Thalidomide treatment in cutaneous lesions of systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter study in China

Efficacy and safety of thalidomide for recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is considered as the most common oral mucosal lesion affecting up to 25% of people worldwide. Thalidomide has been reported for the treatment of RAS, but the evidence has not been systematically evaluated. We first systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of thalidomide for the treatment of RAS.

METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Data, and VIP information from inception to December 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing thalidomide with control for RAS were included in the analysis. The primary outcome were complete response and overall response, and the secondary outcome were recurrence interval (RI), ulcer number and size, healing time, visual analogue scale (VAS), immunological data, and adverse events. Meta-analysis was conducted using the Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Twenty-one trials involving 1668 patients were included in this review. The results of our meta-analysis showed that thalidomide significantly improved the complete response rate and overall response rate, prolonged the recurrence interval, accelerated the healing process, reduced the number and size of ulcers, and lowered TNF-α levels in the treatment of RAS. However, thalidomide significantly increases adverse events.

RESULTS

Thalidomide has a significant benefit in the treatment of RAS. However, considering the potential side effects of thalidomide, it may be an optimal treatment option for major RAS patients or cases that do not respond to topical agents.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024495038.

Efficacy and safety of thalidomide in children with monogenic autoinflammatory diseases: a single-center, real-world-evidence study

BACKGROUND

Monogenic autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) are rare inflammatory diseases caused by genetic variants. The pathogenesis is complex and treatment options are limited. This study aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of thalidomide in the treatment of monogenic AIDs.

METHODS

This was a single-center, single-arm, real-world study. From September 2016 to August 2021, patients with monogenic AIDs who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were given thalidomide for 12 months. There was a 3-month run-in period before dosing. The efficacy and adverse events were evaluated and recorded every 3 months. After 3 and 12 months of thalidomide treatment, clinical manifestations, disease activity score, inflammatory markers, and background medication adjustments were compared with baseline for efficacy analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients entered this study, including 3 with Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS), 4 Blau syndrome, 2 chronic infantile neurologic cutaneous articular syndrome (CINCA), 2 A20 haploinsufficiency (HA20), 1 adenosine deaminase 2 deficiency(DADA2), 1 familial Mediterranean fever (FMF),1 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), 1 PLCγ2-associated antibody deficiency and immune dysregulation (PLAID), and 1 stimulator of interferon genes-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy(SAVI). The efficacy rate in the 16 patients after 3-month and 12-month thalidomide treatment in patients was 56.3%. Twelve patients completed the study, the fever improved in all of them, rash improved in 7 patients, and 5 patients stopped using glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressive agents. C-reactive protein was normal in 8 patients and erythrocyte sedimentation rate was normal in 11 patients. Anorexia and nausea occurred in 2 cases, with no other reported drug-related adverse reactions.

CONCLUSION

The largest cohort of monogenic AIDs with the treatment of thalidomide demonstrated that thalidomide can help reduce disease activity and inflammation, reduce the dosage of glucocorticoids, and improve clinical outcomes. Thalidomide is relatively safe in monogenic AIDs.

An update on the management of refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Management of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) involves a combination of preventive measures, topical and systemic drugs, fairly similar for the different subtypes. Although guidelines exist, to date, no specific drugs have been specifically licensed for CLE. Antimalarials remain the first-line systemic treatment, but many patients do not respond, making refractory lupus a challenge for clinicians. The choice of alternative medication should be based on effectiveness, safety and cost. Most of the available drugs for CLE have been adapted from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatment but the existing literature is limited to small studies and evidence often lacks. As knowledge of pathogenesis of both CLE and SLE is improving, promising new therapies are emerging. In this review, we discuss the available medications, focusing on the novelties under development for CLE.

Lupus Vasculitis: An Overview

Lupus vasculitis (LV) is one of the secondary vasculitides occurring in the setting of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in approximately 50% of patients. It is most commonly associated with small vessels, but medium-sized vessels can also be affected, whereas large vessel involvement is very rare. LV may involve different organ systems and present in a wide variety of clinical manifestations according to the size and site of the vessels involved. LV usually portends a poor prognosis, and a prompt diagnosis is fundamental for a good outcome. The spectrum of involvement ranges from a relatively mild disease affecting small vessels or a single organ to a multiorgan system disease with life-threatening manifestations, such as mesenteric vasculitis, pulmonary hemorrhage, or mononeuritis multiplex. Treatment depends upon the organs involved and the severity of the vasculitis process. In this review, we provide an overview of the different forms of LV, describing their clinical impact and focusing on the available treatment strategies.

Thalidomide and Lenalidomide for Refractory Systemic/Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Treatment: A Narrative Review of Literature for Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Thalidomide has shown exceptional results in systemic/cutaneous lupus erythematosus(SLE/CLE). Recently, lenalidomide has been also prescribed for SLE/CLE treatment. Literature regarding efficacy/adverse events for these drugs is scarce with a single systematic review and meta-analysis focused solely on thalidomide for refractory cutaneous lupus subtypes.

OBJECTIVE

We, therefore, addressed in this narrative review the efficacy/adverse effects of thalidomide and lenalidomide for SLE and CLE. In addition, we provide a specialist approach for clinical practice based on the available evidence.

RESULTS

Efficacy of thalidomide for refractory cutaneous lupus treatment was demonstrated by several studies, mostly retrospective with small sample size(≤20). The frequency of peripheral polyneuropathy is controversial varying from 15-80% with no consistent data regarding cumulative dose and length of use. Drug withdrawn results in clinical partial/complete reversibility for most cases (70%). For lenalidomide, seven studies (small sample sizes) reported its efficacy for SLE/CLE with complete/partial response in all patients with a mean time to response of 3 months. Flare rate varied from 25-75% occurring 0.5-10 months after drug withdrawn. There were no reports of polyneuropathy/worsening of previous thalidomide-induced neuropathy, but most of them did not perform nerve conduction studies. Teratogenicity risk exist for both drugs and strict precautions are required.

CONCLUSIONS

Thalidomide is very efficacious as an induction therapy for patients with severe/refractory cutaneous lupus with high risk of scarring, but its longstanding use should be avoided due to neurotoxicity. Lenalidomide is a promising drug for skin lupus treatment, particularly regarding the apparent lower frequency of nerve side effects.

Efficacy of Thalidomide in Discoid Lupus Erythematosus: Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Thalidomide has been used successfully in a variety of chronic refractory inflammatory dermatological conditions with underlying autoimmune or infectious pathogenesis. It was first used for refractory discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) in 1983 and has steadily grown since then.

METHOD

In this review, we describe the therapeutic benefits of thalidomide for DLE treatment and its biological properties. We explain how new discoveries in DLE pathogenesis are relevant to understand thalidomide's mechanism of action and the need to find an alternative safe drug with similar therapeutic effects.

SUMMARY

Thalidomide's efficacy in DLE patients is significant, with 80-90% reaching clinical remission according to different studies. However, thalidomide's use is still limited by serious adverse effects such as teratogenicity, neurotoxicity, and thrombosis. In addition, there is a frequent rate of relapse and many patients require a long-term low dose of thalidomide as maintenance. The achievement of clinical response within weeks is key to avoid irreversible DLE fibrotic sequelae, making it critical to introduce thalidomide earlier in the DLE treatment algorithm. Recently, microarray and miRNA screenings demonstrated a significant CD4+ T enrichment and T-helper 1 response predom-inance with a dysregulation of regulatory T cell (Treg) expression in DLE lesions that induced high levels of proinflammatory, chemotaxis, and apoptotic proteins that induce the chronic inflammation response. Thalidomide's anti-inflammatory, antiangiogenic, and T-cell co-stimulatory effects may be beneficial for DLE since it promotes cytokine inhibition, inhibits macrophage activation, regulates Treg responses, inhibits angiogenesis, modulates T cells, and promotes NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Progress and Challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review provides an update on the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnostic challenges exist in better defining CLE as an independent disease distinct from systemic lupus erythematosus with cutaneous features and further classifying CLE based on clinical, histological, and laboratory features. Recent mechanistic studies revealed more genetic variations, environmental triggers, and immunologic dysfunctions that are associated with CLE. Drug induction specifically has emerged as one of the most important triggers for CLE. Treatment options include topical agents and systemic therapies, including newer biologics such as belimumab, rituximab, ustekinumab, anifrolumab, and BIIB059 that have shown good clinical efficacy in trials. CLE is a group of complex and heterogenous diseases. Future studies are warranted to better define CLE within the spectrum of lupus erythematosus. Better insight into the pathogenesis of CLE could facilitate the design of more targeted therapies.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A review of the literature

Knowledge with regard to the pathogenesis of lupus erythematosus has progressed rapidly over the past decade, and with it has come promising new agents for the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematous (CLE). Classification of CLE is performed using clinical features and histopathologic findings, and is crucial for determining prognosis and choosing therapeutic options. Preventative therapy is critical in achieving optimal disease control, and patients should be counseled on sun-safe behavior and smoking cessation. First-line therapy includes topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, with antimalarial therapy. Traditionally, refractory disease was treated with oral retinoids, dapsone, and other oral immunosuppressive drugs, but new therapies are emerging with improved side effect profiles and efficacy. Biologic agents, such as belimumab and ustekinumab, have been promising in case studies but will require larger trials to establish their role in routine therapy. Other novel therapies that have been trialed successfully include spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors and fumaric acid esters. Finally, new evidence has been published recently that describes safer dosing regimens in thalidomide and lenalidomide, both effective medications for CLE. Given the chronic disease course of CLE, long-term treatment-related side effects must be minimized, and the introduction of new steroid-sparing agents is encouraging in this regard.

Advances in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: From back to the future, to the future and beyond

There have been many advances in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) over the past decades. Following more than eleven centuries of therapeutic uncertainty, the discovery of the therapeutic properties of glucocorticoids is without any doubt one of the most significant advance in the field of autoimmune diseases. The many progresses made by rapidly growing chemical industry of the 19th century chemistry have allowed the identification of valuable therapeutic compounds such as anti-malarials, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, cyclosporine and later mycophenolate mofetil, which have all profoundly changed the face of the disease. A very visible consequence of this is the profound improvement in the prognosis of the disease, with 10-year survival rates of more than 90% in most dedicated centres. Following the development of biotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis, the late 20th century has slowly opened a new era for the treatment of SLE, that of targeted therapies. With the approval of belimumab in 2011 and 74 targeted therapies in clinical development, we may expect great changes in the therapeutic management of SLE. Those molecules target inflammatory cytokines or chemokines and their receptors, B cells or plasma cells, intracellular signalling pathways, B/T cells co-stimulation molecules, interferons, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, as well as various other targets of interest. Current challenges are now slowly shifting from whether some new drugs will be available to how to select the most adequate drug (or drug combination) at the patient-level.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha in sleep regulation

This review details tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) biology and its role in sleep, and describes how TNF medications influence sleep/wake activity. Substantial evidence from healthy young animals indicates acute enhancement or inhibition of endogenous brain TNF respectively promotes and inhibits sleep. In contrast, the role of TNF in sleep in most human studies involves pathological conditions associated with chronic elevations of systemic TNF and disrupted sleep. Normalization of TNF levels in such patients improves sleep. A few studies involving normal healthy humans and their TNF levels and sleep are consistent with the animal studies but are necessarily more limited in scope. TNF can act on established sleep regulatory circuits to promote sleep and on the cortex within small networks, such as cortical columns, to induce sleep-like states. TNF affects multiple synaptic functions, e.g., its role in synaptic scaling is firmly established. The TNF-plasticity actions, like its role in sleep, can be local network events suggesting that sleep and plasticity share biochemical regulatory mechanisms and thus may be inseparable from each other. We conclude that TNF is involved in sleep regulation acting within an extensive tightly orchestrated biochemical network to niche-adapt sleep in health and disease.