Validation of the Portuguese version of the quality of life questionnaire of the European foundation for osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) in Brazilian women with postmenopausal osteoporosis with vertebral fracture

Enhancing the Opportunistic Bone Status Assessment Using Radiomics Based on Dual-Energy Spectral CT Material Decomposition Images

The dual-energy spectral CT (DEsCT) employs material decomposition (MD) technology, opening up novel avenues for the opportunistic assessment of bone status. Radiomics, a powerful tool for elucidating the structural and textural characteristics of bone, aids in the detection of mineral loss. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy of bone status assessment using both bone density measurements and radiomics models derived from MD images and to further explore the clinical value of radiomics models.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from 307 patients who underwent both quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and full-abdomen DEsCT scans at our institution. Based on QCT measurements, patients were divided into three categories: normal bone mineral density (BMD), osteopenia, and osteoporosis. Using the abdominal DEsCT data, six types of MD images were reconstructed, including HAP (Water), HAP (Fat), Ca (Water), Ca (Fat), Fat (Ca), and Fat (HAP). Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 214) and a validation cohort (n = 93) at a ratio of 7:3. Focusing on the L1 to L3 vertebrae, density values from the six MD images were measured. Six density value models and six radiomics models were constructed using a random forest (RF) classifier. The performance of these models in assessing bone status was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the DeLong test was employed to compare performance differences between the models.

RESULTS

The macro-area under the curve (AUC) values for the density value models based on HAP (Water), HAP (Fat), Ca (Water), and Ca (Fat) MD images were 0.870, 0.870, 0.847, and 0.765, respectively, which outperformed those of Fat (Ca) (AUC = 0.623) and Fat (HAP) (AUC = 0.618) density value models. In the comparison of radiomics models, the trends of model performance were consistent with the density value models across the six MD images. However, the models based on HAP (Water), Ca (Water), HAP (Fat), Ca (Fat), Fat (Ca), and Fat (HAP) images exhibited superior performance than those of the density value models with the corresponding MD images, with values of 0.946, 0.941, 0.934, 0.926, 0.831, and 0.824, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone status assessment can be accurately conducted using density values from HAP (Water), HAP (Fat), Ca (Water), and Ca (Fat) MD images. However, radiomics models derived from MD images surpass traditional density measurement methods in evaluating bone status, highlighting their superior diagnostic potential.

Health-related quality of life in osteoporosis: a systematic review of measurement properties of the QUALEFFO-41

The 41-item Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) is a widely used and freely available patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). However, data on its reliability, validity, and responsiveness remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review the measurement properties of the QUALEFFO-41. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane Library from their inception up to December 2022 was performed. Data were extracted, and the methodological quality of each measurement property was evaluated according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. The evidence of the measurement properties was rated against the updated criteria for good measurement properties, and the quality of evidence was graded using the modified GRADE approach. A total of 99 articles were identified, of which eight studies were included in the review. The QUALEFFO-41 is categorized as B as it demonstrated moderate quality evidence for sufficient content validity, moderate-to-high quality evidence for sufficient hypothesis testing for construct validity (except for the social function domain for convergent validity), and very low-quality evidence for sufficient responsiveness. For structural validity and internal consistency, only the domains of pain and general health perception were sufficient with low-quality evidence. For reliability, only the domain of physical function was sufficient with low-quality evidence. None of the studies reported measurement error, cross-cultural validity, and criterion validity. The QUALEFFO-41 may be a promising, valid, and reliable PROM to assess HRQoL in osteoporosis patients with vertebral fractures. However, future studies must focus on good methodological quality to strengthen the evidence of measurement properties, especially on structural validity, reliability, responsiveness, and cross-cultural validity. The systematic review evaluated the measurement properties of the QUALEFFO-41 questionnaire for assessing Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in osteoporosis patients. The review found moderate-to-high-quality evidence for construct validity but limited evidence for responsiveness and other properties. Future studies should focus on strengthening the evidence, particularly for structural validity, reliability, responsiveness, and cross-cultural validity. The QUALEFFO-41 shows promise as a valid and reliable PROM for HRQoL assessment in osteoporosis patients.

Quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Postmenopausal osteoporosis has become a global trend, which seriously affects women's quality of life. However, the differences remain unclear in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among postmenopausal women with normal bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and osteoporotic fractures. The aim of this study was to assess health-related quality of life in women with three different bone states.

METHODS

Databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were based on the search terms, and the search time was set from the inception of each database to January 2022. A study was included if the researchers used a validated quality of life questionnaire to investigate the quality of life of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteoporotic fractures. The random-effect model was used for meta-analysis, and the mean difference with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies that met the inclusion criteria were systematically reviewed, involving 2897 postmenopausal women, and 12 of them were included in the meta-analysis. Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis had worse overall HRQoL and different HRQoL dimensions compared with postmenopausal women with normal bone density. Compared with postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, postmenopausal women with osteoporotic fractures had worse overall HRQoL and individual dimensions of HRQoL, especially physical component summary (SMD = - 0.61, 95% CI, - 0.98 to - 0.24). Bone mineral density was positively associated with HRQoL, while fragility fracture severity was negatively associated with HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Postmenopausal osteoporosis and fragility fractures reduce HRQoL to varying degrees in women. More research should be done to reduce the incidence of the disease.

Transcultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41)

We translated and adapted transculturally the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) for Korean patients. The translated Korean version of QUALEFFO-41 showed satisfactory reliability and validity.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to translate the QUALEFFO-41 for Korean patients and then validate the Korean version of QUALEFFO-41.

METHODS

Translation and transcultural adaptation of the QUALEFFO-41 was conducted according to the international recommendations. Ninety-seven patients (mean age, 73.6 years) with osteoporosis were participated in validating the Korean version of QUALEFFO-41. To test reliability, internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. To test validity, convergent validity was assessed using correlation with the SF-12 and EQ-5D and discriminant validity was assessed using ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

The English version of QUALEFFO-41 was translated and adapted to Korean without notable discrepancies. The Korean QUALEFFO-41 had good reliability with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.733 to 0.942. QUALEFFO-41 had good correlations to SF-12 and EQ-5D. Compared with subjects without history of vertebral fracture (VF), those with history of VF showed significantly worse scores according to QUALEFFO-41, but not according to SF-12 or EQ-5D. ROC curve analysis revealed that the physical function domain of QUALEFFO-41 had significant ability to discriminate between subjects with and without history of VF, while SF-12 or EQ-5D did not.

CONCLUSIONS

The Korean version of QUALEFFO-41 demonstrated relevant internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant validity, which can be recommended to evaluate quality of life in Koreans.

The reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese version of Male QUALEFFO-26

The aim of the study was to investigate the reliability and validity of Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-26) in male osteoporosis patients from Chinese population. The simplified Chinese version of Male QUALEFFO-26 was translated and adapted on the basis of QUALEFFO-31, which was assigned to the cases and controls together with SF-36. Reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's α. Validity was assessed with Pearson's correlation analysis between the similar domains of the two questionnaires. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was carried out to determine the ability of male QUALEFFO-26 to discriminate between cases and controls. The ICC was 0.83 for pain domain, 0.79 for mental domain and 0.81 for physical function. Cronbach's α of each domain ranged from 0.82 to 0.89. Pearson correlation coefficients indicated significantly high correlations between corresponding domains of QUALEFFO-26 and SF-36, with r ranging from -0.523 to -0.832. ROC analysis showed that all the domains of QUALEFFO-26 were significantly predictive of vertebral deformity, with the values of AUC ranging from 0.68 to 0.84. The simplified Chinese version of Male QUALEFFO-26 was a valid, reliable and repeatable instrument showing favorable psychometric characteristics. The questionnaire can be used in male osteoporosis patients from Chinese population.

Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the quality of life questionnaire of the European foundation for osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-31)

PURPOSE

To translate quality of life questionnaire of the European foundation for osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-31) into a simplified Chinese version, and test its reliability and validity in osteoporosis patients from mainland Chinese population.

METHODS

Postmenopausal osteoporosis women with history of vertebral fracture were included as cases, and age-matched healthy female were included as controls. All subjects were from mainland China. The simplified Chinese version of QUALEFFO-31 and SF-36 were assigned to the two groups. Reliability was assessed using kappa statistics of agreement for each item and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's α. Pearson's correlation was used to assess convergent and discriminant validity.

RESULTS

Overall, 66 cases and 66 age-matched controls were included. The ICC for the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.76 to 0.91. Cronbach's α for pain, physical function, and mental function domains were 0.94, 0.87, and 0.79, respectively. Convergent validity and discriminant validity showed that each correlation coefficient between score of each item with total score of related domain was higher than that with total score of unrelated domain. Pearson's correlation coefficients indicated significantly high correlations between corresponding domains of QUALEFFO-31 and SF-36.

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified Chinese version of the QUALEFFO-31 is a reliable and valid outcome measure of functional status in patients with osteoporosis. This Chinese version of the QUALEFFO-31 can be utilized for future clinical studies in mainland China.

Validation of the Malay version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) in Malaysia

PURPOSE

To assess the validity and reliability of the Malay version of the Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) in Malaysia.

METHODS

The QUALEFFO-41 was translated from English to Malay and administered to 215 post-menopausal osteoporotic women ≥50 years who could understand Malay, at baseline and 4 weeks. The SF-36 was administered at baseline to assess convergent validity. To assess discriminative validity, patients with and without back pain were recruited.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the QUALEFFO-41 had five domains. Good internal consistency was seen in all domains (0.752-0.925) except for the social activity domain (0.692). Test-retest reliability showed adequate correlation for all items (0.752-0.964, p < 0.001). Patients with back pain had significantly worse QOL compared with those without (back pain = 42.2 ± 10.9, no back pain = 33.3 ± 8.9; p < 0.001). The total QUALEFFO-41 score and the SF-36 physical and mental composite scores were significantly correlated (-0.636 and -0.529, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The Malay version of the QUALEFFO-41 was found to be a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate the QOL of osteoporotic patients in Malaysia. To enable the QUALEFFO-41 to be used in a multiracial population, further studies should look into validating other versions of the QUALEFFO-41 in Malaysia.

An outcome measure of functionality and quality of life in Iranian women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a validation study of the QUALEFFO-41

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a very common disease and often results in vertebral fractures. The Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) is a tool to measure health-related quality of life in these patients. This study aimed to cross-culturally translate and validate the QUALEFFO-41 in Iran.

METHODS

This was a prospective clinical validation study. A forward-backward procedure was used to translate the questionnaire from English into Persian. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation were made in accordance with published guidelines. Patients were divided into two study groups according to the World Health Organization criteria: those with at least one vertebral fracture who had undergone surgery and those with osteoporosis and no fractures as a control group. All of the participants were assessed by both the QUALEFFO-41 and SF-36. The surgery group was asked to respond to the QUALEFFO-41 at two points in time: the pre- and postoperative assessments (6-month follow-up). To test reliability, the internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Validity was evaluated by assessing convergent validity between the QUALEFFO-41 and SF-36 and item-scale correlations and discriminatory ability. Internal responsiveness of the QUALEFFO-41 to the clinical intervention (surgery) also was evaluated comparing patients' pre- and postoperative scores.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients completed the questionnaire: 48 surgical patients and 101 as a control group. At the pre- and postoperative assessments, the QUALEFFO-41 showed adequate internal consistency in all domains (Cronbach's alpha of 0.71 to 0.81). Additionally, the correlation of each item with its hypothesized domain on the QUALEFFO-41 indicated acceptable results, suggesting that the items had a substantial relationship with their own domains. Further analysis also indicated that the questionnaire was responsive to change (P < 0.0001). Significant correlations existed between scores of similar subscales of the QUALEFFO-41 and SF-36 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings show that the Iranian version of the QUALEFFO-41 is a reliable and valid measure of functionality and quality-of-life evaluation among patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.