Impact of delayed veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning on postoperative rehabilitation of lung transplantation: a single-center comparative study

Respiratory compliance related to prognostic of lung transplant patients with veno‑venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) plays an important role in the perioperative care of critically ill lung transplant patients. However, the factors predicting prognosis are unclear. This study assessed the association between static respiratory compliance (Crs) and outcomes of lung transplant patients receiving VV-ECMO in terms of 90-day mortality. Data were retrospectively collected for patients that underwent lung transplantation with VV-ECMO support during 2022-2023. Patients were divided into two groups according to the early postoperative Crs: lower Crs (Crs < 25 ml/cmH2O) and higher Crs (Crs ≥ 25 ml/cmH2O). Differences in patient characteristics and prognosis were then compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the value of Crs for predicting 90-day mortality and univariate Cox proportional hazard model analysis was performed to estimate risk of Crs. Data were available for a total of 85 patients, including 50 (58.8%) patients in the higher Crs group and 35 (41.2%) patients in the lower Crs group. A lower Crs was significantly associated with a longer postoperative ECMO duration (hours, 42 vs. 24; P = 0.022), longer postoperative ventilator time (days, 3.7 vs. 2.0; P = 0.003), higher application of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (20.0% vs. 6.0%; P = 0.049), higher incidence of pneumonia (42.9% vs. 20.0%; P = 0.023), and higher 90-day mortality (22.9% vs. 6.0%; P = 0.023). The area under the curve of Crs for predicting 90-day mortality was 0.661 (P = 0.034). A higher Crs was a protective factor (hazard ratio = 0.925 [0.870-0.984)] P = 0.014). For lung transplant patients receiving VV-ECMO support, Crs < 25 ml/cmH2O is associated with more complications and higher 90-day mortality. As Crs is easily obtained at the bedside, it may be useful for predicting prognosis and guiding patient management.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2022 Part I: Lung Transplantation

These highlights focus on the research in lung transplantation (LTX) that was published in 2022 and includes the assessment and optimization of candidates for LTX, donor optimization, the use of organs from donation after circulatory death, and outcomes when using marginal or novel donors; recipient factors affecting LTX, including age, disease, the use of extracorporeal life support; and special situations, such as coronavirus disease2019, pediatric LTX, and retransplantation. The remainder of the article focuses on the perioperative management of LTX, including the perioperative risk factors for acute renal failure (acute kidney injury); the incidence and management of phrenic nerve injury, delirium, and pain; and the postoperative management of hyperammonemia, early postoperative infections, and the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA to detect rejection.

Postoperative conditions of rehabilitative interest in lung transplantation: a systematic review

Lung transplantation is an elective treatment option for end-stage respiratory diseases in which all medical therapy options have been exhausted. The current study aimed to identify updated information on the postoperative conditions that may impair rehabilitation after lung transplantation and to provide specific considerations of their clinical relevance during the recovery process. The present study is a systematic review conducted by searching three primary databases: the United States National Library of Medicine PubMed system, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The databases were searched for articles published from database inception until May 2024; at the end of the selection process, 27 documents were included in the final analysis. The retrieved material identified 19 conditions of rehabilitative interest that potentially affect the postoperative course: graft dysfunction, dysphagia, postsurgical pain, cognitive impairment, chronic lung allograft dysfunction-bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, phrenic nerve injury, delayed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning, airway clearance, refractory hypoxemia, mediastinitis, reduced oxidative capacity, sternal dehiscence, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), gastroparesis, ossification of the elbow, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, airway dehiscence, recurrent pleural effusion, and scapular prolapse. Although some patients are not amenable to rehabilitation techniques, others can significantly improve with rehabilitation.

Which strategy is better for lung transplantation: Cardiopulmonary bypass or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation?

Background: In lung transplantation surgery, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is essential for safety. Various support methods, including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and off-pump techniques, are used, with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) gaining prominence. However, consensus on the best support strategy is lacking.Purpose: This article reviews risks, benefits, and outcomes of different support strategies in lung transplantation. By consolidating knowledge, it aims to clarify selecting the most appropriate ECLS modality.Research Design: A comprehensive literature review examined CPB, off-pump techniques, and ECMO outcomes in lung transplantation, including surgical results and complications.Study Sample: Studies, including clinical trials and observational research, focused on ECLS in lung transplantation, both retrospective and prospective, providing a broad evidence base.Data Collection and/or Analysis: Selected studies were analyzed for surgical outcomes, complications, and survival rates associated with CPB, off-pump techniques, and ECMO to assess safety and effectiveness.Results: Off-pump techniques are preferred, with ECMO increasingly vital as a bridge to transplant, overshadowing CPB. However, ECMO entails hidden risks and higher costs. While safer than CPB, optimizing ECMO postoperative use and monitoring is crucial for success.Conclusions: Off-pump techniques are standard, but ECMO's role is expanding. Despite advantages, careful ECMO management is crucial due to hidden risks and costs. Future research should focus on refining ECMO use and monitoring to improve outcomes, emphasizing individualized approaches for LT recipients.