Consent and awareness: mental conditions at diagnosis

Practice of informed consent in Guangdong, China: a qualitative study from the perspective of in-hospital patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the practice of informed consent in China from the perspective of patients.

DESIGN

A qualitative study using in-depth interviews with in-hospital patients focusing on personal experience with informed consent.

SETTING

Guangdong Province, China.

PARTICIPANTS

71 in-hospital patients in rehabilitation after surgical operations were included.

RESULTS

Medical information is not actively conveyed by doctors nor effectively received by patients. Without complete and understandable information, patients are unable to make an autonomous clinical decision but must sign an informed consent form following the doctor's medical arrangement. Three barriers to accessing medical information by patients were identified: (1) medical information received by patients was insufficient to support their decision-making, (2) patients lacked medical knowledge to understand the perceptions of doctors and (3) patient-doctor interactions were insufficient in clinical settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Informed consent is implemented as an administrative procedure at the hospital level in China. However, it has not been embedded in doctors' clinical practices because, from the perspective of patients, doctors do not fulfil the obligation of medical information provision. As a result, the informed part of informed consent was neglected by individual doctors in China. Reforming medical education, monitoring the process of informed consent in clinical settings and redesigning medical institutional arrangements are pathways to restoring the practice of informed consent and patient-centred models in China.

Informed consent procedures with cognitively impaired patients: A review of ethics and best practices

AIMS

The objectives of this article are to discuss ethical issues of informed consent in cognitively impaired patients and review considerations for capacity determination. We will also discuss how to evaluate capacity, determine competence, and obtain informed consent when a patient is deemed incompetent. This review emphasizes how to carry out informed consent procedures when capacity is questionable and discusses measures supported for use when determining cognitively impaired patients' ability to consent.

METHODS

Information was gathered from medical and psychological codes of ethics, peer-reviewed journals, published guidelines from health-care organizations (e.g., American Medical Association), and scholarly books. Google Scholar and PsycINFO were searched for articles related to 'informed consent' and 'cognitive impairment' published in English between 1975 and 2014. Relevant sources referenced in retrieved publications were subsequently searched and reviewed.

RESULTS

We selected 49 sources generated by our search. Sources were included in our review if they presented information related to at least one of our focus areas. These areas included: review of informed consent ethics and procedures, review of cognitive impairment evaluations, recommendations for measuring cognitive capacity, and alternative forms of informed consent.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' cognitive impairments can hinder the ability of patients to understand treatment options. Evaluating the capacity of patients with cognitive impairment to understand treatment options is vital for valid informed consent and should be guided by best practices. Thus, proper identification of patients with questionable capacity, capacity evaluation, and determination of competence, as well as reliance upon appropriate alternative consent procedures, are paramount.