The Chinese version of the SLEQOL is a reliable assessment of health-related quality of life in Han Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Needs for discharge planning and facilitators-barriers to implementing discharge plans for patients with SLE: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the needs of patients with SLE in terms of discharge planning, to outline the practical perspectives of clinical healthcare professionals regarding the enablers and impediments to SLE patients' discharge planning, and to establish a basis for the creation of SLE discharge plans for subsequently diagnosed patients.

METHODS

Descriptive qualitative research methodology was used in this study, with the researcher herself as the research instrument. Healthcare professionals formally employed in the rheumatology and immunology department, as well as SLE patients admitted to a tertiary-level hospital in Anhui Province between August and December 2023, were chosen for the study using a purposeful sample technique. In-person, semi-structured in-depth interviews were carried out, and used thematic analysis to analyze the interview data and distil themes.

RESULT

A total of 17 patients and 13 healthcare professionals were interviewed. Five themes and sixteen sub-themes in all were extracted: ①the needs of SLE patients for discharge planning; ②the present state of discharge planning implementation; ③factors conducive to the implementation of discharge planning; ④factors hindering the implementation of discharge planning; ⑤recommendations for implementing of discharge planning.

CONCLUSION

Planning for the discharge of SLE patients is essential, and in order to support patients' successful discharge, management should strengthen training, thoroughly evaluate the needs of SLE patients, and create customized discharge plans.

Performance of a New Instrument for the Measurement of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity: The SLE-DAS

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease that affects multiple organ systems and manifests in a relapsing-remitting pattern. Consequently, it is paramount for rheumatologists to assess disease activity, identify flare-ups, and establish treatment goals for patients with SLE. In 2019, the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) was introduced as a novel tool for measuring disease activity. This tool refines the parameters of the established SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) to enhance the assessment process. This review aims to provide an introduction to the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) and summarizes research on its development, its comparison with existing disease activity measures, and its performance in clinical settings. Literature searches on PubMed using the keyword "SLE-DAS" were conducted, covering publications from March 2019 to September 2023. Studies that compared SLE-DAS with other SLE disease activity measurement tools were reviewed. Findings indicated that SLE-DAS consistently performs on par with, and sometimes better than, traditional measures in assessing clinically meaningful changes, patient improvement, disease activity, health-related quality of life, hospitalization rates, and disease flare-ups. The association between SLE-DAS and mortality rates among patients with SLE, however, remains to be further explored. Although SLE-DAS is a promising and potentially effective tool for measuring SLE disease activity, additional research is needed to confirm its effectiveness and broaden its clinical use.

Assessment of cutaneous disease activity in early lupus and its correlation with quality of life: a cross-sectional study

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-system autoimmune disease with varied dermatological manifestations that are almost universal. Overall, lupus disease has a major effect on the quality of life in these patients. We assessed the extent of cutaneous disease in early lupus and correlated it with the SLE quality-of-life (SLEQoL) index and disease activity measures. Patients diagnosed as SLE with the skin involved were recruited at the first presentation and were assessed for cutaneous and systemic disease activity using the cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index (CLASI) and the Mexican-SLE disease activity index (Mex-SLEDAI), respectively. Quality of life was assessed with the SLEQoL tool while systemic damage was captured by the SLICC damage index. Fifty-two patients with SLE who had cutaneous involvement were enrolled (40, 76.9% females) with a median disease duration of 1 month (1-3.7). The median age was 27.5 years (IQR: 20-41). Median Mex-SLEDAI and SLICC damage index were 8(IQR: 4.5-11) and 0 (0-1), respectively. The median CLASI activity and damage scores were 3 (1-5) and 1 (0-1), respectively. Overall, there was no correlation between SLEQoL with CLASI or CLASI damage. Only the self-image domain of SLEQoL correlated with total CLASI (ρ = 0.32; p = 0.01) and CLASI-D (ρ = 0.35; p = 0.02). There was a weak correlation of CLASI with the Mexican-SLEDAI score (ρ = 0.30; p = 0.03) but not with the SLICC damage index. In this cohort of early lupus, cutaneous disease activity in lupus had a weak correlation with systemic disease. Cutaneous features did not appear to influence the quality of life except in the self-image domain.

The impact of distress disclosure and anxiety on the association between social support and quality of life among Chinese women with systemic lupus erythematosus

The evidence on the relationship between social support and quality of life in female systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients is complex. The purpose of this study was to explore the impacts of distress disclosure and anxiety on the association between social support and quality of life among Chinese women with SLE. A cross-sectional study was conducted, and 237 samples were obtained. Measures included demographic characteristics, Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL), social support rate scale (SSRS), distress disclosure index (DDI), and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS). Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and moderated mediating effect analysis were carried out. The LupusQoL was negatively correlated with age, systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI), DDI, and SAS. SSRS had a positive predictive effect on the LupusQoL, while SLEDAI and DDI had the opposite effect. SAS had a negative predictive effect on the LupusQoL. There were interactive effects of SAS and DDI on LupusQoL. In the moderated mediation model, SAS played moderating effect in the role of DDI on LupusQoL; the DDI of female patients with SLE played a partial mediator role, the mediation effect was 0.19, and the mediation effect ratio was 33.3%. In conclusion, to pay attention to the QOL, we should consider the mediator role of distress disclosure and the moderating role of anxiety.

Relation Among Anxiety, Depression, Sleep Quality and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Path Analysis

Purpose

This study aimed to examine the relationship between anxiety, depression, sleep quality and health-related quality of life among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients in China.

Patients and Methods

After ethical approval and obtaining participants' informed consent, a cross-sectional study was conducted in The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between October 1, 2021 and January 30, 2022. The data comprised demographic information, number of SLE symptoms, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (SLEQoL). We performed descriptive statistics, Spearman or Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression. And Path analysis was performed to examine direct and indirect associations between these variables and health-related quality of life.

Results

A total of 580 patients were recruited and 513 met our target criteria. Our final model fitted the data well: goodness-of-fit index (GFI) =0.996; adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) =0.974; comparative fit index (CFI) =0.998; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) =0.043. This model explained 57.3% of the variance on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with SLE and all the hypothesized paths reached significance (P<0.05). Anxiety, depression, sleep quality, income/family, and number of SLE symptoms were related to health-related quality of life, and anxiety had the most influence on HRQoL (β=0.561).

Conclusion

The study model helps to explain the relation among anxiety, depression, sleep quality and health-related quality of life in patients with SLE. It also suggests that health care professionals should be aware of factors such as anxiety, sleep quality, number of SLE symptoms, and depression in their care for HRQoL of SLE patients.

Quality of life measures in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A systematic review

In this study we systematically investigated the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) tools, which have been most often used over the last five years to evaluate the QoL in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), focusing on their items and applications. A detailed literature search was conducted: the inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) studies including at least 50 patients; 2) studies including at least 25 patients with SLE; 3) quality of life testing with validated measures. The systematic review was based on 119 studies for a total of 32,449 SLE patients and 3092 controls. A total of 35 different patients-reported quality of life measures, applied in cohorts of patients with SLE, were retrieved with the 36-item Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) (63 studies of 119 =52.95%), Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) (17 studies =14.3%) and Lupus Patient-Reported Outcome (LupusPRO) (12 studies =10%) being the most commonly used tools. Overall, this systematic review of the literature indicated that quality of life in patients with SLE appears to be poor and generally lower compared to both the general population and patients with other chronic conditions, as was shown by a few studies that used SF-36 and LupusPRO. The use of HRQoL scoring in SLE is gaining increasing interest and is used both in randomized controlled trials and in real-life. Future efforts are needed to improve the understanding of the impact of the disease burden on quality of life from the patient’s perspective.

Patient-Reported Outcomes for Quality of Life in SLE: Essential in Clinical Trials and Ready for Routine Care

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are widely used to assess quality of life in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) research, and there is growing evidence for their use in clinical care. In this review, we evaluate the current evidence for their use in assessing quality of life in SLE in both research and clinical settings and examine the different characteristics of the commonly used PRO tools. There are now several well-validated generic and SLE-specific tools that have demonstrated utility in clinical trials and several tools that complement activity and damage measures in the clinical setting. PRO tools may help overcome physician–patient discordance in SLE and are valuable in the assessment of fibromyalgia and type 2 symptoms such as widespread pain and fatigue. Future work will identify optimal PRO tools for different settings but, despite current limitations, they are ready to be incorporated into patient care.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Lupus

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) was identified as a core systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) outcome in 1999. More than 20 years later, however, generic PRO measures evaluating impact in SLE are used mainly for research. Generic and disease-targeted PRO tools have unique advantages. Significant progress in identification of patient disease-relevant PRO concepts and development of new PRO tools for SLE has occurred over the past 20 years. Further research needs to focus on responsiveness and minimally important differences of existing, promising PRO tools to facilitate their use in SLE patient care and research.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Targeted literature review of the epidemiology, current treatment and disease burden in the Asia Pacific region

OBJECTIVE

To understand the epidemiology, current treatment and disease burden of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the Asia Pacific region (APAC).

METHODS

A targeted literature review of published evidence on SLE in APAC was conducted, using the MEDLINE® database (2008-2018), conference proceedings and other supplementary sources.

RESULTS

The review identified 70 studies conducted in China (n=15), Japan (n=13), Taiwan (n=12), Korea (n=9), Australia (n=7), Hong Kong (n=6), Singapore (n=4), and multiple places within the APAC region (n=4). Incidence rates (per 100,000 per year) ranged from 0.9-8.4, while prevalence rates ranged from 3.7-127 (per 100,000); however, recent data was limited. Asian SLE patients were reported to have higher disease severity, activity (higher SLE disease activity index scores) and organ damage accrual; along with increased morbidity, mortality, and susceptibility to renal involvement compared with other ethnicities in APAC. The risk of developing SLE is higher in the Asian population. Routinely used SLE therapies included belimumab, hydroxychloroquine, cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids; however, prescribing patterns varied across the region. Increased disease activity was associated with high economic burden and poor quality of life for SLE patients in APAC.

CONCLUSION

SLE remains a disease with a significant unmet medical need for an innovative therapy that is well-tolerated and effective for patients in APAC. Further evidence is required to better characterize the disease and fully capture the burden and impact of SLE in APAC. This review has highlighted where there is a paucity of data from patients across the APAC region.

Comparison of performance of specific (SLEQOL) and generic (SF36) health-related quality of life questionnaires and their associations with disease status of systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal study

Background

The utility of generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is uncertain. We compared the performance of generic (SF36) and specific (SLEQOL) HRQoL surveys by examining their associations with the Global Rating of Change (GRC) and SLE clinical indicators.

Methods

The study included SLE patients who attended a single-center rheumatology clinic between 2013 and 2017. Patients completed both specific (SLEQOL) and generic (SF36) surveys and rated their GRC compared to the previous visit using a 7-point Likert scale on the same day of routine visits. Based on GRC scores, patients’ change in HRQoL was categorized as “no change,” “deterioration,” or “improvement.” Disease activity (SLEDAI-2K), flare, and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) were assessed at each visit, and organ damage (SDI) was determined annually. Pairwise correlations between SLEQOL and SF36 components were examined, and associations between GRC status and SLE disease indicators were compared using generalized estimating equations (GEE).

Results

Three hundred thirty-seven patients with 2062 visits were included in the analysis. SLEQOL correlated significantly with SF36. Patients reported improvements in HRQoL in 58%, deterioration in 15%, and “no change” in 27% of all visits. Compared to the “no change” group, mean SF36 and SLEQOL scores were significantly lower in the deterioration group and higher in the improvement group. The magnitude of changes observed with SLEQOL and SF36 in the deterioration and improvement groups was similar. Patients in LLDAS had significantly higher mean scores in both SLEQOL and SF36. In contrast, patients with active disease, especially those with cutaneous, renal, central nervous system, and musculoskeletal activity, had significantly lower SLEQOL and SF36. Flare and organ damage were also associated with lower SLEQOL and SF36-PCS (physical component) but not with SF36-MCS (mental component).

Conclusion

SLEQOL and SF36 similarly describe HRQoL in SLE. Both instruments demonstrated strong associations with GRC-based deterioration or improvement as well as SLE disease status. LLDAS was associated with improved HRQoL.