Suturable mesh better resists early laparotomy failure in a cyclic ball-burst model

Outcomes Following Implantation With Mesh Suture: A Registry of 1111 Patients

Background

Mesh suture is a novel suture design intended to distribute pressure at the suture-tissue interface, potentially reducing suture pull-through and repair failures. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of mesh suture closures across surgical indications and assess early outcomes, with emphasis on abdominal wall closure.

Methods

A registry was created using institutional implant logs from January 2023 to July 2024 across an integrated healthcare system. A retrospective chart review collected demographics, surgical details, and complications.

Results

In total, 1111 patients received mesh suture by 86 surgeons. Most cases involved full-thickness abdominal wall closures (88.2%). Further analysis focused on abdominal wall closures without planar mesh (N = 862). The 90-day surgical site infection rate was 9.0%, and the surgical site event rate was 11.8%. There were 9 (1.0%) fascial dehiscence events, 3 (0.3%) chronic draining sinuses, and 2 (0.2%) enterocutaneous fistulae. The 90-day readmission and reoperation rates were 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively. The hernia formation rate was 4.8%. On univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiology class, wound class, and diabetes were significantly associated with major complications (P < 0.05). The mean follow-up was 162 days.

Conclusions

Mesh suture appears versatile and user-friendly across specialties and indications. Early outcomes are encouraging; however, prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate long-term performance.

Short-term outcomes of mesh-suture repair in the treatment of ventral hernias: a single-center study

BACKGROUND

Defect closure with mesh suture is a novel technique for hernia repair. Originally described as the construction of lightweight macroporous polypropylene mesh strips as a suture material, it is now available as an FDA-approved product. Mesh suture better distributes tensile forces and reduces fascial tearing compared to traditional suture but requires less implanted material and tissue dissection compared to planar mesh. Limited studies have demonstrated mesh suture's effectiveness in short-term recurrence rates. This study describes the short-term outcomes of our initial experience with mesh-suture-based herniorrhaphy.

METHODS

This study is an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective review of surgeon case logs from May 2023 to February 2024. All patients who had undergone hernia repair utilizing mesh suture (Duramesh, Mesh Suture Inc, Chicago, IL) as the method of repair at our medical center were enrolled. A descriptive analysis regarding patient and hernia characteristics was performed and short-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 63 patients (Mean age 61, Mean BMI 31.0 kg/m2, 60% female) who had undergone mesh-suture repair since its availability at our institution. Hernias included 31.7% primary, 27.0% incisional, 34.9% parastomal, and 6.4% other. Of these, 8 (12.7%) were recurrent hernia repairs. The average defect size was 41.0 cm2, with a range from 0.25 to 459 cm2. Average length of stay was 3.2 days, with a range of 0 to 20. Eleven patients (17.5%) were readmitted in the 90-day postoperative period. With an average follow-up of 45 days, there were ten surgical site occurrences (including four surgical site infections) and three recurrences (4.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial experience with mesh-suture herniorrhaphy has demonstrated acceptable short-term rates of surgical site occurrences and recurrences. This provides additional support for its use, particularly in patients where a planar mesh-based repair might traditionally be avoided. Further studies of mesh-suture herniorrhaphy long-term recurrence rates and cost-effectiveness are needed.

Early Experience with Mesh Suture for DIEP Flap Abdominal Site Closures

Background

The gold standard of microsurgical breast reconstruction is the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap. As techniques have evolved, DIEP flaps have significantly reduced the morbidity previously caused by transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. However, abdominal wall complications continue to persist after DIEP flap surgery, with bulge rates reported as high as 33%.

Methods

The first 25 patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery with the use of Duramesh (MSI, Chicago, Ill.) by the senior author were identified. A retrospective chart review of patient and surgical details was performed. Charts were reviewed for outcomes, including surgical site infections, surgical site events, incisional hernia formation, and/or bulge. Standard descriptive summary statistics were used for patient characteristics, surgical details, and primary and secondary outcomes.

Results

Twenty-five patients were reviewed. Average follow-up duration was 216 ± 39 days. One patient (4%) developed a surgical site infection, and four patients (16%) developed a surgical site event. One patient developed a bulge, but no patients developed an incisional hernia.

Conclusions

Duramesh mesh suture provides a promising opportunity for DIEP surgeons to minimize both abdominal wall morbidity and mesh-related complications. Mesh suture can be used in a similar fashion as other sutures to perform primary closure of the anterior rectus sheath while also providing force-distribution benefits typically unique to planar mesh. This pilot study suggests that Duramesh is a safe, simple alternative to existing techniques in DIEP flap surgery and can be considered by microsurgeons to reduce fascial dehiscence, bulge, and/or hernia formation.

Correction of Rectus Abdominis Diastasis: A Prospective Comparative Study Between a New Suturable Polypropylene Mesh vs Polypropylene Standard Suture Plication

BACKGROUND

Duramesh (Mesh Suture Inc., Chicago, IL) is a new suturing concept, combining the principles of mesh with the precision, flexibility, and versatility of a suture, suitable also for abdominal rectus diastasis (ARD) correction.

OBJECTIVES

This prospective research aimed to compare mesh with the standard polypropylene suture plication for rectus diastasis repair with regard to safety (infection, seroma, hematoma, surgical wound dehiscence, and fistula rates and hospital stay); effectiveness (ARD recurrence by ultrasound sonography, palpability of the muscular suture, surgical time, and postoperative pain evaluation); and satisfaction of the patients based on the BODY-Q, a patient-reported outcome measure.

METHODS

Sixty-five of the initial 70 patients who underwent rectus diastasis repair with a 6-month follow-up were randomly divided into 2 groups, comprising 33 patients treated with Duramesh and 32 patients treated with standard 0 polypropylene suture plication. Data regarding infection, seroma, hematoma, surgical wound dehiscence, and fistula rates; hospital stay; ARD recurrence; palpability of the muscular suture; surgical time; postoperative pain evaluation (measured by visual analog scale, or VAS); and the BODY-Q were analyzed by Prism 9 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).

RESULTS

No significant differences were reported between the 2 groups with regard to infection, seroma, hematoma, surgical wound dehiscence, and fistula rates and hospital stay. The mesh decreased the time required to perform plication compared with standard polypropylene detached sutures. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to the VAS and BODY-Q data.

CONCLUSIONS

Duramesh 0 application for rectus diastasis repair is safe and effective without compromising aesthetic improvement when compared with standard 0 polypropylene plication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Strength of small-bites abdominal wall closure using different suturing methods and materials in an experimental animal model

PURPOSE

Using small instead of large bites for laparotomy closure results in lower incidence of incisional hernia, but no consensus exists on which suture material to use. This study aimed to compare five different closure strategies in a standardized experimental setting.

METHODS

Fifty porcine abdominal walls were arranged into 5 groups: (A) running 2/0 polydioxanone; (B) interlocking 2/0 polydioxanone; (C) running size 0 barbed polydioxanone; (D) running size 0 barbed glycolic acid and trimethylene carbonate; (E) running size 0 suturable polypropylene mesh. The small-bites technique was used for linea alba closure in all. The abdominal walls were divided into a supra- and infra-umbilical half, resulting in 20 specimens per group that were pulled apart in a tensile testing machine. Maximum tensile force and types of suture failure were registered.

RESULTS

The highest tensile force was measured when using barbed polydioxanone (334.8 N ± 157.0), but differences did not reach statistical significance. Infra-umbilical abdominal walls endured a significantly higher maximum tensile force compared to supra-umbilical (397 N vs 271 N, p < 0.001). Barbed glycolic acid and trimethylene carbonate failed significantly more often (25% vs 0%, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Based on tensile force, both interlocking and running suture techniques using polydioxanone, and running sutures using barbed polydioxanone or suturable mesh, seem to be suitable for abdominal wall closure. Tensile strength was significantly higher in infra-umbilical abdominal walls compared to supra-umbilical. Barbed glycolic acid and trimethylene carbonate should probably be discouraged for fascial closure, because of increased risk of suture failure.

Mesh Strip Repair for Midline Ventral Hernias: A Case Series

Background

Polypropylene mesh strip repair is a novel method of hernia closure. Currently, there is limited representation in the literature regarding both the reproducibility of this method and its outcomes. The present study sought to analyze a second institution's experience with fascial closure using the mesh strip technique with long-term follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction by the senior author was performed. Patients undergoing midline ventral hernia repair with mesh strip only fascial closure and greater than 1 year follow-up were including for analysis. Demographic data; operative details; and outcomes, specifically presence and timing of hernia recurrence, were recorded.

Results

Eighteen patients met inclusion criteria. Average follow-up was 860 ± 307 days. Nine patients (50%) had recurrence of their hernia after repair. Average time to recurrence was 602 ± 406 days, with the earliest recurrence occurring at 126 days postoperatively. Seven patients (39%) underwent concurrent anterior component separation (four unilateral, three bilateral), of which there were three recurrences, all occurring in patients with bilateral anterior component separation.

Conclusions

The mesh strip repair is a novel technique that shows uncertain reproducibility of outcomes, specifically with concurrent component separation techniques. With the recent Food and Drug Administration approval of a mesh suture, further multi-institutional analysis will allow for better characterization of the outcomes and indications for this technique.

Duramesh registry study: short-term outcomes using mesh suture for abdominal wall closure

Introduction

Sutures are flexible linear elements that join tissue and maintain their hold with a surgeon-created knot. Tension at the suture/tissue interface can cut the very tissues that sutures are designed to hold, leading to dehiscence and incisional hernia formation. A new suture design (Duramesh, Mesh Suture Inc., Chicago, IL) was approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration in September 2022. The multiple filaments of the mesh suture are designed to diffuse tension at the suture/tissue interface thereby limiting pull-through. The macroporosity and hollow core of the mesh suture encourage fibrovascular incorporation for a durable repair. We created the first registry and clinical report of patients undergoing mesh suture implantation to assess its real-world effectiveness.

Methods

A patient registry was created based on institutional implant logs from January to August 2023 at an integrated health-care system. Operative reports were reviewed by the study team to verify use of "Duramesh" by dictation. Retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate patient and surgical characteristics, follow-up, and short-term outcomes of interest. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-squared analysis with Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism.

Results

Three hundred seventy-nine separate implantations by 56 surgeons across 12 (sub) specialties at a university hospital and two community hospitals were performed. Mesh suture was used for treatment of the abdominal wall in 314 cases. Follow-up averaged 80.8 ± 52.4 days. The most common abdominal wall indications were ventral hernia repair (N = 97), fascial closure (N = 93), abdominal donor site closure from autologous breast reconstruction (N = 51), and umbilical hernia repair (N = 41). Mesh suture was used in all Centers for Disease Control (CDC) wound classifications, including 92 CDC class 2 or 3 abdominal operations. There were 19 surgical site infections (6.1%) and 37 surgical site events (11.8%).

Conclusions

Short-term registry data demonstrates the wide diversity of surgical disciplines and scenarios in which mesh suture has been used to date. The early adoption of mesh suture into practice highlights that consequences of suture pull-through influence operative decision making. As this is the first interim report of the Duramesh mesh suture registry, follow-up is too short for characterization of long-term durability of abdominal wall closures.

Novel mesh suture may resist bone cutting seen with wire-based sternal closures

OBJECTIVE

Sternal dehiscence is frequently associated with wire-based closures cutting through fragile bone, allowing sternal motion, separation, and infection. We investigated whether bone cutting could be limited by using a newly available mesh suture with improved force distribution.

METHODS

Five sternal models were closed using 8 interrupted single sternal wires, double sternal wires, braided poly(ethylene terephthalate) sutures, single-wrapped mesh sutures, or double-wrapped mesh sutures. To simulate chest-wall forces, closed sternal models were pulled apart using 1020 N of axial force applied incrementally. Double sternal wire and double-wrapped mesh suture were further compared by closing 3 new models with each material and subjecting these models to cyclic loading cycles, simulating breathing and coughing. Image analysis of needle hole size measured "bone cutting" by each closure material and sternal distraction as a function of force.

RESULTS

All models exhibited maximal separation at the xiphoid. During axial loading, needle hole size increased 7.2% in the double-wrapped mesh suture model and 9.2% in the double-wire model. Single-wrapped mesh suture, single wires, and braided poly(ethylene terephthalate) extended needle hole size by 6.7%, 47.0%, and 168.3% of original size, respectively. The double-wire model resisted sternal distraction best, separating 0.285 cm at the xiphoid. During cyclic loading, mesh suture exhibited significantly less bone cutting (P = .02) than double wire, with comparable levels of sternal separation (P = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh suture may resist bone cutting seen in sternal wire closure in bone models with comparable distraction to currently used sternal closure methods.

A Biomechanical Analysis of Prophylactic Mesh Reinforced Porcine Laparotomy Incisions

INTRODUCTION

Research indicates that prophylactic mesh may help prevent incisional hernia after laparotomy, but best practice patterns in these situations are still evolving. Here, we compare the failure loads (FLs) and biomechanical stiffness (BMS) of 35 porcine abdominal wall laparotomy incisions reinforced with meshes of various widths and fixation distances using biomechanical testing.

METHODS

In each specimen, a 10-cm incision was made and closed using continuous 1-0 Maxon suture. Specimens were randomized to mesh width (none, 2.5 cm, 3 cm, 4 cm, 6 cm, 8 cm) and tack separation (1.5 cm, 2 cm apart) and the meshes secured in an onlay fashion. Cyclic loads oscillating from 15 N to 140 N were applied to simulate abdominal wall stress, and the specimens subsequently loaded to failure. FLs (N) and BMS (N/mm) were comparatively analyzed.

RESULTS

All specimens failed via suture pull-through. FLs and BMS were lowest in specimens with suture-only (421.43 N; 11.69 N/mm). FLs and BMS were significantly higher in 4-cm mesh specimens (567.51 N) than those with suture, 2.5-cm, and 3.0-cm mesh (all P < 0.05). FLs in specimens with a greater number of tacks were consistently higher in meshes of similar sizes, although these did not reach significance.

CONCLUSIONS

A 4-cm mesh reenforcement was superior to suture-only and smaller meshes at preserving strength in laparotomy closure in a porcine model but larger meshes (6 cm, 8 cm) did not provide an additional benefit. Meshes with more fixation points may be advantageous, but additional data are needed to make definitive conclusions.

An In Vivo Comparison: Novel Mesh Suture Versus Traditional Suture-Based Repair in a Rabbit Tendon Model

Purpose

Despite advancements in surgical techniques, suture pull-though and rupture continue to limit the early range of motion and functional rehabilitation after flexor tendon repairs. The aim of this study was to evaluate a suturable mesh compared with a commonly used braided suture in an in vivo rabbit intrasynovial tendon model.

Methods

Twenty-four New Zealand female rabbits (3-4 kg) were injected with 2 units/kg botulinum toxin evenly distributed into 4 sites in the left calf. After 1 week, the animals underwent surgical tenotomy of the flexor digitorum tendon and were randomized to repair with either 2-0 Duramesh suturable mesh or to 2-0 Fiberwire using a 2-strand modified Kessler and 6-0 polypropylene running epitendinous suture. Rabbits were killed at 2, 4, and 9 weeks after surgery.

Results

Grouping across time points, 58.3% (7 of 12) of Duramesh repairs were found to be intact for the explant compared with 16.7% (2 of 12) of Fiberwire repairs (P = .09). At 2 weeks, the mean Duramesh repairs were significantly stronger than the Fiberwire repairs with a mean failure load of 50.7 ± 12.7 N compared to 14.8 ± 18.3 N (P = .02). The load supported by the Duramesh repairs at 2 weeks (mean 50.7 ± 12.7 N) was similar to the load supported by both Fiberwire (52.2 ± 13.6 N) and Duramesh (57.6 ± 22.3 N) at 4 weeks. The strength of repair between Fiberwire and Duramesh at 4 weeks and 9 weeks was not significantly different.

Conclusions

The 2-strand tendon repair with suturable mesh achieved significantly greater strength at 2 weeks than the conventional suture material. Future studies should evaluate the strength of repair prior to 2 weeks to determine the strength curve for this novel suture material.

Clinical Relevance

This study evaluates the utility of a novel suturable mesh for flexor tendon repair in an in vivo rabbit model compared with conventional suture material.

Suturable Mesh Demonstrates Improved Outcomes over Standard Suture in a Porcine Laparotomy Closure Model

Background:

Laparotomy closures fail due to suture pull-through. I hypothesize that a suturable mesh may limit pull-through via mechanisms of force distribution and fibrous encapsulation of the device filaments.

Methods:

Fifteen domestic swine 74 kg in size were randomly allocated to three groups for laparotomy closure with either size 0 suturable mesh, number 1 suturable mesh, or number 1 polypropylene. All three devices were placed in running fashion with 1-cm bites and 1-cm travels. Primary endpoints were hernia formation at 13 weeks and a semiquantitative analysis of the histological tissue response. Secondary endpoints included adhesions, surgical site occurrence (SSO), and documentation of “loose sutures.”

Results:

There were numerically fewer hernias in the number 1 suturable mesh group. Nine of the 10 suturable mesh devices were well encapsulated within the tissues and could not be pulled away, whereas four of the five polypropylene sutures were loose. Adhesions were least for number 1 suturable mesh. Histologically, the suturable mesh implanted devices showed good fibrovascular ingrowth and were judged to be “nonirritants.” The soft-tissue response was statistically greater (P = 0.006) for the number 1 suturable mesh than for the number 1 polypropylene.

Conclusions:

The mechanism by which meshes support closure sites is clearly demonstrated with this model. Suturable mesh has the potential to change surgical algorithms for abdominal wall closure.

Biomechanics applied to incisional hernia repair - Considering the critical and the gained resistance towards impacts related to pressure

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia repair is burdened with recurrence, pain and disability. The repair is usually carried out with a textile mesh fixed between the layers of the abdominal wall.

METHODS

We developed a bench test with low cyclic loading. The test uses dynamic intermittent strain resembling coughs. We applied preoperative computed tomography of the abdomen at rest and during Valsalva's maneuver to the individual patient to analyze tissue elasticity.

FINDINGS

The mesh, its placements and overlap, the type and distribution of fixation elements, the elasticity of the tissue of the individual and the closure of the abdominal defect-all aspects influence the reconstruction necessary. Each influence can be attributed to a relative numerical quantity which can be summed up into a characterizing value. The elasticity of the tissues within the abdominal wall of the individual patient can be assessed with low-dose computed tomography of the abdomen with Valsalva's maneuver. We established a procedure to integrate the results into a surgical concept. We demonstrate potential computer algorithms using non-rigid b-spline registration and artificial intelligence to further improve the evaluation process.

INTERPRETATION

The bench test yields relative values for the characterization of hernia, mesh and fixation. It can be applied to patient care using established procedures. The clinical application in the first ninety-six patients shows no recurrences and reduced pain levels after one year. The concept has been spread to other surgical groups with the same results in another fifty patients. Future efforts will make the abdominal wall reconstruction more predictable.