Characteristics of laparoscopic and open hernia repair simulation models: a systematic review

Usability of a Novel 3D Printed Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulator

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of a novel 3D printed open inguinal hernia repair (IHR) simulator compared to our institution's porcine tissue training model.

DESIGN

We iteratively developed a novel 3D printed inguinal hernia model and then designed a convergent mixed methods study to compare the model with a porcine model. Participants completed a rating form post use of the models and were subsequently interviewed.

SETTING

We conducted this study at the surgical skills center of a single large urban academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals were eligible if they were a senior general surgery resident, defined as postgraduate year (PGY) 3 or higher, or attending surgeon with expertise in open inguinal hernia repair or surgical education. Participants were 6 residents and 7 general surgery faculty; all completed the rating form, and 12 were interviewed.

RESULTS

The 3D printed simulator demonstrated medium (>0.5) to large effect sizes (>0.8) on 10 of 12 evaluative criteria when compared to the porcine model, with the greatest effect seen in pelvic anatomy and the lowest in mechanical properties and operating in small spaces. We identified 4 themes: (1) utility varies between trainees and faculty: trainees prioritized anatomy whereas faculty prioritized both anatomy and tissue fidelity, (2) anticipate less intraop cognitive load: the 3D printed simulator realistically simulated procedure steps and could decrease intraop cognitive load, (3) both models can increase confidence: both models allow residents to practice the repair in a pressure-free environment, allowing them to build confidence, and (4) need novel ways to understand complexity of the anatomy: current methods to understand anatomy are insufficient.

CONCLUSIONS

An anatomically accurate 3D printed model may contribute to effective training for IHR. Addition of 3D to a tissue model would allow further development of trainee knowledge and skills.

Acceptance and use of extended reality in surgical training: an umbrella review

BACKGROUND

Extended reality (XR) technologies which include virtual, augmented, and mixed reality have significant potential in surgical training, because they can help to eliminate the limitations of traditional methods. This umbrella review aimed to investigate factors that influence the acceptance and use of XR in surgical training using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model.

METHODS

An umbrella review was conducted in 2024 by searching various databases until the end of 2023. Studies were selected based on the predefined eligibility criteria and analyzed using the components of the UTAUT model. The quality and risk of bias of the selected studies were assessed, and the findings were reported descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 44 articles were included in this study. In most studies, XR technologies were used for surgical training of orthopedics, neurology, and laparoscopy. Based on the UTAUT model, the findings indicated that XR technologies improved surgical skills and procedural accuracy while simultaneously reducing risks and operating room time (performance expectancy). In terms of effort expectancy, user-friendly systems were accessible for the trainees with various levels of expertise. From a social influence standpoint, XR technologies enhanced learning by providing positive feedback from experienced surgeons during surgical training. In addition, facilitating conditions emphasized the importance of resource availability and addressing technical and financial limitations to maximize the effectiveness of XR technologies in surgical training.

CONCLUSIONS

XR technologies significantly improve surgical training by increasing skills and procedural accuracy. Although adoption is facilitated by designing user-friendly interfaces and positive social influences, financial and resource challenges must be overcome, too. The successful integration of XR into surgical training necessitates careful curriculum design and resource allocation. Future research should focus on overcoming these barriers, so that XR can fully realize its potential in surgical training.

Development of Ventral Hernia Repair Curriculum Using the AWSSOM-a Synthetic Abdominal Wall Surgical Skills Operational Model

INTRODUCTION

Ventral hernia repair cost the U.S. healthcare system nearly 3 billion dollars annually. Surgical repair is a critical competency for residents yet hernia recurrence rates following mesh-based repair range from 0.8% to 24%. Improving surgical techniques using cadavers is often cost-prohibited for many education programs and limited research exists using simulation models with a corresponding hernia repair curriculum in the graduate medical education setting. This pilot project aimed to develop a low cost, easily reproducible novel abdominal wall reconstruction model and pilot-test the ventral hernia repair curriculum to inform further refinement prior to formal evaluation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This descriptive study pilot-tested the newly refined Abdominal Wall Surgical Skills Operative Model (AWSSOM) simulator for ventral hernia repair with mesh and its corresponding 2-h training curriculum for use at all levels of general surgery graduate medical education. The AWSSOM is a 3D printed synthetic anatomically realistic abdominal wall model consisting of silicone cured layers of skin, fat, rectus abdominis and a posterior rectus sheath fascia, and silicone tubules to simulate lateral neurovascular bundles. The curriculum incorporated didactic content reflecting surgical practice guidelines, hands-on practice, and faculty guidance promoting interactive critical thinking development during task performance. A pre-/post-assessment included a 10-item knowledge test, a 19-item psychomotor assessment, and 4-items confidence survey to examine changes in performance, knowledge, and confidence in competently completing the ventral hernia repair technique. Descriptive statistics were used to report the limited results of six military surgical resident participants and inform further model and curriculum refinement prior to formal evaluation.

RESULTS

The five-layer AWSSOM model was manufactured in 65 h at a material cost of $87 per model frame, is reusable model, and secure base. Six surgical residents were recruited; only four completed both pre- and post-tests due to resident schedule conflicts. The average increase in knowledge was 25%, although variable changes in confidence were observed over the four program year participants. A larger sample size and a control group are needed to demonstrate curriculum effectiveness at improving knowledge, performance, and confidence in ventral hernia repair with mesh and better delineate if high scores translate to better operative skills. A key improvement requested by residents was a more secure model base for dissection and performance of the hernia repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel abdominal wall surgical skills operative model fills an important proof of concept gap in simulation training. It is low cost with the potential to improve cognitive and psychomotor skills, as well as confidence to competently complete ventral hernia repair with mesh in the graduate medical education setting. Prior to formal effectiveness testing, our lessons learned should be addressed in both the model and curriculum. Future studies must include an adequately powered statistical evaluation with a larger sample across all levels of training.

Development and validation of a high-quality simulator with exchangeable peritoneum for transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

INTRODUCTION

Practical simulation training with proper haptic feedback and the fragility of the human body is required to overcome the long learning curve associated with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR). However, few hernia models accurately reflect the texture and fragility of the human body. Therefore, in this study, we developed a novel model for transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) LIHR training and evaluated its validity.

METHODS

We developed a high-quality mock peritoneum with a hydrated polyvinyl alcohol layer and a unique two-way crossing cellulose fiber layer. To complete the simulation, the peritoneum was adhered to a urethane foam inguinal base with surgical landmarks. Participants could perform all the procedures required for the TAPP LIHR. Twenty-four surgeons performed TAPP LIHR simulation using a novel simulator. Their opinions were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Additionally, 6 surgical residents and 10 surgical experts performed the procedure. Their performance was evaluated using the TAPP checklist score and procedure time.

RESULTS

Most participants strongly agreed that the TAPP LIHR simulator with an exchangeable peritoneum model was useful. The participants agreed on the model fidelity for tactile sensation, forceps handling, and humanlike anatomy. In comparisons between surgical residents and experts, the experts had significantly higher scores (10.6 vs. 17.2, p < 0.05) and shorter procedure times (92.3 vs. 55.9 min; p < .05) than did surgical residents.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a high-quality exchangeable peritoneal model that mimics the human peritoneum's texture and fragility. This model enhances laparoscopic simulation training, potentially shortening TAPP LIHR learning curves.

Hernia 3D training model: a new inguinal hernia 3D-printed simulator

OBJECTIVE

Barros et al. demonstrated a 3D printed model that exhibits anatomical representativeness, low cost, and scalability. The model was created based on subtraction data obtained from computed tomography scans. Images were modeled and reconstructed in 3D to display the male inguinal region, typically viewed using a laparoscopic approach. To evaluate the functionality and quality of the anatomical representation of the hernia 3D training model.

METHODS

A model was created based on subtraction data derived from computed tomography scans of the pelvic bones and lumbar spine using the Blender 3.2.2 software program. Images were modeled and reconstructed in 3D to display the male inguinal region, typically viewed using a laparoscopic approach. Polylactic acid plastic was used to print the model. Some structures were made using ethylene vinyl acetate to enable possible material replacement and model reutilization. Thirty surgeons with various training levels were invited to use the model. Transabdominal inguinal hernioplasty was performed by simulating the same steps as those of a laparoscopic surgery, and the surgeons answered a questionnaire regarding the simulation.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight surgeons responded, seven of whom were experts in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias. The model was deemed easy to use, realistic, and anatomically precise, establishing it as a valuable supplement to minimally invasive surgery training.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of this 3D model was favorable, as it accurately depicted the inguinal region anatomically, while also proving to be cost-effective for training purposes. The model could be a good option, particularly beneficial for training surgeons at the beginning of their careers.

Optimizing laparoscopic and robotic skills through simulation in participants with limited or no prior experience: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Simulation is an innovative tool for developing complex skills required for surgical training. The objective of this study was to determine the advancement of laparoscopic and robotic skills through simulation in participants with limited or no previous experience.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in keeping with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. We conducted searches using MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Variables analyzed were study characteristics, participant demographics, and characteristics of the learning program. Our main measures were effectiveness, surgical time, and errors. These were reported using standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI (P < .05). Secondary measures included skill transfer and learning curve.

RESULTS

A total of 17 RCTs were included and comprised 619 participants: 354 participants (57%) were in the simulation group and 265 (43%) in the control group. Results indicated that laparoscopic simulation effectively enhanced surgical skills (SMD, 0.59 [0.18-1]; P = .004) and was significantly associated with shorter surgical duration (SMD, -1.08 [-1.57 to -0.59]; P < .0001) and a fewer errors made (SMD, -1.91 [-3.13 to -0.70]; P = .002). In the robotic simulation, there was no difference in effectiveness (SMD, 0.17 [-0.19 to 0.52]; P = .36) or surgical time (SMD, 0.27 [-0.86 to 1.39]; P = .64). Furthermore, skills were found to be transferable from simulation to a real-life operating room (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Simulation is an effective tool for optimizing laparoscopic skills, even in participants with limited or no previous experience. This approach not only contributes to the reduction of surgical time and errors but also facilitates the transfer of skills to the surgical environment. In contrast, robotic simulation fails to maximize skill development, requiring previous experience in laparoscopy to achieve optimal levels of effectiveness.

RAWS4all project: validation of a new silicone model for robotic TAPP inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) hernia repair is a complex procedure that presents several challenges. Even though, due to the high prevalence of inguinal hernia, TAPP technique is increasing in frequency and robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery (rAWS) is emerging as a valuable tool in this regard. Although inguinal TAPP procedure principles have been published and simulation is needed, the availability of validated models remains scarce.

METHODS

A new low-cost model was developed to simulate inguinal rTAPP repair. For validity assessment, a new TAPP-specific fidelity questionnaire and assessment scale were developed to compare the performance of novices and experts in the simulated procedure. The models used were assessed at 60 min for execution and quality score.

RESULTS

Twenty-five residents and specialists from all over the country participated in this study. Execution, quality, and global performance was higher in the seniors group compared to juniors (8.91 vs 6.36, p = 0.02; 8.09 vs 5.14, p < .001; and 17 vs. 11,5, p < .001, respectively). Overall fidelity was assessed as being very high [4.41 (3.5-5.0), α = .918] as well as face [4.31 (3.0-5.0), α = .867] and content validity [4.44 (3.2-5.0), α = .803]. Participants strongly agreed that the model is adequate to be used with the DaVinci® Robot [4.52 (3.5-5.0), α = .758].

CONCLUSION

This study shows face, content, and construct validity of the model for inguinal TAPP simulation, including for robotic surgery. Therefore, the model can be a valuable tool for learning, understanding, practicing, and mastering the TAPP technique prior to participating in the operating room.

Assessing knowledge and confidence of surgical residents in inguinal hernia repair using a low-cost synthetic model

PURPOSE

Open repair of groin hernia is an essential skill for the general surgeon. This study aimed to develop a low-cost hernia model based on a validated high-fidelity model and assess its effectiveness in teaching inguinal hernia repair to surgical trainees from many institutions throughout Africa.

METHODS

Using inexpensive, locally available materials, a low-cost hernia model was created. Six models were constructed, and a workshop was conducted for surgical residents. Pre- and post-workshop surveys were administered to assess knowledge, confidence, and understanding. Statistical analyses were performed using paired t tests and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

The low-cost hernia model consisted of various readily available materials and cost an average of $5.07. Sixty-eight trainees participated in the workshop, and 59 completed the post-workshop survey. Participants reported a significant increase in confidence for both mesh and non-mesh repairs and an improved understanding of hernia anatomy after the workshop. Trainees scored an average of 5.6 (SD 1.9) out of 10 questions on the pre-workshop quiz and 7.9 (SD 1.4) out of 10 on the post-workshop quiz (p < 0.001), indicating improved knowledge. All trainees supported the use of the model for education.

CONCLUSION

The low-cost hernia model demonstrated its effectiveness in enhancing trainees' understanding of hernia anatomy and increasing their confidence in hernia repair. Integrating low-cost hernia models into training programs can help improve trainees' knowledge and confidence in a safe and affordable environment.

Use of a Composed Simulator by Veterinarian Non-Experts in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Training and Acquisition of Surgical Skills for Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Dogs

This study aims to assess the acquisition of surgical skills for laparoscopic ovariectomy (LOE) in dogs by veterinary surgeons with no experience in minimally invasive surgery using the CALMA Veterinary Lap-trainer simulator (CVLTS) in an experimental and analytical setting. Veterinary surgeons with no experience in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (experimental, n = 5), and MIS experts (experts, n = 3) were evaluated. Experimental and expert group participants watched an instructional video (initial time) before practicing the LOE on uterine tissues and ovaries freshly reconstituted after elective ovariohysterectomy (initial time evaluation). Then, the experimental group practiced five training sessions on the composite simulator with permanent feedback and then performed the LOE again (final time evaluation). Surgical performances in initial and final evaluations were video recorded and further evaluated by three external MIS experts using Global objective assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS) and LOE-specific rating scales (SRSs) in a double-blinded schedule. In addition, a hands movement assessment system (HMAS) attached to the back of the hands was used to quantitatively measure completion time, angularity, and movement smoothness. Data were analyzed with one-factor ANOVA and Tukey's contrast test. No statistically significant differences were found between the novice group's performance after training and the expert group's performance according to the GOALS (p < 0.01) and SRS (p < 0.05) scores. Moreover, the novices had significantly improved time, number of movements, and angularity in the final time compared with the initial time (p < 0.05), with no significant differences compared to the expert group (p > 0.05). LOE training using a composed simulator resulted in significantly improved laparoscopic skills and time, number, and angularity of movements data, providing evidence of the usefulness and reliability of CVLTS in training LOE.