Risk factors for surgical site infection after groin hernia repair: does the mesh or technique matter?

The impact of smoking on ventral and inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Individual studies indicate poorer outcomes for smokers after hernia repair. Previous meta-analyses have examined the impact of smoking on specific outcomes such as recurrence and surgical site infection, but there has been a lack of comprehensive consensus or systematic review on this subject. Addressing this gap, our study undertakes a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of smoking on the outcomes of ventral hernia repair (VHR) and inguinal hernia repair.

SOURCE

A thorough search of Cochrane Central, Scopus, SciELO, and PubMed/MEDLINE, focusing on studies that examined the effect of smoking on inguinal and VHR outcomes was conducted. Key outcomes evaluated included recurrence, reoperation, surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), and seroma.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Out of 3296 screened studies, 42 met the inclusion criteria. These comprised 25 studies (69,295 patients) on VHR and 17 studies (204,337 patients) on inguinal hernia repair. The analysis revealed that smokers had significantly higher rates of recurrence (10.4% vs. 9.1%; RR 1.48; 95% CI [1.15; 1.90]; P < 0.01), SSO (13.6% vs. 12.7%; RR 1.44; 95% CI [1.12; 1.86]; P < 0.01) and SSI (6.6% vs. 4.2%; RR 1.64; 95% CI [1.38; 1.94]; P < 0.01) following VHR. Additionally, smokers undergoing inguinal hernia repair showed higher recurrence (9% vs. 8.7%; RR 1.91; 95% CI [1.21; 3.01]; P < 0.01), SSI (0.6% vs. 0.3%; RR 1.6; 95% CI [1.21; 2.0]; P < 0.001), and chronic pain (9.9% vs. 10%; RR 1.24; 95% CI [1.06; 1.45]; P < 0.01) rates. No significant differences were observed in seroma (RR 2.63; 95% CI [0.88; 7.91]; P = 0.084) and reoperation rates (RR 1.48; 95% CI [0.77; 2.85]; P = 0.236) for VHR, and in reoperation rates (RR 0.99; 95% CI [0.51; 1.91]; P = 0.978) for inguinal hernias between smokers and non-smokers. Analysis using funnel plots and Egger's test showed the absence of publication bias in the study outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive meta-analysis found statistically significant increases in recurrence rates, and immediate postoperative complications, such as SSO and SSI following inguinal and VHR. Also, our subgroup analysis suggests that the MIS approach seems to be protective of adverse outcomes in the smokers group. However, our findings suggest that these findings are not of clinical relevance, so our data do not support the necessity of smoking cessation before hernia surgery. More studies are needed to elucidate the specific consequences of smoking in both inguinal and ventral hernia repair.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

ID CRD42024517640.

Polypropylene vs. stainless-steel wire suture: short-term recurrence rate after shouldice primary inguinal hernia repair, a non-inferior analysis among 1120 patients. A case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Polypropylene material is commonly used for posterior wall reconstruction in hernia repair, in contrast with the classically described stainless-steel wire used at Shouldice Hospital. This study was conducted to evaluate possible differences in Shouldice Repair outcomes using polypropylene or stainless-steel wire sutures.

METHODS

A prospective follow-up of consecutive patients who underwent elective unilateral Shouldice primary inguinal hernia repair at Shouldice Hospital between December 6, 2021, and September 1, 2022, was conducted. Data was collected from follow-up telephone calls as well as manually reviewing patient's charts. The primary objective was to determine whether the use of polypropylene was non-inferior to the use of stainless-steel wire, regarding the recurrence rate reported by the patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year after Shouldice primary inguinal hernia repair.

RESULTS

A total of 1120 patients were contacted by telephone (polypropylene: 560; stainless-steel wire: 560). The median follow-up period was 16 months (interquartile range: 15-18). In 22 (1.96%) cases a surgical site infection was diagnosed. There was a total of 18 recurrences reported by the patients (1.6%). There was no statistical difference between the groups (polypropylene: 7 (1.25%) vs. stainless steel wire: 11 (1.96%), p > 0.05) for the recurrence rate.

CONCLUSION

The use of polypropylene is non-inferior to the use of stainless-steel wire regarding recurrence rate at a median follow-up period of 16 months after elective unilateral Shouldice primary inguinal hernia repair. This finding may encourage other centers where stainless-steel wire is not easily available to perform the Shouldice Repair.

Transrectus Extraperitoneal Versus Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Recent guidelines have recommended minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for unilateral inguinal hernia due to reduced chronic pain. The most performed approaches consist of posterior mesh placement by the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques. However, it remains debatable whether the advantage of those techniques stems from the MIS approach or posterior mesh placement or both. As the transrectus preperitoneal (TREPP) technique is an open option for posterior mesh placement, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing TREPP and MIS techniques for groin hernia repair. Material and Methods: Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Scielo, and PubMed were systematically searched for studies comparing TREPP and MIS techniques for groin hernia repair. Outcomes assessed were recurrence, cumulative surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), and postoperative pain. Results: Twenty-nine studies were screened, and eight were thoroughly reviewed. Three studies were included, of which two compared TREPP with the TEP technique, and one compared TREPP with both TEP and TAPP techniques. We found lower SSI rates for the MIS approaches (0.61% versus 0.33%; risk ratios (RRs) 3.96; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-15.16; P = .04). We did not find statistically significant differences regarding recurrence (2.42% versus 2.51%; RR 1.01; P = .98), postoperative pain (4.2% versus 6.4%; RR 0.61; P = .4), and SSO (4.2% versus 4.0%; RR 0.6; P = .43) between TREPP and MIS techniques. Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis found a lower SSI for the MIS repair but did not find differences regarding recurrence, SSO, and postoperative pain. More studies are required to provide a more accurate conclusion about this topic.

The Impact of a Specialized Hernia Center and Standardized Practices on Surgical Outcomes in Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: Hernia registries report that guidelines are not always implemented by general surgeons and suggest that the success rate of this procedure is higher in hernia specialty centers. There are many definitions of hernia centers, but their objectives consist of improving healthcare by homogenizing the clinical practice. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze hernia centers' definitions and compare hernia centers with non-specialized centers. Material and Methods: Cochrane Central, Scopus, Scielo, and PubMed were systematically searched for studies defining a hernia center or comparing hernia centers and non-specialized centers. Outcomes assessed were recurrence, surgical site events, hospital length of stay (LOS), and operative time. We performed subgroup analyses of hernia type. Statistical analysis was performed with R Studio. Results: 3,260 studies were screened and 88 were thoroughly reviewed. Thirteen studies were included. Five studies defined a hernia center and eight studies, comprising 141,366 patients, compared a hernia center with a non-specialized center. Generally, the definitions were similar in decision-making and educational requirements but differed in structural aspects and the steps required for the certification. We found lower recurrence rates for hernia centers for both inguinal (1.08% versus 5.11%; RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.23; p < 0.001) and ventral hernia (3.2% vs. 8.9%; RR 0.425; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.64; p < 0.001). Hernia centers also presented lower surgical site infection for both ventral (4.3% vs. 11.9%; RR 0.435; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.90; p = 0.026) and inguinal (0.1% vs. 0.52%; RR 0.15; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.99; p = 0.49) repair. Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis support that a hernia center establishment improves postoperative outcomes data. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024522263, PROSPERO CRD42024522263.

Unplanned readmissions after hernia repair

INTRODUCTION

Several quality indices have been set up for evaluating the impact of the reduction of the length of stay (LOS), such as the 30-day unplanned readmission (UR30) rate. The main goal of our study was to analyze the UR30 following groin hernia repair (GHR), primary- (PVHR), and incisional ventral hernia repairs (IVHR).

METHODS

A French registry-based multicenter study was conducted using prospective data from all consecutive patients registered from 2015 to 2021.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of UR30 was 1.32%. This included 160/18,042 (0.87%) for GHR, 41/4012 (1.02%) for PVHR, and 145/3754 (3.86%) for IVHR. The leading cause of UR30 was postoperative complications (POC). The nature of the predominant complications varied among the three categories. The correlation between UR30 and POC (and risk factors for POC) was strong in GHR but was not in IVHR due to a 'protective' longer LOS in this subgroup. As the LOS has decreased over the last years, this has 'mechanically' resulted in an increase in the occurrence of UR30, but not in a rise of POC, neither in volume nor in severity. The reduction of LOS just shifted the problem from inpatient to outpatient settings.

CONCLUSION

Since the steady development of day-care surgery, the prevention of the UR not only hinges on the prevention of the POC but newly on a better organization of outpatient care which is currently a huge challenge due to a GPs' and nurses' shortage in France.

The Role of Imaging in the Pre- and Postoperative Evaluation of Inguinal Hernia

Inguinal hernia repair is the most frequently performed surgical procedure. Imaging has a fundamental role in initial assessment and postoperative evaluation of inguinal hernias. Clinical implications of radiology in the preoperative setting include diagnosis of occult/complicated hernias and enhancement of diagnostic certainty. Postoperatively, imaging may assist the detection and characterization of complications. Familiarity with the normal appearance of the postoperative groin area and surgical techniques is required to avoid misinterpretation. This pictorial essay provides an overview of the expected postoperative imaging findings and highlights the role of imaging in the pre- and postoperative evaluation of inguinal hernias, with emphasis on ultrasonography.

Surgical aspects and early morbidity of patients undergoing open recurrent inguinal hernia repair

PURPOSE

This study aims to characterize the patterns of recurrence associated with specific types of primary inguinal hernia repair techniques used for and their respective correlations with early morbidity, in patients undergoing open repair for their first hernia recurrence.

METHODS

After ethics approval was obtained, a retrospective review of charts from patients who underwent open surgery for repair of a first recurrence after a previous inguinal hernia repair during 2013-2017 was completed. Statistical analyses were performed and p-values < .05 are reported as statistically significant.

RESULTS

1393 patients underwent 1453 surgeries for recurrent inguinal hernias at this institution. Operations for recurrence were longer (61.9 ± 21.1 vs. 49.3 ± 11.9; p < .001), required more frequent intra-operative surgical consultation (1% vs. 0.2%; p < .001) and had a higher incidence of surgical-site infections (0.8% vs. 0.4%; p = .03) than primary inguinal hernia repairs. When comparing the patterns of recurrence among different techniques of primary repairs, patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair presented with a higher incidence of indirect recurrences. Reoperations after a Shouldice repair and open mesh repair represented markers for higher surgical difficulty in the recurrent operation (longer operative time, higher identification of heavy scarring, less nerve identification, and higher frequency of intra-operative consultation), but not higher rates of complications when compared with other techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Open reoperations for inguinal hernia first recurrences are more complex, with noticeable differences according to the index operation, and associated with higher morbidity when compared with primary hernia repairs. This complexity varies according to the type of primary surgery, with a previous Shouldice repair and open hernia repair with mesh presenting higher surgical difficulties although this did not translate to higher incidence of early complications. This information may allow adequate allocation of surgeons with an expertise in recurrent hernias and choice of recurrent repair method (laparoscopic or open) based on the primary surgery.

Treatment of mesh infection after inguinal hernia repair: 3-year experience with 120 patients

PURPOSE

Mesh infection is a devastating complication of sterile hernia repair surgery. This study was performed to assess the short- and long-term outcomes following treatment for mesh infection after inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included all patients who developed mesh infection after inguinal hernia repair from January 2018 to December 2020. Patient demographics, mesh infection characteristics, microbiology, features of surgery, short- and long-term outcomes, and follow-up data were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 120 patients (8 women, 112 men; mean age, 54.4 years; mean body mass index, 24.8 kg/m²) were treated for mesh infection. The cultures were positive in 88 patients; 62.5% of these were positive for Staphylococcus aureus. Laparoscopic exploration was performed in 108 patients. Seventy patients underwent complete removal of infected mesh, and 50 underwent partial removal. During the short-term follow-up, 11 patients developed a minor wound infection and were treated with dressings and antibiotics, 1 developed a wound infection requiring debridement, 30 developed seromas, and 3 developed hematomas that did not require surgical intervention. During the mean follow-up of 39.1 months, 4 patients developed hernia recurrence, 2 experienced chronic pain, and 23 developed recurrent infection requiring reoperation in the partial mesh removal group (in contrast, only 4 patients in the complete mesh removal group developed recurrent infection, with a statistically significant difference).

CONCLUSION

The outcome of mesh infection after inguinal hernia repair treated by mesh removal is satisfactory. Systematic individualized treatment by experienced experts based on the patient's previous repair technique, implanted mesh, and physical condition is recommended.

Pre-operative factors associated with short- and long-term outcomes in the patient with inguinal hernia: What does the current evidence say?

Hernia repair is one of the most frequent interventions in surgery worldwide. The approach to abdominal wall and inguinal hernias remains a challenge due to emerging evidence on aspects such as timely diagnosis, use of innovative techniques or post-surgical care. However, pre-operative preparation is also a factor that substantially affects the absolute success rate of this type of condition. Time management between diagnosis and intervention, control of diseases that increase intra-abdominal pressure, weight and nutritional status, are some of the many elements to be considered in this type of patients before surgery. Considering that this condition carries high health care costs, especially in case of recurrence, has a risk of complications and affects the individual's functional capacity, the objective of this review is to synthesize evidence on the role of these factors on the short- and long-term outcome of inguinal hernia management, and to make suggestions on the general approach to this type of patients.