Experience of musculoskeletal ultrasound scanning improves physicians' physical examination skills in assessment of synovitis

Practical Use of Ultrasound in Modern Rheumatology-From A to Z

During the past 20 years, the use of ultrasound (US) in rheumatology has increased tremendously, and has become a valuable tool in rheumatologists' hands, not only for assessment of musculoskeletal structures like joints and peri-articular tissues, but also for evaluation of nerves, vessels, lungs, and skin, as well as for increasing the accuracy in a number of US-guided aspirations and injections. The US is currently used as the imaging method of choice for establishing an early diagnosis, assessing disease activity, monitoring treatment efficacy, and assessing the remission state of inflammatory joint diseases. It is also used as a complementary tool for the assessment of patients with degenerative joint diseases like osteoarthritis, and in the detection of crystal deposits for establishing the diagnosis of metabolic arthropathies (gout, calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease). The US has an added value in the diagnostic process of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis, and is currently included in the classification criteria. A novel use of US in the assessment of the skin and lung involvement in connective tissue diseases has the potential to replace more expensive and risky imaging modalities. This narrative review will take a close look at the most recent evidence-based data regarding the use of US in the big spectrum of rheumatic diseases.

Seeing is believing: Smart use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology practice

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography has become an increasingly valuable tool as a complement to the physical exam in rheumatology practice. Its point-of-care access, low cost, safety, portability, and reliability in trained hands, make this technique especially useful in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Growing evidence has demonstrated the value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in the detection of inflammatory and structural changes in patients with joint pain without obvious joint swelling, in differentiating various inflammatory diagnoses, in the monitoring of inflammatory arthritis, and interventional procedures. The potential role of ultrasound guiding treat-to-target strategies or tapering treatment in inflammatory arthritis requires further research. However, musculoskeletal ultrasound can also have pitfalls and limitations that a clinician should be aware of.

Associations of ultrasound-based inflammation patterns with peripheral innate lymphoid cell populations, serum cytokines/chemokines, and treatment response to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis

Objectives

We aimed to explore the associations of musculoskeletal inflammation patterns with peripheral blood innate lymphoid cell (ILC) populations, serum cytokines/chemokines, and treatment response to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA).

Methods

We enrolled 100 patients with either RA or SpA and performed ultrasound to evaluate power Doppler signals for synovitis (52 joint regions), tenosynovitis (20 tendons), and enthesitis (44 sites). We performed clustering analysis using unsupervised random forest based on the multi-axis ultrasound information and classified the patients into groups. We identified and counted ILC1-3 populations in the peripheral blood by flow cytometry and also measured the serum levels of 20 cytokines/chemokines. We also determined ACR20 response at 3 months in 38 patients who began treatment with methotrexate after study assessment.

Results

Synovitis was more prevalent and severe in RA than in SpA, whereas tenosynovitis and enthesitis were comparable between RA and SpA. Patients were classified into two groups which represented synovitis-dominant and synovitis-nondominant inflammation patterns. While peripheral ILC counts were not significantly different between RA and SpA, they were significantly higher in the synovitis-nondominant group than in the synovitis-dominant group (ILC1-3: p = 0.0007, p = 0.0061, and p = 0.0002, respectively). On the other hand, clustering of patients based on serum cytokines/chemokines did not clearly correspond either to clinical diagnoses or to synovitis-dominant/nondominant patterns. The synovitis-dominant pattern was the most significant factor that predicted clinical response to methotrexate (p = 0.0065).

Conclusions

Musculoskeletal inflammation patterns determined by ultrasound are associated with peripheral ILC counts and could predict treatment response to methotrexate.