Nutritional status and constipation scoring of inguinal hernia patients: a case-control study

Diet and risk for hernia: a Mendelian randomization analysis

Background

The relationship between dietary factors and hernias is currently unclear.

Methods

The UK Biobank was used to extract dietary factors that were used as exposures, including intake of alcohol, non-oily fish, beef, fresh fruit, oily fish, salad/raw vegetables, dried fruit, coffee, cereal, salt, tea, water, cooked vegetables, cheese, Lamb/mutton, pork, poultry, processed meat, and bread. The FinnGen biobank was used to obtain GWAS data on hernias as outcomes. The main analysis of this study was performed using the weighted median, MR-Egger, and IVW methods. Cochran's Q test was utilized to assess heterogeneity. To find potential outliers, the MR-PRESSO method was used. Leave-one-out analysis was employed to assess the IVW method's robustness.

Results

Alcoholic consumption per week (OR: 0.614; p = 0.00614) reduced the risk of inguinal hernia. Alcohol intake frequency (OR: 1.309; p = 0.0477) increased the risk of ventral hernia (mainly including incisional hernia and parastomal hernia). The intake of non-oily fish (OR: 2.945; p = 0.0214) increased the risk of inguinal hernia. Salt added to food (OR: 1.841; p = 0.00267) increased the risk of umbilical hernia. Cheese intake (OR: 0.434; p = 0.000536) and dried fruit intake (OR: 0.322; p = 0.00716) decreased the risk of ventral hernia, while cooked vegetable intake (OR: 4.475; p = 0.0380) increased the risk of ventral hernia. No causal relationships were found with hernias from other dietary factors.

Conclusion

Inguinal, umbilical, and ventral hernias are all related to dietary factors.

Incisional hernias post cytoreductive surgery/peritonectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is often combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal tumour deposits. Considering CRS, the evidence relating the large incisions, local chemotherapy and abdominal wall trauma to incisional hernias (IH) has not been synthesized. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the proportion of IH present in patients post CRS and the effect HIPEC had on these rates.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Registry of Trials were searched up to June 2023 to examine studies relating IH and CRS plus or minus HIPEC. The most up to date PRISMA guidelines were followed. Pertinent clinical information was synthesized in tabular form. A meta-analysis reporting the pooled proportions of IH post CRS plus or minus HIPEC, the odds of IH in HIPEC versus non-HIPEC CRS and the difference in follow-up time between groups was conducted.

RESULTS

Nine studies comprising 1416 patients were included. The pooled proportion of IH post CRS was 12% (95% confidence interval (CI) 8-16%) in HIPEC and 7% (95% CI 4-10%) in non-HIPEC patients and 11% (95% CI 7-14%) overall. Previously reported rates of IH in midline laparotomy range from 10 to 30%. The odds of IH in the HIPEC was 1.9 times higher compared to non-HIPEC cohorts however this was not statistically significant (odds ratio (OR) 1.9, 95% 0.7-5.2; p = 0.21). There was no significant difference in average follow-up times between HIPEC and non-HIPEC cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

IH post CRS plus or minus HIPEC were in the expected range for midline laparotomies. IH in patients receiving HIPEC may occur at a greater proportion than in non-HIPEC patients, however, there were too few studies in our meta-analysis to determine this with statistical significance.

Correlation between abdominal visceral volume measured by a simple procedure and bulging at the abdominal free flap donor site for breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstructions using autologous abdominal tissue result in breasts with a natural shape and consistency. One of the major complications is abdominal bulging. Because of the increased abdominal wall tension, high visceral volume (not visceral fat alone) may increase the occurrence rate of abdominal bulging. A simple procedure involving CT imaging was used to assess this relationship in patients undergoing an abdominal free flap for unilateral breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A total of 278 patients were enrolled in this study. The patients' demographics, the thicknesses of visceral volume were compared (Bulging (+) vs. Bulging (-)). Visceral volume was investigated based on the horizontal thickness, which was measured at the thickest part at the level of the umbilical fossa between both sides under the transverse abdominis muscles.

RESULTS

Bulging (+) consisted of 39 patients (14.0%), whereas Bulging (-) included 239 patients. Patients with Bulging (+) were significantly older, had higher gestational history rate, and had thin rectus abdominis muscle. In terms of visceral volume, the Bulging (+) group had significantly higher horizontal thicknesses (median 233 mm vs. 219 mm, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed with respect to other factors (age, BMI, history of laparotomy, and operative details). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle, horizontal visceral volume, and gestational history were independently significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only the patients with thin rectus abdominis muscle but also patients with a thick horizontal visceral volume may have a higher risk of abdominal bulging.