Joint involvement in Mexican patients with ulcerative colitis: a hospital-based retrospective study

Development of ankylosing spondylitis in patients with ulcerative colitis: A systematic meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which can cause inflammation of the intestinal tract. Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an inflammatory disease of the sacroiliac joints. Many studies have found that some UC patients progress to AS. In this study, we conducted a literature search and meta-analysis to investigate the prevalence of AS among UC patients during follow-up.

METHODS

The studies related to the AS among patients with UC were obtained from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases since its inception-December 2022. The literature was screened strictly according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Forest plots were used to detect the overall incidence of AS in UC and to compare the risk ratios for the development of AS in the UC. The heterogeneity of studies was assessed using I2 statistical methods.

RESULTS

1) 17 studies with 98704 UC patients were included. 2)700 UC patients developed AS during follow-up (1.66%, 95% CI: 0.89-2.62%). Human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) was reported in 3 studies. HLA-B27 positivity was significantly higher than the incidence of HLA-B27 negativity in AS patients (68.29% vs 31.71%, P < 0.0001). There was significantly increased risk of AS development in HLA-B27 positive IBD patients (RR: 22.17, 95% CI: 11.79-41.66, P < 0.0001). 3)The definite follow-up time was reported in 12 studies (range: 0.3-40 years). After follow-up for ≥5 years, the incidence of AS among patients with UC was 1.75% (95% CI: 0.62-3.37%). Meanwhile, after follow-up for <5 years, the incidence of AS among patients with UC was 1.41% (95% CI: 0.65-2.37%) which was significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients with UC are more likely to develop AS in the future. Furthermore, the IBD patients are at a higher risk of AS who have positive HLA-B27. The incidence of AS increased with longer follow-up time.

Gancao Xiexin decoction combined with mesalazine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUD

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease that involves the rectum, colon and ileum. Gancao Xiexin decoction (GCXXD) is a classic herbal formula in Shanghanlun. More and more research evidence shows that GCXXD has a certain therapeutic effect on UC. Therefore, we designed this study protocol aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GCXXD combine with mesalazine for UC.

METHODS

We will systematically search 6 databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CNKI, VIP, Wang-fang database up to July 2020 to obtain eligible studies. The primary outcomes will focus on the clinical effectiveness. Review Manager 5.3 software will be used for data analysis.

RESULTS

This study will provide the systematic evidence of UC treated with GCXXD combine with mesalazine.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this meta-analysis will provide evidence to judge whether GCXXD combine with mesalazine is a more effective intervention compare to mesalazine only for patient of UC.

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202080008.

Assessment of extraintestinal manifestations in inflammatory bowel diseases: A systematic review and a proposed guide for clinical trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Extraintestinal manifestations are common in inflammatory bowel disease patients, although there are few data available on their diagnosis, management and follow-up. We systematically reviewed the literature evidence to evaluate tools and investigations used for the diagnosis and for the assessment of the treatment response in inflammatory bowel disease patients with extraintestinal manifestations.

METHODS

We searched in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from January 1999-December 2019 for all interventional and non-interventional studies published in English assessing diagnostic tools and investigations used in inflammatory bowel disease patients with extraintestinal manifestations.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies (16 interventional and 29 non-interventional) were included in our systematic review, enrolling 7994 inflammatory bowel disease patients. The diagnostic assessment of extraintestinal manifestations was performed by dedicated specialists in a percentage of cases ranging from 60-100% depending on the specific condition. The clinical examination was the most frequent diagnostic strategy, accounting for 35 studies (77.8%). In patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis or rheumatological symptoms, biochemical and imaging tests were also performed. Anti-TNF agents were the most used biological drugs for the treatment of extraintestinal manifestations (20 studies, 44.4%), and the treatment response varied from 59.1% in axial spondyloarthritis to 88.9% in ocular manifestations. No benefit was detected in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients after treatment with biologics.

CONCLUSIONS

In the clinical management of inflammatory bowel disease patients with extraintestinal manifestations the collaboration of dedicated specialists for diagnostic investigations and follow-up is key to ensure the best of care approach. However, international guidelines are needed to homogenise and standardise the assessment of extraintestinal manifestations.

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for ulcerative colitis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing year by year worldwide, and it is listed as one of the refractory diseases by World Health Organization. In addition to typical intestinal manifestations such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, mucus, pus, and bloody stool, it can also accompany multiorgan and multisystem extraintestinal manifestations, seriously affecting the life and work of patients. Furthermore, UC patients with a tremendous psychological pressure and affects their physical and mental health. In recent years, many complementary and alternative therapies have been used for treatment of UC, but only pair-wised drugs have been evaluated in the traditional meta-analyses and some results are inconsistent. Consequently, it is essential to propose a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to discuss the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies in the treatment of UC.

METHODS

We will search Chinese and English databases comprehensively and systematically from the establishment of databases to May 2020, free of language or publication restrictions. All randomized controlled trials on complementary and alternative therapies for UC will be included. Two researchers will independently screen titles, abstracts, full texts, and extract data, then assess the bias risk of each study. We will conduct pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analyses to the relative outcomes of the efficacy and safety. Data analysis will use STATA and WinBUGs 1.4.3 software in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for UC based on changes in symptoms, clinical efficacy, quality of life and adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This study will provide evidence for whether complementary and alternative therapies are beneficial to the treatment of UC. In order to provide reliable evidence-based medicine for clinical practice.

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202060015.

Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Spondyloarthritis: State of the Art and Unmet Needs

Inflammatory bowel disease-associated spondyloarthritis is a systemic disease characterized by the chronic inflammation of both the gastrointestinal tract and the musculoskeletal system. Since inflammatory bowel disease-associated spondyloarthritis has been associated with a significant diagnostic delay, which may lead to poor quality of life and progression of joint damage, efforts to discover new reliable and noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers have been made. We reviewed the state of the art of biomarker research in inflammatory bowel disease-associated spondyloarthritis, showing that to date it has been largely unsatisfactory. Only a few of the biomarkers that have been investigated are likely to enter the clinical practice upon further validation in independent cohorts. The research of new and innovative biomarkers for inflammatory bowel disease-associated spondyloarthritis is warranted.