Impact of gender, work, and clinical presentation on diagnostic delay in Italian patients with primary ankylosing spondylitis

Causes of Sleep Disturbance in Early ASAS Spondyloarthritis: A Retrospective Long-Term Experience

Introduction: Sleep disturbance (SD) in the second half of the night due to inflammatory pain was included in the 2009 ASAS classification criteria of Spondyloarthritis (SpA), even though its definition is uncertain. Aim: We aimed to investigate SD in early-SpA (e-SpA) patients at T1 (2010-2013), comparing them to long-term SpA (l-SpA) patients at T2 (2023-2024) after at least 10 years of follow-up. Methods: At T1, in e-SpA and l-SpA cases, SD, classified as "difficulty in initiating sleep" (DIS), "difficulty in maintaining sleep" (DMS) and "early awakening" (EA), was compared to clinical parameters (ASDAS-CRP, BASDAI, m-HAQ-S, BASMI, MASES, 68/66 joint count, tenderness of sacroiliac joints, fatigue [FACIT] and HADS for anxiety [A] and depression [D]). At T2, e-SpA patients were re-evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results: At T1, 45% of 166 SpA patients had SD; in e-SpA patients (60), SD correlated with sacroiliac pain (DMS) BASDAI, FACIT and HADS-D (EA); in l-SpA patients (106), it correlated with HADS-A (DIS), BASDAI and FACIT (DMS). At T2, e-SpA patients showed a high PSQI in 51.5% of cases, correlated with T2-ASDAS-CRP and T2-BASDAI. Moreover, T1-ASDAS-CRP was predictive of T2-PSQI. Conclusions: SD is more specific for inflammatory pain in e-SpA and might be influenced by disease activity also in long-term disease.

Factors Associated With Diagnostic Delay in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Impact of Clinical Factors and Social Vulnerability

OBJECTIVE

Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) often experience significant delay between symptom onset and diagnosis for reasons that are incompletely understood. We investigated associations between demographic, medical, and socioeconomic factors and axSpA diagnostic delay.

METHODS

We identified patients meeting modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or 2009 Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria for axSpA in the Mass General Brigham health care system between December 1990 and October 2021. We determined the duration of diagnostic delay, defined as the duration of back pain symptoms reported at diagnosis, as well as disease manifestations and specialty care prior to diagnosis from the electronic health record. We obtained each patient's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) by mapping their address to the US Centers for Disease Control SVI Atlas. We examined associations among disease manifestations, SVI, and diagnostic delay using ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 554 patients with axSpA who had a median diagnostic delay of 3.8 years (interquartile range 1.1-10), peripheral arthritis (odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.93) and older age at symptom onset (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.88 per five years) were associated with shorter delay. AS at diagnosis (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.30-2.63), a history of uveitis prior to diagnosis (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.73-4.52), and higher social vulnerability (defined as national SVI 80th to 99th percentiles; OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.06-3.84) were associated with longer diagnostic delay.

CONCLUSION

Older age at back pain onset and peripheral arthritis were associated with shorter delay, whereas uveitis was associated with longer diagnostic delay. Patients with higher socioeconomic vulnerability had longer diagnostic delay independent of clinical factors.

Sex Bias in Diagnostic Delay: Are Axial Spondyloarthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis Still Phantom Diseases in Women? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic delay (DD) is associated with poor radiological and quality of life outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The female (F) population is often misdiagnosed, as classification criteria were previously studied mostly in males (M). We conducted a systematic review to investigate (i) the difference in DD between the sexes, the impact of HLA*B27 and clinical and social factors (work and education) on this gap, and (ii) the possible influence of the year of publication (before and after the 2009 ASAS classification criteria), geographical region (Europe and Israel vs. extra-European countries), sample sources (mono-center vs. multi-center studies), and world bank (WB) economic class on DD in both sexes. We searched, in PubMed and Embase, studies that reported the mean or median DD or the statistical difference in DD between sexes, adding a manual search. Starting from 399 publications, we selected 26 studies (17 from PubMed and Embase, 9 from manual search) that were successively evaluated with the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (m-NOS). The mean DD of 16 high-quality (m-NOS > 4/8) studies, pooled with random-effects meta-analysis, produces results higher in F (1.48, 95% CI 0.83-2.14, p < 0.0001) but with significant results at the second analysis only in articles published before the 2009 ASAS classification criteria (0.95, 95% CI 0.05-1.85, p < 0.0001) and in extra-European countries (3.16, 95% CI 2.11-4.22, p < 0.05). With limited evidence, some studies suggest that DD in F might be positively influenced by HLA*B27 positivity, peripheral involvement, and social factors.

Development and test–retest reliability of a screening tool for axial spondyloarthritis

Background

People with axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) suffer from lengthy diagnostic delays of ~7 years. The usage of screening tools to identify axSpA patients in primary care can reduce diagnostic delays by facilitating early referral to rheumatologic care. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of a potential screening tool for patients with axSpA.

Method

Content validity was evaluated by soliciting feedback from 7 rheumatologists regarding the relevance and content representativeness of the proposed screening questions. For the test-retest study, participants ≥18 years of age with chronic back pain (≥3 months) without a diagnosis of mechanical or inflammatory back pain (n = 91) were e-recruited through ResearchMatch. Participation included completing identical baseline and follow-up questionnaires ~14 days apart. Weighted quadratic kappa was used to measure test-retest reliability between the two ratings of the ordinal scales. Construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and items with factor loadings ≥0.6 were extracted. Scale dimensionality and simplified factorial solutions were measured using Kaiser’s criteria (Eigenvalue >1). Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure internal consistency.

Results

Most participants were women, non-Hispanic white, and had at least some college education, with a mean age of 45 years. On average, the age at onset of back pain was 31 years. Eleven questions yielded test–retest reliabilities ranging from 0.6 to 0.76. Results from EFA extracted two factors relating to: 1) how pain affects daily life functioning and 2) whether pain improves with movement. Internal consistency was high for questions evaluating how pain affects life, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.81. Following assessment for validity and reliability, the questionnaire was revised to create the 6-item screening tool.

Conclusions

The 6-item SpA-SED screening tool designed to identify potential cases of axSpA was found to have good test–retest reliability and high internal consistency.

Factors Associated With Diagnostic Delay of Axial Spondyloarthritis in Colombian Patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

The diagnostic delay of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is globally reported to be between 3 and 11 years. Early diagnosis and treatment have long-term benefits for patients and the health care system. Several international studies have evaluated some factors associated with diagnostic delay, but there are no known studies in the Colombian population. This study assesses the factors associated with diagnostic delay of axSpA in a rheumatology center in Bogota, Colombia.

METHODS

This monocentric analytical cross-sectional study was done in a specialized rheumatology center. Patients who fulfilled the 2009 Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axSpA were included. Information was obtained from medical records and a phone call. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were done to assess the associated factors with diagnostic delay.

RESULTS

One hundred one patients were included, 54 were women (53.5%). The median diagnostic delay was 2 years (interquartile range, 1-7). The bivariate analysis showed that a younger age at diagnosis (p = 0.042) and previous diagnosis of lumbar degenerative disease (p = 0.029) were associated with a longer diagnostic delay. The logistical regression showed that previous lumbar degenerative disc disease (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-7.53) and fibromyalgia (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-13.1) diagnosis were both associated with a longer diagnostic delay.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with a longer diagnostic delay were previous diagnosis of lumbar degenerative disc disease and fibromyalgia. Additional studies are needed so that the reasons for diagnostic delay are understood and early diagnosis and management of axSpA are enabled.

Diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review

Identification of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) remains challenging, frequently resulting in a diagnostic delay for patients. Current benchmarks of delay are usually reported as mean data, which are typically skewed and therefore may be overestimating delay. Our aim was to determine the extent of median delay patients’ experience in receiving a diagnosis of axSpA and examine whether specific factors are associated with the presence of such delay. We conducted a systematic review across five literature databases (from inception to November 2021), with studies reporting the average time period of diagnostic delay in patients with axSpA being included. Any additional information examining associations between specific factors and delay were also extracted. A narrative synthesis was used to report the median range of diagnostic delay experienced by patients with axSpA and summarise which factors have a role in the delay. From an initial 11,995 articles, 69 reported an average time period of diagnostic delay, with 25 of these providing a median delay from symptom onset to diagnosis. Across these studies, delay ranged from 0.67 to 8 years, with over three-quarters reporting a median of between 2 years and 6 years. A third of all studies reported median delay data ranging from just 2 to 2.3 years. Of seven variables reported with sufficient frequency to evaluate, only ‘gender’ and ‘family history of axSpA’ had sufficient concordant data to draw any conclusion on their role, neither influenced the extent of the delay. Despite improvements in recent decades, patients with axSpA frequently experience years of diagnostic delay and this remains an extensive worldwide problem. This is further compounded by a mixed picture of the disease, patient and healthcare-related factors influencing delay.

Key points • Despite improvements in recent decades, patients with axSpA frequently experience years of diagnostic delay. • Median diagnostic delay typically ranges from 2 to 6 years globally. • Neither ‘gender’ nor ‘family history of axSpA’ influenced the extent of diagnostic delay experienced. • Diagnostic delay based on mean, rather than median, data influences the interpretation of the delay time period and consistently reports a longer delay period.

Fibromyalgia in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the demographic characteristics, disease activity, functional status, and quality of life between patients with axial spondyloarthritis and fibromyalgia and patients with axial spondyloarthritis without fibromyalgia.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase databases, from the earliest available indexing date to March 30, 2019, for comparative studies evaluating fibromyalgia in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Two authors extracted data independently, and all discrepancies were resolved through consensus.

RESULTS

Seven comparative studies were identified. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of age, levels of inflammatory markers, and prevalence of extra-articular manifestations such as uveitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease between patients with Axial spondyloarthritis fibromyalgia and those without it. Sex ratios (female to male) were approximately 3:2 and 1:3 in patients with and without fibromyalgia, respectively. The ratios concerning human leukocyte antigen B27-positive patients with and without fibromyalgia were 45.1% and 65.6%, respectively. Patients with fibromyalgia had significantly higher Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that patients with Axial spondyloarthritis fibromyalgia had considerably higher pain severity, disease activity, and worse quality of life than patients without fibromyalgia. The sex ratios (female to male) were approximately 3:2 and 1:3, and ratios for human leukocyte antigen B27-positive patients were 45.1% and 65.6% in patients with and without fibromyalgia, respectively. Further well-designed studies are needed to substantiate our results.

Risk Factors for Spinal Structural Damage in a Chinese Cohort With Ankylosing Spondylitis

OBJECTIVES

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 270 Chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in order to identify potential risk factors for severity of spinal structural damage.

METHODS

Two hundred seventy AS patients fulfilled the Modified New York Criteria. Computed tomography (CT) was used to scan sacroiliac and hip joints, and radiography was used to scan anteroposterior and lateral lumbar spine, as well as lateral cervical spine. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index and modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) were scored in duplicate.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-three patients had low mSASSS (mSASSS, <10), and 87 patients had high mSASSS (mSASSS, ≥10). Univariate analysis revealed that AS age of onset, body mass index (BMI), smoking duration, duration of symptoms, diagnostic delay, hip involvement, and sacroiliitis grade were significantly associated with the risk of having high mSASSS after adjustment (all p's < 0.05). Hip involvement interacted significantly with BMI and smoking duration in a graded manner. Particularly, relative to patients with low BMI-negative hip involvement, those with high BMI-negative hip involvement, low BMI-positive hip involvement, and high BMI-positive hip involvement had a 1.94-fold, 3.29-fold, and 5.07-fold increased risk of high mSASSS (95% confidence interval, 0.84-4.47, 1.37-7.89, and 1.97-13.06, p = 0.118, 0.008, and 0.001, respectively). Finally, a nomogram graph based on 7 significant risk factors was generated with substantial prediction accuracy (concordance index, 0.906).

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified 7 potential risk factors for the severity of spinal structural damage in Chinese AS patients. Importantly, positive hip involvement, combined with high BMI or long smoking duration, was associated with a remarkably increased risk of having severe spinal structural damage.

Worldwide Differences in Clinical Phenotype of Axial Spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to describe the variations in the clinical presentation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) across the globe.

RECENT FINDINGS

We searched the PubMed database and screened more than 1360 articles; 60 of them were selected based on relevance to the topic being discussed and the goals of the review. Most of the clinical manifestations, including IBP, peripheral arthritis, and extra-articular involvement are seen in different regions of the world, but with appreciable clinical heterogeneity, possibly related to a smaller number of patients from some countries, and global variation in the prevalence of HLA-B27. For example, HLA-B27-positive patients have an earlier age of onset, higher prevalence of acute anterior uveitis, and greater familial occurrence. Peripheral arthritis and enthesitis are most commonly seen among axSpA patients from Latin America and Asia, whereas IBD appears to be slightly more common among Middle Eastern and North African patients. The main weakness encountered while reviewing these data is that some studies were small, and others were cross-sectional and retrospective; hence the inferences may have a selection bias. AxSpA is a very heterogenous disease with varied presentation across the globe, in part related to HLA-B27 positivity. It is imperative to further investigate the key regional differences as they impact timely disease recognition and initiation of early treatment. Therefore, there is a need for a large worldwide systematic study to capture the clinical picture of AxSpA in a more uniform manner.

Sex and gender differences in axial spondyloarthritis: myths and truths

Mounting evidence reveals evident sex differences in physiology, disease presentation and response to medication in axial SpA (axSpA). Unfortunately these data are often neglected in clinical practice and research. In this review, myths that still exist on diagnosis, disease manifestation and drug effectiveness were argued against data of the most recent literature. The aim is to increase awareness of sex differences in the clinical aspects of axSpA.

Diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Delay to diagnosis in axial SpA (axSpA) is longer than in many other rheumatic diseases. Prolonged delay is associate with poorer outcomes, including functional impairment and quality of life. Our aims were to describe global variation in delay to diagnosis, factors associated with delay, and delay compared with PsA.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science using a predefined protocol. Diagnostic delay was defined as years between the age at symptom onset and at diagnosis. We pooled the mean delay using random effects inverse variance meta-analysis. We examined variations in pooled estimates using prespecified subgroup analyses and sources of heterogeneity using meta-regression.

Results

A total of 64 studies reported the mean diagnostic delay in axSpA patients. The pooled mean delay was 6.7 years (95% CI 6.2, 7.2) with high levels of heterogeneity. Delay to diagnosis did not improve over time when stratifying results by year of publication. Studies from high-income countries (defined by the World Bank) reported longer delays than those from middle-income countries. Factors consistently reported to be associated with longer delays were lower education levels, younger age at symptom onset and absence of extra-articular manifestations (EAMs). The pooled estimate for diagnostic delay from 8 PsA studies was significantly shorter, at 2.6 years (95% CI 1.6, 3.6).

Conclusion

For axSpA patients, delay to diagnosis remains unacceptably prolonged in many parts of the world. Patient factors (e.g. education) and disease presentation (onset age and EAMs) should inform campaigns to improve delay.

The Delay of Diagnosis in Spondyloarthropathy Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia

Objective

Seronegative spondyloarthropathies (SpA) are a group of rheumatological disorders that share the common feature of being rheumatoid factor negative. Inflammation of the sacroiliac joint is considered the hallmark of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). On the other hand, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) affects patients with psoriasis. It is characterized by asymmetrical oligoarticular arthritis. Involvement of the distal interphalangeal joint is a unique feature of PsA. Enteropathic arthritis (EnA) involves the presence of inflammatory arthropathy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These diseases are strongly associated with the HLA-B27 gene. Although they are significantly disabling, their diagnosis has been frequently delayed. Early diagnosis is associated with early treatment, and thus better disease outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic delay (DD), that is, the duration between onset of symptoms and diagnosis, of SpA patients and its relation to the demographic characteristics, disease activity, measured by ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) and bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) scores, and the HLA-B27 status of Saudi SpA patients.

Methods

The data of 94 patients who were diagnosed with SpA were collected from medical records and from them personally. The data included patient demographics, age at diagnosis, delay of diagnosis, in years, disease activity (BASDAI and ASDAS scores), HLA-B27 status and C-reactive protein levels (CRP). The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

50% of patients were females. The mean DD was (mean ± SD) 4.98 ± 6.00 (range: 0-35). The average age of symptoms onset was 30.70 ± 11.30 (range: 8-59) and the average age at diagnosis was 35.65 ± 10.80 (range: 16-60). The mean BASDAI and ASDAS scores were 3.05 ± 2.21 and 2.29 ± 1.01, respectively. The majority of the patients had high disease activity (35.1 %). 25.0% were HLA-B27 positive. 83.7 % had normal CRP. There was no statistically significant difference between DD and gender, HLA-B27 status, ASDAS and BASDAI scores, and CRP. The DD was significantly higher in AS patients when compared to PsA (p-value= 0.048) and EnA patients (p-value < 0.0001). There was a statistically significant weak anticorrelation between DD and the age at symptoms onset in PsA patients (r-value= -0.39, p-value= 0.003). Age at diagnosis was statistically significantly higher in patients with PsA when compared to EnA. There was no correlation between DD and the disease activity in SpA patients.

Conclusion

The means of DD in AS, PsA, and EnA patients were 6.69 ± 5.83, 3.67 ± 6.42 and 2.00 ± 1.60, respectively. DD was greater in AS patients when compared to PsA and EnA patients. Early detection and referral to rheumatologists should be addressed, as early intervention is associated with favorable disease outcomes.

Gender Differences in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Women Are Not So Lucky

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) was historically seen as a predominantly male disease. However, more recent data showed a more homogenous sex prevalence. Unfortunately, in many studies in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), the number of women included is low and the analyses are often not stratified for gender distribution. The purpose of this review is to aggregate the existing data on gender differences in axSpA in order to increase the awareness that female axSpA patients are still under-recognized.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies considering gender differences revealed that female axSpA patients had different disease manifestations due to different immunological, hormonal, and genetic responses. For instance, allelic frequencies of the AHNK-gene and tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) haplotypes differed between men and women with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In addition, different levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukins IL-6, IL-17, and IL-18, were found between the two sexes. Furthermore, female patients show a higher diagnostic delay compared to males. Several studies indicate a higher frequency of extra-articular manifestations (EAM) in female axSpA patients, such as enthesitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), whereas acute anterior uveitis is more prevalent in male patients. Male AS patients more frequently show a higher Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (BASRI) scores and modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Scores (mSASSS) than females, which indicates that males have higher radiological damage and radiographic progression. However, disease activity (BASDAI) and quality of life (AsQol) scores are significantly higher in women, and more importantly, they have significantly lower response rates to treatment with TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and a significantly lower drug adherence. Despite the fact that men with axial SpA have a worse radiologic prognosis, women have a high disease burden, in part because they have a longer delay in diagnosis, higher disease activity, and significantly less responsiveness to treatment with TNFi.

Understanding How the Diagnostic Delay of Spondyloarthritis Differs Between Women and Men: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

To identify empirical evidence of diagnostic delay in spondyloarthritis (SpA), determine whether sex-related differences persist, and conduct an analysis from that perspective of the possible causes, including the influence of quality research, in this group of inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

A systematic review was done of delay in diagnosis of SpA in MEDLINE and EMBASE and other sources. Study quality was determined in line with the Strengthening The Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. A metaanalysis of 13 papers reporting sex-disaggregated data was performed to evaluate sex-related differences in diagnostic delay. The global effect of diagnostic delay by sex was calculated using means difference (D) through a fixed effects model.

RESULTS

The review included 23,883 patients (32.3% women) from 42 papers. No significant differences between the sexes were detected for symptoms at disease onset or during evolution. However, the mean for delay in diagnosis of SpA showed sex-related differences, being 8.8 years (7.4-10.1) for women and 6.5 (5.6-7.4) for men (p = 0.01). Only 40% of papers had high quality. A metaanalysis included 12,073 participants (31.2% women). The mean global effect was D = 0.6 years (0.31-0.89), indicating that men were diagnosed 0.6 year (7 months) before women.

CONCLUSION

Delay in diagnosis of SpA persists, and is longer in women than in men. There are no significant sex-related differences in symptoms that could explain sex-related differences in diagnostic delay. Methodological and possible publication bias could result in sex-biased medical practice.