Neuron-specific enolase levels immediately following cardiovascular surgery is modulated by hemolysis due to cardiopulmonary bypass, making it unsuitable as a brain damage biomarker

Neuron-Specific Enolase and S100B as Biomarkers of Ischemic Brain Injury During Surgery

Biochemical markers can be used in addition to neuroimaging techniques to evaluate the extent of ischemic brain injuries and to enable earlier diagnosis and faster intervention following the ischemic event. Among the potential biomarkers of ischemic brain injuries during surgery, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100B are the most frequently studied and were shown to be the most promising. The aim of this review was to summarize the role of NSE and S100B as biomarkers of ischemic brain injuries that occur during selected surgical procedures, predominantly carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Some other invasive interventions that cause ischemic brain injuries, like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, were also included. We can conclude that these biomarkers can be useful for the evaluation of ischemic brain injuries that occur during various surgical procedures. They can help to determine the most optimal conditions for performing the surgery and therefore improve the procedures to consequently minimize brain damage caused during surgery. Because of a significant delay between sample collection and obtaining the results, they are not suitable for real-time assessment of brain injuries. Some improvement can be expected with the future development of laboratory methods. The association of the changes in NSE and S100B levels during surgery with potential consequences of ischemic brain injury have been described in numerous studies. However, even in a very homogenous group of surgical procedures like CEA, these findings cannot be summarized into a common final conclusion; therefore, the prognostic value of the two markers is not clearly supported at the present time.

Evaluation of silent brain injury in patients undergoing aorto-ostial coronary stent implantation

BACKGROUND

Aorto-ostial (AO) coronary interventions may be associated with multiple problems, including the potential embolization of atherothrombotic debris into the aorta and systemic circulation. Such embolization could theoretically lead to stroke or silent brain injury (SBI). In this study, we aimed to investigate whether there is an increased risk of SBI in patients undergoing AO stent implantation.

METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive patients undergoing AO stenting and 55 consecutive patients undergoing non-AO stenting were included. Venous blood samples were obtained before and 12 h after the procedure to measure neuron-specific enolase (NSE), which is a sensitive marker of brain injury. Newly developed NSE elevation after the procedure in an asymptomatic patient was defined as SBI.

RESULTS

SBI was detected in 24 (43.6%) patients in the AO stenting group and 17 (30.9%) patients in the non-AO stenting group (p = .167). Although the SBI rates were statistically comparable between the groups, the presence of significant (≥50%) AO stenosis was found to be an independent predictor of SBI in multivariate logistic regression analysis [odds ratio (OR) 2.856; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.057-7.716; p = .038]. A longer procedure time was another independent predictor for the development of SBI (OR 1.037; 95% CI 1.005-1.069; p = .023).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that AO stenting may be associated with an increased risk of SBI if the lesion in the ostium is significant.

Establishing Neuron-Specific Enolase Reference Intervals: A Comparative Analysis of Partitioned Approach- and Gender-Based Continuous Age- and Season-Related Models

Background/Objectives: Static reference intervals (RIs) fail to capture the dynamic changes in bioanalytes. This study aimed to develop gender-based continuous age- and season-related RIs for neuron-specific enolase (NSE) using real-world data and to compare them with partitioned RIs. Methods: The NSE results from 4097 individuals were included after rigorous screening. Partitioned RIs were determined using the Hoffmann method. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) were selected to develop continuous RIs. Results: The partitioned RIs are as follows: <16.4 µg/L for males aged ≥19 years; <14.47 µg/L for females aged 19-49 years; and <17.25 µg/L for females aged ≥50 years. For continuous RIs, NSE levels in males remain stable with age, while in females, NSE levels evidently increase around the age of 50. Although less impactful than age, seasonal changes still affect NSE levels. Dynamic changes and continuous RIs for NSE are visualized in this study. Conclusions: We developed gender-based continuous age- and season-integrated RIs for NSE in North China, highlighting the variation in NSE levels in females with age and season. Compared to static RIs, continuous RIs are more responsive to NSE, potentially enhancing the precision and individualization of health assessments.

Neuron-Specific Enolase-What Are We Measuring?

Since the discovery of the neuron-specific protein by Moore and McGregor in 1965, tens of thousands of studies have investigated the basic and applied significance of neuron-specific enolase (NSE). This promising biomarker, according to many researchers, has not found widespread use in clinical practice, particularly in acute cerebrovascular accidents. Moreover, the several studies refuting the usefulness of serum NSE measurement in critically ill patients leads us to consider the reasons for such contradictory conclusions. In this article, we have analyzed the main directions in the study of NSE and expressed our perspective on the reasons for the contradictory results and the difficulties in implementing the results of these studies in clinical practice. In our opinion, the method of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) used in the majority of the studies is inappropriate for the evaluation of NSE as a marker of central nervous system damage, because it does not allow for the differentiation of heterodimers of enolases and the assessment of the enzymatic activity of this group of enzymatic proteins. Therefore, the methodological approach for the evaluation of NSE (γγ-enolase) as a biomarker needs to be elaborated and improved. Furthermore, the specificity of the applied research methods and the appropriateness of the continued use of the term "neuron-specific enolase" must be addressed.

Performance of biomarkers NF-L, NSE, Tau and GFAP in blood and cerebrospinal fluid in rat for the detection of nervous system injury

Background

Target organ toxicity is often a reason for attritions in nonclinical and clinical drug development. Leveraging emerging safety biomarkers in nonclinical studies provides an opportunity to monitor such toxicities early and efficiently, potentially translating to early clinical trials. As a part of the European Union's Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), two projects have focused on evaluating safety biomarkers of nervous system (NS) toxicity: Translational Safety Biomarker Pipeline (TransBioLine) and Neurotoxicity De-Risking in Preclinical Drug Discovery (NeuroDeRisk).

Methods

Performance of fluid-based NS injury biomarker candidates neurofilament light chain (NF-L), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neuron specific enolase (NSE) and total Tau in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was evaluated in 15 rat in vivo studies. Model nervous system toxicants as well as other compounds were used to evaluate sensitivity and specificity. Histopathologic assessments of nervous tissues and behavioral observations were conducted to detect and characterize NS injuries. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to compare the relative performance of the biomarkers in their ability to detect NS injury.

Results

NF-L was the best performer in detecting both peripheral nervous system (PNS) and CNS injury in plasma, (AUC of 0.97-0.99; respectively). In CSF, Tau correlated the best with CNS (AUC 0.97), but not PNS injury. NSE and GFAP were suitable for monitoring CNS injury, but with lesser sensitivity. In summary, NF-L is a sensitive and specific biomarker in rats for detecting compound-induced central and peripheral NS injuries. While NF-L measurement alone cannot inform the site of the injury, addition of biomarkers like Tau and NSE and analysis in both blood and CSF can provide additional information about the origin of the NS injury.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate the utility of emerging safety biomarkers of drug-induced NS injury in rats and provide additional supporting evidence for biomarker translation across species and potential use in clinical settings to monitor drug-induced NS injury in patients.