Han family with essential tremor caused by the P421L variant of the TENM4 gene in China

Six Myths and Misconceptions about Essential Tremor

There are myths and misperceptions about most human diseases, and neurological diseases are no exception. In many instances, myths and misconceptions reflect what is no more than the collective failure of the field to catch up with the state of the science in that field. Hence, one may perhaps refer to these as "lags" rather than myths. As the field of medicine attempts to be evidence-based, it is best to remain true to published data and the state of the science. In this paper, I review six myths and misconceptions about ET. Myth 1 relates to the natural history and prognosis of ET. Myths 2 and 3 relate to the biological basis of ET, whereas myths 4 and 5 relate to the expression of the core clinical feature of ET. Finally, myth 6 focuses on the issue of disease classification. The myths are as follows: Myth 1: "ET is not associated with a shorter life expectancy". Myth 2: "The pathophysiology of ET remains unclear". Myth 3: "There have also been studies that do not show any cerebellar degeneration". Myth 4: "ET is a postural or a kinetic tremor". Myth 5: "Action tremor in ET is usually bilateral and symmetric". Myth 6: "ET plus". As neurologists, we are not ignorant of feedback loops. A regular review of facts should help to frame one's output. As such, one's formulations and output will be firmly grounded in data.

Clinical and genetic features of dominant Essential Tremor in Tuscany, Italy: FUS, CAMTA1, ATXN1 and beyond

OBJECTIVE

Essential Tremor (ET) is one of the most common neurological disorders. In most instances ET is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait with age-related penetrance (virtually complete in advanced age); however, ET genetics remains elusive. The current study aims to identify possibly pathogenic genetic variants in a group of well-characterized ET families.

METHODS

34 individuals from 14 families with dominant ET were clinically evaluated and studied by whole exome sequencing studies (after excluding trinucleotide expansion disorders).

RESULTS

Most patients had pure ET. In 4 families, exome studies could identify a genetic variant potentially able to significantly alter the protein structure (CADD >20, REVEL score > 0.25), shared by all the affected individuals (in CAMTA1, FUS, MYH14, SGCE genes). In another family there were two variants in dominant genes (PCDH9 and SQSTM1). Moreover, an interrupted "intermediate" trinucleotide expansion in ATXN1 ("SCA1") was identified in a further family with pure ET.

CONCLUSION

Combining our observations together with earlier reports, we can conclude that ET genes confirmed in at least two families to date include CAMTA1 and FUS (reported here), as well as CACNA1G, NOTCH2NLC and TENM4. Most cases of familial ET, inherited with an autosomal dominant inheritance, may result from "mild" variants of many different genes that, when affected by more harmful genetic variants, lead to more severe neurological syndromes (still autosomal dominant). Thus, ET phenotype may be the "mild", incomplete manifestation of many other dominant neurogenetic diseases. These findings further support evidence of genetic heterogeneity for such disease(s). Author's keywords: cerebellar ataxias, movement disorders, neurogenetics, rare neurological disorders, tremor.