Chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy (CISP): First juvenile case description

The neurophysiological lesson from the Italian CIDP database

INTRODUCTION

Electrophysiological diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) may be challenging. Thus, with the aim ofproviding some practical advice in electrophysiological approach to a patient with suspected CIDP, we analyzed electrophysiological data from 499 patients enrolled inthe Italian CIDP Database.

METHODS

We calculated the rate of each demyelinating feature, the rate of demyelinating features per nerve, the diagnostic rate for upper andlower limb nerves, and, using a ROC curve analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of each couple of nerves and each demyelinating feature, for every CIDP subtype.Moreover, we compared the electrophysiological data of definite and probable CIDP patients with those of possible and not-fulfilling CIDP patients, and by a logisticregression analysis, we estimated the odds ratio (OR) to make an electrophysiological diagnosis of definite or probable CIDP.

RESULTS

The ulnar nerve had the highestrate of demyelinating features and, when tested bilaterally, had the highest diagnostic accuracy except for DADS in which peroneal nerves were the most informative.In possible and not-fulfilling CIDP patients, a lower number of nerves and proximal temporal dispersion (TD) measurements had been performed compared to definiteand probable CIDP patients. Importantly, OR for each tested motor nerve and each TD measurement was 1.59 and 1.33, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findingsdemonstrated that the diagnosis of CIDP may be missed due to inadequate or incomplete electrophysiological examination or interpretation. At the same time, thesedata taken together could be useful to draw a thoughtful electrophysiological approach to patients suspected of CIDP.

Chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy (CISP)

Chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy (CISP) is a rare variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). We describe a man with isolated sensory ataxia whose initial investigations included normal nerve conduction studies and normal non-enhanced MR imaging of whole spine, but whose subsequent investigations showed delayed somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) responses of the lower limbs, elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein and lumbosacral nerve roots enhancement on MR imaging. We diagnosed CISP and he improved following intravenous immunoglobulin. Proposed diagnostic criteria for CISP are sensory symptoms with a polyneuropathic distribution without weakness, and normal motor and sensory nerve conduction and electromyography (EMG) studies, plus at least two of: abnormal SSEPs not due to central nervous system (CNS) involvement, MRI showing gadolinium enhancement or hypertrophy of the nerve roots, cauda equina or plexuses, and elevated CSF protein with normal cell count. Intravenous immunoglobulin is an effective treatment.

The neurophysiological lesson from the Italian CIDP database

Introduction

Electrophysiological diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) may be challenging. Thus, with the aim ofproviding some practical advice in electrophysiological approach to a patient with suspected CIDP, we analyzed electrophysiological data from 499 patients enrolled inthe Italian CIDP Database.

Methods

We calculated the rate of each demyelinating feature, the rate of demyelinating features per nerve, the diagnostic rate for upper andlower limb nerves, and, using a ROC curve analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of each couple of nerves and each demyelinating feature, for every CIDP subtype.Moreover, we compared the electrophysiological data of definite and probable CIDP patients with those of possible and not-fulfilling CIDP patients, and by a logisticregression analysis, we estimated the odds ratio (OR) to make an electrophysiological diagnosis of definite or probable CIDP.

Results

The ulnar nerve had the highestrate of demyelinating features and, when tested bilaterally, had the highest diagnostic accuracy except for DADS in which peroneal nerves were the most informative.In possible and not-fulfilling CIDP patients, a lower number of nerves and proximal temporal dispersion (TD) measurements had been performed compared to definiteand probable CIDP patients. Importantly, OR for each tested motor nerve and each TD measurement was 1.59 and 1.33, respectively.

Conclusion

Our findingsdemonstrated that the diagnosis of CIDP may be missed due to inadequate or incomplete electrophysiological examination or interpretation. At the same time, thesedata taken together could be useful to draw a thoughtful electrophysiological approach to patients suspected of CIDP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-021-05321-z.