PM-Scl and Th/To in systemic sclerosis: a comparison of different autoantibody assays

Distinct Scleroderma Autoantibody Profiles Stratify Patients for Cancer Risk at Scleroderma Onset and During the Disease Course

OBJECTIVES

We examined whether an array of scleroderma autoantibodies associates with risk of cancer and could be useful tools for risk stratification.

METHODS

Scleroderma cancer cases and scleroderma controls without cancer from the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center and the University of Pittsburgh Scleroderma Center were studied. Sera were assayed by Lineblot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for autoantibodies against centromere, topoisomerase 1, RNA polymerase (POLR) 3, PM/Scl, Th/To, NOR90, U3 RNP, Ku, Ro52, U1RNP, and RNPC3. Logistic regression models were constructed to examine whether distinct autoantibodies associated with overall cancer at any time and cancer-associated scleroderma (cancer occurring three years before and after scleroderma onset). The effects of having more than one autoantibody on cancer were further examined using random forest analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 676 cases and 687 controls were studied. After adjusting for relevant covariates, anti-POLR3 (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.11) and monospecific anti-Ro52 (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.29-3.74) were associated with an increased overall cancer risk, whereas anticentromere (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.93) and anti-U1RNP (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.93) were associated with lower risk. When examining risk of cancer-associated scleroderma, these immune responses remained associated with increased or decreased risk: anti-POLR3 (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.33-3.91), monospecific anti-Ro52 (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.05-6.30), anticentromere (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.74), and anti-U1RNP (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11-0.93). Anti-Ro52 plus anti-U1RNP or anti-Th/To was associated with decreased cancer risk compared with anti-Ro52 alone.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that five distinct scleroderma immune responses, alone or in combination, may be useful tools to stratify the risk of cancer for scleroderma patients. Further study examining cancer risk in autoantibody subgroups relative to the general population is warranted.

The Autoantibody Array Assay: A Novel Autoantibody Detection Method

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) and dermatomyositis (DM) are autoimmune collagen diseases. Specific autoantibodies are known to be involved in their pathogeneses, each presenting with a different clinical manifestation. Although immunoprecipitation is the gold standard method for detecting autoantibodies, it is difficult to perform in all cases owing to the use of radioisotopes. In this study, we developed a new detection method for SSc and DM autoantibodies (A-cube) using cell-free protein synthesis and examined its validity. Proteins were synthesized using wheat germ cell-free protein synthesis. A total of 100 cases of SSc, 50 cases of DM, and 82 healthy controls were examined. The validity of the method was examined by a comparison with existing test results. Anti-centromere antibody, anti-topoisomerase I antibody, anti-RNA polymerase III antibody, anti-U1RNP anti-body, anti-Jo-1 antibody, anti-TIF1γ antibody, anti-Mi-2 antibody, and anti-ARS antibody were tested for. The results suggested that A-cube is comparable with existing testing methods or has a high sensitivity or specificity. In addition, there was a case in which the diagnosis was reconsidered using the A-cube. The quality of the A-cube was ensured, and its usefulness for a comprehensive analysis was demonstrated. The A-cube can therefore contribute to the clinical assessment and treatment of SSc and DM.

Subsets of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis Enriched for Contemporaneous Cancer Relative to the General Population

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates cancer risk in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) relative to the general population.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of IIM patients and malignancy. Myositis-specific and -associated autoantibodies were determined by Euroimmun line blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and immunoprecipitation. We calculated standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs) and adjusted for calendar year, age, sex, race, and ethnicity by comparing observed cancers in IIM patients versus expected cancers in the general population using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry.

RESULTS

Of 1,172 IIM patients, 203 (17%) patients with a cancer history were studied. Over a median follow-up of 5.2 years, the observed number of IIM patients diagnosed with cancer was increased 1.43-fold (SPR 1.43 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.15-1.77]; P = 0.002). Within 3 years of IIM symptom onset, an increased SPR was observed for anti-transcription intermediary factor 1γ (anti-TIF1γ)-positive patients for ovarian and breast cancer (ovarian SPR 18.39 [95% CI 5.01-47.08], P < 0.001; breast SPR 3.84 [95% CI 1.99-6.71], P < 0.001). As expected, anti-TIF1γ positivity was associated with a significantly elevated SPR; however, only 55% (36 of 66) of all cancers within 3 years of dermatomyositis onset were observed in anti-TIF1γ-positive patients. Other myositis-specific autoantibodies, including anti-Mi-2, anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE), and anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP-2), accounted for 26% (17 of 66) of cancers diagnosed within 3 years of dermatomyositis onset. No cancer association, positive or negative, was observed for patients with antisynthetase, anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (anti-MDA-5), or anti-hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti-HMGCR) antibodies.

CONCLUSION

In a tertiary referral center population, anti-TIF1γ was most strongly associated with breast and ovarian cancer. Patients with antisynthetase, anti-MDA-5, or anti-HMGCR antibodies had the same cancer risk as the general population.

Diagnostic Performance of Anti-Topoisomerase-I, Anti-Th/To Antibody and Anti-Fibrillarin Using Immunoblot Method in Systemic Sclerosis Related Interstitial Lung Disease Patients

Purpose

Systemic Sclerosis related Interstitial Lung Disease (SSc-ILD) is the most common clinical manifestation of SSc with a high morbidity and mortality rate. However, the Thorax High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HCRT) as the gold standard diagnostic tool for SSc-ILD is not widely equipped in health-care facilities. Recently, specific autoantibody examination (anti-topoisomerase-1 (ATA), anti-Th/To antibody, and anti-fibrillarin) has been studied and used for SSc-ILD diagnosis. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of specific autoantibody examination among SSc-ILD.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study reviews data from local dedicated SSc database (Sclerosis Systemic Register System Development Electronic Medical Record) which were collected between March 2019 and August 2021. Population of this study include adult inpatients and outpatients at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, who have been diagnosed with SSc based on ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria, which met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The SSc patients were grouped into SSc-ILD and SSc non-ILD based on HRCT and tested for SSC-ILD specific autoantibody test (ATA, anti-Th/To antibody, and anti-fibrillarin) to obtain the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive value).

Results

A total of 74 subject grouped into 47 SSc-ILD and 27 SSc-non ILD patients. ATA validity test results showed 85.1% sensitivity, 19.2% specificity, 65.6% PPV, and 41.7% NPV. Anti-Th/To antibody obtained 27.7% sensitivity, 88.9% specificity, 81.3% PPV, and 41.4% NPV. The anti-fibrillarin validity test result showed a 12.8% sensitivity, 96.3% specificity, 85.7% PPV, and 38.8% NPV. The combination of the three parameters had 95.7% sensitivity, 18.5% specificity, 67.1% PPV, and 71.4% NPV.

Conclusion

The combination of the SSc-ILD specific autoantibody test and HCRT is expected to detect all affected patients. Based on these results, SSc-ILD autoantibody-specific test can be used as an alternative examination for screening and diagnosis in health-care facilities that are not equipped with HRCT.

Scleroderma autoantibodies in guiding monitoring and treatment decisions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

One of the key clinical challenges of systemic sclerosis (SSc) is diversity in clinical presentation, organ involvement and disease progression. Antinuclear autoantibodies (ANA) are central to the diagnosis of SSc. ANA specificities associated with distinct clinical patterns of organ and skin involvement. Understanding of the molecular differences and pathogenesis of scleroderma has helped further inform clinical acumen. Here, we provide an update on ANA on clinical profiling, management and future direction of SSc.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been further development in delineating clinical patterns in ANA, genetic susceptibility and antigen triggers predisposing to ANA subtypes. Sub-group analysis of recent clinical trials shows differing treatment responses to novel therapeutics.

SUMMARY

ANA subtyping is likely to be firmly embedded into future classification systems. Beyond informing current management and monitoring of scleroderma patients, ANA subsets have implication on future research and clinical trial design.