Detecting surface changes in a familiar tune: exploring pitch, tempo and timbre

Do rats (Rattus norvegicus) perceive octave equivalence, a critical human cross-cultural aspect of pitch perception?

Octave equivalence describes the perception that two notes separated by a doubling in frequency have a similar quality. In humans, octave equivalence is important to both music and language learning and is found cross-culturally. Cross-species studies comparing human and non-human animals can help illuminate the necessary pre-conditions to developing octave equivalence. Here, we tested whether rats (Rattus norvegicus) perceive octave equivalence using a standardized cross-species paradigm. This allowed us to disentangle concurring hypotheses regarding the evolutionary roots of this phenomenon. One hypothesis is that octave equivalence is directly connected to vocal learning, but this hypothesis is only partially supported by data. According to another hypothesis, the harmonic structure of mammalian vocalizations may be more important. If rats perceive octave equivalence, this would support the importance of vocal harmonic structure. If rats do not perceive octave equivalence, this would suggest that octave equivalence evolved independently in several mammalian clades due to a more complex interplay of different factors such as-but not exclusively-the ability to vocally learn. Evidence from our study suggests that rats do perceive octave equivalence, thereby suggesting that the harmonic vocal structure found in mammals may be a key pre-requisite for octave equivalence. Stage 1 approved protocol: the study reported here was originally accepted as a Registered Report and the study design was approved in Stage 1. We hereby confirm that the completed experiment(s) have been executed and analysed in the manner originally approved with any unforeseen changes in those approved methods and analyses clearly noted. The approved Stage 1 protocol can be found at: https://osf.io/gvf7c/?view_only=76dc1840f31c4f9ab59eb93cbadb98b7.

Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats

A central feature in music is the hierarchical organization of its components. Musical pieces are not a simple concatenation of chords, but are characterized by rhythmic and harmonic structures. Here, we explore if sensitivity to music structure might emerge in the absence of any experience with musical stimuli. For this, we tested if rats detect the difference between structured and unstructured musical excerpts and compared their performance with that of humans. Structured melodies were excerpts of Mozart's sonatas. Unstructured melodies were created by the recombination of fragments of different sonatas. We trained listeners (both human participants and Long-Evans rats) with a set of structured and unstructured excerpts, and tested them with completely novel excerpts they had not heard before. After hundreds of training trials, rats were able to tell apart novel structured from unstructured melodies. Human listeners required only a few trials to reach better performance than rats. Interestingly, such performance was increased in humans when tonality changes were included, while it decreased to chance in rats. Our results suggest that, with enough training, rats might learn to discriminate acoustic differences differentiating hierarchical music structures from unstructured excerpts. More importantly, the results point toward species-specific adaptations on how tonality is processed.