A systematic review and network meta-analysis of current and investigational treatments for active ankylosing spondylitis

Comparative efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks, a selective inhibitor of IL-17F and IL-17A, with those of biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in non-radiographic axial SpA (nr-axSpA) and AS.

METHODS

A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials until January 2023 for inclusion in Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs), including three b/tsDMARDs exposure networks: predominantly-naïve, naïve, and experienced. Outcomes were Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)20, ASAS40 and ASAS partial remission (PR) response rates at 12-16 weeks. A safety NMA investigated discontinuations due to any reason and serious adverse events at 12-16 weeks.

RESULTS

The NMA included 36 trials. The predominantly-naïve network provided the most comprehensive results. In the predominantly-naïve nr-axSpA analysis, bimekizumab had significantly higher ASAS20 response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg [with loading dose (LD)/without LD], and comparable response rates vs other active comparators. In the predominantly-naïve AS analysis, bimekizumab had significantly higher ASAS40 response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg (without LD), significantly higher ASAS-PR response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg (with LD) and comparable response rates vs other active comparators. Bimekizumab demonstrated similar safety to that of other b/tsDMARDs.

CONCLUSION

Across ASAS outcomes, bimekizumab was comparable with most b/tsDMARDs, including ixekizumab, TNF inhibitors and upadacitinib, and achieved higher response rates vs secukinumab for some ASAS outcomes in predominantly b/tsDMARD-naïve nr-axSpA and AS patients at 12-16 weeks. In a pooled axSpA network, bimekizumab demonstrated comparable safety vs other b/tsDMARDs.

The Efficacy and Safety of Biologics in Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis and Their Impact on Quality of Life and Comorbidities: A Literature Review

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis that affects the axial skeleton, causing intense pain, progressive joint destruction, and a gradual reduction in physical function. Additionally, AS can result in extra-musculoskeletal manifestations including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), psoriasis, and acute anterior uveitis (AAU) affecting patients' quality of life (QoL). Furthermore, AS association with neurological and cardiovascular events has been documented. With the advent of biologics, treating AS has dramatically changed due to their high efficacy and tolerable safety. Nevertheless, there are differences in traits, including rapidity of onset, long-term efficacy, safety profile, and influence on comorbidities. A better understanding of such traits enables clinicians to make the best decision for each patient, increasing persistence, extending medication survival, enhancing patient satisfaction, and reducing the disease effect of AS. A review of the literature published in English in PubMed and Google Scholar databases from 2010 to 2023 was conducted. All relevant results fitting the scope of the topic were included. In this article, we emphasize biologics' efficacy and safety profile in patients with AS. In addition, we discuss the impact of biologics on comorbidities and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Comparison of biologics and small-molecule drugs in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background: Biologics and small-molecule drugs have become increasingly accepted worldwide in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). However, a quantitative multiple comparison of their efficacy and safety is lacking. This study aims to provide an integrated assessment of the relative benefits and safety profiles of these drugs in axSpA treatment. Methods: We included randomized clinical trials that compared biologics and small-molecule drugs in the treatment of axSpA patients. The primary outcomes assessed were efficacy, including the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) improvement of 20% (ASAS20) and 40% (ASAS40). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). We used the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve value and ranking plot to evaluate and rank clinical outcomes and safety profiles of different treatments. The two-dimensional graphs were illustrated to visually assess both the efficacy (horizontal axis) and safety (vertical axis) of each intervention. Results: Our analysis included 57 randomized clinical trials involving a total of 11,787 axSpA patients. We found that seven drugs (TNFRFc, TNFmAb, IL17Ai, IL17A/Fi, IL17RAi, JAK1/3i, and JAK1i) were significantly more effective in achieving ASAS20 response compared to the placebo (PLA). Except for IL17RAi, these drugs were also associated with higher ASAS40 responses. TNFmAb demonstrated the highest clinical response efficacy among all the drugs. Subgroup analyses for AS and nr-axSpA patients yielded similar results. IL17A/Fi emerged as a promising choice, effectively balancing efficacy and safety, as indicated by its position in the upper right corner of the two-dimensional graphs. Conclusion: Our findings highlight TNFmAb as the most effective biologic across all evaluated efficacy outcomes in this network meta-analysis. Meanwhile, IL17A/Fi stands out for its lower risk and superior performance in achieving a balance between efficacy and safety in the treatment of axSpA patients.

Evaluation of preclinical efficacy of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in ankylosing spondylitis

Objective

Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs) have significant regenerative, tissue repair, and immunomodulatory properties that can help reduce inflammatory responses in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In this study, we used a combination of bovine proteoglycan and dimethyldioctadecylammonium (DDA) to establish a mouse model of proteoglycan-induced spondylitis (PGISp). To evaluate the therapeutic effects of UCMSCs, we treated PGISp mice with different doses of hUCMSCs via tail vein injection.

Methods

At week 13, the PGISp mice exhibited thickened, erythematous paws, erythema in the extremities, and lameness. CT scans revealed necrotic lysis of chondrocytes, formation of fissures, visible hemorrhage, connective tissue hyperplasia, and focal infiltration of lymphocytes in the intervertebral discs. At week 14, the PGISp mice were randomly divided into three groups and administered different doses of hUCMSCs (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0×107 cells/kg, iv, QOW×2, n=10). To assess the therapeutic effects of hUCMSCs, we evaluated Th cell subsets in the spleen, spleen and thymus coefficients, peripheral blood inflammatory factors, and pathological and imaging observations of the spines and lumbar spines in the PGISp mice.

Results

The results demonstrated that injection of hUCMSCs shifted the balance axis between Th1 and Th2 cells in the spleen towards Th2 cells. Moreover, the spleen coefficient and levels of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and CCL-2) in the serum decreased after hUCMSC injection. CT imaging and pathological analysis indicated that hUCMSC treatment inhibited ectopic osteogenesis and maintained clear small joint gaps, which slowed down the progression of structural lesions in the disc, nucleus pulposus, fibrous ring, and cartilage in PGISp mice.

Conclusion

Administering hUCMSCs at the 14th week after modeling proved to be an effective treatment for PGISp mice. This experiment offers a valuable reference for the pre-clinical use of hUCMSCs in the treatment of AS.

Temporomandibular joint involvement in individuals with ankylosing spondylitis: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to identify the signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement in individuals with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

DESIGN

Systematic literature searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases (up to April 2022). Studies with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) in adults with AS were included. TMJ outcomes were extracted and analyzed qualitatively.

RESULTS

From 527 potentially eligible studies, 22 were included. A total of 4309 individuals with AS were evaluated, aged between 18 and 80 years, being males approximately 65% of the sample. Signs and symptoms of pain, tenderness to palpation on TMJ and masticatory muscles, joint noises (i.e., clicking or crepitus), limited mouth opening, disc displacement, and radiographic changes were often observed.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence shows that different signs and symptoms of TMD co-occur with AS disease, with a higher prevalence of TMD observed in individuals with AS than in individuals without AS. Indeed, it seems that individuals suffering from AS disease have an increased risk of developing TMD.

Cervical Spine Fracture Prediction by Simple Plain X-Ray in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients after Low-Energy Trauma

Objective

Timely diagnosis is essential in the management of cervical spine fracture (CSF) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. However, the value of simple plain X‐ray in the early management of ASCSF has not been well‐studied. This study aimed to explore the prediction ability of simple plain X‐ray for CSF in AS patients who suffer from low‐energy trauma (LET).

Methods

From January 2010 to December 2020, AS patients who experienced LET were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data including gender, age, body mass index, time interval between AS diagnosis and trauma, smoking or not, and a presence of continuous bony bridge between anterior margin of C1 and C2 body or not were collected. Morphological features including atlanto‐occipital gap, Pavlov ratio of C2–7, Angle A–D, Borden's index, and Harrison's value were measured by the lateral cervical X‐ray. All data was compared between patients who had CSF and those who did not. Binary logistic regression analysis and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to discriminate and assess the predictive parameters.

Results

A total of 129 AS patients were divided into Fracture group (41 cases) and Non‐fracture group (88 cases) based on whether CSF existed. Twelve parameters showed significant differences between two groups (p < 0.05). According to the binary logistic regression model, four of the 12 parameters showed a further correlation with the occurrence of CSF, namely, mean Pavlov ratio (p < 0.001, OR = 0.067, 95% CI: 0.023 to 0.194), Angle D (p = 0.031, OR = 1.057, 95% CI: 1.005 to 1.112), Borden's index (p = 0.042, OR = 1.131, 95% CI: 0.994 to 1.287), the time interval between the AS diagnosis and the trauma (p < 0.020, OR = 0.935, 95% CI: 0.883 to 0.990). The ROC curve further revealed the mean Pavlov ratio had the largest AUC (0.793) with the cut‐off of 0.72. While the optimal cut‐off value was 45.65° for Angle D (sensitivity = 61.0%, specificity = 78.4%), 9.79 for Borden's index (sensitivity = 87.8%, specificity = 37.5%), 15.50 years for the time interval between AS diagnosis and trauma (sensitivity = 70.7%, specificity = 56.8%).

Conclusions

The time interval between the AS diagnosis and the trauma, mean Pavlov ratio, Angle D, and Borden's index showed predictive ability for the occurrence of CSF in AS patients who encounter LET. Surgeons should consider measuring these parameters in the management of AS patient.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Golimumab in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients With Early and Late Disease Through One Year of the GO-ALIVE Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) golimumab in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with early disease (ED) versus late disease (LD).

METHODS

The phase 3, double-blind, GO-ALIVE study randomized patients to IV golimumab 2 mg/kg at weeks 0 and 4 and then every 8 weeks through week 52, or placebo at weeks 0, 4, and 12 with crossover to IV golimumab at week 16. Clinical efficacy was assessed by ≥20% improvement in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society response criteria (ASAS20), ≥50% improvement in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI 50), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) <1.3 (inactive disease). Using self-reported duration of inflammatory back pain (IBP), patients were grouped into quartiles: first = ED and fourth = LD. Descriptive statistics summarized efficacy and safety findings through 1 year.

RESULTS

Early disease patients (n = 60) were ~10 years younger and had shorter median AS (IBP) symptom duration (2-3 years) versus LD patients (n = 52; 21-24 years). At week 16, numerically higher proportions of golimumab- than placebo-treated patients achieved ASAS20 (ED: 71% vs. 32%; LD: 67% vs. 21%), BASDAI 50 (ED: 40% vs. 12%; LD: 33% vs. 7%), and ASDAS <1.3 (ED: 17% vs. 4%; LD 8% vs. 0%) regardless of IBP duration. Efficacy was durable through 1 year of treatment; however, response rates were numerically higher in patients with ED versus LD. Through week 60, adverse events and serious adverse events, respectively, were reported by 46% and 3% of ED patients and 61% and 2% of LD patients.

CONCLUSION

Prompt diagnosis of AS and early treatment with IV golimumab may yield more robust improvements in disease activity.

Optimal Biologic Drugs for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis and Network Metaregression

Background

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a common immune-related systemic chronic inflammatory osteoarthropathy. Previous studies have proven that biologic agents, including IL-17A inhibitors (IL17Ai), TNF-α inhibitor FC fusion protein (TNFiFCP), or fully human monoclonal antibody (TNFiNMA) and JAK inhibitor (JAKi), are effective for AS treatment. Our study is aimed at comparing the clinical efficacy, tolerability, and safety of different biological agents, including novel IL-6 inhibitor (IL6i), IL-23 inhibitor (IL23i), and IL-17 A/F dual variable domain inhibitor (IL17AFi) in AS.

Method

PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CNKI, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. A frequentist framework network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed. Ranking effects were calculated by surface under the cumulative ranking analysis (SUCRA) and cluster-rank analysis.

Results

IL17AFi reported both the highest ASAS40 (SUCRA = 91.4%) and ASAS20 (SUCRA = 92.5%) response, while IL6i and IL23i reported the lowest responses (SUCRA = 6.6% and 19.9%, respectively). With the exceptions of IL6i (RR 0.60, 95% CI (0.22 to 1.67) for ASAS40 and 1.36 (0.71 to 2.58) for ASAS20) and IL23i (0.98 (0.68 to 1.40) for ASAS40 and 0.91 (0.70 to 1.19) for ASAS20), all biological drugs demonstrated statistically superior ASAS responses than placebo. TNFiFMA performed best in the suppression of disease activity (SUCRA = 77.4%, SMD 2.35, and 95% CI (1.11 to 3.59)) and functional improvement (SUCRA = 68.8%, SMD 1.67, and 95% CI (0.59 to 2.74)). There were no significant differences in tolerability or safety between biologic drugs and placebo.

Conclusions

The novel IL-17 A/F dual variable domain inhibitor, bimekizumab, may be an ideal future treatment choice for AS, while IL-23 and IL-6 inhibitors demonstrate little potential in the treatment of AS. For patients with rapid disease progression and severe functional limitation, TNF-α inhibitors, especially infliximab, are safe and effective and could be a first-line treatment choice.

Tofacitinib for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis in adults

INTRODUCTION

Ankylosing spondylitis, also known as radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, is a complex, immune-mediated inflammatory disorder most commonly involving the spine including the sacroiliac joints.

AREAS COVERED

Complex pathogenesis of axial spondyloarthritis involving genetic, environmental, and both innate and adaptive immune systems. Treatment options for ankylosing spondylitis. Pharmacologic properties, efficacy, and safety of tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor. Data regarding efficacy of approved JAK inhibitors in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis, including tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib.

EXPERT OPINION

Current treatment options of ankylosing spondylitis include NSAIDs, TNFi, and IL-17i. JAK inhibitors present a new class of therapy that has shown efficacy in the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis in adults. While it has not been directly compared to alternate therapies, tofacitinib has been shown to be effective in both phase II and phase III trials for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. While these trials did not show any significant difference from placebo in terms of safety, the ORAL Surveillance study showed tofacitinib to be inferior to TNFi when comparing adverse events. Thus, tofacitinib presents a viable treatment option for the management of AS, however shared decision making regarding risks and benefits will be important.

Disease modification in ankylosing spondylitis with TNF inhibitors: spotlight on early phase clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease whose main hallmark is involvement of the axial skeleton. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the first line treatment; however, their use is limited because of side effects. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are a safe and effective therapy, and they have been approved for the management of AS.

AREAS COVERED

This is a review of the efficacy of TNFi in disease modification in AS. It is focused on results from early-phase clinical trials; however, it also discusses the most relevant findings in order to optimize anti-TNF treatment. A literature search was done using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library, looking for scientific publications from inception to August 2021. Further information was retrieved from ClinicalTrial.gov and Clinicaltrialsregister.eu.

EXPERT OPINION

TNFi have demonstrated short- and long-term improvements in all aspects of disease activity, as well as physical function in patients with AS. They have drastically revolutionized the management of the disease; and even though new drugs have become available in the market, TNFi has not been displaced for the treatment of AS, and still constitute the best alternative when NSAIDs are no-longer an option.

Immunosuppression in Rheumatologic and Auto-immune Disease

Many rheumatologic diseases are thought to originate in dysregulation of the immune system; lupus nephritis, for example, involves humoral immunity, while autoinflammatory diseases such as familial Mediterranean fever are caused by defects in innate immunity. Of note, this dysregulation may involve both upregulation of immune system components and aspects of immunodeficiency. Treatment of rheumatologic diseases thus requires a familiarity with a variety of immunosuppressive medications and their effects on immune system function.In many rheumatologic conditions, due to an incompletely elucidated mechanism of disease, immunosuppression is relatively broad in contrast to agents used, for example, in treatment of transplant rejection. Multiple immunosuppressive drugs may also be used in succession or in combination. As such, an understanding of the mechanisms and targets of immunosuppressive drugs is essential to appreciating their utility and potential adverse effects. Because of the overlap between therapies used in rheumatologic as well as other inflammatory disorders, some of these medications are discussed in other disease processes (e.g., Immunosuppression for inflammatory bowel disease) or in greater detail in other chapters of this textbook (corticosteroids, mTOR inhibitors, antiproliferative agents).

Efficacy of Tofacitinib in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic approaches for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) include non-pharmacologic therapies, symptomatic treatments, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin inhibitors, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin, and Janus kinase inhibitors. This systematic review aimed to provide complete and up-to-date information on efficacy of tofacitinib in the treatment of PsA, giving special attention to non-skin manifestations (peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, and dactylitis).

METHODS

A search of studies published between January 2016 and June 2020 was carried out on PubMed and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

The number of studies with tofacitinib in PsA is limited and most of them are post hoc analyses from OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond. Tofacitinib has been demonstrated to be efficacious for the treatment of all disease manifestations in PsA. Superior effectivity to placebo is achieved at the earliest time point evaluated, and maintained over time. Patients who switch from placebo to tofacitinib show the same improvements; however, the time to initial response is faster in patients who firstly receive tofacitinib, compared with those switching subsequently. Additional data suggest that tofacitinib may be also effective for the treatment of the axial domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Tofacitinib has been demonstrated to be efficacious for the treatment of peripheral and axial involvement, enthesitis, and dactylitis manifestation in PsA. Further prospective and long-term studies are required to corroborate and complete the present results. Similarly, real-world evidence is also necessary to complement the information obtained in clinical trials, and thereby to have a better overview of real efficacy and safety of the drug.

Propensity score matching/reweighting analysis comparing intravenous golimumab to infliximab for ankylosing spondylitis using data from the GO-ALIVE and ASSERT trials

Objective

To compare the relative efficacy of intravenous golimumab (GOL IV) and infliximab (IFX) for active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods

Propensity score (PS) methods were used to compare the efficacy of GOL IV 2 mg/kg and IFX 5 mg/kg using individual patient data (IPD) from the active arms of the phase 3 GO-ALIVE and ASSERT studies. Outcomes included the proportion of patients with a ≥ 20% improvement in the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Criteria (ASAS20), change from baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) score, and change from baseline in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels from weeks 4–52.

Results

Before matching, 105 patients were treated with GOL IV and 201 patients were treated with IFX. After matching on all covariates, 118 patients were included in the ASAS20 analysis, 96 in the BASFI analysis, and 160 in the CRP analysis. After matching, GOL IV showed significantly greater improvement in ASAS20 response than IFX for weeks 28–44 (e.g., OR = 9.05 [95% CI 1.62–50.4] at week 44) and was comparable in change from baseline in BASFI scores and CRP levels to IFX at all time points. Results were robust for inclusion of different sets of covariates in scenario analyses.

Conclusions

This is the first analysis of its kind to leverage clinical trial data to compare two biologics using PS methods in the treatment of active AS. Overall, GOL IV was associated with greater improvement in ASAS20 response than IFX in patients with AS at 28, 36, and 44 weeks of follow-up.

Key Points • Although intravenous golimumab (GOL IV) and infliximab (IFX) are the only two IV-based tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors with demonstrated phase 3 clinical efficacy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), no study has evaluated their comparative efficacy in a head-to-head trial. • Propensity score matching was used to derive indirect treatment comparisons of GOL IV and IFX for ≥ 20% in the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Criteria (ASAS20), change in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and change in C-reactive protein (CRP) using individual patient data from the GO-ALIVE and ASSERT phase 3 trials. • Propensity score matched indirect comparisons showed improved relative efficacy of GOL IV compared to IFX; after matching for up to 16 baseline covariates, GOL IV was associated with significantly greater odds of ASAS20 response at weeks 28, 36, and 44 than IFX as well as equivalent changes from baseline in BASFI and CRP. • This novel application of propensity score matching using data from phase 3 trials, the first analysis of its kind in AS, allowed adjustment for important imbalances in prognostic factors between trials to generate estimates of comparative efficacy between GOL IV and IFX in the absence of a head-to-head trial between these treatments.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10067-020-05051-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The off-label uses profile of tofacitinib in systemic rheumatic diseases

Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor that targets JAK1/JAK3. Tofacitinib has been approved by the FDA to be used in the treatments of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, plaque psoriasis and ulcerative colitis. Considering the important pathogenic role of the JAK/STAT pathway in autoimmune disease, tofacitinib could be, theoretically, effective in the treatments of other systemic rheumatic diseases. Here we reviewed the published literature to profile the perspectives about the off-label uses of tofacitinib, especially in those refractory cases with poor response to conventional therapies or biologic agents. Tofacitinib can be a new therapeutic option and help reducing hormone dependence and correlated adverse events.