Evidence for long-term spatial memory in a parid

Cognitive control of memory in a food-storing and a non-storing bird species

Scatter hoarding black-capped chickadees use memory to relocate hidden food, often after delays of hours or days. The ability of these birds to maintain accurate memories of the location and current status of many food caches while engaging in other distracting daily activities suggests that their memory may be especially resistant to competing cognitive load. We measured resistance to competing cognitive load during spatial memory tests in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) and a non-caching species, dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Birds were presented with two types of task. In the Discrimination task, birds learned by trial-and-error to select a target from among 2 distractors. In the Match-to-Sample task, birds viewed a sample which they had to remember in order to correctly select it from among two distractors at test. On two-thirds of trials, the tasks were presented Stand-Alone: after birds initiated a trial, they completed either a Discrimination or a Match-to-Sample task. The remaining trials were Concurrent causing a competing cognitive load: after birds intiated a trial, they saw the sample for the Match-to-Sample task, then completed a Discrimination during the retention interval, and finally completed a Match-to-Sample test. Competing cognitive load reduced accuracy of juncos significantly more than accuracy of chickadees. The need to encode and retain the locations of multiple food caches may have led to the evolution of enhanced cognitive control of memory in black-capped chickadees.

What is the nature of cache memory in Parids? A comment on Chettih et al. 2024

Recent findings by Chettih et al. (Cell 187: 1922-1935, 2024) from electrophysiological recordings in the hippocampus of black-capped chickadees shed light on the debate about how food-hoarding Parids may remember their cache sites. When birds retrieve caches, a "bar code" is reactivated, which is very similar to the code generated when the same cache was made. The current evidence suggests that this bar code is only triggered after the bird starts to retrieve the cache, and not in anticipation. This finding is more consistent with cued recall than with free recall of cache locations.

Different memory systems in food-hoarding birds: A response to Pravosudov

We recently showed that food-hoarding birds use familiarity processes more than recollection processes when remembering the spatial location of their caches (Smulders et al., Animal Cognition 26:1929-1943, 2023). Pravosudov (Learning & Behavior, https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-023-00616-x , 2023) called our findings into question, claiming that our method is unable to distinguish between recollection and familiarity, and that associative learning tasks are a better way to study the memory for cache sites. In this response, we argue that our methods would have been more likely to detect recollection than familiarity, if Pravosudov's assertions were correct. We also point out that associative learning mechanisms may be good for building semantic knowledge, but are incompatible with the needs of cache site memory, which requires the unique encoding of caching events.

Multiple cache recovery task cannot determine memory mechanisms

A recent paper Smulders et al., (2023) analyzed results of an experiment in which food-caching coal tits needed to relocate and recover multiple previously made food caches and argued that food caching parids use familiarity and not recollection memory when recovering food caches. The memory task involving recovery of multiple caches in the same trial, however, cannot discriminate between these two memory mechanisms because small birds do not need to recover multiple caches to eat during a single trial. They satiate quickly after eating just the first recovered food cache and quickly lose motivation to search for caches, and can be expected to start exploring noncache locations rather than recovering the remaining caches, which would result in inaccurate memory measurements.

Learning and memory in hybrid migratory songbirds: cognition as a reproductive isolating barrier across seasons

Hybrid zones can be used to identify traits that maintain reproductive isolation and contribute to speciation. Cognitive traits may serve as post-mating reproductive isolating barriers, reducing the fitness of hybrids if, for example, misexpression occurs in hybrids and disrupts important neurological mechanisms. We tested this hypothesis in a hybrid zone between two subspecies of Swainson's thrushes (Catharus ustulatus) using two cognitive tests-an associative learning spatial test and neophobia test. We included comparisons across the sexes and seasons (spring migration and winter), testing if hybrid females performed worse than males (as per Haldane's rule) and if birds (regardless of ancestry or sex) performed better during migration, when they are building navigational maps and encountering new environments. We documented reduced cognitive abilities in hybrids, but this result was limited to males and winter. Hybrid females did not perform worse than males in either season. Although season was a significant predictor of performance, contrary to our prediction, all birds learned faster during the winter. The hypothesis that cognitive traits could serve as post-mating isolating barriers is relatively new; this is one of the first tests in a natural hybrid zone and non-food-caching species. We also provide one of the first comparisons of cognitive abilities between seasons. Future neurostructural and neurophysiological work should be used to examine mechanisms underlying our behavioral observations.

A Hypothetical Modelling and Experimental Design for Measuring Foraging Strategies of Animals

Based on animal long-term and short-term memory radial foraging techniques (or LMRFT and SMRFT), we devise a modelling approach that could capture the foraging behaviours of animals. In this modelling, LMRFT-based optimal foraging paths and SMRFT-based ones are constructed with respect to different levels of foraging strategies. Then, by a devised structural metric, we calculate the structural distance between these modelled optimal paths and the hypothetical real foraging paths taken by agents. We sample 20 foods positions via a chosen bivariate normal distribution for three agents. Then, we calculate their Euclidean distance matrix and their ranked matrix. Using LMRFT-based or SMRFT-based optimal foraging strategies, the optimal foraging paths are created. Then, foraging strategies are identified using optimal parameter learning techniques. Our results, based on the simulated foraging data, show that LMRFT-based foraging strategies for agent 1,2 and 3 are 3, 2 and 5, i.e., agent 3 is the most intelligent one among the three in terms of radial level. However, from the SMRFT-based perspective of strategies, their optimal foraging strategies are 5,5 and 2, respectively, i.e., agent 1 is as intelligent as agent 2 and both of them have better SMRFT-based foraging strategies than agent 3.

Seasonal variation in gonadal hormones, spatial cognition, and hippocampal attributes: More questions than answers

A large body of research has been dedicated to understanding the factors that modulate spatial cognition and attributes of the hippocampus, a highly plastic brain region that underlies spatial processing abilities. Variation in gonadal hormones impacts spatial memory and hippocampal attributes in vertebrates, although the direction of the effect has not been entirely consistent. To add complexity, individuals in the field must optimize fitness by coordinating activities with the appropriate environmental cues, and many of these behaviors are correlated tightly with seasonal variation in gonadal hormone release. As such, it remains unclear if the relationship among systemic gonadal hormones, spatial cognition, and the hippocampus also exhibits seasonal variation. This review presents an overview of the relationship among gonadal hormones, the hippocampus, and spatial cognition, and how the seasonal release of gonadal hormones correlates with seasonal variation in spatial cognition and hippocampal attributes. Additionally, this review presents other neuroendocrine mechanisms that may be involved in modulating the relationship among seasonality, gonadal hormone release, and the hippocampus and spatial cognition, including seasonal rhythms of steroid hormone binding globulins, neurosteroids, sex steroid hormone receptor expression, and hormone interactions. Here, endocrinology, ecology, and behavioral neuroscience are brought together to present an overview of the research demonstrating the mechanistic effects of systemic gonadal hormones on spatial cognition and the hippocampus, while, at a functional level, superimposing seasonal effects to examine ecologically-relevant circannual changes in gonadal hormones and spatial behaviors.

Flexible use of memory by food-caching birds

Animals use memory-guided and memory-independent strategies to make navigational decisions. Disentangling the contribution of these strategies to navigation is critical for understanding how memory influences behavioral output. To address this issue, we studied spatial behaviors of the chickadee, a food-caching bird. Chickadees hide food in concealed, scattered locations and retrieve their caches later in time. We designed an apparatus that allows birds to cache and retrieve food at many sites while navigating in a laboratory arena. This apparatus enabled automated tracking of behavioral variables – including caches, retrievals, and investigations of different sites. We built probabilistic models to fit these behavioral data using a combination of mnemonic and non-mnemonic factors. We found that chickadees use some navigational strategies that are independent of cache memories, including opportunistic foraging and spatial biases. They combine these strategies with spatially precise memories of which sites contain caches and which sites they have previously checked. A single memory of site contents is used in a context-dependent manner: during caching chickadees avoid sites that contain food, while during retrieval they instead preferentially access occupied sites. Our approach is a powerful way to investigate navigational decisions in a natural behavior, including flexible contributions of memory to these decisions.

Humans form new memories about what is happening in their lives every day. These autobiographical memories depend on a part of the brain called the hippocampus. But how these memories are recorded remains unclear. Studying certain birds may help to provide more insight.

Black-capped chickadees, for example, are memory specialists. They stash thousands of food items and use their memories to recover these hidden food stores. This behavior also relies on these birds’ hippocampus. Studying these animals' behavior in the laboratory may help scientists decode how the birds use their memories and to gain more insight about the brain processes underlying memory.

Now, Applegate and Aronov show that chickadees use memory not only to retrieve food but also to decide where to hide it in the first place. In the experiments, chickadees were placed in a specialized enclosure with a grid of holes covered by silicone rubber flaps on the floor. The birds lifted the flaps with their toes or beak to hide a piece of sunflower seed underneath. Applegate and Aronov recorded and analyzed the animals’ seed hiding and retrieving behavior with a video camera to determine whether the birds were remembering the sites or happening on them by chance.

This revealed that black-capped chickadees use the same memories of where they had hidden food in two different ways. When they were hiding new morsels, the birds remembered where they had stashed food and avoided those flaps. When they were retrieving food, the birds knew exactly which flaps to look under. Future experiments using this special enclosure may help scientists monitor what happens in the chickadees’ brains during these activities.

Interaction of memory systems is controlled by context in both food-storing and non-storing birds

Animals and humans have multiple memory systems. While both black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) and dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) are under selective pressure to remember reliable long-term spatial locations (habit memory), chickadees must additionally quickly form and rapidly update spatial memory for unique cache sites (one-trial memory). We conducted a series of three experiments in which we assessed the degree to which habit and one-trial memory were expressed in both species as a function of training context. In Experiment 1, birds failed to demonstrate habits on probe trials after being trained in the context of a biased Match-to-Sample task in which the same high-frequency target was always correct. In Experiment 2, habit strongly controlled performance when habits were learned as Discriminations, defining a specific training context. In Experiment 3, context no longer defined when to express habits and habit and one-trial memory competed for control of behavior. Across all experiments, birds preferentially used the memory system at test that was consistent with the context in which it was acquired. Although the memory adaptations that allow chickadees to successfully recover cached food might predispose them to favor one-trial memory, we found no species differences in the weighting of habit and one-trial memory. In the experiments here, context was a powerful factor controlling the interaction of memory systems.

Factors That Modulate Neurogenesis: A Top-Down Approach

Although hippocampal neurogenesis in the adult brain has been conserved across the vertebrate lineage, laboratory studies have primarily examined this phenomenon in rodent models. This approach has been successful in elucidating important factors and mechanisms that can modulate rates of hippocampal neurogenesis, including hormones, environmental complexity, learning and memory, motor stimulation, and stress. However, recent studies have found that neurobiological research on neurogenesis in rodents may not easily translate to, or explain, neurogenesis patterns in nonrodent systems, particularly in species examined in the field. This review examines some of the evolutionary and ecological variables that may also modulate neurogenesis patterns. This 'top-down' and more naturalistic approach, which incorporates ecology and natural history, particularly of nonmodel species, may allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the functional significance of neurogenesis.

Context-specific effects of estradiol on spatial learning and memory in the zebra finch

Estradiol is known to impact cognitive function including spatial learning and memory, with studies focused largely on rodent models. Estrogens can be produced peripherally or centrally as neuroestrogens, and the specific role for neuroestrogens in memory processes remains unresolved. Many songbirds possess remarkable spatial memory capabilities and also express the estrogen synthetic enzyme aromatase abundantly in the hippocampus, suggesting that locally-produced estrogens may promote the acquisition or retrieval of spatial memories in these birds. We examined the effect of estradiol on spatial memory in three contexts in the zebra finch: retrieval after discrimination training, retrieval after familiarization but without discrimination training, and memory acquisition, using a combination of estradiol implants and oral dosing with the aromatase inhibitor fadrozole (FAD). Retrieval of spatial memory in both contexts was impaired when estradiol production was blocked. However, spatial memory acquisition was enhanced when estradiol production was inhibited whereas estradiol replacement impaired acquisition. These results provide evidence for a context-specific role of estradiol in songbird spatial memory, results that find accord with some mammalian studies but have not yet been observed in birds.

Long-term memory of hierarchical relationships in free-living greylag geese

Animals may memorise spatial and social information for many months and even years. Here, we investigated long-term memory of hierarchically ordered relationships, where the position of a reward depended on the relationship of a stimulus relative to other stimuli in the hierarchy. Seventeen greylag geese (Anser anser) had been trained on discriminations between successive pairs of five or seven implicitly ordered colours, where the higher ranking colour in each pair was rewarded. Geese were re-tested on the task 2, 6 and 12 months after learning the dyadic colour relationships. They chose the correct colour above chance at all three points in time, whereby performance was better in colour pairs at the beginning or end of the colour series. Nonetheless, they also performed above chance on internal colour pairs, which is indicative of long-term memory for quantitative differences in associative strength and/or for relational information. There were no indications for a decline in performance over time, indicating that geese may remember dyadic relationships for at least 6 months and probably well over 1 year. Furthermore, performance in the memory task was unrelated to the individuals' sex and their performance while initially learning the dyadic colour relationships. We discuss possible functions of this long-term memory in the social domain.