Impact of TNF-α inhibitor on lipid profile and atherogenic index of plasma in axial spondyloarthritis: 2-year follow-up data from the Catholic Axial Spondyloarthritis COhort (CASCO)

Impact of anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment on lipid profiles in Korean patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Objective

To investigate the effects of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment on lipid profiles and identify risk factors for an increase in total cholesterol (TC) after the anti-TNF treatment in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed AS patients who received the first-line anti-TNF treatment. Patients with at least nine months of follow-up were included; those who were under 18 years or on any lipid-lowering agent were excluded. A linear mixed model was used to assess the impact of anti-TNF inhibitors on disease activity and lipid profile (TC, low-density lipoprotein [LDL], high-density lipoprotein [HDL], and triglycerides [TG]). Univariable and multivariable linear regression were used to identify risk factors for an increase in TC after 3 months of anti-TNF treatment.

Results

A total of 315 AS patients were enrolled (78.1% male, median age 32.0 [26.0~41.0]). TC, HDL, and TG levels significantly increased particularly within the first 3 months of anti-TNF treatment, while LDL level did not show significant changes. Changes in inflammatory markers and lipid particles (TC, LDL, TG) were correlated over time, but HDL showed no significant correlation. Older age, higher baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and lower baseline LDL level were related to an increase in TC after 3 months of the anti-TNF treatment.

Conclusion

In AS patients, anti-TNF treatment has been found to increase lipid particles, potentially due to its anti-inflammatory effects. Future research should explore the underlying mechanism and the clinical implications of dyslipidemia, particularly the occurrence of cardiovascular events, following anti-TNF treatment in AS patients.

Cardiovascular risk in axial spondyloarthritis-a systematic review

Cardiovascular manifestations are common in patients suffering axial spondyloarthritis and can result in substantial morbidity and disease burden. To give an overview of this important aspect of axial spondyloarthritis, we conducted a systematic literature search of all articles published between January 2000 and 25 May 2023 on cardiovascular manifestations. Using PubMed and SCOPUS, 123 out of 6792 articles were identified and included in this review. Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis seems to be underrepresented in studies; thus, more evidence for ankylosing spondylitis exists. All in all, we found some traditional risk factors that led to higher cardiovascular disease burden or major cardiovascular events. These specific risk factors seem to be more aggressive in patients with spondyloarthropathies and have a strong connection to high or long-standing disease activity. Since disease activity is a major driver of morbidity, diagnostic, therapeutic, and lifestyle interventions are crucial for better outcomes. Key Points • Several studies on axial spondyloarthritis and associated cardiovascular diseases have been conducted in the last few years addressing risk stratification of these patients including artificial intelligence. • Recent data suggest distinct manifestations of cardiovascular disease entities among men and women which the treating physician needs to be aware of. • Rheumatologists need to screen axial spondyloarthritis patients for emerging cardiovascular disease and should aim at reducing traditional risk factors like hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and smoking as well as disease activity.

Interleukin-17-targeted treatment in patients with spondyloarthritis and associated cardiometabolic risk profile

Spondyloarthritis is a group of immune-mediated rheumatic disorders that significantly impact patients' physical function and quality of life. Patients with spondyloarthritis experience a greater prevalence of cardiometabolic disorders, such as obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus, and these comorbidities are associated with increased spondyloarthritis disease activity and risk of cardiovascular events. This narrative review summarizes the evidence for a physiological link between inflammatory status and cardiometabolic comorbidities in spondyloarthritis, as well as the impact of interleukin (IL)-17 blockade versus other molecular mechanisms in patients with cardiometabolic conditions. The IL-23/IL-17 axis plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of spondyloarthritis by promoting inflammation and tissue remodeling at the affected joints and entheses. The importance of the IL-23/IL-17 signaling cascade in underlying sub-clinical inflammation in common cardiometabolic disorders suggests the existence of shared pathways between these processes and spondyloarthritis pathophysiology. Thus, a bidirectional relationship exists between the effects of biologic drugs and patients' cardiometabolic profile, which must be considered during treatment decision making. Biologic therapy may induce changes in patients' cardiometabolic status and cardiometabolic conditions may conversely impact the clinical response to biologic therapy. Available evidence regarding the impact of IL-17 blockade with secukinumab on cardiometabolic parameters suggests this drug does not interfere with traditional cardiovascular risk markers and could be associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular events. Additionally, the efficacy and retention rates of secukinumab do not appear to be negatively affected by obesity, with some studies reporting a positive impact on clinical outcomes, contrary to that described with other approaches, such as tumor necrosis factor blockade. In this article, we also review evidence for this bidirectional association with other treatments for spondyloarthritis. Current evidence suggests that IL-17-targeted therapy with secukinumab is highly effective in spondyloarthritis patients with cardiometabolic comorbidities and may provide additional cardiometabolic benefits.

Athrogenic indexes: Useful markers for predicting metabolic syndrome in axial spondyloarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic syndrome is a pathological entity associated with a high risk of cardiovascular disease. Data regarding the frequency of this syndrome, lipid profile, and atherogenic index of plasma in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis are scarce. We aim to determine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with spondyloarthritis. We also aim to determine discriminative values of atherogenic indexes between patients with and without metabolic syndrome.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study including 51 patients meeting the ASAS 2009 criteria for radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. We measured the following parameters: triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoproteins (HDL_c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL_c), and total cholesterol (TC). We calculated TC/HDL_c, TG/HDL_c, LDL_c/HDL_c ratios, and atherogenic index of plasma (LogTG/HDL_c).

RESULTS

Metabolic syndrome was noted in 33% of cases. Patients with active disease had a higher body mass index (26.89±5.88 versus 23.63±4.47kg/m², p=0.03), higher TG (1.41±0.64 versus 0.89±0.5mmol/L, p=0.05) and a lower HDL_c level (1±0.28 versus 1.31±0.22mmol/L, p=0.01). However, the LogTG/HDL_c and TG/HDL_c were higher in patients under TNFα inhibitors. The ability of the TG/HDL_c ratio and LogTG/HDL_c to distinguish patients with or without metabolic syndrome were good at cut-offs of 1.33 and 0.22, respectively (specificity: 91.2% and sensitivity 70.6% for both ratios).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that metabolic syndrome is frequent in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Atherogenic indexes can be used for predicting metabolic syndrome in these patients.

Effect of Biologics on Cardiovascular Inflammation: Mechanistic Insights and Risk Reduction

It is increasingly recognized that atherosclerosis and consequently cardiovascular disease (CVD) are closely linked with inflammatory processes. The latter is in the center of the pathogenic mechanism underlying autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD). It follows then, that optimal control of inflammation in ARDs may lead to a decrease of the accompanied CVD risk. Major trials (eg, CANTOS, CIRT), aimed at examining the possible benefits of immunomodulatory treatments in CVD, demonstrated conflicting results. On the other hand, substantial evidence is accumulating about the possible beneficial effects of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with ARDs, particularly those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It seems that bDMARDs (some more than others) alter the lipid profile in RA patients but do not adversely affect, in most cases, the TC/HDL ratio. Favorable effects are noted for arterial stiffness and endothelial function. This is reflected in the lower risk for CVD events, seen in observational studies of RA patients treated with bDMARDs. It should be stressed that more data exist for the TNF-inhibitors than for other bDMARDs, such as tocilizumab, abatacept and rituximab. As regards the spondyloarthropathies (SpA), data are less robust. For TNF-inhibitors, effects appear to be on par with those seen in RA but no conclusions can be drawn for newer biologic drugs used in SpA (eg, IL-17 blockers). Finally, there is accumulating evidence for a beneficial effect of immunosuppressive treatment in cardiac inflammation and function in several ARDs. Introduction of newer therapeutic options in clinical practice seem to have a positive impact on CVD in the setting of ARD. This is probably due to better control of inflammation, but direct improvement in vascular pathology is also a valid hypothesis. Most data are derived from observational studies and, therefore, randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the possible favorable effect of bDMARDs on CVD outcomes.

Four-year follow-up of atherogenicity in rheumatoid arthritis patients: from the nationwide Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics Registry

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) on lipid profile and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to compare the occurrence of dyslipidemia between patients using bDMARDs, tsDMARDs, or conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs).

METHODS

Data on lipid profile, AIP, and occurrence of dyslipidemia were collected from the Korean College of Rheumatology BIOlogics registry. A comparison was conducted between patients using bDMARDs (tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor, tocilizumab, abatacept), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis), and cDMARDs. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the occurrence of dyslipidemia between groups, and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the cox proportional hazard method.

RESULTS

The data of 917, 826, 789, 691, and 520 RA patients were eligible for analysis at the baseline, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 4-year follow-ups, respectively. Baseline total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) were higher in the cDMARDs group, whereas AIP was comparable. During the 4-year follow-up, AIP was comparable between the groups. The occurrence of dyslipidemia did not show a significant difference when comparing the bDMARDs/tsDMARDs and cDMARDs groups (P=0.06) or the TNF-α inhibitor, tocilizumab, abatacept, JAKi, and cDMARD user groups (P=0.3). In the multivariate cox proportional hazard model, older age (HR=1.03, P=0.005) and concomitant hypertension (HR=2.21, P=0.013) were significantly associated with dyslipidemia occurrence.

CONCLUSION

Long-term use of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs is relatively safe with regard to lipid profile, AIP, and the occurrence of dyslipidemia in RA patients. Key Points • The use of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs did not increase the risk of dyslipidemia than cDMARDs use in patients with RA. • AIP was comparable between bDMARDs user, tsDMARDs user, and cDMARDs user group in 4-year follow-up data. • Based on the present study, the long-term use of bDMARDs or tsDMARDs did not significantly deteriorate atherogenic lipid profile nor an increased risk of dyslipidemia in patients with RA.