Clinical potential of hemodynamic ramp test by simultaneous echocardiography and right heart catheterization for aortic insufficiency in a patient with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device

Acausal Modelling of Advanced-Stage Heart Failure and the Istanbul Heart Ventricular Assist Device Support with Patient Data

BACKGROUND

In object-oriented or acausal modelling, components of the model can be connected topologically, following the inherent structure of the physical system, and system equations can be formulated automatically. This technique allows individuals without a mathematics background to develop knowledge-based models and facilitates collaboration in multidisciplinary fields like biomedical engineering. This study conducts a preclinical evaluation of a ventricular assist device (VAD) in assisting advanced-stage heart failure patients in an acausal modelling environment.

METHODS

A comprehensive object-oriented model of the cardiovascular system with a VAD is developed in MATLAB/SIMSCAPE, and its hemodynamic behaviour is studied. An analytically derived pump model is calibrated for the experimental prototype of the Istanbul Heart VAD. Hemodynamics are produced under healthy, diseased, and assisted conditions. The study features a comprehensive collection of advanced-stage heart failure patients' data from the literature to identify parameters for disease modelling and to validate the resulting hemodynamics.

RESULTS

Regurgitation, suction, and optimal speeds are identified, and trends in different hemodynamic parameters are observed for the simulated pathophysiological conditions. Using pertinent parameters in disease modelling allows for more accurate results compared to the traditional approach of arbitrary reduction in left ventricular contractility to model dilated cardiomyopathy.

CONCLUSION

The current research provides a comprehensive and validated framework for the preclinical evaluation of cardiac assist devices. Due to its object-oriented nature, the featured model is readily modifiable for other cardiovascular diseases for studying the effect of pump operating conditions on hemodynamics and vice versa in silico and hybrid mock circulatory loops. The work also provides a potential teaching tool for understanding the pathophysiology of heart failure, diagnosis rationale, and degree of assist requirements.

Considerations of valvular heart disease in children with ventricular assist devices

Ventricular assist devices have become a valuable tool in the treatment of heart failure in children. The use of ventricular assist devices has decreased mortality in children with end-stage heart failure awaiting transplant. It is not uncommon for children with end-stage heart failure associated with cardiomyopathy or congenital heart disease to have significant systemic semilunar and atrioventricular valve regurgitation, which can impact the efficiency and efficacy of hemodynamic support provided by a ventricular assist device. Therefore, implanting clinicians should carefully assess for valve abnormalities that may need repair and impact device selection and cannulation strategy to effectively support this diverse population. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of this important and relevant topic and to discuss strategies for managing these patients.

Aortic valve disorders and left ventricular assist devices

Aortic valve disorders are important considerations in advanced heart failure patients being evaluated for left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and those on LVAD support. Aortic insufficiency (AI) can be present prior to LVAD implantation or develop de novo during LVAD support. It is usually a progressive disorder and can lead to impaired LVAD effectiveness and heart failure symptoms. Severe AI is associated with worsening hemodynamics, increased hospitalizations, and decreased survival in LVAD patients. Diagnosis is made with echocardiographic, device assessment, and/or catheterization studies. Standard echocardiographic criteria for AI are insufficient for accurate diagnosis of AI severity. Management of pre-existing AI includes aortic repair or replacement at the time of LVAD implant. Management of de novo AI on LVAD support is challenging with increased risks of repeat surgical intervention, and percutaneous techniques including transcatheter aortic valve replacement are assuming greater importance. In this manuscript, we provide a comprehensive approach to contemporary diagnosis and management of aortic valve disorders in the setting of LVAD therapy.

Concomitant or late aortic valve intervention and its efficacy for aortic insufficiency associated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation

Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (AI) in patients who underwent continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation is a significant complication. According to the INTERMACS registry analysis, at least mild AI occurs in 55% of patients at 6 months after CF-LVAD implantation and moderate to severe AI is significantly associated with higher rates of re-hospitalization and mortality. The clinical implications of these data may underscore consideration of prophylactic aortic valve replacement, or repair, at the time of CF-LVAD implantation, particularly with expected longer duration of support and in patients with preexisting AI that is more than mild. More crucially, even if a native aortic valve is seemingly competent at the time of VAD implantation, we frequently find de novo AI as time goes by, potentially due to commissural fusion in the setting of inconsistent aortic valve opening or persistent valve closure caused by CF-LVAD support, that alters morphological and functional properties of innately competent aortic valves. Therefore, close monitoring of AI is mandatory, as the prognostic nature of its longitudinal progression is still unclear. Clearly, significant AI during VAD support warrants surgical intervention at the appropriate timing, especially in patients of destination therapy. Nonetheless, such an uncertainty in the progression of AI translates to a lack of consensus regarding the management of this untoward complication. In practice, proposed surgical options are aortic valve replacement, repair, closure, and more recently transcatheter aortic valve implantation or closure. Transcatheter approach is of course less invasive, however, its efficacy in terms of long-term outcome is limited. In this review, we summarize the recent evidence related to the pathophysiology and surgical treatment of AI associated with CF-LVAD implantation.