Methotrexate revisited: considerations for subcutaneous administration in RA

Psoriatic arthritis: A comprehensive review for the dermatologist-Part II: Screening and management

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a common comorbidity of psoriasis occurring in up to one-third of patients. Dermatologists hold an essential role in screening patients with psoriasis for PsA, since as many as 85% of patients develop psoriasis before PsA. Early detection and treatment of PsA are important for both short- and long-term patient outcomes and quality of life. Many factors must be weighed when selecting the appropriate therapy for PsA. One must consider the 'domains of disease' that are manifested, the disease severity, patient comorbidities, patient preferences (routes of dosing or frequency, as examples) as well as factors often outside of patient-physician control, such as access to medications based on insurance coverage and formularies. As many patients will have involvement of multiple domains of psoriatic disease, selecting the therapy that best captures the patient's disease is required. In this review, we will address PsA screening, diagnosis, therapeutic approach to psoriatic disease, comorbidity considerations, and comanagement.

Side Effects of Methotrexate and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: Differences in Tolerability Among Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective

To examine the prevalence of side effects with methotrexate (MTX) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

This retrospective analysis, conducted between January 2000 and January 2019, used data from the FORWARD databank. Adult patients enrolled in the registry with self‐reported and physician‐confirmed diagnosis of PsA or RA were included if they had completed at least one questionnaire before initiating and within 12 months following initiation of MTX or a TNFi. The primary outcome was to examine the prevalence of side effects with MTX and TNFi within the year following treatment initiation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between PsA and RA and the reporting of their side effects.

Results

Overall, 116 patients with PsA and 4247 patients with RA newly initiated MTX, and 124 patients with PsA and 4361 patients with RA newly initiated a TNFi. Patients with PsA were more likely to report MTX‐related side effects than those with RA (44.8% vs. 29.4%), whereas similar proportions of patients with PsA and RA reported TNFi‐related side effects within the first year (24.2% and 22.8%, respectively). Additionally, patients with PsA initiating MTX were more likely to report nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, depression, and tinnitus than patients with RA initiating MTX or those with PsA or RA initiating a TNFi.

Conclusion

Patients with PsA reported more side effects than patients with RA, and this difference was more pronounced in those receiving MTX versus TNFi.

High Efficacy Combined Microneedles Array with Methotrexate Nanocrystals for Effective Anti-Rheumatoid Arthritis

Introduction

Methotrexate (MTX) is the first-line drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in several countries. However, MTX has an extremely low solubility in water, and the side effects caused by its delivery mode restrict its curative effect. In this study, we designed a dissolving microneedles array (DMNA) containing MTX nanocrystals (MTX-NCs) (MTX-NC@DMNA) to improve the treatment of RA. DMNA-based drug delivery combines the advantages of patient compliance with the use of transdermal drug delivery systems and high-efficiency injection administration; thus, it can mitigate the side effects that result from current administration routes. Carrier-free and surfactant-free MTX-NCs were prepared to overcome bioavailability limitations and poor drug loading problems.

Methods

The MTX-NCs prepared by reverse solvent precipitation method was encapsulated in the DMNA. The morphology, mechanical properties, safety, stability and in vivo dissolution were evaluated, and its pharmacodynamic characteristics were assessed in a rat model of RA.

Results

The particle size of the MTX-NCs was 148.1 ± 10.1 nm. The MTX-NC@DMNA were found to be rigid enough to penetrate the skin and deliver the drug successfully. The results indicated effective skin recovery after removal of the DMNA. It was found that the MTX-NC@DMNA significantly reduced foot swelling in the rats and regulated the balance in the levels of related cytokines. It also reduced pathological damage to the synovium, joint, and cartilage, and effectively alleviated organ injury in the rats.

Conclusion

Transdermal administration of MTX-NC@DMNA may be an effective approach for treating RA.

Anti-proliferation and anti-inflammation effects of corilagin in rheumatoid arthritis by downregulating NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

The dried aboveground part of Geranium Wilfordii Maxim. (G. Wilfordii) is a traditional Chinese herbal medicine named lao-guan-cao. It has long been used for dispelling wind-dampness, unblocking meridians, and stopping diarrhea and dysentery. Previous investigations have revealed that 50% ethanolic extract of G. Wilfordii has anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferation activities on TNF-α induced murine fibrosarcoma L929 cells. Corilagin (COR) is a main compound in G. Wilfordii with the content up to 1.69 mg/g. Pharmacology study showed that COR has anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, anti-microorganism, anti-oxidant, and hepatoprotective effects. However, there is no any investigation on its anti-proliferation and anti-inflammation effects in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

AIM OF THE STUDY

The present study aimed to evaluate the potential pharmacological mechanisms of anti-proliferation and anti-inflammation effects of COR in RA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In vitro, MH7A cells model induced by IL-1β was used. The anti-proliferation activity of COR was assessed by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, and the anti-migration and anti-invasion activity of COR was determined by wound healing assay and transwell assay, respectively. Furthermore, apoptosis assay by flow cytometer was used to measure the pro-apoptotic effect of COR. The mRNA expressions of Bax, Bcl-2, IL-6, IL-8, MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, COX-2, and iNOS were measured by qRT-PCR, and related protein were further verified by ELISA kits or Western blot. Moreover, protein levels associated with NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways of p65, P-p65, IκBα, P-IκBα, ERK1/2, P-ERK1/2, JNK, P-JNK1/2/3, p38, and P-p38 were determined by Western blot. The nuclear translocation of NF-κB-p65 was detected by immunofluorescent staining. In vivo, adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) rat model was used, and the body weight, paw swelling, and arthritis score during the entire period were measured. Histopathological analysis of joints of synovial tissues was also determined. The expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in serum including IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-17 were measured.

RESULTS

The in vitro results showed that COR could dose-dependently inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion of IL-1β-induced MH7A cells, as well as promote its apoptosis. Moreover, it also suppressed the over-expression of Bcl-2, IL-6, IL-8, MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, COX-2, and iNOS while up-regulated the level of Bax. Besides, the ratios of P-p65/p65, P-IκBα/IκBα, P-ERK/ERK, P-JNK/JNK, and P-p38/p38 were decreased, and the nuclear translocation of p65 induced by IL-1β was blocked by COR. In vivo results indicated that COR significantly reduced the paw swelling and arthritis score in AIA rats, and inhibited synovial tissue hyperplasia and erosion, as well as inflammatory cells infiltration. It also decreased the serum pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-17) production.

CONCLUSION

These results revealed that COR exerted anti-rheumatoid arthritis effect, and its underlying mechanisms may be related to inhibiting the proliferation, migration, and invasion of synovial fibroblasts, enhancing cell apoptosis, and suppressing inflammatory responses via downregulating NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways.

Optimising low-dose methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis-A review

Methotrexate at low doses (5-25 mg/week) is first-line therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. However, there is inter- and intrapatient variability in response, with contribution of variability in concentrations of active polyglutamate metabolites, associated with clinical efficacy and toxicity. Prescribing remains heterogeneous across population groups, disease states and regimens. This review examines current knowledge of dose-response of oral methotrexate in the setting of rheumatoid arthritis, and how this could help inform dosage regimens.

Effects and safety of Sinomenine in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis contrast to methotrexate: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the curative clinical efficacy and safety of sinomenine (SIN) in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in comparison to methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS

We searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Database, Pubmed and Cochrane Library electronically up to August 31, 2015, without language limitation. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Software Review Manager 5.3 was used for Meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 16 eligible studies within 1500 RA patients were included. The meta-analysis indicated that on basis of MTX, SIN was more effective in total effective rate (P < 0.000 01). Besides, SIN alone versus MTX also showed advantages in RA therapy (P = 0.04) Taken together, adverse events occurred less frequently in combination of SIN and MTX than MTX alone (P < 0.0001), especially in digestive system (P < 0.000 01),while occurred more in dermato mucosal system with SIN treatment versus MTX (P = 0.02), and were similar for both remedies in nervous system (P = 0.12) and hematological system (P = 0.25).

CONCLUTION

Compared to MTX, SIN had better clinical efficacy and relatively fewer adverse events in treatment of RA, especially when it was used together with MTX. Due to the poor methodological quality, well-designed, multiple-center RCTs are still required to further confirm the findings.

Inadequate response or intolerability to oral methotrexate: Is it optimal to switch to subcutaneous methotrexate prior to considering therapy with biologics?

Methotrexate (MTX) is considered an anchor drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. It is also the first-line therapy in a multitude of rheumatologic conditions. Low-dose oral MTX is the preliminary modality of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis due to its affordability, favorable outcomes, and limited risks. However, patients refractory to low-dose MTX therapy may require larger doses of oral MTX. Several studies in the past have demonstrated variability in bioavailability of oral MTX at high doses. This warrants a subsequent switch to parenteral MTX. Widely used among the parenteral preparations of MTX is subcutaneous (SC) MTX. SC MTX provides dependable efficacy, predictable bioavailability, sustained clinical outcomes, and minimal GI adverse effects. It is useful either singularly or in combination therapy regimens. Although SC MTX and intramuscular MTX have similar pharmacokinetics, SC MTX may be preferred by most patients. Development of prefilled syringes and auto-injectors have enabled self-administration of the medication providing the patients with a sense of independence and improved general well-being. Hence, SC MTX can prove to be more efficacious in patients refractory to oral MTX therapy or in patients experiencing severe gastrointestinal adverse effects.

Subcutaneous fluid and drug delivery: safe, efficient and inexpensive

Patients with difficult venous access or oral intolerance and clinical situations with inadequate response to oral therapy have generated the need for alternative routes of delivery for drugs and fluids.

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review examining the evidence for subcutaneous (SC) administration of drugs and/or fluids.

We used a broad search strategy using electronic databases CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane library, key terms and ‘Medical Subject Headings’ (MeSH) such as ‘subcutaneous route’, ‘hypodermoclysis’ and the name/group of the most used drugs via this route (e.g. ‘ketorolac, morphine, ceftriaxone’, ‘analgesics, opioids, antibiotics’).

We conclude that the SC route is an effective alternative for rehydration in patients with mild–moderate dehydration and offers a number of potential advantages in appropriately selected scenarios. Experience of administering drugs by this route suggests that it is well tolerated and is associated with minimal side-effects.