Italian validation of the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ)

A novel tool for characterising upper limb function in progressive multiple sclerosis through kinematic assessment

INTRODUCTION

Current upper limb assessment methods in MS rely on measuring duration in tasks like the nine-hole peg test (9HPT). Kinematic techniques may provide a more useful measure of functional change in clinical and research practice. The aim of this study was to assess upper limb function prospectively in people with progressive MS using a kinematic 3D motion capture system and compare with current measures.

METHODS

42 people with progressive MS (PwPMS) and 15 healthy controls reached-and-grasped different objects whilst recorded by a kinematic assessment system. 9HPT, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and patient reported outcome measures (PROs) were collected. All measures were taken at baseline for PwPMS and controls, and again at six months for PwPMS.

RESULTS

Relative to controls, PwPMS had significantly longer reaction (0.11 s, p < 0.05) and reach (0.25 s, p < 0.05) times. PwPMS took longer to pick-up (0.34 s, p < 0.05), move (0.14 s, p < 0.05), and place (0.18 s, p < 0.05) objects. PwPMS had lower peak velocities when reaching (7.4 cm/s, p < 0.05) and moving (7.3 cm/s, p < 0.05) objects. Kinematic assessment demonstrated consistent differences between PwPMS with mild and severe upper limb dysfunction as defined by PROs, which were not captured by 9HPT or EDSS in this group. PwPMS demonstrated altered grip apertures profiles, as measured by their ability to complete individual parts of the reach and grasp task, between the baseline and follow-up timepoints.

CONCLUSIONS

We have created and tested a novel upper limb function assessment tool which has detected changes and characteristics in hand function, not currently captured by the EDSS and 9HPT.

Mobile Health App (DIGICOG-MS) for Self-Assessment of Cognitive Impairment in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Instrument Validation and Usability Study

BACKGROUND

Mobile health (mHealth) apps have proven useful for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Thus, easy-to-use digital solutions are now strongly required to assess and monitor cognitive impairment, one of the most disturbing symptoms in MS that is experienced by almost 43% to 70% of people with MS. Therefore, we developed DIGICOG-MS (Digital assessment of Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis), a smartphone- and tablet-based mHealth app to self-assess cognitive impairment in MS.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to test the validity and usability of the novel mHealth app with a sample of people with MS.

METHODS

DIGICOG-MS includes 4 digital tests assumed to evaluate the most affected cognitive domains in MS (visuospatial memory [VSM], verbal memory [VM], semantic fluency [SF], and information processing speed [IPS]) and inspired by traditional paper-based tests that assess the same cognitive functions (10/36 Spatial Recall Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Word List Generation, Symbol Digit Modalities Test). Participants were asked to complete both digital and traditional assessments in 2 separate sessions. Convergent validity was analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient to determine the strength of the associations between digital and traditional tests. To test the app's reliability, the agreement between 2 repeated measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Usability of DIGICOG-MS was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) administered at the conclusion of the digital session.

RESULTS

The final sample consisted of 92 people with MS (60 women) followed as outpatients at the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Society (AISM) Rehabilitation Service of Genoa (Italy). They had a mean age of 51.38 (SD 11.36) years, education duration of 13.07 (SD 2.74) years, disease duration of 12.91 (SD 9.51) years, and a disability level (Expanded Disability Status Scale) of 3.58 (SD 1.75). Relapsing-remitting MS was most common (68/92, 74%), followed by secondary progressive (15/92, 16%) and primary progressive (9/92, 10%) courses. Pearson correlation analyses indicated significantly strong correlations for VSM, VM, SF, and IPS (all P<.001), with r values ranging from 0.58 to 0.78 for all cognitive domains. Test-retest reliability of the mHealth app was excellent (ICCs>0.90) for VM and IPS and good for VSM and SF (ICCs>0.80). Moreover, the SUS score averaged 84.5 (SD 13.34), and the mean total MAUQ score was 104.02 (SD 17.69), suggesting that DIGICOG-MS was highly usable and well appreciated.

CONCLUSIONS

The DIGICOG-MS tests were strongly correlated with traditional paper-based evaluations. Furthermore, people with MS positively evaluated DIGICOG-MS, finding it highly usable. Since cognitive impairment poses major limitations for people with MS, these findings open new paths to deploy digital cognitive tests for MS and further support the use of a novel mHealth app for cognitive self-assessment by people with MS in clinical practice.

[Questionnaires for arm function assessment in patients with multiple sclerosis]

Arm dysfunction is one of the disabling manifestations of multiple sclerosis (MS), especially in later stages of the disease. Assessment of the functioning of the upper limbs is necessary to objectify the course of MS, determine the effectiveness of therapy, and individualize rehabilitation measures. The tools that assess the upper extremity dysfunction include tests and questionnaires. Questionnaires (patient-reported outcome measures) represent the special importance, since the opinions and preferences of patients themselves help to implement a patient-centered approach to treatment. The article presents a brief description of three multidimensional MS-specific and four unidimensional MS-nonspecific questionnaires that used in assessment of upper limb function in MS patients. The disease-specific unidimensional Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ), specifically designed to assess the arm use in patients with MS, is discussed in more detail. The use of AMSQ in the Russian population is possible only after the procedure of cultural adaptation and validation of the Russian version.

Validity and reliability of Persian version of the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire

Introduction

This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire which is a self-report questionnaire for persons with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Method

This methodological study was performed in the following stages: translation, validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of Persian-AMSQ. The Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), Coin Rotation Task (CRT), and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) for construct validity were used. Psychometric testing was done to ascertain the validity and reliability of the questionnaire.

Results

In this study, 155 people with MS participated. There were no major linguistic or cultural difficulties in the translation of AMSQ. Face and content validity confirmed by experts and people with MS. The internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α = 0.99). Test-retest reliability, as measured with intra-class coefficient, was 0.98. Correlations with 9HPT (r = 0.54), CRT (r = 0.16), and FIM (r = -0.54) were significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The Persian-AMSQ appears to be a valid and reliable questionnaire for measuring upper extremity dysfunction in MS.

Italian translation and psychometric validation of the ABILHAND-26 and its correlation with upper limb objective and subjective measures in multiple sclerosis subjects

BACKGROUND

Upper limb (UL) function is affected in about 50% of people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS). In the last decade, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) are playing an important role in clinical trial and practice. ABILIHAND-26 is a PROM that assess self-perceived manual ability defined as the capacity to manage daily activities using the upper limbs. The aim of the study is to translate the ABILHAND-26 into Italian, to explore its psychometric properties examining the associations with demographics, clinical variables, 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) and Manual Ability Measures-36 (MAM-36).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects were recruited in five Italian neurological centers. They were evaluated through ABILHAND-26, 9-HPT and MAM-36. Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis were adopted to investigate the psychometric properties of the ABILHAND-26.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-five patients were recruited. Rasch analyses showed adequate functioning and supported the unidimensionality of the scale. ABILHAND-26 showed negative correlations with age and disease duration, moderate negative correlation with EDSS and the 9-HPT scores for both arms and strong positive associations (ρ ≥ .84) with the MAM-36. Difference in ABILHAND-26 scores only emerged when comparing patients with severe disability (EDSS ≥ 6) with patients with either mild or moderate disability. t) and when comapring relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive patients.

CONCLUSION

The Italian version of the ABILHAND-26 is now available. It shows adequate reliability of the score, moderate criterion validity and strong convergent validity. ABILHAND-26 could represent a valid assessment for self-perceived ability to perform manual activity, especially for PwMS with moderate-to-high level of disability.

MAM-36 and ABILHAND as outcome measures of multiple sclerosis hand disability: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Impaired upper limb functionality and dexterity are common in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and lead to increased dependency and reduced quality of life.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the Manual Abilites Measure 36 (MAM-36) and the ABILHAND questionnaire to recognize an involvement of the upper limbs in PwMS, and to compare their results with those of other patient reported outcomes (PRO) evaluating disability, functional independence, symptoms of anxiety and depression, fatigue and quality of life.

DESIGN

The study design was observational.

SETTING

The setting of the study was outpatient.

POPULATION

The study population included fifty-one PwMS (mean age of 56.31 years, age range of 33-82 years, 72.5% of patients were females).

METHODS

For each patient were collected MAM-36, ABILHAND questionnaire, expanded disability status scale (EDSS), Functional Independence measure (FIM), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) and Life Satisfaction Index (LSI).

RESULTS

A strong correlation between MAM-36 and the ABILHAND questionnaire (Spearman r: 0.79; P<0.0001) were found. We obtained a significant correlation between MAM-36 and EDSS (Spearman r: -0.5; P=0.0002), FIM (Spearman r: 0.55; P<0.0001); we did not observe a correlation with MFIS (Spearman r: -0.33; P=0.02); moreover we found a similar trend between ABILHAND and EDSS (Spearman r: -0.47; P=0.0005), FIM (Spearman r: 0.61; P<0.0001), MFIS (Spearman r: -0.41; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In PwMS the assessment of upper limbs is fundamental since it closely related to the level of disability of the person. Both MAM-36 and ABILHAND Questionnaire are equally able to detect upper limb dysfunctions in PwMS.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Both MAM-36 and ABILHAND can be used for upper limbs evaluation, within a multidimensional approach that seems to be the best way to evaluate PwMS.

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Manual Ability Measure-36 (MAM-36) in people with multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

The Manual Ability Measure-36 (MAM-36) has been used to assess subjective upper limb function in people with several neurological and non-neurological diseases. Besides, the MAM-36 is one of the most commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The aim was to translate and conduct cross-cultural adaptation of the MAM-36 into Turkish and investigate its psychometric properties in pwMS.

METHODS

The MAM-36 was translated and culturally adapted into Turkish. Two hundred pwMS were recruited for the psychometric study. Hand skills, handgrip strength, upper limb spasticity, disability level, and quality of life were evaluated by the validated performance-based tests and questionnaires including the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ) which is a validated MS-specific PROM to assess upper limb function.

RESULTS

MAM-36 was significantly correlated with the performance-based tests and questionnaires, EDSS, age, and disease duration (p < 0.05). MAM-36 and AMSQ were strongly correlated (r_s = - 0.90, p < 0.01). PwMS with spasticity had significantly lower MAM-36 scores compared to those without spasticity (p < 0.01). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97) was high.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of MAM-36 has been found as a valid and reliable method for measuring upper limb function in pwMS.