Rectus diastasis increases risk of burst abdomen in emergency midline laparotomies: a matched case–control study

The sagitta in 3D reconstruction of linea alba on routine CT scans is predictive of postoperative burst abdomen

PURPOSE

Burst abdomen (BA) is a relevant complication after abdominal surgery that causes additional surgical procedures, prolonged hospital stays and long-term morbidity. Several underlying risk factors exist and have been characterized previously. Those risk factors consist of surgical and medical factors. Recently, CT-derived body composition is of rising interest and 3D reconstruction of the linea alba has been studied. The clinical significance of those parameters is not clear. We therefore performed an analysis of linea alba 3D reconstruction measurements and their prognostic significance on the development of BA.

METHODS

An institutional data base of patients with post operative wound infections was assembled. The subgroup of patients with BA was compared to controls. If the patients had complete preoperative abdominal CT scans, their images were further analyzed and 3D reconstruction of the linea alba was performed. Subsequently, lineal alba was measured at predetermined positions. Those values were evaluated as risk factors for postoperative BA.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients with BA and 32 controls were eligible for the analysis. We found body mass index-related significant differences as well as sex related differences in linea alba width. Furthermore, BA patients had a significantly wider linea alba and longer sagitta compared to controls. In the multivariate analysis of linea alba measurements and clinical parameters, the length of the sagitta was significantly associated with the risk of BA (OR 1.266; 95% CI 1.011-1.585; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

In this study of 3D reconstruction of the linea alba from routine CT scans, we could show that a longer sagitta was associated with an increased risk of postoperative BA.

Complete Abdominal Evisceration After Open Hysterectomy: A Case Report and Evidence-Based Review

Background/Objectives: Despite its low incidence, complete postoperative abdominal evisceration represents a complication requiring an urgent solution. We aimed to present a rare case of an abdominal evisceration of the omentum and small-bowel loops after a total abdominal hysterectomy and review the literature regarding this condition's diagnosis and therapeutic management. Case report: On the sixth postoperative day for a uterine fibroid, a 68-year-old patient presented with an abdominal evisceration of the omentum and small bowel that occurred two hours before. An emergency laparotomy was performed to correct the evisceration and restore the integrity of the abdominal wall structure. The literature review was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases using the terms "abdominal wall dehiscence", "abdominal evisceration", "open abdomen", "burst abdomen", "abdominal fascial dehiscence", "abdominal dehiscence post-hysterectomy", and "hysterectomy complications" by identifying all-time articles published in English. Results: Seven studies were included in this electronic search. The early diagnosis of abdominal evisceration, the identification of risk factors and comorbidities, followed by the choice of surgical technique, and postoperative follow-up were parts of the standard algorithm for managing this life-threatening case. Conclusions: Abdominal evisceration, as a surgical emergency, requires the diagnosis and treatment of this complication alongside the identification of the risk factors that can lead to its occurrence, as well as careful postoperative monitoring adapted to each case.

The clinical consequences of burst abdomen after emergency midline laparotomy: a prospective, observational cohort study

PURPOSE

The emergency midline laparotomy is a commonly performed procedure with a burst abdomen being a critical surgical complication requiring further emergency surgery. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with burst abdomen after emergency midline laparotomy.

METHODS

A single-center, prospective, observational cohort study of patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy during a two-year period was done. Abdominal wall closure followed a standardized technique using monofilament, slowly absorbable suture in a continuous suturing technique with a suture-to-wound ratio of at least 4:1. Treatment of burst abdomen was surgical. Data, including intra-hospital postoperative complications, were collected and registered chronologically based on journal entries. The primary outcome was to describe postoperative complications, length of stay, and the overall morbidity based on the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), stratified between patients who did and did not suffer from a burst abdomen during admission.

RESULTS

A total of 543 patients were included in the final cohort, including 24 patients with burst abdomen during admission. The incidence of burst abdomen after emergency midline laparotomy was 4.4%. Patients with a burst abdomen had a higher total amount of complications per patient (median of 3, IQR 1.3-5.8 vs. median of 1, IQR 0.0-3.0; p = 0.001) and a significantly higher CCI (median of 53.0, IQR 40.3-94.8 vs. median of 21.0, IQR 0.0-42.0; p =  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with burst abdomen had an increased risk of postoperative complications during admission as well as a longer and more complicated admission with multiple non-surgical complications.

The Original Rutherford Morison Incision: A Case Report

In recent years, the Rutherford Morison incision has become synonymous with renal transplant surgery. However, this incision was originally intended for access to the sigmoid colon and pelvis, particularly in the case of a midline previously scarred from operation. We present a case of a middle-aged female with a caecal tumour, requiring resection. Upon examination, this patient was found to have large concomitant diastasis of the recti. A right-sided Rutherford Morison incision was utilized in performing a right hemicolectomy. Although the advantages of a minimally invasive approach to colonic resections are well described, laparoscopy was not utilized in the case discussed. Due to the wide area of anterior abdominal wall laxity, herniation is likely to develop at both port placement and specimen delivery sites. A similar outcome would result from a midline incision. However, a paramedian is an acceptable alternative to a Rutherford Morison incision in a case like this, as it is known to have very low rates of post-operative incisional herniation. While in modern times, its use may have become repurposed, the Rutherford Morison incision is one which should be remembered and used in the surgeons' armamentarium to improve clinical outcomes when necessary.

[Incisional hernias: epidemiology, evidence and guidelines]

BACKGROUND

From an epidemiological point of view, one third of the population in industrialized countries will undergo abdominal surgery during their lifetime. Depending on the degree of patient-related and procedure-related risks, the occurrence of incisional hernias is associated in a range of up to 30% at 2‑year follow-up and even up to 60% at 5 years. In addition to influencing comorbidities, the type of surgical approach and closure technique are of critical importance.

OBJECTIVE

To present a descriptive evidence-based recommendation for abdominal wall closure and prophylactic mesh augmentation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A concise summary was prepared incorporating the current literature and existing guidelines.

RESULTS

According to recent studies the recognized risk for the occurrence of incisional hernias in the presence of obesity and abdominal aortic diseases also applies to patients undergoing colorectal surgery and the presence of diastasis recti abdominis. Based on high-level published data, the short stitch technique for midline laparotomy in the elective setting has a high level of evidence to be a standard procedure. Patients with an increased risk profile should receive prophylactic mesh reinforcement, either onlay or sublay, in addition to the short stitch technique. In emergency laparotomy, the individual risk of infection with respect to the closure technique used must be included.

CONCLUSION

The avoidance of incisional hernias is primarily achieved by the minimally invasive access for laparoscopy. For closure of the most commonly used midline approach, the short stitch technique and, in the case of existing risk factors, additionally mesh augmentation are recommended.

Prevalence of rectus diastasis is higher in patients with inguinal hernia

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of rectus diastasis (RD) in patients with inguinal hernia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Multicenter, cross-sectional study. Patients with inguinal hernia were included in the study group (IH) and those with benign proctologic complaints created the control group (CG). Age, gender, BMI, family history for inguinal hernias, comorbid diseases, alcohol use, smoking, constipation, malignancy, chemotherapy, number of births, multiple pregnancies and prostate hypertrophy history of all patients in both groups were recorded. All patients were evaluated for RD and umbilical hernias by physical examination.

RESULTS

A total of 528 consecutive patients were included in the study (292 IH / 236 CG). Overall prevalence of RD was 35.6% and it was significantly higher in IH than in CG (46.9% vs 21.6%, p < 0.001). Also, umbilical hernia was more frequently detected in the patients with inguinal hernia. Other risk factors for RD were age, BMI, DM, BPH and smoking. The mean inter-rectus distance for 528 patients was 18.1 mm; it was 20.71 ± 10.68 mm in IH and 14.88 ± 8.82 in CG (p < 0.001). It was determined that the increase in age and BMI caused an increase in the inter-rectus distance, and that the presence of DM, inguinal hernia and umbilical hernia increased the inter-rectus distance quantitatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of RD seems to be higher in patients with inguinal hernia comparing to that in general population. Increased age, high BMI and DM were found to be independent risk factors for RD development.