP), 1225 (53.3%) in open techniques (Bassini, Shouldice, Lichtenstein, Plug, TIP, Gilbert, Desarda), and 62 (2.7%) in other techniques.

RESULTS

The matched pair analysis results did not identify any disadvantage in terms of the outcome criteria for patients with an anamnestic history of immunosuppressive condition and/or preoperative corticosteroid treatment (yes vs no). In particular, no disadvantage was noted in the rate of surgical site infections (0.65% vs 0.70%; ns) or seromas (1.22% vs 1.57%; ns). The overall rates of postoperative complications were 3.40% vs 4.31% (p = ns) (plus 0.22% concordant events in five matched pairs).

CONCLUSION

In primary unilateral inguinal hernia surgery, an immunosuppressive condition and/or preoperative corticosteroid treatment does not appear to have a negative influence on wound complications.

Inguinal hernia repair in Spain. A population-based study of 263,283 patients: factors associated with the choice of laparoscopic approach

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (IHR) rate in Spain and identify the factors associated with the choice of this surgical approach.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 263,283 patients who underwent IHR from January 2016 to December 2018 was conducted. Data were extracted from the Spanish Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) of the Health Ministry database. The primary outcome was laparoscopic (LAP) rate utilization. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with LAP-IHR.

RESULTS

Only 5.7% (15,059) patients underwent LAP-IHR, whereas the remnant 94.3% (248,224 patients) underwent open repair. High variability in the LAP-IHR rate across the country was observed; ranged between provinces from 0 to 19.7%, for a unilateral hernia, and between 0 to 57.4% in the case of bilateral hernias. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the patient place of residence was the most remarkable factor associated with the likelihood of receiving LAP-IHR (OR 4.96; p < 0.001). There were also significant differences favoring LAP-IHR for bilateral operation (OR 4.596; p < 0.001), insurance coverage (OR 4.439, p < 0.001) and self-pay patients (OR 2.317; p < 0.001), as well as a recurrent hernia (OR 1.780; p < 0.001), age younger than 65 years (OR 1.555; p < 0.001) and male sex (OR 1.162, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LAP-IHR remains a not frequent choice among surgeons in Spain, even when dealing with recurrent and bilateral hernias. The results suggest that the choice of LAP-IHR could depend on the surgeon's preference rather than on the indication appropriateness.

Perioperative Tablet-Based Telemonitoring After Abdominal Wall Hernia Surgery: Pilot Prospective Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Hernia repairs account for millions of general surgical procedures performed each year worldwide, with a notable shift to outpatient settings over the last decades. As technical possibilities such as smartphones, tablets, and different kinds of probes are becoming more and more available, such systems have been evaluated for applications in various clinical settings. However, there have been few studies conducted in the surgical field, especially in general surgery.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the feasibility of a tablet-based follow up to monitor activity levels after repair of abdominal wall hernias and to evaluate a possible reduction of adverse events by their earlier recognition.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for elective surgical repair of minor abdominal wall hernias (eg, inguinal, umbilical, or trocar hernias) were equipped with a telemonitoring system, including a tablet, pulse oximeter, and actimeter, for a monitoring phase of 7 days before and 30 days after surgery. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

We enrolled 16 patients with a mean overall age of 48.75 (SD 16.27) years. Preoperative activity levels were reached on postoperative day 12 with a median of 2242 (IQR 0-4578) steps after plunging on the day of surgery. The median proportion of available activity measurements over the entire study period of 38 days was 69% (IQR 56%-81%). We observed a gradual decrease in the proportion of available data for all parameters during the postoperative course. Six out of ten patients (60%) regained preoperative activity levels within 3 weeks after surgery. Overall, patients rated the usability of the system as relatively easy.

CONCLUSIONS

Tablet-based follow up is feasible after surgical repair of minor abdominal wall hernias, with good adherence rates during the first couple of weeks after surgery. Thus, such a system could be a useful tool to supplement or even replace traditional outpatient follow up in selected general surgical patients.

Hospital volume and outcome in inguinal hernia repair: analysis of routine data of 133,449 patients

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernias are repaired using either open or minimally invasive surgical techniques. For both types of surgery it has been demonstrated that a higher annual surgeon volume is associated with a lower risk of recurrence. This present study investigated the volume-outcome implications for recurrence operations, surgical complications, rate of chronic pain requiring treatment, and 30-day mortality based on the hospital volume.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data basis used was the routine data collected throughout the Federal Republic of Germany for persons insured by the Local General Sickness Fund "AOK" who had undergone inpatient inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2015. Complications were recorded by means of indicators. Hospitals were divided into five groups on the basis of the annual caseload volume: 1-50, 51-75, 76-100, 101-125, and ≥ 126 inguinal hernia repairs per year. The effect of the hospital volume on the indicators was assessed using multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

133,449 inguinal hernia repairs were included. The incidence for recurrence operations was 0.95%, for surgical complications 4.22%, for chronic pain requiring treatment 2.87%, and for the 30-day mortality 0.28%. Low volume hospitals (1-50 and 51-75 inguinal hernia repairs per year) showed a significantly increased recurrence risk compared to high volume hospitals with ≥ 126 inguinal hernia repairs per year (odds ratio: 1.53 and 1.24). No significant correlations were found for the other results.

CONCLUSIONS

The study gives a detailed picture of hospital care for inguinal hernia repair in Germany. Furthermore, it was noted that the risk of hernia recurrence decreases in line with a rising caseload of the treating hospital.