Comparison of postoperative infection after emergency inguinal hernia surgery with enterectomy between mesh repair and non-mesh repair: a national database analysis

Inguinal hernia mesh infections: Chronic challenges, atypical pathogens and lessons in sterilisation

Chronic mesh infections after inguinal hernia repair present significant clinical challenges due to biofilm-mediated resistance, involvement of multidrug-resistant and atypical pathogens, and gaps in preventive strategies. Our case series of four patients highlights critical research gaps, including the overlooked role of atypical pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, diagnostic challenges in detecting slow-growing or resistant organisms and perioperative sterilisation lapses, especially inconsistent Glutaraldehyde use during late-day operations. Many patients suffered with persistent sinuses and recurrent hernias months after surgery. Microbiological analyses identified Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and mixed flora. Complete mesh removal and culture-directed antimicrobial therapy resolved all cases within 8-12 months. Our study underscores the need for robust sterilisation protocols, advanced diagnostic measures and biofilm-resistant biomaterials.

Potentiality of Antibacterial Gels for the Prophylactic Coating of Hernia Repair Prosthetic Materials

Prosthetic mesh infection constitutes one of the major postsurgical complications following abdominal hernia repair. Antibacterial coatings represent a prophylactic strategy to reduce the risk of infection. This study assessed the in vitro response of two antibacterial gels made of 1% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) functionalized with an antiseptic (chlorhexidine, CHX) or an antibiotic (rifampicin, RIF), developed for the coating of polypropylene (PP) meshes for hernia repair. Fragments of a lightweight PP mesh (1 cm2) presoaked in the unloaded or drug-loaded CMC (0.05% CHX; 0.13 mg/mL RIF) were challenged with 106 CFU/mL Staphylococcus aureus (Sa) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Agar diffusion tests, sonication, turbidimetry, crystal violet staining, scanning electron microscopy and cell viability assays (fibroblasts, mesothelial cells) were performed to evaluate the response of the gels. Both compounds-especially the RIF-loaded gel-exerted a biocidal effect against gram-positive bacteria, developing wide inhibition halos, precluding adhesion to the mesh surface, and hampering bacterial survival in culture. The antibiotic gel proved innocuous, while lower viability was found in cells exposed to the antiseptic (p < 0.05). Together with their fast, affordable, convenient processing and easy application, the results suggest the potential effectiveness of these drug-loaded CMC gels in providing meshes with an antibacterial coating exhibiting great biocide performance.

Assessing the Safety of Mesh Repair in Strangulated Groin Hernias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The use of mesh in emergency repair of complicated groin hernias has been a subject of discussion for decades. While it is now generally accepted that mesh could safely be used in incarcerated (irreducible) and obstructed hernias (without strangulation), with wound infection rates comparable to suture repairs, the use of mesh in strangulated hernias involving bowel resection is still controversial. The aim of this study, therefore, was to analyse the safety of mesh use in strangulated hernias with ischaemic bowel at the time of surgery. A literature search was carried out using relevant keywords. The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 framework anddata analysis was done using the Review Manager version 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) meta-analysis software. Seven studies comprising 1,159 patients who had emergency surgery for strangulated groin hernias were analysed. A pooled random effect meta-analysis did not show any significant difference in the surgical site infection rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.39-1.96, p = 0.75), seroma formation (OR = 3.39; 95% CI = 0.70-16.43; p = 0.13), and hernia recurrence (OR = 0.33; CI = 0.05-2.22; p = 0.26) between the two groups. The long-held concern that mesh could not be safely used in strangulated groin hernias has not been validated by the results obtained from this systematic review and meta-analysis. However, more randomised controlled trials in this clinical area would need to be carried out to further validate the results of this study.

Suture repair versus mesh repair in elderly populations with incarcerated or strangulated groin hernia

Tension-free hernia repair is the gold standard for groin hernia repair. However, the optimal surgical treatment for incarcerated or strangulated groin hernia in elderly populations is controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of mesh repair and suture repair in the treatment of incarcerated or strangulated groin hernia in elderly patients. Patients ≥ 65 years who underwent urgent surgical repair for incarcerated or strangulated groin hernia from January 2012 to June 2022 were included. Patients' demographic data and postoperative outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with limited life expectancy were screened from the elderly population for subgroup analysis. A total of 103 patients (median age: 84 years old, range 65-96; mean follow-up time: 36.8 ± 24.8 months) were included, involving 42 cases in the suture repair group and 61 cases in the mesh repair group. Suture repair and mesh repair had similar lengths of ICU and hospital stay, and rates of small bowel resection, chronic pain, surgical site infection, and surgical-related death. However, suture repair had a significantly higher recurrence rate than mesh repair (7% vs. 2%, P = 0.04). In our subgroup analysis, for patients with limited life expectancy (41 patients; median age: 88 years old, range: 80-96), suture repair had no statistical difference in postoperative outcomes compared with mesh repair. Mesh repair is suitable for elderly patients with acutely incarcerated or strangulated groin hernias. However, for elderly patients with limited life expectancy, suture repair and mesh repair showed similar clinical outcomes.

The "Little-Old-Lady's Hernia", Obturator Hernia: A Case Report and Literature Review

Obturator hernias, though rare, are clinically significant abdominal hernias, predominantly affecting elderly, thin women, with an estimated prevalence of less than 1%. The primary treatment involves surgical intervention to reduce and repair the defect, either through laparotomy or laparoscopy, with bowel resection needed in up to 75% of patients. Here, we present the case of an 83-year-old woman presenting with abdominal pain and a history of constipation. An abdominal computed tomography scan demonstrated a left obturator hernia with small bowel obstruction. Successful reduction of the hernia was achieved, albeit requiring intestinal resection via an open surgical approach. Subsequently, the patient achieved complete recovery.

Management of groin hernias in emergency setting: differences in indications and outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach. A single-center retrospective experience

PURPOSE

The use of minimally invasive groin hernia repair techniques in an emergency setting is still debated and its widespread is limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique in the treatment of inguinal and femoral hernias in emergency setting based on our experience, comparing indications and outcomes with the open technique.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed including all patients with incarcerated and/or strangulated groin hernia who underwent emergency surgery from November 2019 to September 2022. Perioperative variables and short- and long-term outcomes were examined. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test for nominal variables and Student's t test for continuous ones. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included: 29 patients were treated with TAPP technique (Tapp group) and 37 with open technique plus diagnostic laparoscopy (Open group). Patients in the TAPP group were younger, had less severe clinical scenarios, and had a trend for lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, whereas ASA score and BMI were similar. The small bowel was more frequently herniated in the open group. Bilateral hernia repair was performed in 20.69% of patients in the Tapp group versus 0% in the Open group (p = 0.004). Bowel resection was more frequent in the open group (48.65% vs 0% of the Tapp group, p < 0.001) length of surgery was comparable in the two groups. In the Tapp group, the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter (2.59 ± 2.28 days vs. 9.08 ± 14.48 days; p = 0.023). Postoperative complications, according to Clavien-Dindo, were more severe in Open group where there were two deaths. There were no differences in the number of readmission and re-operations at 30 days and in the recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency repair of inguinal and femoral hernias using TAPP is a valuable option, safe and feasible in selected patients. In this series, indications for TAPP were reserved to younger patients with less comorbidities and less severe clinical scenario. Future randomized studies are needed to compare TAPP with open emergency hernia surgery in all settings. Potential advantages of TAPP are the reduction of postoperative complications, earlier recovery, and the possibility of bilateral treatment.

Mesh repair versus non-mesh repair for incarcerated and strangulated groin hernia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mesh repair in incarcerated or strangulated groin hernia is controversial, especially when bowel resection is required. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing mesh and non-mesh repair in patients undergoing emergency groin hernia repair.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of databases to identify studies comparing mesh and primary suture repair of patients with incarcerated or strangulated inguinal or femoral hernias who underwent emergency surgery. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.

RESULTS

1095 studies were screened and 101 were thoroughly reviewed. Twenty observational studies and four randomized controlled trials comprising 12,402 patients were included. We found that mesh-based repair had reduced recurrence (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.19, 0.67; P = 0.001; I2 = 35%), length of hospital stay (OR - 1.02; 95% CI - 1.87, - 0.17; P = 0.02; I2 = 94%) and operative time (OR - 9.21; 95% CI - 16.82, - 1.61; P = 0.02; I2 = 95%) without increasing surgical site infection, mortality or postoperative complications such as seroma, chronic, ileus or urinary retention. In the subgroup analysis of patients that underwent bowel resection, we found that mesh repair was associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.04, 2.91; P = 0.04; I2 = 9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh repair for incarcerated and strangulated groin hernias reduces recurrence without an increase in postoperative complications and should be considered in clean cases. However, in the setting of bowel resection, mesh repair might increase the incidence of surgical site infection.

Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair

BACKGROUND

A groin hernia is a collective name for inguinal and femoral hernias, which can present acutely with incarceration or strangulation of the hernia sac content, requiring emergency treatment. Timely repair of emergency groin hernias is crucial due to the risk of reduced blood supply and thus damage to the bowel, but the optimal surgical approach is unclear. While mesh repair is the standard treatment for elective hernia surgery, using mesh for emergency groin hernia repair remains controversial due to the risk of surgical site infection.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia.

SEARCH METHODS

On 5 August 2022, we searched the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, and Embase Ovid, as well as two trial registers for ongoing and completed trials. Additionally, we performed forward and backward citation searches for the included trials and relevant review articles. We searched without any language or publication restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mesh with non-mesh repair in emergency groin hernia surgery in adults. We included any mesh and any non-mesh repairs. All studies fulfilling the study, participant, and intervention criteria were included irrespective of reported outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology. We presented dichotomous data as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We based missing data analysis on best- and worst-case scenarios. For outcomes with sufficiently low heterogeneity, we performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model. We analysed subgroups when feasible, including the degree of contamination. We used RoB 2 for risk of bias assessment, and summarised the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 trials randomising 1241 participants undergoing emergency groin hernia surgery with either mesh (626 participants) or non-mesh hernia repair (615 participants). The studies were conducted in China, the Middle East, and South Asia. Most patients were men, and most participants had an inguinal hernia (41 participants had femoral hernias). The mean/median age in the mesh group ranged from 35 to 70 years, and from 41 to 69 years in the non-mesh group. All studies were performed in a hospital emergency setting (tertiary care) and lasted for 11 to 139 months, with a median study duration of 31 months. The majority of the studies only included participants with clean to clean-contaminated surgical fields. For all outcomes, we considered the certainty of the evidence to be very low, mainly downgraded due to high risk of bias (due to deviations from intended intervention and missing outcome data), indirectness, and imprecision. Mesh hernia repair may have no effect on or slightly increase the risk of 30-day surgical site infections (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.88; I² = 21%; 2 studies, 454 participants) when compared with non-mesh hernia repair, but the evidence is very uncertain. The evidence is also very uncertain about the effect of mesh hernia repair compared with non-mesh hernia repair on 30-day mortality (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.28; 1 study, 208 participants). In summary, the results showed 70 more (from 5 fewer to 200 more) surgical site infections and 29 more (from 32 fewer to 175 more) deaths within 30 days of mesh hernia repair per 1000 participants compared with non-mesh hernia repair. The evidence is very uncertain about 90-day surgical site infections after mesh versus non-mesh hernia repair (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.15 to 6.64; 1 study, 60 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No 30-day recurrences were recorded, and mesh hernia repair may not reduce recurrence within one year (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.03; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 104 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Within 30 days of hernia repair, no meshes were removed from clean to clean-contaminated fields, but 6.7% of meshes (1 study, 208 participants) were removed from contaminated to dirty surgical fields. Among the four studies reporting 90-day mesh removal, no events occurred. We were not able to identify any studies reporting complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification or reoperation for complications within 30 days of repair.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that in terms of 30-day surgical site infections, 30-day mortality, and hernia recurrence within one year, the evidence for the use of mesh hernia repair compared with non-mesh hernia repair in emergency groin hernia surgery is very uncertain. Unfortunately, firm conclusions cannot be drawn due to very low-certainty evidence and meta-analyses based on small-sized and low-quality studies. There is a need for future high-quality RCTs or high-quality registry-based studies if RCTs are unfeasible.

Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Pediatric Intussusception: Analysis Using a National Inpatient Database in Japan

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery for pediatric intussusception has recently become more common as an alternative to open surgery. However, the differences in outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to compare short-term surgical outcomes and recurrence rates between patients treated with laparoscopic and open surgery for pediatric intussusception.

METHODS

Patients aged <18 years who underwent laparoscopic (n = 192) and open (n = 416) surgery for intussusception between April 2016 and March 2021 were retrospectively identified using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. Propensity-score overlap weighting analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. The outcomes included in-hospital morbidity, reoperation, readmission for intussusception, bowel resection, the diagnosis of Meckel's diverticulum, duration of anesthesia, postoperative length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic surgery group was older, heavier, and had fewer congenital malformations and emergency admissions than the open surgery group did. Overlap weighting analyses showed no significant differences in in-hospital morbidity (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.88 [0.35-2.23]), reoperation (1.88 [0.24-14.9]), readmission for intussusception within 30 days (0.80 [0.12-5.30]) and 1 year (0.90 [0.28-2.93]), bowel resection (0.69 [0.46-1.02]), the diagnosis of Meckel's diverticulum (0.97 [0.50-1.90]), duration of anesthesia (difference, 11 [-1-24] minutes), postoperative length of stay (difference, -1.9 [-4.2-0.4] days), or total hospitalization costs (difference, 612 [ -746-1970] US dollars) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large nationwide cohort, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between laparoscopic and open surgery. Laparoscopic surgery is an acceptable treatment option for pediatric intussusception.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Current opinions in inguinal hernia emergencies: A comprehensive review of related evidences

INTRODUCTION:

Groins hernia emergencies are evaluated under two definitions: incarceration that is defined as a hernia in which its content becomes irreducible at the passage in the abdominal wall and strangulation that compromises the blood supply to the omentum and/or intestines within the hernia sac. The purpose of this paper was to determine the latest knowledge about groin hernia emergencies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

PubMed and Google Scholar searches were done by using combinations of “inguinal hernia” and “emergency”, and “groin hernia” and “emergency” keywords at first. More detailed searches were performed to enrich the “Surgical treatment” part of the paper by using “emergency hernia” and “mesh”, “emergency hernia,” and “laparoscopic versus open” keywords afterward.

RESULTS:

Approximately 5%–10% of all inguinal repairs are performed in emergency settings. Both lateral and medial inguinal hernias can get incarcerated or strangulated, whereas the risk for femoral hernias is higher. Manual reduction of incarcerated inguinal hernias is successful in approximately 60% of the cases. The prediction of bowel ischemia due to strangulation may be possible with some blood tests and imaging studies like ultrasound and computed tomography. It has been shown that the longer the duration of incarceration the higher the risk of bowel ischemia. Bowel resection which is more frequently necessary in patients with advanced age, female gender, and femoral hernia, is associated with an increased risk of perioperative mortality. Some surgeons still use tissue-suture repairs in an emergency setting; however, mesh repairs have been shown to be safe unless there is an overt contamination.

CONCLUSION:

Early treatment of complicated groin hernias is the key to favorable outcomes. The need for bowel resection and advanced age are the most prominent factors for morbidity and mortality. Mesh repairs are safe in most cases. Minimally invasive approaches promise good results in experienced centers.

Comparison of bleeding following gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsy in patients treated with and without direct oral anticoagulants

Background and study aims  Despite the widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), the association between DOAC use and complications (e. g., bleeding) following gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsy remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate complications after biopsy in patients treated with DOACs in Japan, where biopsies would be generally performed without DOAC withdrawal based on guideline recommendations. Patients and methods  Using a Japanese nationwide database, we identified patients taking DOACs who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsy (n  = 2,769, DOAC group) and those not taking DOACs (n = 129,357, control group) from April 2015 to November 2020. We conducted 1:4 propensity score (PS) matching and overlap PS-weighting analyses with adjustment for background characteristics to compare occurrence of post-procedure hemorrhage and stroke within 1 week after biopsy, and thrombin use on the day of biopsy without a diagnosis of hemorrhage. Results  In total, 578 patients (0.44 %) developed post-procedure hemorrhage, and 13 patients (0.01 %) developed stroke. The DOAC group had more comorbidities than the control group. The PS matching analysis revealed no significant differences in post-procedure hemorrhage (odds ratio, 1.52 [95 % confidential interval, 0.96-2.41]) or stroke (1.00 [0.21-4.71]), whereas the DOAC group received thrombin more often than the control group (1.60 [1.30-1.95]). The results were equivalent in the overlap PS-weighting analysis. Conclusions  The PS analyses showed no significant differences in complications following gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsy between DOAC users and non-users. These results suggest the safety of endoscopic biopsy without DOAC withdrawal although the need for careful hemostasis remains.

Evaluating the Role of Glove Changing Before Mesh Application During Herniorrhaphy Surgery to Reduce Surgical Site Infections

Background: Prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) in hernia repair with mesh remains the main concern. Many risk factors have been proposed; however, the role of changing the glove remains to be elucidated. Methods: This longitudinal study was conducted on adult inguinal hernia cases referred to elective repair using mesh reconstruction. Two hundred cases were enrolled and classified into two groups, including the group that surgeon and his assistants changed the glove and the group in which the gloves remained unchanged. Age, gender, surgery duration, and the side of hernia were compared between those who developed SSI and those without this complication. Moreover, the infection rate was compared between the two study groups. Results: One hundred and two males (51.0%) and 98 females (49.0%) with a mean age of 42.60 ± 15.79 years old were enrolled in the study. None of the variables showed a significant difference between SSI cases and non-SSI cases. Moreover, the rate of infection was not significantly different between the two study groups. Conclusions: Glove changing before mesh application indicates no considerable role in reducing SSI rate; however, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: A propensity score analysis in Japan

BACKGROUND

Although the laparoscopic approach has been applied to distal pancreatectomy, its benefits with regard to the short-term outcomes of distal pancreatectomy remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database, we identified patients who underwent laparoscopic (n = 6647) and open (n = 21,843) distal pancreatectomy between July 2012 and March 2020. We conducted a 1:2 propensity score-matched analysis with adjustment for background characteristics (e.g., comorbidities, preoperative diagnosis, and hospital background) to compare in-hospital morbidity and mortality, reoperation requirement, duration of anesthesia and drainage, postoperative length of stay, and total hospitalization costs. For sensitivity analyses, we performed overlap propensity score-weighted analysis, instrumental variable analysis, and subgroup analyses for hospital volume, patients with benign tumors, and those with malignant tumors that required splenectomy.

RESULTS

In-hospital morbidity and mortality were 27% and 0.7%, respectively. The 1:2 propensity score-matched analysis showed that compared to open surgery, laparoscopic surgery was significantly associated with lower in-hospital morbidity (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.78 [0.73 to 0.84]) and mortality (0.26 [0.14 to 0.50]), lower occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (0.78 [0.72 to 0.85]), postoperative bleeding (0.59 [0.51 to 0.69]), and reoperation (0.65 [0.58 to 0.75]), longer duration of anesthesia (difference, 59 [56 to 63] minutes), shorter duration of drainage (difference, -4.0 [-4.5 to -3.6] days) and postoperative length of stay (difference, -4.4 [-4.9 to -3.9] days), and lower total hospitalization costs (difference, -1510 [-1776 to -1243] US dollars). The sensitivity analyses showed compatible results with those from the main analysis.

CONCLUSION

In this large nationwide cohort, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy showed lower in-hospital morbidity, mortality, and total hospitalization costs than open distal pancreatectomy. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy may be a favorable procedure in terms of both complications and costs.

Mesh versus non‐mesh for emergency groin hernia repair

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:

Acute Pancreatitis in Japan: Comparison of Before and After Revision of the Clinical Guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Cases of acute pancreatitis (AP) are increasing worldwide, and mortality remains high in severe cases. In 2015, the Japanese guidelines for the management of AP were revised. We aimed to clarify the clinical practice of AP in Japan and its trend during the revision of the guidelines using a Japanese nationwide administrative database.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 102,119 patients with AP who were hospitalized between April 2014 and March 2018. The study period was divided into the first period (the time before the revision: fiscal years 2014 and 2015) and second period (after the revision: 2016 and 2017).

RESULTS

Severe cases of AP accounted for 27.7% of total cases. The in-hospital mortality in severe cases was 5.7%. The mortality within 14 days of admission improved from 3.2% in the first period to 2.6% in the second period (P = 0.022). Referred patients had more severe diseases and a higher mortality. The mortality in patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fistuloplasty for local complications (11.6%) was lower than that in patients who underwent percutaneous drainage (23.4%) or AP surgery (22.6%) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We clarified the clinical practice of AP including the improved mortality after the revision of the guidelines.