B cell depletion for autoimmune diseases in paediatric patients

Treatment of mixed connective tissue disease: A multicenter retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) is a rare systemic disorder that belongs to connective tissue diseases (CTD). Few studies are available on MCTD treatment.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study within the French MCTD cohort. Data were collected at diagnosis, during follow-up, and at the last follow-up (LFU). We studied three treatment groups i) no treatment, ii) hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and/or glucocorticoids (GC) and iii) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)/immunosuppressant (IS).

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifteen patients were included and followed for 96 [40-156] months. At MCTD diagnosis, 52 (16.5 %) patients were treatment-free, while 224 (71.1 %) received GC and/or HCQ and 39 (12.4 %) received DMARDs and/or IS. During follow-up, 10 (3.2 %) patients remained treatment-free, and 77 (24.4 %) were GC-free. Most patients (n = 271; 85.8 %) received HCQ, and 161 (51.1 %) were treated with DMARDs and/or IS. DMARDs and/or IS, including anti-B cell therapeutics, were more frequently prescribed in patients with musculoskeletal involvement (p < 0.0001), interstitial lung disease (ILD, p < 0.0001) and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, p < 0.01). Patients in clinical remission and those who did not evolve to a differentiated CTD (MCTD-dCTD) received significantly less frequently DMARDs and/or IS (including anti-B cell therapeutics; p < 0.0001 for both). Patients who received HCQ at MCTD diagnosis appeared to develop less frequently ILD or PAH (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

HCQ and GC were the cornerstones of MCTD treatment and were sufficient to control disease manifestations in nearly half of the patients, reflecting the good prognosis of this disease. DMARDs and IS were used for musculoskeletal involvement, PAH/ILD, and in MCTD-dCTD patients.

Safety and efficacy of biologics in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus: a critical systematic review

Biologic agents are increasingly being used to treat adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the available data on biologic agents' use in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) remains limited. To collate available evidence related to the efficacy and safety of using biologic agents in cSLE. The study followed the PRISMA checklist for reporting the data and conducted a thorough search using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from January 2005 to August 2023. Only articles meeting specific criteria were included, focusing on cSLE, the use of biologic agents, and having outcome measures at six- and 12-month follow-ups for safety and efficacy. Case reports were excluded, and four independent reviewers screened the articles for accuracy, with a fifth reviewer resolving any discrepancies that arose to achieve a consensus. The final selection included 18 studies with a total of 593 patients treated with biologic agents for severe and/ or refractory cSLE. The most common indication for using biologic agents was lupus nephritis. Rituximab was used in 12 studies, while belimumab was used in six studies. The studies evaluated the efficacy of biologic agents based on SLE disease activity scores, laboratory parameter improvements, and reduced corticosteroid dosage. Positive outcomes were reported, with improvements in renal, hematologic, and immunologic parameters along with mild adverse effects, mostly related to mild infections and infusion reactions. Belimumab and rituximab have shown promise as potential treatments for severe and refractory cSLE cases, leading to decreased disease activity and complete or partial remission in many patients with an acceptable safety profile. However, further research is needed to better understand their benefits and potential risks in these patients. Key Points • This review emphasizes the lack of sufficient randomized controlled trials exploring the use of biologics in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE). • Treatment plans for cSLE are being derived from those used for adult systemic lupus erythematosus. • According to current evidence, belimumab and rituximab can be potential treatment options for refractory and severe cases of cSLE. • Additional studies are required to reach more definitive conclusions.

Biologic drugs in the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis: a literature review

There is no clear consensus in the literature regarding the choice of biologic therapies and efficacy in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). In this review, we aimed to examine previous studies regarding biologic drug use in JDM patients. We screened MEDLINE and Scopus for articles involving JDM patients treated with biologic drugs. We identified 74 articles describing 495 JDM patients treated with biologic drugs (538 biologic treatments) during our literature search. The median (min-max) age of these patients was 9.8 (1-17) years (F/M:1.8). The most frequently used biologic drugs were rituximab (RTX, 50%) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (34.8%). In a few cases, abatacept (4.3%), anti-interleukin-1 agents (0.9%), tocilizumab (0.9%), bortezomib (0.4%), ustekinumab (0.2%), eculizumab (0.2%), and golimumab (0.2%) were used. RTX was most frequently preferred in patients with severe skin involvement (46.3%). Improvement with RTX was obtained in 60.1% of RTX treatments. Infliximab was most frequently preferred in calcinosis (43.3%), while adalimumab in skin involvement (50%) and etanercept in resistant/recurrent diseases (80%). Improvement was achieved in 44.4% of anti-TNF treatments. Adverse events were observed in 46.8% (58/124) of all treatments. Our results suggest that biologic agents may be a promising alternative for the treatment of particularly resistant JDM cases. Controlled studies are required to provide higher level of evidence for the timing of biologic use in JDM treatment. Key Points • There is no consensus on the choice and efficacy of biologic therapies in JDM. • RTX and TNF inhibitors are the most commonly used biologic drugs. • Biologics were especially preferred in severe skin involvement, calcinosis, and resistant diseases.

B Cells on the Stage of Inflammation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Leading or Supporting Actors in Disease Pathogenesis?

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a term that collectively refers to a group of chronic childhood arthritides, which together constitute the most common rheumatic condition in children. The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria define seven categories of JIA: oligoarticular, polyarticular rheumatoid factor (RF) negative (RF-), polyarticular RF positive (RF+), systemic, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis. The ILAR classification includes persistent and extended oligoarthritis as subcategories of oligoarticular JIA, but not as distinct categories. JIA is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process affecting the synovia that begins before the age of 16 and persists at least 6 weeks. If not treated, JIA can cause significant disability and loss of quality of life. Treatment of JIA is adjusted according to the severity of the disease as combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), synthetic and/ or biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Although the disease etiology is unknown, disturbances in innate and adaptive immune responses have been implicated in JIA development. B cells may have important roles in JIA pathogenesis through autoantibody production, antigen presentation, cytokine release and/ or T cell activation. The study of B cells has not been extensively explored in JIA, but evidence from the literature suggests that B cells might have indeed a relevant role in JIA pathophysiology. The detection of autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA), RF and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) in JIA patients supports a breakdown in B cell tolerance. Furthermore, alterations in B cell subpopulations have been documented in peripheral blood and synovial fluid from JIA patients. In fact, altered B cell homeostasis, B cell differentiation and B cell hyperactivity have been described in JIA. Of note, B cell depletion therapy with rituximab has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment in children with JIA, which further supports B cell intervention in disease development.

Rituximab use in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: Indications, efficacy and safety in an Indian cohort

Introduction: Children with systemic lupus erythematosus have a more challenging and difficult course as compared to their adult counterparts. Today, the aim of therapy for any child with lupus is to keep the child in a state of sustained remission with minimal or no use of steroids. This laudable goal is often difficult to achieve for the child with lupus. In addition to the use of disease modifying agents, sometimes in combination, Rituximab (RTX) is also used as an off-label indication to manage such patients.Objectives: To study the use, efficacy and safety of RTX in a cohort of patients with pediatric lupus followed at a single tertiary level center in Northern India.Methods: This paper is a retrospective review looking at the use of RTX in children with systemic lupus at a tertiary level pediatric rheumatology center in North India over a period of seventeen years. This paper describes the indications, use, efficacy and safety of RTX in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus.Results: RTX was used in 17 of 225 pediatric lupus patients (7.5%), with the most common indication being resistant renal disease (53%). Significant improvement was seen in all domains studied: The mean SLEDAI was 16.25 prior to RTX and reduced to 1.43 six months after the RTX (p value 0.001), steroid use dropped from 100% pre- RTX to 33% at 2 years, there was a sustained reduction in proteinuria in the patients with nephritis from a mean urine spot protein creatinine ratio of 3.1 pre RTX to 0.4 at one year post RTX (p= .006). Finally, 82% of the children had no flare during the follow up (median 24 months). No patient had any adverse event.Conclusions: This study confirms that RTX is very effective in childhood lupus and can be safely used even in a country with a very high burden of infectious diseases. This data adds to the scarce literature in this area from the developing world.

Advancing the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Treatment for juvenile idiopathic arthritis has undergone substantial changes in recent decades. These changes are partly due to the availability of new treatments, mainly biological agents, as well as developments in treatment strategies, including a focus on concepts such as treat-to-target. In addition, the creation of large paediatric research networks has improved patient access to, and design of, clinical trials for rare paediatric diseases. Although these advances have resulted in improvements in care for most patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, certain subgroups of patients continue to have a poor prognosis. Further research aims to identify patients in these subgroups early, to personalise their care, improve functional outcomes, and minimise long-term damage and harm. Optimising the duration of therapy for those individuals who require systemic immunosuppression is also of importance. Incorporation of novel biomarkers in combination with validated clinical measures in an effort to predict outcomes and target therapy accordingly is an exciting development.

Recent progress in the treatment of non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the joints and other organs that occurs in 1 in 1,000 children in the United States. Given the various categories of JIA, interpretation of the literature can be difficult. In this review, new developments in understanding non-systemic JIA and its treatment will be covered. Recent advances in the journey toward personalized treatment in JIA will be highlighted, including a review of currently available biologic modifiers. Uveitis and the temporomandibular joint will be discussed as particularly challenging treatment issues. Recent guideline updates and literature-guided treatment decisions will be reviewed.

A Retrospective Analysis of Rituximab Treatment for B Cell Depletion in Different Pediatric Indications

Background: Rituximab (RTX) is used in cancer therapy as well as in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and alloimmune responses after transplantation. It depletes the disease-causing B cells by binding to the CD (cluster of differentiation) 20 antigen. We evaluate different pediatric treatment protocols (via fixed treatment schedule, B cell- or symptom-controlled) and their therapeutic effects. Methods: Demographic information, clinical and laboratory characteristics, and special laboratory values such as immunoglobulin G (IgG), CD19 positive B cells and Epstein-Barr viral load were retrospectively analyzed in children treated with RTX between 2008 and 2016. Results: Seventy-six patients aged 1 to 19 (median 13) years were treated with 259 RTX infusions. The spectrum of diseases was very heterogeneous. RTX led to a complete depletion of the B cells. The reconstitution time varied between patients and was dependent on the application schedule (median 11.8 months). Fourteen out of 27 (52%) patients developed hypogammaglobulinaemia. The risk of IgG deficiency was 2.6 times higher in children under 4 years of age than in olderones. In the last group IgG deficiency developed in only 38% of the cases (n = 8). Recurrent and severe infections were observed each in 11/72 (15%) patients. Treatment-related reactions occurred in 24/76 (32%) cases; however, treatment had to be discontinued in only 1 case. In 16/25 (76%), the Epstein-Barr viral load dropped below the detection limit after the first RTX infusion. Conclusion: RTX is an effective and well-tolerated drug for the treatment of oncological diseases as well as autoimmune and alloimmune conditions in children. B cell depletion and reconstitution varies both intra- und interindividually, suggesting that symptom-oriented and B cell-controlled therapy may be favorable. Treatment-related reactions, IgG deficiency and infections must be taken into account.

Adjuvant rituximab, a potential treatment for the young patient with Graves' hyperthyroidism (RiGD): study protocol for a single-arm, single-stage, phase II trial

INTRODUCTION

Graves' disease (Graves' hyperthyroidism) is a challenging condition for the young person and their family. The excess thyroid hormone generated by autoimmune stimulation of the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor on the thyroid gland can have a profound impact on well-being. Managing the young person with Graves' hyperthyroidism is more difficult than in older people because the side effects of conventional treatment are more significant in this age group and because the disease tends not to resolve spontaneously in the short to medium term. New immunomodulatory agents are available and the anti-B cell monoclonal antibody rituximab is of particular interest because it targets cells that manufacture the antibodies that stimulate the thyroid gland in Graves'.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The trial aims to establish whether the combination of a single dose of rituximab (500 mg) and a 12-month course of antithyroid drug (usually carbimazole) can result in a meaningful increase in the proportion of patients in remission at 2 years, the primary endpoint. A single-stage, phase II A'Hern design is used. 27 patients aged 12-20 years with newly presenting Graves' hyperthyroidism will be recruited. Markers of immune function, including lymphocyte numbers and antibody levels (total and specific), will be collected regularly throughout the trial.

DISCUSSION

The trial will determine whether the immunomodulatory medication, rituximab, will facilitate remission above and beyond that observed with antithyroid drug alone. A meaningful increase in the expected proportion of young patients entering remission when managed according to the trial protocol will justify consideration of a phase III trial.Ethics and dissemination The trial has received a favourable ethical opinion (North East - Tyne and Wear South Research Ethics Committee, reference 16/NE/0253, EudraCT number 2016-000209-35). The results of this trial will be distributed at international endocrine meetings, in the peer-reviewed literature and via patient support groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN20381716.

Facts and controversies in mixed connective tissue disease

Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) is a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) characterised by the combination of clinical manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), cutaneous systemic sclerosis (SSc) and polymyositis-dermatomyositis, in the presence of elevated titers of anti-U1-RNP antibodies. Main symptoms of the disease are polyarthritis, hand oedema, Raynaud's phenomenon, sclerodactyly, myositis and oesophageal hypomobility. Although widely discussed, most authors today accept MCTD as an independent entity. Others, however, suggest that these patients may belong to subgroups or early stages of certain definite connective diseases, such as SLE or SSc, or are, in fact, SARD overlap syndromes.

Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in the Management of Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab for treating pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE).

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in children with pSLE. Data from studies performed before July 2016 were collected from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the International Rheumatic Disease Abstracts, with no language restrictions. Study eligibility criteria included clinical trials and observational studies with a minimal sample size of 5 patients, regarding treatment with rituximab in patients with refractory pSLE (aged <18 years at the time of diagnosis). Independent extraction of articles was performed by 2 investigators using predefined data fields.

RESULTS

Twelve case series met the criteria for data extraction for the systematic review with a good quality assessment according to an 18-criteria checklist using a modified Delphi method. Among them, 3 studies were multicenter and 3 were prospective. The total number of patients was 272. Studies collected patients with active disease refractory to steroids and immunosuppressant drugs. Refractory lupus nephritis was the most common indication (33%). Acceptable evidence suggested improvements in renal, neuropsychiatric and haematological manifestations, disease activity, complement and anti-double stranded Desoxy-Nucleo-Adenosine, with a steroid-sparing effect. However, there was poor evidence suggesting efficacy on arthralgia, photosensitivity, and mucocutaneous manifestations of SLE in children. An overall acceptable safety profile with few major adverse events was shown.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab exhibited a satisfactory profile regarding efficacy and safety indicating that this agent is a promising therapy for pSLE and should be further investigated.

[Evidence of treatment of chronic inflammation in childhood and adolescence with biologics]

BACKGROUND

Biologics, usually monoclonal antibodies or fusion proteins, are thought to specifically interfere with immunopathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases. In order to test these substances also in children and adolescents, financial incentives for manufacturers were created and classification of chronic inflammatory diseases and definition of disease activity, improvement, relapse and remission were established and large international research cooperation projects were founded.

METHODS

A selective literature search was carried out for treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases in children and adolescents with biologics including current guidelines.

RESULTS

Only 7 out of 18 prescribed biologics have been approved for children and mostly within narrow limits. The evidence for efficacy is based on four randomized double blind placebo-controlled studies, seven withdrawal studies and seven observational studies. In spite of the limited evidence in comparison to their use in adult patients these substances are broadly used worldwide and have enlarged and substantially improved the therapeutic choices in children when conventional treatment failed or proved to be toxic. Severe adverse events including infections occasionally occur (0.01-0.03 events per patient year) but the rate of malignancies is not obviously increased; however, only two thirds of patients respond to treatment. Improvement is often incomplete, some patients deteriorate and definite termination of drug treatment is possible in only a few patients.

CONCLUSION

As the prescription of biologics has become an important issue of treatment but is based on insufficient evidence data, further studies are necessary in children and adolescents with diseases, such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and inherited fever syndromes. As many drugs are available these studies can be conducted against verum.

Rituximab use in young adults diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis unresponsive to conventional treatment: report of 6 cases

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in childhood. Without an effective therapy, patients may progress quickly to functional disability. Recently, depletion of B cells emerged as a new approach for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, including JIA. We describe six cases of JIA patients followed at a referral center for Rheumatology and Pediatric Rheumatology, submitted to treatment with rituximab (RTX) after refractoriness to three anti-TNF agents. Patients received RTX cycles with two infusions every six months. Response to treatment was assessed by DAS28, HAQ/CHAQ, and an overall assessment by the doctor and the patient. Of our six patients, four were girls (mean age at onset of disease: 6.1 years; mean disease evolution time: 15.1 years; mean age upon receiving RTX: 21.6 years). Four patients belonged to polyarticular subtype (1 rheumatoid factor [RF]-negative, 3 FR-positive), a patient with systemic JIA subtype with a polyarticular course and arthritis related to enthesitis. Of our six patients, five responded to treatment; and during the course of 12 months, the clinical response was maintained, although not sustained. However, discontinuation by infusion reactions caused the withdrawal of RTX in two patients. The use of RTX in JIA is restricted to cases refractory to other biological agents and, even considering that this study was held in a small number of advanced patients, RTX proved to be an effective therapeutic option.

Republished: new age of biological therapies in paediatric rheumatology

Many paediatric rheumatic diseases result from the abnormal activation or control of the immune system. Biologic drugs, which are synthesised within a biological system, have been designed to target specific molecules involved in cytokine signalling or cell-cell interactions. The past 15 years have seen a revolution in the range of effective treatments for rheumatic diseases, particularly juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). As a result, the target of inactive disease and minimal long-term disease-associated damage is increasingly becoming achievable. In this article we review evidence from recent trials of the use of biologic drugs in the treatment of systemic JIA, juvenile dermatomyositis and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. We also highlight novel agents currently undergoing investigation which may broaden our therapeutic armamentarium over the coming decade. Key to these developments are well-designed multicentre controlled clinical trials and long-term safety monitoring as part of international drug registries.

Rituximab therapy has a rapid and durable response for refractory cytopenia in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

Objectives

Autoimmune thrombocytopenia (AITP) and hemolytic anemia (AIHA) are common in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) and may be refractory to conventional therapies. Our objectives were to: (a) examine our experience; (b) determine the rate and durability of response to rituximab; and (c) evaluate its safety in our cSLE population with refractory cytopenias.

Methods

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of cSLE patients with refractory AITP or AIHA treated with rituximab between 2003 and 2012. Outcomes included the time to complete clinical response, time to B-cell depletion, duration of response and time to flare. Adverse events were also analyzed.

Results

Twenty-four (6%) of 394 cSLE patients received rituximab for refractory cytopenia. The indication was AITP in 16 (67%), AIHA in five (21%) and both in three (13%) patients. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) time from cytopenia onset to rituximab therapy was 16 (7–27) months for AITP and 10 (2–29) months for AIHA. Complete response following the first course of rituximab occurred at a median (IQR) of 48 (14–103) days, only one patient failed to respond. Five (21%) patients had one or more flare episodes at 22 (15–27) months. Infusion reactions were rare and one infection with herpes zoster required hospitalization in the first 12 months. Three of four patients with low IgG levels prior to the first rituximab course developed persistent hypogammaglobulinemia, and three patients have required intravenous immunoglobulin replacement.

Conclusion

Rituximab appears to be a well-tolerated, safe and long-lasting therapy for cSLE patients with refractory AITP and/or AIHA. Caution should be exercised when considering rituximab for patients with preexisting hypogammaglobulinemia.

The development and assessment of biological treatments for children

The development of biological agents with specific immunological targets has revolutionized the treatment of a wide variety of paediatric diseases where traditional immunosuppressive agents have been partly ineffective or intolerable. The increasing requirement for pharmaceutical companies to undertake paediatric studies has provided impetus for studies of biologics in children. The assessment of biological agents in children to date has largely relied upon randomized controlled trials using a withdrawal design, rather than a parallel study design. This approach has been largely used due to ethical concerns, including use of placebo treatments in children with active chronic disease, and justified on the basis that treatments have usually already undergone robust assessment in related adult conditions. However, this study design limits the reliability of the data and can confuse the interpretation of safety results. Careful ongoing monitoring of safety and efficacy in real-world practice through national and international biologics registries and robust reporting systems is crucial. The most commonly used biological agents in children target tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1, interleukin-6 and cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated antigen-4. These agents are most frequently used in paediatric rheumatic diseases. This review discusses the development and assessment of biologics within paediatric rheumatology with reference to the lessons learned from use in other subspecialties.

Safety and efficacy of rituximab in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus and other rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVE

Rituximab (RTX) has been used to treat many pediatric autoimmune conditions. We investigated the safety and efficacy of RTX in a variety of pediatric autoimmune diseases, especially systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Retrospective study of children treated with RTX. Effectiveness data was recorded for patients with at least 12 months of followup; safety data was recorded for all subjects.

RESULTS

The study included 104 children; 50 had SLE. Improvements in corticosteroid dosage, physician's global assessment of disease activity, and SLE-associated markers of disease activity were seen. The incidence of hospitalized infections was similar to previous studies of patients with childhood-onset SLE.

CONCLUSION

RTX can be safely administered to children and appears to contribute to decreased disease activity and steroid burden.

Successful treatment of relapsing autoimmune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with rituximab

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare but life-threatening condition characterized by thrombotic microangiopathy. The standard treatment for TTP is plasmapheresis. For refractory or relapsing cases, various immunosuppressive agents have been tried, and among them rituximab has shown promising results. TTP is rarer in the pediatric age group and the use of rituximab in children with TTP is limited. Reported herein is the successful treatment of relapsing autoimmune TTP with rituximab in a 12-year-old girl.

New age of biological therapies in paediatric rheumatology

Many paediatric rheumatic diseases result from the abnormal activation or control of the immune system. Biologic drugs, which are synthesised within a biological system, have been designed to target specific molecules involved in cytokine signalling or cell-cell interactions. The past 15 years have seen a revolution in the range of effective treatments for rheumatic diseases, particularly juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). As a result, the target of inactive disease and minimal long-term disease-associated damage is increasingly becoming achievable. In this article we review evidence from recent trials of the use of biologic drugs in the treatment of systemic JIA, juvenile dermatomyositis and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. We also highlight novel agents currently undergoing investigation which may broaden our therapeutic armamentarium over the coming decade. Key to these developments are well-designed multicentre controlled clinical trials and long-term safety monitoring as part of international drug registries.

Treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a revolution in care

A generation ago, children with arthritis faced a lifetime of pain and disability. Today, there are a multitude of treatment options, including a variety of biologics targeting key cytokines and other inflammatory mediators. While non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids were once the mainstay of therapy, they are now largely used as bridge or adjunctive therapies. Among the conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, methotrexate remains first-line therapy for most children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) due to its long track record of safety and effectiveness in the management of peripheral arthritis. Sulfasalazine and leflunomide may also have a secondary role. The tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have shown tremendous benefit in children with polyarticular JIA and likely in enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriatic JIA as well. There may be additional benefit in combining TNFi with methotrexate. Abatacept and tocilizumab also appear to benefit polyarticular JIA; the role of rituximab remains unclear. For the treatment of systemic JIA, while the TNFi are of less benefit, blockade of interleukin-1 or interleukin-6 is highly effective. Additionally, interleukin-1 blockade appears to be effective treatment of macrophage activation syndrome, one of the most dangerous complications of JIA; specifically, anakinra in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids may obviate the need for cytotoxic approaches. In contrast, methotrexate along with the TNFi and abatacept are effective agents for the management of uveitis, another complication of JIA. Overall, the biologics have demonstrated an impressive safety record in children with JIA, although children do need to be monitored for rare but potentially dangerous adverse events, such as tuberculosis and other infections; paradoxical development of additional autoimmune diseases; and possibly an increased risk of malignancy. Finally, there may be a window of opportunity during which children with JIA will demonstrate most optimal responses to aggressive therapy, underscoring the need for rapid diagnosis and initiation of treatment.

Antibody therapy of pediatric B-cell lymphoma

B-cell lymphoma in children accounts for about 10% of all pediatric malignancies. Chemotherapy has been very successful leading to an over-all 5-year survival between 80 and 90% depending on lymphoma type and extent of disease. Therapeutic toxicity remains high calling for better targeted and thus less toxic therapies. Therapeutic antibodies have become a standard element of B-cell lymphoma therapy in adults. Clinical experience in pediatric lymphoma patients is still very limited. This review outlines the rationale for antibody treatment of B-cell lymphomas in children and describes potential target structures on B-cell lymphoma cells. It summarizes the clinical experience of antibody therapy of B-cell lymphoma in children and gives an outlook on new developments and challenges for antibody therapy of pediatric B-cell lymphoma.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: management and therapeutic options

THE GOALS OF TREATMENT FOR JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS (JIA) INCLUDE: suppression of inflammation, achievement of remission, relief of pain, maintenance of function and doing so with minimal toxicity. Important discoveries over the past 10-15 years have led to more targeted treatments for children with JIA. The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) classification system for childhood arthritides, better assessment tools for clinical response, improved definitions of remission, new imaging techniques and evidence in gene expression profiling have all contributed to the development of more targeted treatments. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents still have a role in mild disease and intra-articular steroid injections continue to be used most commonly in patients with oligoarticular JIA. Disease-modifying agents such as methotrexate have demonstrated efficacy and safety; however, in many patients, the disease remains active despite this treatment. These children now receive more targeted treatment including the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors, interleukin-1 blockade, interleukin-6 blockade, selective costimulation modulators and selective B-cell blockade. The biologic targeted therapies have changed the strategy in which we treat our children with JIA; however, there remains much to be learned about the long-term effects and safety of these medicines.

Elevated BAFF (BLyS) and APRIL in Juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients: relation to clinical manifestations and disease activity

OBJECTIVE

To assess the level of B-cell activating factor belonging to the tumor necrosis factor family (BAFF) also known as B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) and A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) in the serum of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients and to detect their relation to the clinical manifestations and disease activity in the different subtypes of the disease.

METHODS

Seventy-four consecutively recruited JIA patients were clinically examined, the Juvenile arthritis disease activity score in 27 joints (JADAS-27) calculated and Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) used to measure the functional status. Thirty-four healthy matched children served as controls. Routine laboratory examinations were recorded and serum BAFF and April were determined.

RESULTS

The JIA patients were 20 systemic-onset, 31 oligoarticular and 23 polyarticular. Serum BAFF and APRIL were elevated in JIA patients being higher in systemic onset and both significantly correlated. APRIL significantly correlated with both JADAS-27 and CHAQ scores while BAFF correlated only with JADAS-27. The APRIL serum levels were significantly associated with the presence of RF and ANA. The BAFF serum levels were significantly higher in oligoarticular onset JIA patients with uveitis compared to those without.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest increased BAFF and APRIL serum levels in JIA patients denoting their possible role in the disease and calling for additional research to elucidate the intrinsic mechanisms explaining APRIL and BAFF over expression.